Bill Clinton is awesome.

Crossposted at BIG ORANGE SEXY TIME HIGH FIVE!

No, this is not a troll diary or snark: I'm serious.

Bill Clinton is awesome. He's the most human president we'll ever have. He sometimes makes mistakes. He lets his (many) passions get the best of him on occasion. And sure, he seems a bit overwhelmed by the youtube-style campaign. But the man is still awesome. And I support him, no matter what he said in the HEATED primary. I love this man. He represented hope and progress to so many people (including myself).

This is what unity is, folks. It's forgiving heated political debate during a primary and reaching out to the other side. The burden is on the WINNERS to be cordial and forgiving, NOT the losers.

Sure, Clinton got heated in this primary. Sure, he said some things that ticked us off. But this is his wife we're talking about here. Read that again: His wife was running for President. Is it really that shocking that he got into some heated and unfortunate exchanges?

Unfortunately, Obama forced to run against the Clinton years (to a certain extent) because he was running against a Clinton juggernaut. He had no choice, really. That's politics. That was the reality of the situation. This is a major reason why Bill is still a bit miffed. We should first admit this, and then admit that Bill has the right to feel a bit estranged by his party after this primary. He has the right to be a bit saddened. A small part of Obama's message was to turn the page on the Clinton years. I'm not saying Obama shouldn't have gone there (he had to), but it's understandable that Bill would be hurt by this. He's a proud man (as he should be - just look at how marvelous Chelsea turned out).

But let's get back to my main point: Bill Clinton is AWESOME. Look at what his foundation is doing. Bill Clinton has taken the model established by Jimmy Carter (for ex-presidents) and taken it to a whole new level. This campaign was a blip in his otherwise marvelous career, and we need to forgive it. We need to forget it. We need to move on and go back to worshiping Bill Clinton because he has many great deeds ahead of him.

Some folks say, "Why won't Bill give Obama his full support IMMEDIATELY? He's an ex-President and a Democrat. He's supposed to be above bitterness."

To that, I say, "His WIFE just lost. HIS WIFE JUST LOST!!! Get off his back. Give him some time. If, come November, Bill hasn't lifted a finger, then we can revisit this issue. But, for now, give him some time."

Bill Clinton is awesome. Campaigns are sometimes bitter. It's time we started remembering that if we're really serious about party unity.



Display:


Tips appreciated (2.00 / 21)

Mainly because I love keeping TU status so I can laugh at the hidden comments (always hilarious!)


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:42:00 AM EST

Thanks for this diary, Lance. Rec'd... (2.00 / 1)


Obama supporter working to defeat McCain.
by Rumarhazzit on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:17:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This DIARY is awesome. (2.00 / 3)

Rec'd.


by Scan on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:47:25 AM EST

one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (2.00 / 4)

is that good people believe the bullshit that Clinton said anything wrong during the primaries.

Otherwise very good diary!


by Teacher1956 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:48:41 AM EST

Re: one of the reasons I (2.00 / 12)

Obama said things that were wrong during the primaries. I didn't like the rhetoric about universal healthcare mandates. It really hurt our chances at acheiving a good public policy position. But that's the way it goes. I supported him strongly.

But I think it's worth admiting that Bill Clinton said things that were wrong during the primaries...there isn't a racist bone in Bill Clinton's body, but he made some statements that were pretty cynical...after the Jesse Jackson thing, Bill Clinton could have come forth and said, "Look, I know how that sounded. It sounded like I was belittling Obama as a black man's candidate. I'm apologize for that impression. That's not what I meant. That's not what I believe. I was just down after a blowout and looking for a historical reference to show that SC isn't everything." Bill's stubbornness (one of his best and worst traits) probably kept him from going there.

I don't really want to rehash that debate...because I don't think Bill MEANT to be cynical (and he certainly isn't even .0001% racist). But I just wish he had admited that he created an impression that was a bit unfortunate.

