Washington Post A1: McCain Lying About Obama

Wow:


McCain Charge Against Obama Lacks Evidence

By Michael D. Shear and Dan Balz
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, July 30, 2008; A01

For four days, Sen. John McCain and his allies have accused Sen. Barack Obama of snubbing wounded soldiers by canceling a visit to a military hospital because he could not take reporters with him, despite no evidence that the charge is true.

There seems to be quite a rift in the media's coverage of McCain - when they call him out, it's brutal. But there's still a whole host of outlets that insist on repeating McCain's lie about Obama's canceled troop visit:

WASHINGTON -- The number of times Senator John McCain's new advertisement attacking Senator Barack Obama for canceling a visit with wounded troops in Germany last week has been shown fully or partly on local, national and cable newscasts: well into the hundreds.

The number of times that spot actually, truly ran as a paid commercial: roughly a dozen.

Result for Mr. McCain: a public relations coup that allowed him to show his toughest campaign advertisement of the year -- one widely panned as misleading -- to millions of people, largely free, through television news media hungry for political news with arresting visual imagery.
...
Mr. McCain's campaign released the advertisement on Saturday afternoon, and it was shown on television news before it made its first appearance as a paid commercial, during "Saturday Night Live," in Denver. The late local news on the NBC affiliate there, KUSA, showed much of Mr. McCain's commercial in a report about its coming run. "He's putting it in front of your eyes here in Colorado before anywhere else," said the anchor, Carrie McClure. The report included a brief rebuttal from Mr. Obama.

The spot got extensive coverage on "Face the Nation" and "Fox News Sunday" the following morning. Those programs are available on scores of stations. And the Web sites of The New York Times and other news outlets posted links to it.

Yet, by the end of the day, according to the Campaign Media Analysis Group, it had actually run all of six times as a paid advertisement.

The ad was never intended to run in front of voters as a paid commercial. McCain knew that if the lie was outrageous enough, the media would play it over and over. And they did.



Display:


Re: Washington Post A1: McCain Lying About Obama (none / 0)

As usual, GOP Chutzpah wins the day. And why shouldn't it? The media holds voters in just about the same amount of contempt as the GOP does.


Fight the Smears!
by Lettuce on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:10:49 AM EST

Re: Washington Post A1: McCain Lying (none / 0)

So far Obama's push back has been pathetic.


by ottovbvs on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:15:12 AM EST

He has to walk a very fine line (none / 0)

Unfortunately, the media in this country has boxed all Democrats into a very tight spot.  While he does need to be aggressive in attacking McCain, he has to be careful to not go to far or the press will pounce on him (as they did Kerry and Gore).  

I think he is being very smart to keep painting McCain's actions as dissappointing.  And to call McCain out for running this kind of campaign.  I think that we should save the bigger guns for McCain's advocates.

As soon as Obama gets to aggressive, the meme of the angry Black man is going to come out.


by gavoter on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:29:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He has to walk a very fine line (2.00 / 1)

Save the heavy artillery for later on. He DOES need to say a bit more about it now, especially before going on vacation. Typically, though, he's tended to surprise me pleasantly, so I'm not worried.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:44:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Funny (2.00 / 1)

How that didn't keep the Washington Post from themselves lying about Obama.

http://thepage.time.com/2008/07/30/obama -declares-the-moment/


better luck next universe
by thenew on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 10:18:13 AM EST

History repeats (2.00 / 1)

If the Swift Boat Veterans had just run their ads without media attention, Kerry probably would have won.  It was the endless repetition of the ads and hand-wringing of the "news" media that put Kerry in the spot he got to (not saying he didn't run a crappy campaign... he just probably would have won despite that without the media's obsession with the SBVFT ads).


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 11:17:01 AM EST

Re: History repeats (none / 0)

Kerry was out on vacation windsurfing while the Swiftie Liars were getting millions in free media exposure at his expense.  His team's response was late, tentative, and off-the-mark.  In many ways I think it cost him the Election.

I still think he hasn't grasped the fact that anyone could put his military service in question, even after they tore his service record to shreds right in front of him and slimed it.

We have to get better at this kind of streetfight, folks.  

I thought Obama's team was world-class at this stuff?


by dembluestates on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 01:02:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

They've been pretty good so far (none / 0)

I heard that their last response to McCain trying to tie Obama to Paris Hilton and Britney Spears was to remark that the last few ads have been lies and then, "Whoops, he did it again."

That's pretty good.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 01:16:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dishonest John (2.00 / 1)

McCain skipped the Troops The problem here is that the McCain campaign was denied a visit to a military base under the same policy back in April. Of course, there was no outcry or false outrage from Brian Rogers at that time.

From CNN:

With Department of Defense rules prohibiting political campaigning on military bases, it was determined that in some cases McCain could visit the installations as a senator but could not engage in any political activity or have news media present.

McCain campaign officials said Thursday they intentionally did not campaign on military property.

"We follow the rules," said senior McCain adviser Steve Schmidt.

Because all three presidential candidates are sitting senators, DoD officials have privately noted for some weeks that the whole matter of drawing the line between Senate business and campaigning is sensitive.

A U.S. Army official told CNN there are no pending requests from any of the campaigns to visit Army bases at this time. He noted that Sen. Barack Obama recently visited Fayetteville, North Carolina, but did not go to Fort Bragg; and Sen. Hillary Clinton visited Killeen, Texas, but did not go to Fort Hood.

For his Wednesday visit to the U.S. Naval Academy -- of which he is a graduate -- McCain was allowed to make a political appearance at the academy's football stadium because it is privately owned property and is not owned or run by the U.S. military.

Earlier in the day, when McCain had breakfast with midshipmen on academy grounds, it was closed to the press and considered a private event.

The military spokesman points out that any U.S. senator could also request to visit the academy or any military installation.

But the Navy declined a McCain campaign request to speak at the Naval Aviation Museum at the naval base in Pensacola, Florida, because it is a military owned installation and is located on the base, the official said.

McCain did attend an airshow over the weekend at the Navy base in Meridian, Mississippi, because it was open to the general public. But he declined to answer political questions from reporters traveling with him.

by cobsjo on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 12:34:18 PM EST

Re: Washington Post A1: McCain Lying About Obama (none / 0)

If anyone needs any more evidence that McSame's campaign will not be a replay of the slimy, disgusting campaigns run by Karl Rove for 30 years, they should need no further proof.

I don't know what to make of the Obama team's apparent lack of an adequate response.

During the Primary campaign, their rapid-response team hit Clinton hard within minutes sometimes of a launched offensive.

Obama has now let almost a week go by and still no sign of an aggressive, coordinated, hard-hitting response that deals serious damage or capitalizes on an opening.

It seems like a calculated move, not a sign of weakness to me.

Let's see how this plays out:  Andrea Mitchell, now the WP, and maybe McSame's brittle, hard  campaign will shatter into a million pieces.


by dembluestates on Wed Jul 30, 2008 at 12:40:47 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.