Another David and Goliath story from the West Bank

Photobucket

As reported by Mel Frykberg in The Electronic Intifada, 8 July 2008, the story of a Palestinian village that took on the Israeli military using, of course, nonviolent protest. Many Americans have never heard about such protests, because it is the most dangerous kind of news about a people who have been depicted, through a concerted propaganda effort, as "terrorists." Of course, from the perspective of the military occupier, every act of defiance is an act of terrorism according to more modern and inaccurate definitions of the term terrorism and who is using it. State terrorism is excluded, naturally.

The US State Department today is probably the greatest outlet for anti-Palestinian propaganda outside of Israel, and if the Ni'lin standoff were to reach the mainstream media here in the USA, it would undoubtedly be accompanied by references of terrorism and how the military occupation is the fault of Palestinians, who victimize Israelis.

Photobucket

RAMALLAH (IPS) - Ambulances were again prevented Monday from entering the central West Bank village of Ni'ilin, near Ramallah, to evacuate the ill and the wounded. Supplies of medicines were running low, as confrontations continued with youths defying a four-day-old curfew imposed by the Israeli military.

The Israeli army had surrounded the village and ordered residents to remain indoors and was also preventing the media from entering Ni'ilin, said Salah al-Khawaja, spokesman for the Ni'lin Committee for Resisting the Separation Barrier.

Following intense media coverage and a meeting between the Ni'ilin Village Committee and the Israeli army, the curfew was lifted Tuesday morning. But the protestors have refused to give up the fight for their land or committed to ceasing demonstrations.

The blockade followed fierce clashes last Friday which broke out between the army and several hundred Palestinian villagers, international activists and Israeli sympathizers, protesting the continued expropriation of village land. Four Israelis were amongst those arrested.

"On Friday over 20 protestors were injured by beatings, rubber-coated bullets and tear gas inhalation," Hindi Mesleh, a protest organizer presently stuck in the village, told IPS by phone. "Last night the army entered the village at 2am and started shooting sound bombs in front of all the village homes," he added. An Israeli army spokeswoman said that the village was being placed under indefinite curfew due to "increased violence by the protestors."

Photobucket

Of course, when demonstrators throw rocks and roll burning tires towards Israeli border policemen guarding the wall, which was said to have wounded one person and damaged an Israeli jeep, it was no longer nonviolent. That's incredible considering the number of Palestinian civilians including children who have been killed by Israeli Occupation Forces since 2000, even in the past year. Of course, if you suffer a fractured skull from a rubber bullet or beatings of batons issued from Israeli soldiers, it is simply self-defense.

Is this the world of the future according to Orwell? Doubtful. It is really a slick reversal of propaganda to turn victims of military occupation into perpetrators and it has been going on since 9/11, as concisely described by Robert Jensen, Professor of Journalism, University of Texas-Austin, in the documentary, Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land (click onto my signature below for a look).

In contrast to the international press, in American media, there is a reversal of cause and effect in that the occupation is framed as a response to the suicide bombings. All of the Palestinian actions are attacks and Israel actions retaliation, is meaningful. Retaliation suggests a defensive stance against violence initiated by someone else. It places a responsibility for the violence on the party provoking the retaliation. In other words, Palestinian violence like suicide bombings is seen as cause and the origin of the conflict. Since the September 11 attack on the US, Israel's PR strategy has been to frame all Palestinian actions, violent or not, as terrorism. To the extent that they can do that they have repackaged the illegal occupation as part of the war on terrorism.

Photos above are from the International Solidarity Movement site and were reproduced here by permission.

Other stories about the Ni'lin nonviolent protest can be linked here:

Statement from the Ni'lin Popular Committee Against the Apartheid Wall

ActLeft: Stop the fence in Ni'alin

Ynet: Na'alin residents: IDF curfew made us stronger



Display:


RE: Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land (2.00 / 1)

Click below (signature) to see this very enlightening documentary by experts in the field.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 02:35:35 PM EST

Re: Another David and Goliath story from the West (2.00 / 1)

Good diary, once again.  I would take issue with one part of it, though.  You say:

"It is really a slick reversal of propaganda to turn victims of military occupation into perpetrators and it has been going on since 9/11"

I would argue that it has been going on since long before that, although 9/11 seems to have rekindled our sympathies for violent imperialism.

