Sounds good to me. There's gotta be Terms of Service on mainstream advertising services. Perhaps we should call them on it. I mean, they could always just stop being racist and hateful, but from what I've seen, they don't have it in them. They have a need to be hateful.

Given the comments on ALL of those sites, they are going to have to pull all of the ads.

For helping expose PUMA crap.  Sunlight is the best disenfectant.

Haha nice!  Grlpatriot and the rest of the "Liberals for McCain" must be fuming from this obvious censorship!  ARGH!!WEDF#@

We should post this (I not so good at embed):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gGCmlpF8 gQ

"Yes, he's a gay African communist Muslim Nazi."

and a scary wimp with no testicular fortitude

How about some comment from members who aren't too ashamed to use the same username at both sites?  Let's hear from KnowVox, Coyote Creek, Anna Belle, campskunk, FlaDem (I think), and/or NoBama.  Others?

Hey man, they're just righting the Democratic Party.  I mean, their racist screeds scare even the Republicans, but it's all for a greater good, man.

Xov Wonk

The irony here is killing me:

These sites are too anti-Democratic for John McCain's taste.

I guess he realizes that putting money into them, is a, well... you know...

It is good to know he has more class than the racist PUMA's who claim to be Democrats.  

You obviously haven't been a regular reader of The Confluence or you would know that we have two hard and fast rules: no character assassination and no rumormongering without evidence.  

Affirmative Action candidate?  Uh, yeah, especially after the RBC hearing.  I have written more than one post on this especially as it pertains to gender and how men always seem to get all the breaks while the bar is raised for women.  

I've never had an islamophobic day in my life.  I've worked with and for muslims and know them to be decent people who just want to mind their own business. The word I used is "jihad" which was very apropos when the Obamaphiles at DKos were rampaging through the diaries and putting users to the sword, er, relentless trollrating if there was even a hint of resistance to the Obama campaign.  It was all orchestrated in order to get rid of any strong voices on the biggest blog in the political universe who was not for Obama.  

And you know what?  I haven't regretted a minute of it.  I can write what I please whenever I please and people actually read my stuff.  I've been linked by CNN, Salon, the NYTimes and I've been mentioned in Vanity Fair.  I was delighted to find that Hillary's campaign valued my blog and the work of the other Conflucians and I can say that I am proud of our standards.  

And I am very happy to see that I was completely right about your candidate.  He is a facade put up by the old Democratic establishment, propelled by brilliant marketing to young and pretentious suckers and now he is tacking to the right, just as I predicted and pissing his supporters off.  
With 2 months left to the convention,
A former opponent who only suspended her campaign and hasnt released her delegates,
And  
18 million infuriated Democrats.

We applaud John McCain for removing his ads from sites that engage in character assassination.  We don't plan to vote for him but it was the right thing to do.  

And in case you didn't notice, we don't accept ads or donations, although we have had plenty of offers.  Free speech needs to remain free.

How do you recommend your virulently racist supporters get together on your behalf without getting crucified? How do you point them in the right direction?

You renounce sites most people have never heard of. It's like walking into a room full of middle school boys and telling them that because pornography is wrong they shouldn't go to www.lotsofpornographyeverywhere.com (my apologies if that turns out to be a real address).

Now McCain gets the bump to his mavericky status (Oh look! He denounced racism!) and he gets national airing of the hatesites where his more rotten supporters can congregate.

Maybe it was just the low clickthrough.  

dishonest, but I see you are playing to your audience. You take a few fringe sites with off color comments and paint the entire coalition as racist haters. Not true. Nonsupport for Obama does not equate racism and hate.

When a candidate has basically no record of accomplishment, has never held a full time job, has published two books which are now fodder for the RNC to use the lies in it, stands for no Democratic value that I know of - then yes, he is the affirmation action candidate.

Some posters here have eyes but cannot see, ears but cannot hear(or comprehend). The racist meme does not fit the persons you are trying to smear. But, the term just flows fluidly, easily doesn't it? You are a race baiter Geek - it does not work and it will not get him elected. He simply is not qualified. My last post at the orange place at the end of January said - this will set back race relations - I said it was not a cult(BO fans) but a cultural difference. What I really meant was a lack of culture. The term elilist should never be used for a supporter of BO or BO himself - ever. It is a misnomer. The correct use of  elilist is the best - as you can ascertain, from his resume, he is running on a vapor thin resume; hence he is a fraudulent candidate and the first and, I think from what is happening now and will continue, the last affirmation action candidate we will ever have. He will not be elected. Eight years of the phoney Bush made people totally aware of fraudulent MSM coverage and the corporate greed that foments it.

Do you know any others words other than racist? Good time to start building yourself a bigger world view.    

The Reagan Democrats are now Clinton Democrats and have come back to the party, but the party leadership is more interested in nursing its wounded pride than in actually cementing its coalition. It would rather moralize than act. And, given the moral equivocation their selected leader has been showing in the last few weeks, it is uncertain they have a moral leg to stand on.

The message of economic justice still resonates with the majority of Democrats, as shown by Hillary's intense support, but that message is not accepted as true. When we talk about it, we're met by screams of "Racist! Racist!"and sneers that we have nowhere else to go. How can Obama's content-free message make contact with the real world? There is nothing to attach his rhetoric to, no central organizing principle. He talks about the "smallness of our politics," so what is it precisely that is to be enlarged? He has always backed away from the hard choice of throwing the power of the state behind the cause of social justice. At every point, Obama backs away from requiring these efforts, while Hillary embraced them. The Stevensonians have forced their preferred candidate on the party on their own terms, paying no mind to where they stand and what they want to accomplish. They may be centrists, but they no longer have a center to hold.

For Clinton Democrats, there is nowhere else to go with Obama because there was never anything there to begin with. There is nowhere else to go with O because there was never anything there to BEGIN with.