Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hillary To Be VP

Howard Fineman just said on MSNBC that Barack Obama doesn't want to offer Hillary Clinton the VP slot if he thinks she'll take it, nor does she actually want it because 2nd place "is no place at all" or something like that. I don't really get that, since VP would make her the presumptive nominee in 2016 and would enable her to have a high profile post from which to champion such issues as universal healthcare. So what does she actually want? Fineman had a pretty ridiculous answer: "she wants him to give her credit." Is that really the level of his analysis?

Personally, I don't think it's a big deal that she didn't concede tonight. Come on, tonight was Obama's night; she wants her concession to be her moment and hers alone.

I do, however, hope it comes some time this week. If she still hasn't conceded by Friday, we really do have to start wondering what she's thinking.

Update [2008-6-4 0:39:6 by Todd Beeton]:I agree with Chuck Todd: "she only has leverage this week."



Display:


Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

Absolutely. My head kind of spun at little at Fineman's analysis -- it made no sense! Also, dead on with 'she wants her moment'. I think to a certain extent rightfully so. But the sooner she wants to take that moment, the better.


"If we can't live together... we're going to die alone."
by VAAlex on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:19:14 AM EST

Re: Fineman: (2.00 / 3)

Okay in all honesty folks Feinman is considered a douche bag by the clintons. He and KO have no access to the inner decesion making circle of Hillary's campaign.

So every time he starts a sentence with " a clinton insider told me"... I think feinman getting access to clinton insiders is like saying taylor marsh gets access to obama's insiders..


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:37:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: (none / 0)

Fineman is considered a douchebag by a lot more people than the Clintons, me included!

I can't stand his smug, supercilious face.


by dembluestates on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:25:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Andrea Mitchell disagreed (none / 0)

Didn't she say she'd heard nothing like that, and thought that Clinton wanted to be VP?  That's what I remember.


New Jersey politics and news
by John DE on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:46:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

She's earned a right to have her moment however she chooses it and I have no problem with the lack of a concession speech.  Let's see how things play out.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:52:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Too old (none / 0)

Hillary will be too old to run any year other than this one. She'll be 70 in 2016, far too old to be running for the first time. Before I get jumped on, I've said many times that McCain is far too old to be running for President now too and he is. Anyone over the age of 60 is probably going to be considered to be too old to be running, particularly running for the first time rather than for re-election.

The only chance Hillary had was this year. I think 2012 may even be too late for too if Obama lost this year.


by Quinton on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:33:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Too old (2.00 / 2)

You're absolutely right. And I'm astounded that anyone with more than grade school education would write that sentence. Quick, jerome, fire this doofus.

If Hillary wants to be VP, it's only because she knows that it's the Dems best chance for getting the WH. If her supporters walk - and a lot of us will - Obama cannot win. When she said it was looking like the dream ticket was the way to go a few months ago, that's what she was referring to. Ironically, she can without Obama on the ticket. He probably can't win without her. She doesn't need to be VP and it will be insulting to her and the women who support her. But if Obama is smart enough to offer it to her, she'll likely take it and make a win more likely. If she's the nominee, she will absolutely ask him to be VP.


by glitterannebegay on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:18:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Too old (none / 0)

I will no longer tolerate threats like this without saying something. Leave. We don't need you. We will win it without you. If you can't figure out where your own self interest lies, take your ball and go home. We will not let you take hostages.

I'm going to laugh my ass off when Hillary doesn't get VP. Finally I won't have to hear her supporters anymore.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:49:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Too old (none / 0)

If we leave, Obama loses.  

His campaign was excellent at divide and conquer.  He has his support among the African Americans, and among younger people and among the elites.  There's his 50%.

Hillary commands the other 50%.

Obama's path to victory, selected by the Superdelegates, has left it up to him and his supporters to try and bring the Party they split back together since they cannot win it with just the Obama coalition.

This is not a good start.

Stupid.


by dembluestates on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:22:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Too old (none / 0)

You actually think that all 50% would go with you? You might get 10% if you are lucky - she did get the majority of the uneducated, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. That's 5% of the total electorate.We can still beat McCain without you.

If you'd like to stay, stay. We will welcome you with open arms. But don't ever threaten us again.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 05:33:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Agreed on all counts, Todd.

Give her credit--there's never a dull moment!


"The only way I can lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with either a dead girl or a live boy."
by AK Democrat on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:19:15 AM EST

She didn't have to concede (none / 0)

but she could have been graciousness.  It was his night but she tried to grab the spotlight.  The idea of encouraging a petition drive for her as VP makes it impossible to believe she is psychically fit for the job.


by Piuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:20:29 AM EST

Re: She didn't have to concede (none / 0)

"I want you to tell me what I should do, so that we can all come together behind the Democratic nominee and defeat John McCain!"

That's what I wanted to hear. She didn't have to necessarily say "Obama", but I would to have like to have seen the word "nominee".


by TCQuad on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:26:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She didn't have to concede (1.00 / 2)

And she did not thank or congratulate him.  She is a selfish, ungracious individual.


by shirley temple on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:29:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

There is no need for that n/t (2.00 / 2)


John McCain wants you to be poor!
by nklein on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:44:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She didn't have to concede (2.00 / 2)

shirley temple, your name is decieving. You aint a sweet kid at all.

uh uh.

[yeah she did. you see the first part the speech? or did you even bother to watch. which one are you: a lazy hater who didn't watch the beginning, or just misinformed?]


by alyssa chaos on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:57:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She didn't have to concede (none / 0)

She only Concedes to HER SUPPORTERS FIRST.


by Check077 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:28:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She wants her moment to be "all hers" (none / 0)

But is not willing to let him have a moment that's "all his"?


by emeraldblue on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:22:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (2.00 / 2)

I dont thinks it a big deal she didn't concede tonight either.

Maybe she could coordinate something with all the higher ups (like Pelosi, Dean, Reid, Roosevelt) in the party and do some kind of big endorsement of Obama later this week. this ways she shows she is moving with the party. It would be pretty cool.

I thought the night went well, no concession and all.


by alyssa chaos on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:21:38 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither (none / 0)

Pelosi, Reid, and Dean are moving tomorrow.  They are not going to wait for Hillary and I think she did herself some political harm in the move tonight.  


by Piuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:31:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (2.00 / 1)

Political harm? really and you learnt that great talking point in the school of '18 million voters mean jack' - school... I guess.


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:41:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (none / 0)

I mean inside the Party and inside the Senate.  And someone mentioned that if she does intend to run for President again, or Senator, or Governor she needs the Obama people as well.


by Piuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:44:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (1.00 / 0)

HUH???? where do you come up w/ such analysis...

she won her state hands down, she has all the support her state.

nevermind... dont bother on the reply cause I won't engage any further.


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:52:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (2.00 / 1)

She has a very low approval rating right now in her state.


by sweet potato pie on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:22:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (none / 0)

Where you pulling this out of, Sweet Potato??

Gallup this week gives her a 54 Favorable 43 Unfavorable rating.  Newsweek last week gave her 53 for and 43 against nationwide.  She has completely reversed her unfavorables as America has seen her courage, spirit, and values under fire and against the odds .

I can't find a recent poll of her in New York alone in the 2012 race for Senate at all.

As a New Yorker, I can tell you her numbers here are usually 65-75% approval, which means practically every Democrat is in her corner.


by dembluestates on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:34:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm in New York (none / 0)

approval of her has plummented in the past three months here.

Not fatally, but potentially quite damaging.