I was recently out with some friends, one of whom is British, and he started complaining about all the trouble the Irish have made over the years.  He took a Crown-approved position that since most of the people in Northern Ireland had accepted the British occupation that the rest of the country should just follow suit and stop being so unreasonable.

This type of occupation and demonization of the occupied goes hand and glove with violent imperialism.  This, of course, does not excuse American politicians from being so willfully blind to this situation, but it is not as new as it sounds.

Thanks again.


by the mollusk on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 02:48:26 PM EST

Re: Another David and Goliath story from the West (2.00 / 2)

No. I would say, thank you.

As for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, you are right: the military occupation has been going on for 41 years, and during that time, nonviolent protest has been the main tool used by Palestinians to demonstrate against it. Why don't we know this fact? Censorship and propaganda. We have been duped into believing that the Palestinians are the perpetrators of violence and lack of peace in the region.

No more. We must get the facts straight.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 02:54:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another David and Goliath story from the West (2.00 / 1)

"We have been duped into believing that the Palestinians are the perpetrators of violence and lack of peace in the region."

But who, exactly, has been duped into believing this?  It seems like any conversation I get into about this conflict inevitably comes back to harsh criticisms of Israel.  It could just be the crowd I hang out with.  Frankly, I think that most people believe that it is an insoluble situation and they are more concerned with taxes and gas prices.  It would require leadership on the part of an elected official to break through the fog.  Unfortunately we haven't had any leadership at all since 2000.


by the mollusk on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:01:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another David and Goliath story (2.00 / 2)

"It seems like any conversation I get into about this conflict inevitably comes back to harsh criticisms of Israel."

Well, should we criticize the Palestinians for protesting their own military occupation? Or their house demolitions, the destruction of their olive groves, the continuation of Ariel Sharon's "dunam by dunam" technique for wresting lands from the Palestinians, the ethnic cleansing that continues, and the ways often deadly in which Israel has gained control of 42% of the West Bank?

Those damned Palestinians! Sorry to be snarky here, but I'm just not getting your point.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:16:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another David and Goliath story (none / 0)

I'm just saying that it seems self-evident that Israel shares a large portion of the blame for this (I'm trying to be generous to Israel here).  You say that we're being duped, but when I talk to people, almost none of them seem duped.  

Somehow this just doesn't make it to the top of the people's lists of concerns.  Plus people believe that there just isn't a good solution to the situation.

I'm not one of those people, but we just don't ever get good candidates who are willing to confront this problem in a real way.


by the mollusk on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:30:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another David and Goliath story (2.00 / 1)

"don't ever get good candidates who are willing to confront this problem in a real way."

No one can disagree with this statement of yours. But one reason is that Americans don't seem to be concerned is that they are ignorant of the reality, and if they knew what Israel was doing with their tax monies, I don't think they would not be concerned. Killing militarily occupied Palestinians with American weapons is not exactly something most Americans would agree with.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:36:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Another David and Goliath story (2.00 / 1)

"Killing militarily occupied Palestinians with American weapons is not exactly something most Americans would agree with."

exactly.  but many of us will vote for barack obama anyhow.  what other choice do we have?  i have a feeling he'll be a little more even-handed in this conflict.  but who really knows?


by the mollusk on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:41:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Irony (none / 0)

I love that you alluded to David (an Israeli) and Goliath (a Philistine: Palestinian, though not Arab).  You know, speaking of role reversals.  I can't tell if the irony was intentional or not.

The majority of Palestinian opposition is of course non-violent.  Most people do understand that.  But let's not pretend there isn't a significantly higher level of violence directed toward Israel and its people than we see directed against our own countries and peoples.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jul /02/israelandthepalestinians.middleeast

In February, a woman was killed and 11 people injured in the town of Dimona, in which was the first suicide bombing inside Israel in more than a year.

Responsibility for the attack was claimed by hardliners within the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a group linked to the Fatah movement of Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas.

