Sources say (and the campaign confirms) that the Obama campaign has created a Muslim liaison position.
Rumor says it will be Haim Nawas, a Jordanian-American quoted as saying: "We need to recognise that the social structure in the Muslim world is very different from America's. American women need to understand that what is best for them is not necessarily what is best for Muslim women. Advocacy of women's rights in the Muslim world must show sensitivity to local political realities."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0 708/Obama_campaign_hires_Muslim_liaison. html?showall
Forced, arranged marriages.
Honor killing for dating (not sex, but dating).
Genital mutilation.
Polygamy.
Little or no education.
No personal, political or economic freedom, rights or autonomy (not even driver's licenses).
Absolute deference to men in all spheres.
No separation of church and state.
Which (if any) of the foregoing is "best for Muslim women"? Which (if any) of the foregoing deserve our "sensitivity"?
Obama needs a Muslim liaison. But he needs one who will call out the medievalism, not defer to it.
P.S. - I'll say it real slow. This is not a critique of Obama. It is a call for a Muslim liaison who will speak truth to power.
Further P.S. - Most of the sexist excesses of the Muslim world have no basis in the Koran. Muslim sexists wrongfully twist the Koran to justify enslaving and exploiting women.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 29 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.