We want our Senator back.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:24:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

all those voters (none / 0)

and yet (21,000,000) in debt


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:48:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: all those voters (2.00 / 2)

Yeah, but over $100,000,000 net worth and fundraising ability second only to Obama in all of politics.  She has a Senate seat for life if she wants it and has earned a reputation as a party leader in her own right.  She has a lot of leverage and Obama and the party have very little leverage over her.  I've got no problem with her extracting some reasonable concessions for her support.  I just hope she doesn't get greedy and try to blackmail Obama into giving her the VP nomination.  I'm afraid that would be very bad for us in November.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:57:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

well, atleast you have a line (none / 0)

you like her, but atleast you have a line (ie blackmail, greed, etc.).  

what's that old saying...more bees with honey than vinegar.  

see, I think Hillary is going about this the wrong way, unless her real goal is to undermine now and run in 2012, then she's going about it the right way.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:07:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well, atleast you have a line (2.00 / 2)

I don't like her.  I'm Obama all the way.  I'm just a political realist and don't think anything Clinton has done thus far (well, at least since IN/NC) is really out of the norm or egregious.  Kennedy got concessions from Carter.  Jackson got concessions from Dukakis.  Clinton has leverage.  She's earned the right to some considerations from Obama for her support.  They both just need to meet in the middle somewhere.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well, atleast you have a line (none / 0)

That's the thing. She doesn't have leverage. She only has the leverage he gives her. If she doesn't concede soon, the supers decide it for her.

What is she going to do? Tell her supporters not to vote for Obama? She'd be finished.

Obama has this figured out. She is not getting jack squat. He will probably give her enough so that she is not humiliated, but blackmail is just not going to work. This is political chicken between an 18 wheeler named Obama and a Pinto named Clinton. She will blink first.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:56:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: all those voters (2.00 / 1)

AL rogers , your comments are as worthy as the " is this snark" fella. must be miserable being you. and that is coming from an obama supporter ...

what does the debt have to do w/ anything. when you are ahead one tends to get more funding / contributions. she did nor raise peanuts out there.

you're still stuck on being an ass.


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:58:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

if ya can't stand the heat... (1.00 / 1)

on a miserable/bitter person gets personal.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:03:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: if ya can't stand the heat... (1.00 / 0)

you make no sense...kid


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:10:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: all those voters (none / 0)

Clinton being a crappy fundraiser isn't a legitimate point? I just don't know what to make of this.


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:44:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: all those voters (none / 0)

I hear it is now +/- $40M. Every time she mentions her website, all I can hear is send me money, give me money, pay my campaign debts. I hear her supporters are sending in $89 in honor of her mother's birthday tomorrow.


by prajna on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:04:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

got any links? (none / 0)

$21 mill is bad, but $40 mill in the hole would be a freakin disaster.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:08:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: got any links? (2.00 / 1)

Al,

http://www.411mania.com/politics/columns /76964/Main-Issue-For-Clinton%5C%5Cs-Wit hdrawal-Appears-To-Be-The-Money.htm

I've also seen this amount in the foreign press


by prajna on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:31:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Political harm? (2.00 / 2)

You mean Obama won't like her anymore?  And CNN and MSNBC will hate her even more than they do now?  People in NY won't re elect her?  Something else?  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:52:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Political harm? (none / 0)

If she loses the support of the party establishment, she will not last. Maybe you forgot how her Senate election went, but it was hardly an efficient political engine. She needs all the help she can get come her next political fight.


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Political harm? (none / 0)

Bull.

Hillary doesn't need the "Party Establishment" to win New York, they need HER.

All she needs is just her name on the ballot.

I can't think of a single politician, including Obama, who could beat her here.


by dembluestates on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:42:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither (none / 0)

Pelosi, Reid & Dean can shove it up their royal you know what for all we care.  Hillary will take some time to digest, rest and make a decision with a clear head.  I, for one, am very proud of this race....it was a wonderful ride and the thrills and spills were incredible.  

On another point...Hillary's job is done for now, she climbed higher than any other woman and she should hold her head high...In the end, Obama won because he ran a better race..These pundits need not worry about what Hillary will do...in time, we will all know..give us all a break to sit back and realize what was just accomplished by these two candidates.  


by GendraX on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 09:41:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (2.00 / 2)

As a die-hard Obama supporter I concur completely.  While it would have been nice for her to conceed tonight, I understand why she didn't... and thankfully I don't think it will impact the historic nature of the night.

And yet as you said, if she hasn't conceded by the end of the week, the party (and especially the prominent Clinton supporters) need to step in and try to force the reconciliation that we desperately need.


by gabr1el on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:22:11 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (2.00 / 1)

Obama has to take the lead on that.  He has to offer her supporters something.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:53:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (none / 0)

I think it's reasonable for Clinton to negotiate a prime speaking spot at the convention, help for her AA supporters who may be facing primary challenges, a voice in health care policy, help paying off her campaign debt, and perhaps a cabinet position or two for her or her endorsers.  But what can he offer her supporters?  


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:01:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (none / 0)

The same thing HRC has been offering...Geesh, their policies are near identical...What else can he do?  Most of her supporters are waiting for her to give them instructions on what to do...Some think it's going to Denver, some think she's going to run as an Independent, some think she will tell them to vote for McCain, she needs to think about the ramifications of her holding out.

If her goal is to see Obama fail, she is doing the right thing...If her goal is getting a Democrat in the WH she needs to step down.

As far as holding out for leverage, this will not persuade BO to give in...This is exactly what he is fighting against, same old Washington tactics.  If she really wanted the VP spot she could have conceded graciously tonight got on board with BO's message, that will have inched her closer to the VP spot more than anything.


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:34:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (none / 0)

Personally, I, as a Hillary supporter hope and pray, should the offer for VP come her way, I hope she does not take it.  VP today is a meaningless position..she is a doer and a go getter and marches to her own drum as does Obama..both have very strong personalities.  

She can do more good somewhere else and I have expressed my thoughts in a note to Hillary as to how I feel.  She does not need to be his Vice President.


by GendraX on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 09:45:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Wants Hillary To Be VP (none / 0)

I'm with you, kid.

He knows what he can do with his VP slot.  Maybe offer it to Donna Brazile or Claire McCaskill and see how far that gets them.

Hillary will be just fine, thanks, and this country  and the Party Establsihment and "Superdelgates" which stabbed her in the back will realize very shortly, like they did with John Kerry, what a mistake they've made.


by dembluestates on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:48:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Apology Needed (none / 0)

It won't be over until Obama apologizes. I am not sure what he should apologize for but it is best if he comes up with something. Then they will be able to make up.


by ImpeachBushCheney on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:29:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Apologize for winning, perhaps (n/t) (2.00 / 1)


by Aris Katsaris on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:40:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She could have singlehandedly brought (2.00 / 1)

the party together against McCain.

She chose to widen the chasm.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:22:35 AM EST

Re: She could have singlehandedly brought (2.00 / 1)

She didn't widen the chasm.  There was maybe a rhetorical shot across the bow a couple of times in her speech, but nothing truly damaging to Obama or particularly divisive.  She'll bring her supporters along but it will take time.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:04:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 2)

I hope she somehow pressures him into agreeing to let her push her health care plan in the 111th Congress.

I have a feeling its more about making back a little of that campaign debt, however.


Never separate the life you live from the words you speak. -Sen. Paul Wellstone (Minnesota)
by Max Fletcher on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:23:44 AM EST

If she wants to be VP (2.00 / 3)

tonights speech did nothing to get her there. Obama can't make her VEEP now that she's threatened to take her ball home if she doesn't get what she wants (and that was exactly what the speech was). It would be a sign of weakness... so tonight Hillary has ruined her own best shot at being on the ticket.


by Tatan on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:25:33 AM EST

Re: If she wants to be VP (none / 0)

Right on!!