In March, eight students were killed when a gunman opened fire at Mercz Harav Yeshiva, one of Jersusalem's largest seminaries. It was the worst incident inside Israel since April 2006.

In May, 90 people were injured when a rocket launched from the Gaza Strip hit a busy shopping mall in central Ashkelon.

The rising violence this year is yet to match the scale of attacks in 2002 at the height of the Palestinian intifada, when 220 people were killed in 55 separate attacks.

Last year there was only one fatal attack inside Israel, when three employees of a bakery were killed in a suicide bombing in the southern city of Eilat.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:11:34 PM EST

Re: Irony (2.00 / 2)

It probably isn't your fault that you failed to quite the even significantly higher violence directed by the IDF against Palestinian civilians, including an unusual number of child kills, which, for the period, is close to 13 Palestinians to one Israeli. Also, there is failure to speak about the causes of those Israeli deaths, however unfortunate: retaliation. I will post below information about what in fact initiated the earlier Palestinian suicide bombings that still led to a five to one ratio of kills: Palestinian to Israeli.

But what is the cause these killings on either side? Is it not the military occupation, ongoing now for 41 years, and the coordinated colonization of Palestinian lands whose last estimate was 42% of Palestinian lands now under Israeli control?

As I said, it is not your fault for being ignorant of the reality behind those figures you posted. That reality consists of dead and maimed Palestinians.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:31:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (2.00 / 1)

Also, there is failure to speak about the causes of those Israeli deaths, however unfortunate: retaliation.

...

But what is the cause these killings on either side? Is it not the military occupation, ongoing now for 41 years, and the coordinated colonization of Palestinian lands whose last estimate was 42% of Palestinian lands now under Israeli control?

You've gone from pretending that the Palestinians' hands are squeaky-clean to, now, justifying intentional attacks on Israeli civilians in retaliation for attacks on Palestinian civilians.

I never made a claim that Israel's hands were clean.  There's a lot that Israel does that I'm opposed to.  They're too quick to escalate in retaliatory strikes.  They destroy too many civilians' homes for the mere suspicion that they are housing terrorists.  They're on the wrong side of most international arms-control treaties (just like us, now!).  Etc.

But let's not pretend that the Palestinian side of the conflict has been purely the victim.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:47:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (2.00 / 1)

"But let's not pretend that the Palestinian side of the conflict has been purely the victim."

No one is suggesting that Palestinian violence is an approved way of dealing with the killings of their own kind. But what is the responsibility of the victim of military occupation? Or of colonization? Is that person at fault for not acquiescing to the stealing of his home and land? Is he at fault for not just leaving his home instead of fighting back? To your amazement, at least 100,000 Palestinians have left the West Bank each year since 1967 because they are unable to subsist, to support their families.

Before you begin blaming Palestinians for their situation, which is what you are doing, read this material:

This material is quoted by Lawrence of Cyberia about Israel's targeting of civilians and children. Here you have a occupying military force attempting to colonize another people's lands, while Israeli soldiers are given orders to take out Palestinian civilians.

Palestinian deaths during the first and second Intifadas were not unintentional collateral damage. It was terrorist murdering by an occupying force.

Israel's claim that its soldiers adhere to a doctrine of "purity of arms" in dealing with the Palestinian civilian population has been going on for a long time. In the first intifada, Ehud Barak was the IDF's Deputy Chief of Staff, and proclaimed: "We do not want children to be shot under any circumstances ... When you see a child you don't shoot." That was untrue then, just as Bradley Burston's insinuation that Palestinian civilian deaths aren't intentional is a lie now:

The Swedish "Save the Children" organization estimated that "23,600 to 29,900 children required medical treatment for their beating injuries in the first two years of the [first] intifida," with nearly one‐third sustaining broken bones. Nearly one‐third of the beaten children were aged ten and under. It also states that 6,500 to 8,000 children were wounded by gunfire during the first two years of the Intifada. Researchers investigated 66 of the 106 recorded cases of "child gunshot deaths." They concluded that: almost all of them "were hit by directed ‐‐ not random or ricochet ‐‐ gunfire"; nearly twenty percent suffered multiple gunshot wounds; twelve percent were shot from behind; fifteen percent of the children were ten years of age or younger; "most children were not participating in a stone‐throwing demonstration when shot dead"; and "nearly one‐fifth of the children were shot dead while at home or within ten meters of their homes."