At any rate...crap...here I've gone and written a whole paragraph rehashing old fights...stupid stupid stupid!!!:)

Thanks for your comment...I understand how you feel that way.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:56:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Here we go..wait for it... (2.00 / 2)

 thread hijak


by Mae Scott on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:23:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

While I don't care about his Primary remarks (none / 0)

I still condemn the racist criminal justice policies he enacted as President.




Democratic Candidate, US Senate, Wisconsin 2012
by benmasel on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:09:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I (none / 0)

Bill Clinton didn't say one wrong thing. The Jesse Jackson comparison was completely legitimate and a reasonable thing to say. If anyone has a problem with what he said it is THEIR problem not Bill Clinton's.

Reporter: "is Obama so good that it takes the two of you to beat him?"

Bill Clinton walking away to his car: "Jesse Jackson won here in 1984 & 1988, he ran a good race here, Obama has run a good race here, he's run a good race EVERYWHERE, but there are still many congests to go"

That was Bill Clinton downplaying his wife's opponents win. Jesse Jackson was seen as a one-hit wonder so it was a perfect comparison for that purpose. Again, he was not cheerleading for Obama, that wasn't his job. That man was advocating for his wife and he didn't say one thing that was remotely wrong.

Jesse Jackson said the comment was perfectly fine because it obviously was.

Just because the media or anyone else repeats the same nonsense over and over again doesn't make it true. Neiter Bill or Hillary Clinton said anything remotely racists or race-bating.


by mmorang on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:33:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I (1.50 / 4)

Sure, that's the obtuse way of looking at it.  Regardless of Bill Clinton's intent (no one can speak to that except Bill Clinton), the statement offended a lot of people.

I can call your father a motherf**ker, and although that's technically accurate, I'm sure I would offend you and most reasonable people would say I should apologize.


by shalca on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:37:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I (none / 0)

And you think that's a reasonable comparison?


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:26:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

There were better examples (2.00 / 3)

He might have mentioned John Edwards in 2004, who like Jackson won SC but didn't get the nomination. He could have mentioned past winners like Al Gore in 2000, or himself in 1992. He chose to go back to Jackson's campaign for reasons that may not have been conscious, but were hard to miss. Having already won an upset in Iowa, SC demonstrated that Obama was clearly not a "one-hit wonder."

Bill's comment used an unfortunate and unnecessary example in an effort to diminish his wife's opponent, and it backfired badly.


"The world is a mess, and I just need to rule it." -- Dr. Horrible
by BobzCat on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:49:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: There were better examples (none / 0)

Ya, he could have mentioned many people but he didn't. His comment was aimed at downplaying Obama's win. There is nothing wrong with Jesse Jackson. The idea that Clinton was trying to make the point that Obama is the "black" candidate is absurd. Everyone already knew that. Plus, the Clinton campaign didn't send his quote out to the whole world the Obama campaign did.

It's hardly fair to extract the worse possible meaning of his statement and then attribute that to him unless you're a a-hole who has no sense of fair play.


by mmorang on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 09:08:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (1.85 / 7)

I think that supporters from BOTH sides read far more into what each candidate (and their surrogates) said.

Personally I don't hold this against Obama OR Clinton.
Kinda ridiculous to do so...no matter who you supported.


by Kysen on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:56:13 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (none / 0)

Poor little Latinovoter...striking out the only way he knows how.
It's actually kinda cute.
Kinda like when my niece throws a temper-tantrum...even though you know it is wrong and childish, you can't help but grin.  ;)
by Kysen on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:35:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (2.00 / 10)

Yikes! Believing Bill Clinton said nothing wrong during the primaries would be like me, an Obama supporter, saying none of his surrogates said anything wrong. Or for that matter Obama said nothing wrong. I would be deluding myself.

Politicians, just like you and me. occasionally  open their mouths and insert their feet. Bill is no different . Does this make him a bad person, nope just human.

There were times both as President and surrogate for Hillary that I loved him and there were times I wished I could smack him up side the head. I would also say the same for some Obama surrogates.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:59:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (1.37 / 8)

There is a consistent theme among Team Obama to discredit the Clinton legacy in one form or another.