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:35:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

eh... (none / 0)

...people have been "wondering what she's thinking" for months now.

that won't change.

I do hope she conceeds but it doesn't really matter if she does or doesn't.  She'd just be hurting herself.


by DawnG on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:26:13 AM EST

how? (none / 0)

how is she hurting herself?


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:42:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I think it gives a wrong impression... (none / 0)

She doesn't have to conceed tonight.  But if she doesn't conceed at all or if she flat out declares she'll take this fight to the convention, she will alienate more democrats who are demonstrating that they are willing to line up behind the nominee.

It would damage any future plans she might have for president.  


by DawnG on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:54:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: how? (none / 0)

By refusing to recognize the obvious, namely that Obama is the nominee of the Democratic Party in 2008,  Hillary is making herself look foolish.

Even Huckabee was smart enough to recognize McCain as the nominee of the Republican Party.


We shall overcome. Yes we can.
by Sam Wise Gingy on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:39:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

i guess (2.00 / 1)

i don't have a problem with her not conceding as much as i have a problem with her making it sound like she's still fighting and willing to take it to Denver.

Most candidates in this position just give a short speech that doesn't address the issue and just quickly thank their campaign staff and give credit to the nominee.  And then, you expect the concession speech the next day.  The problem was, her speech sounded nothing like that.

But, you are right.  If she concedes within the week, it won't be that bad.


by ab03 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:26:31 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

" I don't really get that, since VP would make her the presumptive nominee in 2016 and would enable her to have a high profile post from which to champion such issues as universal healthcare. "

Isn't being in the Senate a good place to champion issues since  she will actually be able to write the legislation instead of just asking for it as would be the case if she is in the exec. branch?


by ACinCA on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:27:10 AM EST

you can write legislation as VP (none / 0)


by ab03 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:46:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

VP is the head of the senate... (none / 0)

...even better.


by DawnG on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:56:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Hil would be perceived as being too old in 2016. I would rather for her to make another run in 2012, and unseat the McCain successor
then, because after another 4 years of Bush, the entire country will be ready for "real" change.
by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:23:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary Clinton was ungracious tonight. (2.00 / 1)

Tonight was about a historic moment, she made it all about her.

What candidate, forget Obama, put another face in his place, want to deal with that?  Really, who does?

She is just too much.  She is angry at not getting this nomination and she just need to be angry at herself for what happened.

Comparing Obama to Clinton is apples vs. oranges, don't see NO VP SLOT offered to her.


by shirley temple on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:27:58 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Fineman's an idiot. He always says some source told him something that turns out to be false. Everyone else close to Hillary says she wants VP.

I personally hope it doesn't happen.

I'm hoping for:

Schwietzer
Sebelius
Warner


John McCain defends Bush's Iraq strategy.
by recusancy on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:28:26 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Sebelius would be a slap in the face to the 18 million who voted for Hillary, making it even more likely that they would stay home in November.  

Warner is a good choice, he's pro Obama and doesn't like the Clintons.  He would pull in Virginia, for sure.  But would be willing to give up a sure Senate seat for VP?  

I can't comment on Schwietzer since I don't know who she/he is.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:57:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Schwietzer is Governor of Montana.  Kinda close to Tester politically.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:08:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

Your Sebelius comment is sexist.  It could percieved by some Clinton supporters to be a slap in the face but only from a very slanted point of view.

Sebelius would be an excellent choice because she is a great governor with broad appeal in her state.  She is generally a great speaker (state of the union was her worst speech ever).  In Kansas she has a history of bringing republicans into the democratic fold.  And she happens to be a woman.

You seem to conflate the fact that Clinton being an amazing politician and great figure is because she is a woman.  That is just not true.

Now I understand why some could see it as Obama pandering by saying "hey look I picked a woman vote for me" but that would be perception by you not fact.


McCain = bad Obama = good
by CAchemist on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:23:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

No your comment is sexist: The only reason Sebelius is even being put forth, is because of her sex, which to me, is sexist. She brings nothing except her sex. Did you listen to speech the other day? Pathetic!


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:38:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

You see her sex.  Others see a great democratic governor.  

Like it or not she is being groomed for larger national office.  That is why she was given the chance to do the democratic response to the state of the union this year.

Clinton did break through a huge glass ceiling in national politics and she should be commended for that.   She did so because she is an amazing politician.  Please do not continue to limit Clinton's candidacy to her being the female candidate.  She is so much more than that.


McCain = bad Obama = good
by CAchemist on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:48:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Er, I don't think it was I, that said anything about her sex. To me Hillary is just the best choice, since all the rest quit, and I would support her no matter what her sex is, so I don't know what you're referring too.


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:10:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 3)

The only reason Sebelius is even being put forth

BULLSHIT!

I don't give a fuck what her sex is. She has been a great progressive Dem in a conservative state. She has Ohio roots. She was against the war from the start. She's fought for clean energy and turned Republicans into Democrats. She's intelligent, well spoken, progressive, and an extremely good politician.

Hillary's not the only capable, successful woman. Get over it.


John McCain defends Bush's Iraq strategy.
by recusancy on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:15:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

sebelius is fine by all accounts and purpose but she choked in her SOTU rebuttal.

I'd much prefer her stay in Kansas, build up the Dem party there and run for senator in 2010.

Warner is needed in VA. Schweitzer is great.

Truth is, there's a lot of really great candidates but many are risky propositions. Personally, I love mcCaskill but losing the MO senate seat doesn't appeal to me one bit.


!
by alex100 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:10:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I'd much prefer her stay in Kansas, build up the Dem party there and run for senator in 2010.

And then run against Hillary in 2016...  I like that idea a lot!  A great female candidate without all the baggage!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:01:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

the pundits said she would concede tonight ,

they were wrong again.

She would continue to run circles around them , defy them against the odds and march to her own beat.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:28:27 AM EST

you're right - on to Denver! (none / 0)


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:38:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Uh...kay (2.00 / 1)

Who are you and what have you done with Al?


by DawnG on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:58:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Fineman's theory makes no sense.  He has proven himself to be full of shit on many other occasions as well, so I wouldn't give it much credence.

In the past I've doubted whether Hillary wants to be VP, but tonight convinced me.  That's what she is after.  We'll see what happens - huge upsides and downsides.


John McCain: Extending SCHIP would be an "unfunded liability."
by Fuzzy Dunlop on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:31:19 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

Agree, huge pluses and minuses.  In a way, Obama is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.  

If he chooses Hillary, he has to abandon the whole change thing, AND he's saddled with Bill Clinton.  Not good.  If he doesn't choose Hillary, there will 18 million voters who will be angry.  Some will heal, but many will be so angry that they will stay home in November.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:00:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Change (2.00 / 1)

Well, with all respect, he needs a new message going into the fall.

The change thing sounded good in January, but not only is it worn out and more a basis for mocking Obama than supporting him at this time, but as more facts came out, it's pretty clear he's not the revolutionary "new way of politics" he proclaimed himself to be.  That ship sunk in Pennsylvania.  

Best to just tacitly acknowledge he's a politician, no more no less, and what's wrong with that?  Everyone in Washington is a politician.  It's honest.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:43:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change (none / 0)

Oh, I dont know.  I think he can get away with change and hope through the convention (as long as he doesnt wear it out too bad between now and then).