-    cited in The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy (chapter 2, end note 49); by Mearsheimer and Walt.

That's how the IDF killed Palestinian civilians - children - during the first intifada. Not through a careless use of missiles or the occasional errant tank shell, but by individual Israeli soldiers pointing their guns at children in the Occupied Territories - even children under ten, even children who had turned their backs and were running away - and shooting them dead.

And the IDF's record in the second intifada is much worse. Firstly, because the IDF announced in March 2003 that it would no longer routinely investigate the deaths of civilians killed by Israeli soldiers, but would allow individual Israeli officers in the field to decide whether to call in the Military Police whenever their troops killed a civilian, or to simply declare the killing an "unfortunate incident of death", which required no investigation. A policy that has had the following, entirely predictable, result:

The IDF effectively grants immunity to soldiers who open fire illegally. Since the beginning of the intifada, the IDF has ceased to automatically open an investigation into every case in which a Palestinian is killed by IDF fire. The decision as to whether to open a Military Police investigation into each incident is now made by the Judge Advocate General's office, based on the results of the field de-briefings, which are also carried out by the army itself. In one case that was exposed by B'Tselem, it was clear that an eleven-year-old child had died as a result of the violation of procedures and illegal shooting. Despite this, the Judge Advocate General's office decided not to request a Military Police investigation. In addition, the investigations that are opened are generally protracted and based primarily on soldiers' testimonies, while completely ignoring the Palestinian eyewitnesses.
This policy has unavoidably resulted in a situation in which shooting at innocent Palestinians has practically become a routine. (B'Tselem)

And secondly, because at the very beginning of the second intifada, the IDF issued extremely broad open fire regulations, concerning who might be considered a legitimate target:

Sniper: "They forbid us to shoot at children".
Journalist: "How do they say this?"
Sniper: "You don't shoot a child who is 12 or younger".
Journalist: "That is, a child of 12 or older is allowed?"
Sniper: "Twelve and up is allowed. He's not a child anymore, he's already after his bar mitzvah. Something like that".
Journalist: "Thirteen is bar mitzvah age".
Sniper: "Twelve and up, you're allowed to shoot. That's what they tell us".
Journalist: "Under international law, a child is defined as someone up to the age of 18."
Sniper: "Up until 18 is a child?"
Journalist: "So, according to the IDF, it is 12?"
Sniper: "According to what the IDF says to its soldiers. I don't know if this is what the IDF says to the media."
-- Amira Hass' interview with an IDF sharpshooter, explaining why so many Palestinian children were killed in the first weeks of the intifada, when the IDF was largely confronted by stonethrowers. Published in Ha'aretz, Don't shoot till you can see they're over the age of 12, 20 November 2000.

The first suicide bombing in the second intifadah was on Dec. 22 (no Israelis died in it). By that time, 86 Palestinian children (<18 years of age) had been killed by Israelis http://www.rememberthesechildren.org/rem ember2000.html

The first Israeli child was killed on Jan. 17, 2001 http://www.rememberthesechildren.org/rem ember2001.html
By that time, at least 90 Palestinian children had been killed by Israelis.

Alison Weir, in her documentary Off the Charts, noted the following:

Before a single suicide bomber had entered Israel after the start of the Second Intifada, sometimes called, after Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mount, the al Aqsa Intifada, during its first month, 27 Palestinian children had been killed by Israeli Defense Forces in the West Bank and Gaza, the youngest only four months of age, and the majority due to gunshots to the head. Numerous children were also wounded. In the first three months alone, 159 children lost an eye presumably to rubber bullets shot from IDF rifles. Clearly the IDF were intentionally targeting these children, aiming at their heads with either rubber bullets or real bullets in the case of the child kills. We are talking here about a trained, mechanized army versus civilians, children participating in the intifada, the nonviolent resistance instituted by child and teenage Palestinian boys and girls. Oh, yes. Let's be fair. We did hear that an Israeli soldier lost his eye from a rock thrown by a Palestinian boy from a pretty IDF spokeswoman, but it was the only such incident reported in three years.

