Bush Started Looking For Bin Laden When?

White House Press Secretary Dana Perino at today's briefing, in response to the blockbuster New York Times report about the stalled hunt for bin Laden:

"The president has been looking for Osama bin Laden since September 12th. That effort has never let up. And we are dealing with very dangerous terrain, difficult physical environment, very secretive people hiding in caves, an enemy that respects no uniform, respects no civilians, just absolutely wants destruction."

September 12th?

Richard Clarke, from 2004:

"There's a lot of blame to go around, and I probably deserve some blame, too. But on January 24th, 2001, I wrote a memo to Condoleezza Rice asking for, urgently -- underlined urgently -- a Cabinet-level meeting to deal with the impending al Qaeda attack. And that urgent memo-- wasn't acted on.

"I blame the entire Bush leadership for continuing to work on Cold War issues when they back in power in 2001. It was as though they were preserved in amber from when they left office eight years earlier. They came back. They wanted to work on the same issues right away: Iraq, Star Wars. Not new issues, the new threats that had developed over the preceding eight years."

Clarke finally got his meeting about al Qaeda in April, three months after his urgent request. But it wasn't with the president or cabinet. It was with the second-in-command in each relevant department.

For the Pentagon, it was Paul Wolfowitz.

Clarke relates, "I began saying, 'We have to deal with bin Laden; we have to deal with al Qaeda.' Paul Wolfowitz, the Deputy Secretary of Defense, said, 'No, no, no. We don't have to deal with al Qaeda. Why are we talking about that little guy? We have to talk about Iraqi terrorism against the United States.'
...
Clarke says Mr. Clinton ordered his Cabinet to go to battle stations-- meaning, they went on high alert, holding meetings nearly every day.

That, Clarke says, helped thwart a major attack on Los Angeles International Airport, when an al Qaeda operative was stopped at the border with Canada, driving a car full of explosives.

Clarke harshly criticizes President Bush for not going to battle stations when the CIA warned him of a comparable threat in the months before Sept. 11: "He never thought it was important enough for him to hold a meeting on the subject, or for him to order his National Security Adviser to hold a Cabinet-level meeting on the subject."

And remember the August 6th, 2001 PDB Bush received:

   
BEN-VENISTE: Isn't it a fact, Dr. Rice, that the August 6 PDB warned against possible attacks in this country? And I ask you whether you recall the title of that PDB [President's Daily Brief]?

RICE: I believe the title was, "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States."

According to Perino, Bush got the memo one month and six days before he started "looking" for bin Laden.

Perhaps a good reminder that Democrats should never, ever run from a fight on national security.



Display:


Re: Bush Started Looking For Bin Laden When? (2.00 / 1)

well, if I recall, Bush "really isn't that concerned about him," so, hey, if he's not concerned, that's good enough for me.


by Todd Beeton on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 04:32:43 PM EST

Re: Bush Started Looking For Bin Laden When? (none / 0)

Yes, this is a reminder of how the Democrats should never run from a fight on national security.

But they always do in your eyes, so why should they bother?


by spirowasright on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 05:28:03 PM EST

Re: Bush Started Looking For Bin Laden When? (none / 0)

Yes, this is a reminder of how the Democrats should never run from a fight on national security.

But they always run in your eyes, so why should they bother?


by spirowasright on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 05:28:41 PM EST

I really would have preferred ..... (2.00 / 1)

that an Obama spokesman would comment on this 'in the news' story rather than  undercutting the words from Wes Clark yesterday.

This story, as diaried, deserves commentary from Obama, because McCain will simply be Bush 3.  However, we had to see a voluntary statement undercutting truthful words from one of the good guys on our side, instead of a forceful statement about this issue.

Why?


Hell's bells, even the GOP didn't have to crucify Eisenhower's record in order to make Reagan their 'saint'. We can have two great ones, you know?
by emsprater on Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 05:38:00 PM EST

Re: Bush Started Looking For Bin Laden When? (none / 0)

Here's a good take on the story.

http://www.democracyarsenal.org/2008/06/ bush-administra.html


by wjr24 on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 09:36:12 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.