But I agree, after that he will have to evolve it a bit.  It should still be in the background though.

And I will always admit he is a politician.  No more no less.  I dont think it hurts him to admit that and I do think that those that think he is 'above politics' are silly.  People have run on reform, change, hope, etc. forever.

I just think Obama is in one of those rare convergences where everything for him is lining up perfectly - the right message, the right delivery, the right person, the right climate,  and all that.  So hes no magician but he is a skilled politician who happened to come along exactly when the landscape was set for someone just like him.


by pattonbt on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:21:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change (none / 0)

Maybe.

We'll have a better idea when the polls close in Ohio & Pennsylvania in November.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 07:36:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change (none / 0)

It will be a fun ride.

But Ill give you my honest take on why I think Barack will (and Hillary would have) beat McCain handily.  TV and the republican party.

TV will be the most unkind mistress to McCain.  Lets face facts about the US - generally its form over substance.  While I think Obama has both he definitely has the former in spades.  I also think McCain has neither, maybe a little of the latter but defnintely none of the former.

So when the lights hit McCain (as they did last night) he will come off as the loser big time.  Obama is prettier, speaks better, is taller, has more charisma, is younger, is healthier looking, etc.  That alone gives probably 15 points.

As I said, I think Obama has both form and substance so I dont see him as just an empty suit, but I can understand why some do.

Secondly, the republicans are in complete disarray right now and the dems are holding a very strong hand in this landscape.  I think a used condom could beat the republicans right now its so bad for them.

But I never say never.  Obama will have to work hard if he wants to win as he has some peculiarities that are not 'normal' (name, skin color, experience, etc.) in the traditional sense to the average voter.  So nothing is a gimmie.  McCain will still get some of that Maverick love even though he doesnt deserve it.  So Obama shouldnt just assume and he better work his ass off.  And I think he will.


by pattonbt on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 10:31:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Change (none / 0)

What you say about the, let's call it, TV/Youtube effect, is something I've also been considering for a while.  It's like a Nixon/Kennedy redux.  

I think you're points are all accurate.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 04:19:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

She could be after VP.  Or, perhaps it's all posturing--you start negotiations by asking for more than you'll get, so that you have room to "compromise" for what you really want.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:10:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I cannot speak for other men or for other Obama supporters. What I can say is that when any candidate, male or female, adopts the position, "I'm entitled," they lose my respect and support.


by jlmccreery on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:31:28 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

"Personally, I don't think it's a big deal that she didn't concede tonight. Come on, tonight was Obama's night; she wants her concession to be her moment and hers alone."

The point is she distracted from "his" moment and continued to undermine him.

"I won, I won, I won and I'm not getting out." becomes the story. She had the opportunity to pass the torch, unify and strengthen the party in one master stroke while still holding on to her power and even increasing her power.

She blew "her moment".

Also by enumerating "what she wants" she gives the impression that Obama doesn't want the same thing when nothing could be further from the truth.

All this over the back drop of McCain's pitiful prebuttal speech in NOLA.

This would have put him back on his heels big time.

I feel for her, but when she pulls crap like this to undermine the party's nominee for "her moment" my blood boils.


by TimO on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:34:53 AM EST

Aw... (none / 0)

You guys really do hate her.

It's ok though.  We don't really like Obama.  shrug


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Aw... (none / 0)

The difference between us and you is that your candidate lost. The sooner you (and HRC) come to terms with that, the better it'll be for the party.

I know, I know, you guys couldn't care less about the party.


by Baseballhead on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:35:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Easy, tiger. (none / 0)

I know, the other guy started with the childish tone.  But do as your candidate would, and has.  Rise above.


by Mardarkin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:49:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Easy, tiger. (none / 0)

Hey, I'm all for unifying the party. I'm not the one who doesn't want to get behind the presumptive nominee.


by Baseballhead on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:25:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ya- (none / 0)

I know.  But you don't get others to get behind your cause by calling them a doodiehead (in effect)?  Know what I mean?  Just 'cause they suck doesn't mean you have to be sucky too.


by Mardarkin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:37:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Aw... (none / 0)

My candidate lost a few critical votes at a 30 member rules committee.  Al Gore lost because of a 5-4 Supreme Court decision.  

My candidate received more primary votes cast in her name than any nominess of either party in the history of the United States, including yours.

Show a little respect for Hillary.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 07:33:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dear Todd, (none / 0)

there's only three days left this week.

start wondering.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:35:07 AM EST

She is only hurting herself n/t (none / 0)


Yawn.
by spacemanspiff on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:35:24 AM EST

Dear Todd - see lanny (none / 0)

If she really doesn't want to be Veep, then why is Lanny starting a petition?

start wondering.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:36:35 AM EST

Re: Dear Todd - see lanny (2.00 / 1)

Lanny Davis is the George Costanza of the Democratic Party. Everything he does is wrong, and he's too dumb to figure out the "opposite day" strategy.

And Hillary Clinton let him become one of the most prominent spokesmen for her campaign.


by BlueinColorado on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:38:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dear Todd - see lanny (none / 0)

I never thought of Lanny that way before, but it makes perfect sense.


by rfahey22 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:41:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Dear Todd - see lanny (none / 0)

Lanny knows the Clintons better than anyone else.  I'd believe anything he says about Hillary and Bill.  If he says she wants the VP, then she wants it.  He would never say that without her telling him it was ok to say it.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:02:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

As one who... (none / 0)

....to put it mildly, has come to hold Senator Clinton in minimum high regard. she can do a lot more for the one issue where she has some credibility, (health care) and her reputation, as a Senator than as Vice President.


by BlueinColorado on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:36:44 AM EST

What Hillary Wants (none / 0)

She wants to be president.  What she's going to find out is that there is no consolation prize which will compensate for this loss.  It will be a great sign if she's realizing that the VP slot would be a guided cage.  This wouldn't necessarily make her the presumptive nominee in 2016.  She doesn't need the bump in name recognition an unknown would.  This would, however, make it impossible for her to participate in the great issues of the day for the next eight years as anything more than a loyal soldier.  Sign of respect?  Not in the way which matters.

Now that the last race has been run, I think people will be surprised how fast she drops out of the news (if the Dems are smart would give her two weeks, tops).  She'll have her big night at the convention.  And her political future, to no small extent, will depend upon what happens in November (that she'll have one seems obvious, but what it will be is something I don't think anyone can predict today).


by IncognitoErgoSum on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:40:26 AM EST

why only two week? (none / 0)

why not two months?

please.  the race was over after Indiana.  period.  she's had enough time to reconcile to this obvious ending.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:53:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What Hillary Wants (none / 0)

Good points.  We democrats do tend to dump our losers, fairly quickly.  Notice the lack of comments from Kerry, and what ever happened to Dukakis? (Forgive me if he's died and I have forgotten.)

If Hillary isn't the VP, we won't see much of Bill and Hillary anymore.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:04:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Spot on (none / 0)

Perhaps she's struggling to define a consolation prize that ISN'T President. How clearly would any of us be thinking, after devoting a decade of your life to one goal, and having it exceed your grasp.

In college, I was part of a nationally competitive dance team (like the movie Stomp The Yard). I remember one heated contest that we thought we had in the bag. I mean, we were at the top of our form, none of the established competition was even really in the ballpark. We got blown out by a relatively unknown group who put together an amazing show.

Watching them get the trophy, I can honestly say I didn't really believe what was happening. It was like I was expecting the judges to say "HAHA, we're just kidding" and award US the trophy. It was deeply surreal, and it probably didn't sink in until the next day. Some of the team, I think, never really accepted the fact that we lost.