In addition to these children, many more innocent adult civilians were killed, in the month before suicide bombings commenced. If terrorism is the intentional killing of civilians, then clearly, Israel's armed forces were deep into terrorism, state sponsored terrorism, long before the Palestinians engaged in it to any degree. As a people fighting a military occupation, it would seem that the ultimate cause of all of these horrors on both sides rests with Israel and the purpose for which it continued its long occupation, the stealing of Palestinian lands.  

See Alison Weir's short documentary, Off The Charts: Media Bias and Censorship in America for the names, ages, places, and dates of these child killings.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid= -5600677940569035557&q=Alternate+Foc us

To be accurate, there were sporadic bombing incidents engineered by Hamas extremists in Israel during the Oslo period. None at all occurred between 1998 and 2000. But the strong resumption of attacks after 2000, over fifty in the first year, was directly related to civilian and child killings by IDF, and it was not just Hamas, but Islamic Jihad and other Fatah associated organizations that were involved.

This Time.com article apprises of what motivated them:

"Until recently most Palestinians believed they had alternatives to the kind of militancy practiced by Hamas. For years after the 1993 Oslo peace accord, which brought limited self-rule to the Palestinians and the prospect of an independent state, polls showed a strong majority of Palestinians supporting the peace process with Israel and only a minority endorsing suicide bombings. Thus, in their headhunting, the fundamentalists were limited to stalwart followers of their doctrine, which holds that any kind of peace with Israel is anathema. Even then, Hamas and Islamic Jihad had to cajole--some might say brainwash--young men into believing that the rewards of paradise outweighed the prospects of life on earth.

But with the breakdown of the peace process in the summer of 2000 and the start of the latest intifadeh that September, the martyr wannabes started coming to Hamas--and they didn't require persuading. "We don't need to make a big effort, as we used to do in the past," Abdel Aziz Rantisi, one of Hamas' senior leaders, told TIME last week. The TV news does that work for them. "When you see the funerals, the killing of Palestinian civilians, the feelings inside the Palestinians become very strong," he explained."

From the mouth of Rantisi, but it also motivated Fatah supporters, to exact revenge for the killing of Palestinian civilians. Revenge is not a formal use of terrorism. See Alison Weir's film, Off The Charts, at Google Video.

(Why Suicide Bombing Is Now All The Rage)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1101020415-227546,00.html

This commentary is from an article by Rami Khouri, editor of the Beirut newspaper, The Daily Star, which cynically denounced Olmert's statements professing concern for the well-being of Palestinian children:

(Ehud Olmert's Profound Ethics and Deep Lies)

http://www.ramikhouri.com/

"For anyone interested in the facts about the impact of Israeli policies on Palestinian children, a good place to start is the carefully checked data disseminated by the Palestinian Nongovernmental Organization Network (www.palestinemonitor.org). Their data is compiled and verified on the ground by the Ramallah-based Health Development Information and Policy Institute, which has been honored by the World Health Organization for its work in promoting Palestinian health needs. So these people know what they are talking about when it comes to health conditions on the ground in Israeli-occupied Palestine. Some of the facts they provide are as follows.

In just the first two years of the second intifada, from September 2000 to November 2002:

* 383 Palestinian children (under the age of 18) were killed by the Israeli army and Israeli settlers, i.e. almost 19% of the total Palestinians killed; those figures have increased since then.

* Approximately 36% of total Palestinians injured (estimated at more than 41,000) are children; 86 of these children were under the age of ten; 21 infants under the age of 12 months have been killed.

* 245 Palestinian students and school children have been killed; 2,610 pupils have been wounded on their way to or from school.

* The Israeli policy of widespread closure has paralyzed the Palestinian health system, with children particularly vulnerable to this policy of collective punishment. Internal closures have severely disrupted health plans which affect over 500,000 children, including vaccination programs, dental examinations and early diagnosis for children when starting schools.