You continue that theme.


by dtaylor2 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:01:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (2.00 / 4)

By saying he isn't perfect. LOL


by Becky G on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:07:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Huh? (2.00 / 12)

Huh? Not sure how you get this from what I wrote. I said I liked and still do Bill Clinton in fact when he was President really liked him. However there were times I thought he did some things I wanted to smack him for. How is that dissing him. I also said the same about Obama. I thought I was pretty damn even handed.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:07:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (2.00 / 8)

"There is a consistent theme among Team Obama to discredit the Clinton legacy in one form or another."

Yep. Obama was running against a Clinton. Big surprise that he was highlighting (in a small way) some of very small problems of the Clinton years! HUGE SURPRISE!!!

And the Clintons were (you guessed it) defending the Clinton years!!! Wow!!! I'm going to need to sit down after realizing this.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:07:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: one of the reasons I can barely stand Obama (2.00 / 4)

So saying that Bill Clinton is imperfect is "discredit[ing] the Clinton legacy"?

Clinton's legacy is that he's perfect?

Get a grip.  He's a man, not a deity.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:58:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

and this is why I will find it very hard (1.83 / 6)

to vote for Obama.  Bill Clinton said nothing wrong or racist.  Did he criticize Obama, sure just as Obama criticized him and Hillary.  But the whole manufactured controversy over race is sickening to me still.


by Teacher1956 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:16:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and this is why I will find it very hard (2.00 / 9)

A lot of African-Americans heard it differently and saw his words as racially charged.  At the very least, I think Bill Clinton needs to acknowledge and deal with that.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: and this is why I will find it very hard (2.00 / 1)

I'm uprating you, but you're wrong.  I don't tolerate men telling me what is and is not sexually charged, and I don't see why white people keep insisting that they be the final arbiters of what racism is.

Besides, I was annoyed at the same things that most people were annoyed at.


by MeganLocke on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:26:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (none / 0)

So what you are saying is that Bill Clinton is unfit emotionally to seperate business from personal agenda. While he is doing a lot of good in his "Elder Statesman years" we still have to look at the fact that Bill Clinton has some anger issues. Those issues kept secret during his presidency, do not seem to serve him well in years as an elder statesman.He is not wholly but at least partially responsible for the fracture, and divide in this Party.


John McCain: Everyones nowhere man
by johnny sexton on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:51:22 AM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 5)

Wow.
That is totally not what I read.
Did you get a different copy?
by Kysen on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:57:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (none / 0)

This is what I read copied from diary word for word " That was the reality of the situation. This is a major reason why Bill is still a bit miffed. We should first admit this, and then admit that Bill has the right to feel a bit estranged by his party after this primary. He has the right to be a bit saddened." and "To that, I say, "His WIFE just lost. HIS WIFE JUST LOST!!! That would seem to me like he can't seperate personal issues from business issues, unless you read a different diary.


John McCain: Everyones nowhere man
by johnny sexton on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:36:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.75 / 8)

In all honesty----divide in this party was nancy pelosi's constant statements of such divide, jim 'I'm the as corrupt as they come " Clyburn and many others in this party. Who made it their mission to repeatedly attack clintons personally...


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:58:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.50 / 8)

TR'ed for a baseless attack on the No. 3 Dem in the House.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:00:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.22 / 9)

TR'ed for your support of Pelosi's attack on democracy.

Count 1:  Lying about what Super Delegates role is under color of authority

Count 2:  Supporting a stance that Florida popular vote should not factor into the popular vote.

I will not stand with anyone who defends Pelosi.


by dtaylor2 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:03:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.71 / 7)

TR'd for TR abuse.


by HardWorkingWhitePerson on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:18:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.80 / 5)

"I will not stand with anyone who defends Pelosi!"

Haha, your mask just fell right the fuck off.


by MeganLocke on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:27:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.40 / 5)

BLue I Tr'ed you for being ill- informed.  JIM CLYBURN  just got called last week...for breaking the law by giving earmarks of tax payer money to the tunes of millions, to his family members.