That was roughly four months worth of preparation. Imagine if it had been a decade's worth?


by Neef on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 11:07:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

No need to concede tonigh (2.00 / 1)

But there was a need to train her guns on McCain.

It was perfectly fine to tout her accomplishments and her never-say-die attitude. As Obama graciously put it, he is a stronger candidate because of her.

But she gave no indication that the real opponent moving forward is John McCain.  She acted as if she was still making a case for superdelegates to come to her. Her tone was ungracious.

She did not need to concede the election - not in a setting like that. But she should have been much more gracious toward the nominee. Instead, she looked like a sore loser. And that's something that will haunt her for a very long time unless she redresses that soon.


by elrod on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:40:30 AM EST

I think your right about her not conceding tonight (none / 0)

Nobody really cares if she concedes tonight or a week from now, just as long as she concedes soon and we can unite the party.


John McCain wants you to be poor!
by nklein on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:40:56 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

Oh and as far as VP.

She shouldn't take it and she shouldn't insist that it is offered to her.

She'll have much more power in the Senate now and can use it to leverage for her UHC plan, insuring her place in history for eternity.

She would also walk, into the White House in 2016, scratch that, be carried into the White House on velvet pillows.

VP would be beneath her and if I were Obama, I wouldn't want her around after she tried to undermine me in every way possible.


by TimO on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:42:37 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Lanny Davis is floating a petition to have her as VP.

But, here is a thought.  All of these Clinton people suggesting she has to be his VP are really realizing that there only path to continued power is to have her as VP.  There is a big difference to having a friend as VP and being friends with the Sen. from NY.  Even if it is Hillary.


Matthew25Network.com
by cardboard 1 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:46:56 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I'm floating a petition for Lanny Davis to shut the hell up and go away.

/signed


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:56:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary blew it (none / 0)

I don't buy this notion that she wants her concession speech to be her moment alone. I mean, it is a concession speech! This is something you want to spit out and then go on your way.

Tonight was the night to give the concession speech. You give the concession speech when you lose. It was official tonight. Obama is the Democratic nominee. You may not like it, but you put a smile on and give your full support to your party.

This should have been Obama's night. We should not be focused on  Hillary. It is a historic night. Hillary basically blew it by not recognizing his victory.


by erlin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:47:28 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

It was interesting that in Obama's speech he stressed her work on Health Care and the poor which could be paving the way for a Secretary of Health and Human Services as a much more important cabinet position.


by Piuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:47:59 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Why on earth would she want that?  Being a Senator is much better than a cabinet post.  Who the heck even knows the name of the secretary of HHS?!  I suppose it could be a way for Obama to be SURE that Hillary is never on the news again.  But she'd be a fool to give up a Senator-for-life job to be in Obama's cabinet!  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:07:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Why would she want it? (none / 0)

Her stump speeches certainly seemed to craft the impression that she -cared- for you Americans, especially by way of healthcare.  Maybe it's not about how the name appears in the position; maybe it's more about using the position to do some good.


by Mardarkin on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:52:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

She keeps this crap up, that whole senator-for-life thing may come into question. Moveon will Lamont her.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:20:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

I used to think that Hillary wanted the VP slot to set herself up for 2016, but, I agree with Incognito, and I think Fineman may ultimately turn out to be right.  

Fineman convinced me when he said that Hillary would only be a VP if she could be Dick Cheney to Obama, and that is not going to happen.  Instead, she would have to play Al Gore to Obama, the loyal wingman.  I really cannot see Hillary willing to play loyal second-fiddle for eight years in an eight year plan to run for president in 2016.  She could run in 2016 without having to be VP and shape her own legacy.  

I think the VP talk is a bluff, to give herself more leverage in getting whatever it is that she really wants from Obama.  The question is, I don't think anyone has a clue what Hillary really wants.


by ProfessorReo on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:48:57 AM EST

That's the thing (none / 0)

Even if she could be Dick Cheney to Obama (which she couldn't because it's just wrong in the first place) where would Bill Clinton be?  It's just too many personalities.  Too much distraction.  

This really needs to end.  Hillary Clinton could have been president.  She's a major character.  But it would have been a big deal having two presidents with the other major character in her family.  How do you put the two of them into the VP slot in a White House with someone like Barack Obama?  It makes absolutely no sense.  It would do nothing to advance the platform.  It would guarantee a high level of tabloid bullshit focus when we have serious work to do.  

If Hillary had won outright, that would be one thing.  But you can't jam so many personalities on this scale into the Executive.  It's just nuts to think that's a good idea.

Maybe I'm missing something and I'd be glad to have someone paint me a different picture of this.  


by Sun Dog on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:02:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's the thing (none / 0)

The thing is, Hillary would overshadow Obama, the news would always be about Hillary, and Obama couldn't handle that.


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:17:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's the thing (none / 0)

The thing is, the Clinton's would make sure that they would overshadow him just by the nature of who they are, at least on the drama front (just catch Bill's rants the last couple of days).

And Obama shouldn't have to handle that in a VP.

You can make a decent argument that Bill Clinton torpedoed Hillary Clinton's chances in the primary. Do you really think he's going to do any better for Obama?

Didn't think so.


by tysonpublic on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 09:55:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That's the thing (none / 0)

One reason Gore lost, is because he didn't want Bill to campaign for him. Bill Clinton has always been outspoken, and says what's on his mind, that's both his best and worst points. I have to say though, that if I was running for office, Bill Clinton is at the top of my list, of who I'd want talking me up, because people trust him. Bill helped Hillary, not hurt her, because even with his negatives, he is still the most popular democrat out there, and except for the Clinton hating Obama supporters, people do like and trust him.


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 10:36:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

She's queen of the armless. No pull.

Or would Obama be willing to barter the #2 slot for HRC's juggernaut general machine? Oh, wait, that's right. She has nothing but baggage.


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:55:34 AM EST

Re: She only had leverage last month. (2.00 / 2)

Nothing but baggage and those 18 million supporters.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:08:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

How many wouldn't vote for BO in the general? (none / 0)

Other than the Regan Dems and NoQuarter lunatics?

A good two thirds of those guys would probably abandon HRC after the GOP hate machine started back up in full force, anyway.


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:38:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

18 million may have voted for her. I suspect the number of her supporters that are brain dead and would follow her over the cliff is much, much smaller - small enough that I no longer care about the consequences of telling them to bite me when they threaten to damage our chances in the GE.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:21:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

Leverage follows votes and money and star power.  As long as she can keep a not insignificant number of her supporters and donors on board with her, she has loads of leverage.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:15:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She lost the contest, is in debt... (none / 0)

but I guess she still has Speilberg and Saban?


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:43:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

That's a really fucked up comment. Queen of the armless? No pull?  You're sick.


by Jeter on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:14:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

How so? She has zero G.E. machine in place, yet her underlings claim she's indispensable in the G.E.

She's millions in debt, yet her underlings claim she's indispensable in the G.E.

She polarized and divided one of our most important G.E. demographics, especially when it comes to winning seats in the South, yet her underlings claim she's indispensable in the G.E.

I don't see where she can have a big hand in the G.E.


by notxjack on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:46:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She only had leverage last month. (none / 0)

It's your language. Do you know anyone who has lost their arms or another limb? So tasteless.


by Jeter on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:16:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What part of 'Our time is now' don't you get? (none / 0)

"I don't really get that, since VP would make her the presumptive nominee in 2016 and would enable her to have a high profile post from which to champion such issues as universal healthcare."