* During the first two months of the intifada, the rate of upper respiratory infections in children increased from 20% to 40%. Almost 60% of children in Gaza suffer parasitic infections.

* An overwhelming number of Palestinian children show symptoms of trauma such as sleep disorders, nervousness, decrease in appetite and weight, feelings of hopelessness and frustration, and abnormal thoughts of death.

* There have been 36 cases of Palestinian women in labor delayed at checkpoints and refused permission to reach medical facilities or for ambulances to reach them. At least 14 of these women gave birth at the checkpoint with eight of the births resulting in the death of the newborn infants.

The Israeli army killing of Palestinian children continues apace. In its annual report May 16, the respected global human rights organization Amnesty International accused the Israeli army of killing 190 Palestinians, including 50 children, last year (2005)."

Here is some commentary from Jonathan Cook on a grandmother suicide bomber:

"If one thing offers a terrifying glimpse of where the experiment in human despair that is Gaza under Israeli siege is leading, it is the news that a Palestinian woman in her sixties -- a grandmother -- chose last week to strap on a suicide belt and explode herself next to a group of Israeli soldiers invading her refugee camp.

Despite the "Man bites dog" news value of the story, most of the Israeli media played down the incident. Not surprisingly -- it is difficult to portray Fatma al-Najar as a crazed fanatic bent only the destruction of Israel.

It is equally difficult not to pause and wonder at the reasons for her suicide mission; according to her family, one of her grandsons was killed by the Israeli army, another is in a wheelchair after his leg had to be amputated, and her house had been demolished.

Or not to think of the years of trauma she and her family have suffered living in a open-air prison under brutal occupation, and now, since the "disengagement", the agonising months of grinding poverty, slow starvation, repeated aerial bombardments, and the loss of essentials like water and electricity.

Or not to ponder at what it must have been like for her to spend every day under a cloud of fear, to be powerless against a largely unseen and malign force, and to never know when death and mutilation might strike her or her loved ones.

Or not to imagine that she had been longing for the moment when the soldiers who have been destroying her family's lives might show themselves briefly, coming close enough that she could see and touch them, and wreak her revenge.

Yet Western observers, and the organizations that should represent the very best of their Enlightenment values, seem incapable of understanding what might drive a grandmother to become a suicide bomber. Their empathy fails them, and so does their humanity.

Just at the moment Fatma was choosing death and resistance over powerlessness and victimhood -- and at a time when Gaza is struggling through one of the most oppressive and ugly periods of Israeli occupation in nearly four decades -- Human Rights Watch published its latest statement on the conflict. It is document that shames the organization, complacent Western societies and Fatma's memory."

So Palestinians are to blame?


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 04:26:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (2.00 / 1)

Please find anyplace where I said "the Palestinians are to blame."

All I said was that both sides have innocent blood on their hands.  Trying to cast Israel as the sole (or major) aggressor and Palestinians as the sole victim is inaccurate and deceptive.

And if you're going to claim that retaliation killings by Palestinians are "unfortunate" but justified, then you have to allow the same of Israel; or say they are unacceptable on either side.  Not soft language like "not approved" and "unfortunate," followed in the same breath by, but can you really blame them?


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 04:54:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (2.00 / 1)

1) All I said was that both sides have innocent blood on their hands.  2) Trying to cast Israel as the sole (or major) aggressor and Palestinians as the sole victim is inaccurate and deceptive.

Anyone would agree with 1). But how can anyone agree with 2)?

Not the sole aggressor? Please tell how the Palestinians are the aggressors in this conflict. You are essentially saying that the Italian partisans who killed Germans are aggressors (or take any other occupation circumstance). The Germans instituted a 10 for 1 policy when they occupied Italy and carried it out. Many innocent civilians were lined up and murdered in response to the killing of German soldiers by the partisans.

Were these Italian partisans aggressors? By your recogning, they were. And the Germans would agree with you. If they only had not killed those soldiers, no civilians would have been murdered.

