Olmert: Mideast peace deal closer than ever?

Photobucket

Israeli PM, Palestinian leader visit France, vow to work toward peace

This article was filed Sunday morning, July 13, 2008, by the Associated Press. It reported:

PARIS - Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said Sunday that Israel and the Palestinians have never been as close to a peace deal than now.
Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, standing with Olmert at the French presidential palace, said both sides are "serious and want to achieve peace."

Both men, Olmert and Abbas, reportedly held talks on Sunday with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who wants Israel to settle for the two-state solution. This meeting occurred ahead of a summit launching the Union for the Mediterranean, which brings together leaders of 40 nations in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

Said Olmert::

We have never been as close to a possible (peace) agreement as today.

What incredible bullshit after the fall of Annapolis, and the deflection of Bush's last minute directive concerning a peaceful solution, even while Israel continued its relentless occupation and colonizing activity in the West Bank.

Bush calls for end of `occupation' of Arab lands

Bush, as we recall, called for `painful concessions' from both sides, and on Jan. 10, 2008 predicted success within year. You could just hear every Zionist faction in Israel, from Labor to Likud, laughing at this Bush proposal:

There should be an end to the occupation that began in 1967. The agreement must establish Palestine as a homeland for the Palestinian people, just as Israel is a homeland for the Jewish people. These negotiations must ensure that Israel has secure, recognized, and defensible borders. And they must ensure that the state of Palestine is viable, contiguous, sovereign, and independent.

So is Sarkozy nuts?

The Associated Press article continues: but, but, but....

Little overt movement toward a deal

Repeated rounds of Israeli-Palestinian peace talks since a peace conference in Annapolis, Maryland, last year have produced little movement.

What a joke. As during the Camp David/Taba negotiations in 2000, which produced the so-called "generous offer," nothing has changed. In fact, Israel is continuing to expand settlements, and even enlarging the notion of settlements as we speak. There are over 150 so-called "legal" settlements in the West Bank, and about 100 so-called "illegal" ones. To get around the illegality (all settlements are illegal by international law), Israel is now allowing these illegal settlements, largely located on hilltops around the West Bank, to change their names and become associated with the closest legal one as a "suburb." So now we have, as Jimmy Carter contended, over 250 settlements in the West Bank, which enlarge everyday. Settlements were "off the table" during the 2000 negotiations, and presumably they will be off the table in the future.

This advise is almost axiomatic: never listen to what Israel says, look at what it does, if you really want to know Israel's intents, in this case, its view of peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. They keep saying it again and again with their actions: Israel wants land not peace (again, quoting Jimmy Carter).

(Facsimile of the peanuts cartoon reproduced in accordance with criteria for fair use of cartoon material.)



Display:


Settlement Building and Wall Expansion (none / 0)

Speak louder than Olmert's words of peace.

See: Israel Continues to Build Illegal Apartheid Wall


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Sun Jul 13, 2008 at 10:27:40 PM EST

Re: Settlement Building and Wall Expansion (none / 0)

Great diary and I hope that you will continue to do more. This kind of news is just not getting a play in the US given the censorship. And you are right: the wall is being used as an excuse to confiscate more and more Palestinian land.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun Jul 13, 2008 at 10:45:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

WHAT WOULD SHERGALD DO? (none / 0)

The two sides publicly declare they are closer to peace and shergald views this as a negative? Even if it doesn't fly this time, at least there is an effort. But maybe that would nix shergald's true dream of pushing the jews into the sea.

Imagine that, Palestinians recast as a nation instead of victims.
What would sherald do?

Maybe he could write about arab muslims killing black africans in Darfur to seize control of the mineral rights.

Or maybe how autoworkers in Michigan are losing their homes and jobs.

... and that comic, a clear copyright violation.

Don't worry shergald, his name was Shultz, but he wasn't jewish so the international zionist community will not be filling a cease and desist on his behalf.


John McCain: Country Club First!
by demwords on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 04:41:57 AM EST

Re: WHAT WOULD SHERGALD DO? (none / 0)

Morning demwords. By this time, I was expecting much more original propaganda themes from you, but...same old.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 09:01:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: WHAT WOULD SHERGALD DO? (none / 0)

Since you are fond of the Beeb...I offer you
this.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/750464 0.stm


John McCain: Country Club First!
by demwords on Mon Jul 14, 2008 at 12:03:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.