The idea is that by 2016 we aren't going to be talking about health care in the same way because we can do a hell of a lot to change it before then.  Hillary knows that too.  It's not a pet project.  It's something we can do next year.  

Hillary 'lost' something this year.  But she's a high profile Senator from New York, one of the most famous politicians in the world, in the majority, with a Democratic president whose platform and goals differ very little from her own.  


by Sun Dog on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:56:33 AM EST

I think (none / 0)

First, she didnt ruin tonight for Obama.  Maybe here in the Blogosphere she didnt do what we Obama supporters wanted but she didnt go nuclear.  Trust me, read the news, Obama won this night.  I dont think Ive seen the word historic used so much.  This is what most people see.  The news is reading it this way:

Obama = Historic Victory, Awesome
Clinton = Whats the exit strategy
McCain = Who? (or Awful or Joke)

As for Hillary, she wants one night to herself and she wants some concessions that can actually be given.  So be it.  She has political pull right now but as Todd noted, she is on a short clock.

But when (and if) she does get her night and she does concede, I think we will all be pleased with how she does it.  I believe we will see graciousness, a call for unity and a devastating attack on McCain.  She does this and we are on our way.

My guess is Thursday night (Friday night is not a good day for big news - the whole weekend news dump routine).


by pattonbt on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:58:01 AM EST

if she wanted vp (none / 0)

she would have spent time attacking McCain and praising Obama. That is, after all, what VP candidates spend all their time doing.


by vinc on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:59:47 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I think that this speech by Clinton definitely lessens the chances of her getting the VP nod. I think she probably does want to be at least considered but I think she is going about it the wrong way if she thinks she has to force him to do it. Overall, it would have been a more joyous night if she had showed a bit more acknowlegement of the situation at hand and that probably stung Obama a little.

Yesterdays rant by Bill didn't help things either. while he  could have continued to rant against Todd Purdum the VAnity Fair writer and nobody would have thought that much of it but instead he brought it around to somehow being about Obama.


by wasder on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:59:57 AM EST

Thank you, Todd. You answered a question of mine. (none / 0)

I do, however, hope it comes some time this week. If she still hasn't conceded by Friday, we really do have to start wondering what she's thinking.

My question would have been, what would it take for some people to realize that the Clintons are ready to scorch earth?  I have heard so many times that that would never happen because, well, they're just too good people, too good Democrats to ever do that.  And yet we had tonight's speech.

So we shall wait now for a concession/endorsement.  Friday.  Just as we had Friedman Units, perhaps we can call this a Todd-Unit.  How many Todd-Units until we all go, "Oh shit, they really are crazy!"


by Dumbo on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:03:24 AM EST

Re: Thank you, Todd. You answered a question of m (none / 0)

I agree, the Clintons don't take prisoners.  Will they then do everything they can, behind the scenes, to make sure Obama loses in November so that they can run again in 2012?  I wouldn't put it past them.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:10:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Thank you, Todd. You answered a question of m (none / 0)

I hope she hides it well, if she does, because I would like her to run in 2012, and would hate to see her harm her chances now.


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:20:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She doesn't want to look in her supporters faces (2.00 / 1)

and see their disappointment when she concedes.

In that way, she and Bill are very much alike. That's why he wouldn't admit what happened with Monica (I know that's a touchy subject, but I'm serious). He's a smart guy. He knew he was going to get found out once the whole thing started, but he held out from telling her the truth because he couldn't stand to admit that he'd hurt her, and he couldn't stand to see her upset.

In a similar way, Hillary must by dying inside at the thought of a room full of thousands of people who have poured their hearts into getting her elected. Being in that room, and seeing them cry when she says the words, "I have suspended my campaign," and seeing them get mad when she says, "I endorse Barack Obama." Much as people talk about her own personal ambition, I think the feeling that she let all these people down is what is really killing her.

I wouldn't be surprised if she gives her concession/endorsement speech in a very small setting


by 2501 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:07:09 AM EST

Re: She doesn't want to look in her supporters fac (none / 0)

Very interesting analysis.  Don't know if it's true at all or not, but an interesting theory I hadn't considered before.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:18:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"...her moment and hers alone." (none / 0)

And there's the rub.

It's all about her, and not unity for the Democratic party.

It's unfair of her, to drag both her supporters, and Obama's, into limbo-land until she feels "her moment and hers alone" has arrived.

A ship adrift in a sea of rhetoric & recycled clichés.
by DemsRising on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:08:54 AM EST

Video of Fineman on MSNBC (none / 0)

This is amazing.

To summarize and paraphrase, Howard says that Hillary's campaign does not just want to be offered the veep slot (which they don't really want and will refuse), but they also demand that Obama NOT offer the veep slot to another woman.  Why?  He suggests that she feels she has earned the title of Tribune of the American Democratic Women.  Giving the veep nomination to another woman would detract from that for her.

Listen to it.  Amazing.


by Dumbo on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:09:57 AM EST

Re: Video of Fineman on MSNBC (2.00 / 2)

Amazingly idiotic.  MSNBC is becoming more of a joke everyday.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:13:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Video of Fineman on MSNBC (none / 0)

Pause for one second.

Hillary is well aware the giving the VP slot to another woman appears to trivialize women by replacing one woman with another token woman.  Women will be turned off by that completely.  She's stopping the bleeding before it happens.

If Obama wants to win in November, he can't hire a "new actress" to play the role of Hillary.  It's too much of an insult.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:01:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

So if Obama chooses a woman for VP (none / 0)

Will Hillary's women supporters attack her, refuse to vote etc., and set their own cause back?

At some point some people need to realize that there are many more important things to them and the world than Hillary's career.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:08:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So if Obama chooses a woman for VP (none / 0)

That's not the issue here.  You understand the perception of impropriety I'm pointing out here?  The idea that women are fungible and interchangeable?

Please don't tell me you're completely unaware that the above perception exists re: Sebelius.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:13:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Video of Fineman on MSNBC (2.00 / 1)

Sounds like Fineman is just repeating what he's heard from inside CampHillary.

Here's to hoping he picks a woman VP from a among a good number who are qualified assets-- which I have been hoping all along, so long as it isn't Hillary with her co-president attitude and baggage.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:04:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

I don't believe the VP spot is what Hillary want's or needs. As a big supporter of her, the thing I'd like to see, is for her to stay in the senate, stay far away from Obama, but give all the help that you can to Obama during the election, but keep your independence from him. Obama without Clinton, will loose to McCain, so go ahead and campaign for him, but keep your distance, because after he's lost and has been regulated to that great democratic scrap pile, of failed standard bearers, along with Kerry, and the rest, then she'll be ready to win the nomination in 2012. If she waits until 2016, she'll be perceived as being too old. 2012 is her last chance. hang in there Hillary!!


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:11:17 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I completely agree.  She's looking ahead to 2012 and she's thinking about her supporters, all 18 million of them.


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:15:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

If she sabotages... (none / 0)

...BO's campaign she will NEVER win a presidential nomination...yeah she may keep most of her supporters but she would never gain back Obama's coalition...


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

her supporters, all 18 million of them. (none / 0)

And all 18 million she's alienated. If Obama doesn't win there will be some serious bad karma laid on Hillary for all the ugly and untrue soundbites she handed to McCain.

And don't forget. Democrats never give losers a second chance.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:45:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

So you want the Democratic nominee to lose to the Gaffe Machine, John McCain?  I'm sorry but I cannot live through four more years of this bullshit...sounds pretty selfish to me...


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:42:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (2.00 / 1)

Hoping for 4 more years of Bush/McCain just so Hillary can run another vanity campaign in 2012 is about as low as it can get.