Give us a break. Do you really understand the situation in Israel-Palestine? You appear to be trying to come to some equitable distribution of guilt, but when it comes down to the bottom line, if the Israelis (like the Germans) had not occupied the West Bank and other territories and attempted to colonize them, none of this would have occurred.

That's the bottom line you are not willing to accept, in spite of its factual nature.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 05:07:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (2.00 / 1)

Were these Italian partisans aggressors? By your recogning, they were. And the Germans would agree with you. If they only had not killed those soldiers, no civilians would have been murdered.

Three problems with your analogies.

First: the Italian partisans killed German soldiers, not German civilians.  Further, the Germans, in knowingly executing innocent Italians who had nothing to do with the attacks under the concept of collective guilt were committing a recognized war crime.  That's not analogous here, since the Palestinians who die are usually killed indirectly through crossfire and demolition, or in combat as being suspected combatants, or in some other manner that is either unintended or intentional because they are assumed to be combatants.

Is that bad?  It sure is.  But it doesn't rise to the level of summary execution under collective guilt.

Second:  The Israeli Jews have lived in that location for a lot longer than the Palestinian Arabs.  Why are they to be considered the invading force?

It seems to me that since both groups have been there for centuries, it's the responsibility of both groups to coexist peacefully without denying the other group the right to be there.

And third:  If Jordan, Syria, and Egypt had not attacked Israel during the Six Day War, then Israel would not have "had" to occupy the Sinai Peninsula, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights (and subsequently give Sinai back to Egypt and Golan back to Syria).  By your logic, should we not blame Jordan, Syria, and Egypt for the situation in Gaza and the West Bank?

At some point, there has to be responsibility.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 05:33:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (none / 0)

Sorry Bishop, but from here,

"That's not analogous here, since the Palestinians who die are usually killed indirectly through crossfire and demolition, or in combat as being suspected combatants, or in some other manner that is either unintended or intentional because they are assumed to be combatants."

you went downhill. Eighty percent of the Palestinians killed during the second Intifada, and today, are civilians under military occupation. When you sent American fighters to bomb apartments or when tanks and artillary heave shells into civilian neighborhoods, or when soldiers fire randomly into those neighborhoods, you are INTENTIONALLY killing civilians, civilians who are under military occupation.

Then to suggest that the Israelis have a right to live there because they have lived there for centuries, THAT THEY ARE NOT MILITARILY OCCUPYING THE PALESTINIANS OR PERHAPS ETHNICALLY CLEANSING THEM FROM THEIR HOMES AND PROPERTY,

you have become nothing more than a propagandist, an apologist for Israeli brutality and war crimes.

I do get where you are coming from.

Bye.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 07:04:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (none / 0)

Eighty percent of the Palestinians killed during the second Intifada, and today, are civilians under military occupation.

And 71% of the Israeli casualties in the second Intifada have been civilians.  Again, seems like there's plenty of innocent blood to go around.

When you sent American fighters to bomb apartments or when tanks and artillary heave shells into civilian neighborhoods, or when soldiers fire randomly into those neighborhoods, you are INTENTIONALLY killing civilians, civilians who are under military occupation.

If you can't see a moral difference between picking up ten random Italians on the street, lining them up against a wall, and shooting them, and killing ten Palestinian civilians because they are in the same building as a terrorist leader and his guards and you don't sufficiently check to ensure the rest of the building is empty, then I feel sorry for you.  Both are morally wrong, but one is an international war crime while the other is at most criminal negligence.

But I think what scares me more is that you don't seem to be as bothered by Palestinian attacks directed at Israeli schools, shopping malls, and markets, where there are no high-value or military targets, only civilians.  That's much closer in nature to the Nazi war crimes you cited than the Israeli attacks.

Then to suggest that the Israelis have a right to live there because they have lived there for centuries, THAT THEY ARE NOT MILITARILY OCCUPYING THE PALESTINIANS OR PERHAPS ETHNICALLY CLEANSING THEM FROM THEIR HOMES AND PROPERTY,

Seriously?

You know that 20% of Israel's citizens are Arab, right?  And that 12 of its 120 members of the Knesset are Arab?  Pretty bad ethnic cleansing if you make citizens out of them and let them into Parliament.

