All on the same page there.

I was only staking twelve large bottles of Queensland's own XXXX and a Kevin Rudd t-shirt, it was a friendly wager.

Metaphor.

McSame's the one up shits creek.

GREEN with envy.

i'd go with clark. I don't like losing senators.

I think Hillary wants to be President.
I think Hillary will run again in 2012.

When American realizes the errors of its ways (again), they will vote for her unanimously.  

Then America will finally get the President it needs to make real change.

There's some hypocrisy or lying here because, presumably, thse are the same people who supported the Clintons in the 1990s, have been saying forever that Bill clinton would win if he ran today, that Al Gore was wrong to distant himself from Clinton, who argue with Bush supporters by noting how much more successful Clinton was on the economy, among other things.

The sad, and ironic, thing about the Obama campaign is that it has in fact caused such people to sound like the GOP w/r/t the Clintons, hence my saying that adversaries are now always viewed as enemies and always have to be portrayed in as negative light as possible now.  But for Obamans to be doing so totally discredits Obama.

Please.

First, I'm a 43 year old black female, an American.
Second, i didn't say I would vote for McCain.  I said, I'm either not voting at all or writing in Hillary.

Why?

Because I think Obama is the wrong choice and I'm not going to mindlessly follow the same old crappy choice the Democratic National Committee shoves down our throats.

I don't do Kool-Aid.
And I don't ride on bandwagons

No, no, no, I can tell the difference between a real Clinton supporter and a troll, I'm not talking about the Clinton supporters that are willing to discuss their opinions, I'm talking about the trolls that say outlandish bs and then disappear, they are everywhere!

When was the last time you typed this:

Obama is a muslim terrorist who hates whitey and if he wins then we are going to be taken over by al qaeda"

that kind of thing is what I'm talking about, it's all over this website.

I just thought that the moderators were being lax on the rules during the primary, but if that's not going to change . . .

the reason why I'm asking is because I was never on this website Before these primaries, I just assumed that there was more moderation before the primaries, am I wrong?

talking about Clinton supporters, I'm talking about obvious freeper trolls, I'm sorry if I wasn't clear.

I just want to know if this site is going to be better moderated because I just don't want to have to read posts all the time about how 'hussein the terrorist muslim will eat my baby if he is elected,' that sort of thing.

Again, sorry if I wasn't clear about what I meant

LOL!  About 30 minutes ago you said:

About Obama's speech:  "What I heard was, "aren't I fantastic!" and then I changed the channel (I have a hard time listening to Obama speak).

Then this gem:  "For Obama, it's all about Obama."

Juno, you're a great troll but you should at least separate your obvious lies from thread to thread if you expect anyone to believe you.

See,an Obama supporter like you can make it not only easier but pleasant to get behind Obama.

Unfortunately, you are rarity.

Clinton is blowing it for herself right now. She needs to concede, and not for party unity. I've never bought the arguments that she's harming party unity. She isn't any more than is the Obama camp (but they're supposed to be the ones with unity skills).

But for herself.  Obamans need to ignore her. The media need to ignore her - She set herself up for that, I'm sorry to say - and just get on with the General campaign (Obama has figured this out. He is often on a very different page than his supporters).

They only play into her hands when they write and shriek about how awful she is. IF they ignored her, the only person who'd be harmed by that would be Clinton because she didn't concede last night.

As I've said before, while being called a troll and other epithets by Inspired Obamans, I am a realist.

Obama is NOT a rock star.  It's that mentality that is unnerving.  Bush was sent from God. Obama's a rock star.

Why do Americans need to feel their political leaders are something par human?

They're not. Obama is as political as any pol, and he will be a very weak General candidate in many ways.

That is the reality.

Obamans are taking as much time to get over their Clinton hatred and bashing as it is for her to accept defeat, so call it a draw.

Clinton would have been the first female presidential nominee or president.  As a group, she represents over 50% of the population.  In Obama's case, it's 10%. So while it's great that a black man is now vying for president, I think it also shows that the claims of racism were either bogus or real racism was roundly rejected while women, who make up a much larger percentage of the population, have a very long way to go and the sexism and misogyny that reared its ugly head were NOT met with horror and rejection.

I think that is not a good thing.

We are irritated that Clinton behaved exactly as we expected her to. I expect more of my leaders than she delivers, and for once, I wanted to feel good about her.

The change is in Washington. Look, just because we want to change our government, doesn't mean we are lobotomized. It doesn't mean we aren't going to push back when someone keeps repeating the same lies, over and over and over. How many times have you asked "Where's the change?" "Where's the unity?" in the last couple of days? People keep calling you a Republican because that is a Republican tactic. Remember the Saddam/9-11 connection? Over and over and over.

I've tried to be gracious. I've tried to reach out to Clinton supporters. And after what I have seen last night, I've had it. I've had it with the snide needling, the ridiculous spin, the out right lies. Take your ball and go home. We'll do this without you. We don't need you.