But I agree that she should stay the hell away from Obama as she has nothing to offer but political poison and the exact opposite of what his campaign is about. By choosing her as VP, with her record of supporting the most odius aspects of the Bush/NeoCon agenda along with McCain, Obama would undercut his own record and platform of change.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:52:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Then why are we arguing? We have complete agreement, Obama and Clinton do not need each other, and Obama doesn't need bitter old low educated voters like me, that cling to their guns, etc.


by muggle on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:03:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Apparently he doesn't need me either, educated white mother of two voting age kids who all supported Hillary.  He has no intention of trying to woo us.  So be it.  That shouldn't be a problem for His Arrogancy, as long as he can dig up 18 million other voters.  

How does the man manage to look down his nose at so many, when it's so far stuck up in the air?   The man denies physics.  Or he uses his other face.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:11:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

There's a part of me that wants to see McCain win because Clintonites won't come back to the Democratic Party, then watch as the new McCain Supreme Court overturns Roe. Then they can spend the next few lifetimes in an abortion-illegal America, wondering what the heck they were thinking.


by Baseballhead on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:29:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

You're right. We don't need either one of you.


Yes. We. Did.
by pneuma on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:26:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

She's going to campaign vigorously for Obama because she knows she will take part of the blame if he does lose.

I also wouldn't count out a 2016 run as long as she is healthy.  I remember one of the pundits talking about the Clintons, how they love politics, love meeting people, and told the person considering running for president it would be the most fun they had in their entire life.  The point being, this what they love to do.  If she is capable of running in 2016, she will because that is what the Hillary and the Clintons love to do.


by Double Standard on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:58:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

No problem.  If Obama loses the media will blame the Clintons regardless.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:13:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

LOL Did anyone catch Lanny Davis on Larry King?  He was in the room where Clinton gave her speech earlier and they were tearing down the setup. It was noisy and workmen kept walking behind him and getting in the shot.  During a cut away you could see him turn around like he almost got smacked.  I was laughing so hard I didn't hear anything anyone was saying.

And I am a Clinton supporter..but it was the comical beyond belief.


by JustJennifer on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:24:43 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

Wasn't that just the perfect, pathetic, ending to her campaign?  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:14:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

There's no way she could have conceded tonight (2.00 / 1)

Not in front of that crowd. She'll sit down one on one with Obama, things will get hashed out, and she'll throw her weight fully behind him by the end of the week, and endorse in front of a friendlier crowd.

Her website shoots you to a donation form after you've submitted your form letter of support. She's got two more days to get some cash, and I don't blame her for trying for it.

I completely agree that her leverage is only going to last a few days though. Support is going to start to leak the longer she waits.


by upstate girl on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:25:19 AM EST

Re: There's no way she could have conceded tonight (none / 0)

Support for what will leak?  Most of her supporters want her to continue to the convention.  The media turned against her months ago, as did the DNC.  What's she got to lose?  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:16:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

"Come on, tonight was Obama's night?" (2.00 / 1)

You wouldn't have known it by he way she made a point of trying to bigfoot the news cycle with her VP and, "I got more votes," nonsense. If she does want the VP, she and Bill have done her no favors in that regard over the past couple of days.

But Obama bigfooted her and McSame instead by launching his campaign against Bush III with one of the best non convention/inauguration speeches ever in front of a convention sized audience.

Here's to a history making day for America and the world.

Now lets see some REAL Obama/McBush polls!


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:39:34 AM EST

This could get embarrassing for her.. (none / 0)

SD's today:

Clinton: -7.5
Obama: 67.5

If she continues to hold out, she lose many more SD's...


Toot, thank you for raising such a terrific person...You done good and we will have you in our hearts.
by hootie4170 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:40:30 AM EST

Re: Fineman: CHill dude. (2.00 / 1)

We are such a rush... rush society. Relax, take a damn chill pill and let her leave with fucking dignity.  Please.  Ok we get it, Obama will be the Nominee.  Can she at least savor her last victory??? My God Howard Fineman, and the rest of these JOKES like Keith Olberman are gutter rats that are chasing a story that DOESN'T exist.


by nzubechukwu on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:46:27 AM EST

Re: Fineman: CHill dude. (none / 0)

She's had tons of time to concede... TONS!!!  "just give her some time.. give her some time!"  It's been over since February!  No more time!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:52:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: CHill dude. (none / 0)

How about letting her 18 million supporters have a few days too?  Her speech tonight was for them, and they very much appreciated it.  

If Obama and democrat leaders put pressure on Hillary, they risk losing even more of her supporters.  And for what?  What's the rush?  What difference will another week make?  

Piss off Hillary supporters enough, and watch the convention dissolve into chaos.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:19:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: SUPER whatever.... (none / 0)

1 more thing.  Super Delegates are cowards.  Half of them don't even publicly announce, rather jump on the bandwagon when it's already left the damn building. lol...


by nzubechukwu on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:48:55 AM EST

Re: SUPER whatever.... (none / 0)

There's a lot of hesitation to endorse.  It's not about Hillary.  It's about wanting to be tarred with Farrakhan/Pfleger/Obama/Wright/Michelle/ etc. when the ship sinks over the summer.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 01:59:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: SUPER whatever.... (none / 0)

If that was a legitimate concern the supers would have made Hillary the nominee. That ship sailed with the Indiana/North Carolina primaries.

No they are just spineless and want Hillary to make it easy and concede so they can declare without pissing anybody off.


by hankg on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:20:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

VP? (none / 0)

I find it hard to believe she wants the VP slot. By aggressively and publicly strong arming Obama she has made it impossible for him to even consider her. He would look weak. How could he face up to the bad guys if he can get pushed around by the candidate he beat.

Having watched her speech it looks like she wants to stoke the resentment in her supporters and box him into a no win situation. He offers it he looks spineless if he doesn't offer it then her supporters will be even more pissed off.

I really thought that once there was a winner that she would do the right thing. Maybe I'm missreading it but she managed to sabotage his GE kick off speech. All the networks are talking about is Hillary. Historic win for Obama? Speech in front of 30,000+ answering McCains attacks? who cares. The Clinton Obama soap opera is so much more gossip worthy for the tabloid media and the punditocracy.


by hankg on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:13:04 AM EST

Re: VP? (none / 0)

Agreed.  Someone mentioned that Walter Mondale faced much the same problem.  He chose Geraldine Ferraro out of pressure from her supporters.

Ugly.


by 08AMA on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:47:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Fineman talks out of his a... (2.00 / 1)

Is this the same Howard Fineman who said Elizabeth Edwards would endorse Hillary and campaign with her in North Carolina - another assinine statement from his supposed "sources."

Fineman's track record with this insider stuff is horrendous.

Rub a Magic 8 Ball for answers and you'll get better results.


by GregNYC on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:15:53 AM EST

"she only has leverage this week." (none / 0)

She's so ham fisted that her leverage is imaginary.

If Obama chose her after all these manipulative and bullying  games in front of the whole world he would labeled a "capitulating appeaser."


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:25:00 AM EST

Re: "she only has leverage this week." (none / 0)

When it comes to making the VP choice, I certainly do not envy Barack Obama.  He has an exceedingly difficult decision to make.  As much as I do not want Clinton on the ticket, I'm beginning to wonder how he can get away with NOT choosing her.