Arab Muslims are in fact set to be a demographic majority in large parts of Israel in the near future.

Which isn't to say that Israeli Arab citizens are treated particularly well, there are lots of valid complaints that they are treated as second-class citizens; but we're talking Jim Crow here, not Slobodan Milosevic.

And for the record, the Jews were living in Israel around the time of the New Testament, under occupation by the Romans, until they were massacred and mostly expelled in 132.  Some stayed, and others started to return in the latter half of the second millennium, but most of world Jewry drifted in diaspora for about 1800 years, brutally expelled from almost anywhere they went.  The Muslims (Arab, Turk, and some other ethnic groups) did not come to power until the 600s.  So yes, they have been there for centuries (centuries longer than the Palestinian Arabs as a matter of fact) and have a right to call it home, just as the Palestinians have a right to call it home because they have lived there now for generations beyond measure.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 09:32:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (none / 0)

I have seen you before in many guises on many sites, attempting to justify the 41 year military occupation and colonization of Palestinian lands still going on today in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

I have heard all your arguments before mostly repeated by the right wing Zionist cabal that occupies Daily Kos and else where, especially on Little Green Footballs. This collective responsibility you argue for gives Israel all the rights in the world to continue its occupation/colonization, rather than being utlimately responsible from the beginning.

Besides you have nothing to debate with but fabricated history and an ethnocentric morality which says that it is okay to steal the homes and lands of other persons just because they do not have the right kind of ethnicity/religion.

You are essentially here trying to do what all Israeli propagandists do: justify occupation, ethnic cleansing, murder, and theft of owned property, in essence, the dissolution of the Palestinian people and their culture.

Bye.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Fri Jul 11, 2008 at 01:20:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Irony (none / 0)

Right wing Zionist cabal that occupies Daily Kos...

LOL.  Okay, I guess they were right.  Nevermind, think what you want, have fun.


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Fri Jul 11, 2008 at 08:34:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And sometimes Goliath wins (2.00 / 3)

I recall well the murder of Rachel Corrie.  I was corresponding at the time with ISM, negotiating a volunteer stint to travel to Palestine and help them with their marketing and outreach, as well as volunteer as an international observer for the Olive Harvest.

Rachel Corrie was methodically run over by a bulldozer in an attempt to save the house of a Palestinian Doctor.  This Doctor's house was scheduled to be demolished because he committed the unpardonable crime of treating an injured man in his hospital emergency room who later proved to be a suspected terrorist.

At a massive outdoor memorial for Rachel Corrie held by the ISM, Israeli Intelligence spotted a "known terrorist" in a crowd of over 20,000 people.  Well, that's all it took to label this non-violent movement a terrorist organization.  The following week, as I recall, ISM's headquarters were raided, and all their computer equipment confiscated.

Did I mention I had been in correspondence with them as a possible volunteer?

Suddenly, for the next year and a half, every time I tried to travel on an airplane anywhere in the US I would be taken out of the line and thoroughly searched, patted down, and twice stripped to my unmentionables.  

Coincidence?


The universe is a casual place, not a suit-and-tie affair.
by mtnspirit on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 03:46:10 PM EST

Re: And sometimes Goliath wins (2.00 / 2)

Not really surprised, that is, about your ordeal. The US has become the greatest impediment to peace in the Middle East, and I have no doubt that peace activists are singled out as potential terrorists, all in accord State Department acquience to Israeli propaganda regard the terrorist nature of Palestinians (see above).

Personally, I believe along with Jeff Halper of ICAHD that peace and Palestinian human rights must be fought for right here in the USA. ISM's daily reports about Israel's brutal military occupation are just not getting through to Americans. Local protests within the country I think would have a greater effect in the long run. So if you are still thinking about joining ISM, I would recommend staying here and getting involved with them locally in protest activities.

Just my impression.

Otherwise, I appreciate your willingness to engage a human rights activity like the plight of the Palestinians with hands on involvement. Not something many of can do, even if we wanted to.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Wed Jul 09, 2008 at 04:02:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.