There's a lot of drama left in this process and Hillary's gonna be right in the middle of it all.  Guaranteed.


by 08AMA on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:45:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "she only has leverage this week." (none / 0)

He probably can't win without her. She has more supporters than he does and we despise him. I'll write her name in before I'll vote for him.


by glitterannebegay on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:20:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "she only has leverage this week." (none / 0)

Many of the people who talk in such strong terms have said they won't vote for Obama even if she is offered VP.  In my opinion the vast majority of HRC supporters will migrate to Obama by November.  Some will refuse to vote for him, but I think many of those would do the same even with her on the ticket.  

Of course, I'm just going by what I read here, which is probably grave folly.


by semiquaver on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:29:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "she only has leverage this week." (none / 0)

He probably can't win without her. SHE can't win regardless.

It's over! Get over it! Sheesh.


by Baseballhead on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:36:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Maybe McCain will send you a card of thanks (none / 0)


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:40:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: "she only has leverage this week." (2.00 / 1)

I agree, if doesn't put her on the ticket, he's toast.  But that means he has to change his whole campaign.  It can't be about change if he's taking the Clintons along. Plus, he's stuck with Hillary AND Bill.  Not good for the campaign.  If he doesn't take Clinton, he risks pissing off even more of her 18 million supporters.  He's in a lose-lose situation.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:23:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Just the opposite (none / 0)

"I'm beginning to wonder how he can get away with NOT choosing her."

He can't get away with caving in to her blackmailish strategems.

There will probably be a few cranks disappointed enough to either not vote or vote for McSame if she's not VP. But just as many or more voters will be just as turned off if she is on his ticket. Obama is best served to pick the VP who is right for him, not right for Hillary.

She also undermines Obama's Iraq position since she voted in lockstep with Bush/McCain. Any WarDem on the ticket will weaken him.

"There's a lot of drama left in this process and Hillary's gonna be right in the middle of it all."

The drama queen can't be stopped from playing her game, more to her own continuing detriment than Obama's. But he can't give in to her any more than a parent should to a tantrum throwing child.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:38:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just the opposite (none / 0)

Yeah, Obama doesn't need all her screaming women supporters.  He'll just need to pick up some other 18 million supporters.  


by SueBee on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:25:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just the opposite (none / 0)

There are only a few Hillary cultists who will drink the koolaid. The massive majority of her supporters are sensible people who not only realize that nothing is worse that Bush the Third, but will come to see Obama's many wonderful assets and qualities now that he isn't being attacked by a Democrat.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 11:02:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just the opposite (none / 0)

Most HRC-supporting women will understand that voting for McCain, or abstaining, or writing in HRC's name in November is helping to put one of the most anti-women candidates in history in the Oval Office.

This is the man who called his wife "the c-word" in front of a reporter.

This is the man who said overturning "Roe v. Wade" would be a good idea.

This is a man who has repeatedly voted against wage protection legislation for women.

So yes, I understand that some women who previously supported Clinton will vote for McCain or not vote at all.

However, it will be a tiny fraction.  Because the stakes are too high.  The next President could nominate as many as 3 justices to the Supreme Court.

America won't take that chance.


by erzeszut on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:04:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I reckon she misjudged the swells and jumped anyhow.  Pride cometh before the fall.  The Hillary as VP meme is DOA after her most recent effort and it seems her inner circle knows it, from the looks on their faces today.


by Shaun Appleby on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 02:45:01 AM EST

Isn't (none / 0)

saying "I don't want to be VP" what you're supposed to do if you want the job?


by semiquaver on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:34:04 AM EST

Re: Isn't (none / 0)

Then saying she wants the job, as she did today, must mean she DOESN'T want it.

Now that that's settled, let's move on to McCain.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 03:44:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

timelines don't match (none / 0)

I've seen indications from the Obama campaign that they want to take a good few weeks to decide on the VP, which seems reasonable; HRC may or may not be one of the people they're seriously considering - I don't know - but if they announce it this week it will look as if she's blackmailed him into giving her the slot, and that is something Obama should not and (I hope) will not accept. However, if she remains silent and refuses to concede beyond the few days' grace period people are ready to give her then I think she will come under enormous pressure from all sections of the party, including her erstwhile supporters, and effectively destroy her own political career as well as undermining the party. Obama may well promise to CONSIDER her for VP and various other sweeteners in return for her endorsement, but he certainly should not go further than that. She is really negotiating from a position of weakness, and if she doesn't realise that she's less of a pro than I give her credit for.


by al1 on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 04:38:41 AM EST

Re: timelines don't match (none / 0)

With due respect he's not in the strongest negotiating position. If he doesn't offer the veep slot she can just return to the senate, go through the motions, and no one other than the Obama fans seeking an excuse for is defeat will think any the less of her. She'll be re-elected as senator from NY so how does this destroy her political career. She's not going to run against him just let him paddle his own canoe.    


by ottovbvs on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:13:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: timelines don't match (none / 0)

With due respect he's not in the strongest negotiating position. If he doesn't offer the veep slot she can just return to the senate, go through the motions, and no one other than the Obama fans seeking an excuse for is defeat will think any the less of her. She'll be re-elected as senator from NY so how does this destroy her political career. She's not going to run against him just let him paddle his own canoe.    


by ottovbvs on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:13:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

The Kabuki Theater would be important for Hillary supporters.  But I think she really would want it, unless she is sure he will lose now and be out of the way in 2012.


by Bob H on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 06:31:55 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama (none / 0)

I've seen Fineman make so many dumb pronouncements why should this one be treated with special respect.


by ottovbvs on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:08:55 AM EST

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

TOO OLD.  Hillary is borderline too old to be elected in 2008.  If Hillary ran in 2016 it would look like some fossilized FSU leader (or McCain who is too old for the job.)  What you seem to not get is that this is Hillary's only shot.  2016 will go to someone younger or same age as Obama.


by bakho on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 08:19:35 AM EST

Et tu, Beeton? (none / 0)

Beeton says: "I agree with Chuck Todd: "she only has leverage this week.""

She's being forced out of the race EVERY SINGLE WEEK since Iowa.  It's amazing that she's still around.

If she doesn't concede this week, she'll still have leverage-- there's still DENVER, remember?

I don't understand why everyone LOVES to tell her what's the right thing to do.

Look, she earned it.  Didn't Kennedy, Obama's own hero, go to the convention many hundreds of delegates behind to challenge a sitting president?


by Sieglinde on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 09:35:35 AM EST

Re: Et tu, Beeton? (none / 0)

Kennedy did.  And in doing so, contributed to Carter's loss in 1980.

I'm not saying it's the only reason Carter lost.  But it sure didn't help!!

If HRC cares more about herself than her party or her country, she'll carry the fight to Denver.

I'm an optimist, so I choose to believe that she'll do the right thing and admit that the charade of her winning the nomination is over.  This race essentially ended on Super Tuesday.


by erzeszut on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:07:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Fineman: Neither Obama Nor Clinton Wants Hilla (none / 0)

I don't see how 2016 works.

She'll be 68. McCain is 71 and we have a lot of undercurrent noting that he is too old. I know women live longer and presumably healthier lives than a man so that HRC at 71 will be more vigorous and robust than McCain is now, but won't the same "too old" undercurrent apply to her too?


by MNPundit on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 10:30:40 AM EST

Pick HER night, BHO can go on an hour earlier... (none / 0)

Only seems fair, right?  Represent EVERY voter?

Let HER night be a shared night like she made his.

I'm sorry to disrupt party unity, but the egotism simply has to stop.

Has anyone else read the shrub's congratulation message?  The first classy move I've ever seen out of him.  Quite a contrast.


by Eman on Wed Jun 04, 2008 at 12:46:34 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.