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:11:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.75 / 8)

TR'd for tr abuse.


by HardWorkingWhitePerson on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:20:27 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.83 / 6)

Loyal Democrats don't bash their Party's leaders based on thin gruel like the type you are trying to serve us.  

Anyone who isn't a concern troll might find this article  helpful in deciding how much bullshit A&K is serving up.  See how easy that is?    


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:18:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (none / 0)

Good rapid response! You shall have mojo.


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 07:32:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 8)

I don't remember THAT many personal attacks on the Clintons. Jesse Jackson Jr. basically was sent to the corner to wear the dunce cap after he made that moronic statement about Hillary crying.

Were there personal attacks on the Clintons? Yeah. That's politics. Were there personal attacks on Obama? Yeah. That's politics.

Hey - I could live off of spite and water for 30 days, but that's not going to keep McCain out of the whitehouse.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:01:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I wonder why you don't (2.00 / 3)

remember that many personal attacks on the Clintons.

I remember Barack trying to smear Bill Clinton when his campaign lied about him and said he was getting paid to give speeches on 9-11.

And JJjr got sent to the corner after the race baiting and damage had been done. And after he got sent to the corner his job was to strong arm black superdelegates into voting for Barack and threatening them with primary opponents.


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:17:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder why you don't (2.00 / 6)

Are you kidding?

Do you think any black people actually heard what JJjr said and were like, "Wow, he has a point. She never cried after Katrina!"

No. Black people are not the morons that you think they are. They heard that statement and (like everyone else), they felt bad for Hillary Clinton and wondered why Jesse would say something so stupid.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:21:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Anger issues (2.00 / 6)

Dude - yeah, Bill Clinton has anger issues:) Not a newsflash! He blows up at people and has some hilarious flip outs. I know former staffers - there are funny stories:)

But his situation is unprecedented. Never have we had a wife of a former president run for office. Bush Sr. doesn't count it's really a different thing. He was too old to hit the campaign trail, and his party didn't like him anyway.

Bill needs some time.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:59:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 3)

I don't think I can give Big Dog any kudos just yet but I will say that I was very impressed by Chelsea this campaign season.  I hope she can get back on the campaign trail after the convention.  She did a great job at the colleges.  


Consider that everything which happens, happens justly, and if thou observest carefully, thou wilt find it to be so. -Marcus Aurelius
by Blue Neponset on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 10:58:04 AM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 4)

I will always love the Clintons - no doubt about it.  Sure, Bill gets heated, but this was for his wife.  I'd be pissed too.  I, as a Clinton supporter, still find myself struggling with the Obama message, and thus I can totally understand Bill's reluctance to do much for Obama as of yet.  But, I think he'll come around.


by ejintx on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:03:49 AM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.14 / 7)

I pray Bill doesn't come around unless Obama selects Hillary as VP.

Half the democratic party just stabbed the other half in the back and unless Obama is going to take his knife out there is no reason to play nice.


by dtaylor2 on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:10:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (none / 0)

Half the democratic party just stabbed the other half in the back

Huh?  It was an election.  One person won and everyone else didn't win, because that's how elections work.  Nobody was stabbed in the back.  Get a grip.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:52:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 1)

Hillary Clinton's "half" are already supporting Obama, just as the reverse would have been true had she won.  I don't know what you're talking about.


by MeganLocke on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:50:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Great diary. (2.00 / 5)

Crossposted at BIG ORANGE SEXY TIME HIGH FIVE!

I LOL'd.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:12:51 AM EST

Re: Great diary. (2.00 / 2)

ha thanks. They didn't like it so much over there.

I tend to agree with that community more than this one (that's probably an understatement), but this community is impressing me more lately...

This was always a place where Clinton/Obama supporters could debate, which made it unique.


by Lance Bryce on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:23:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

BIG ORANGE SEXY TIME HIGH FIVE! (2.00 / 2)

classic.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:43:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 3)

You know, I had all sorts of quibbles with this diary -- just minor ones, but quibbles none the lest -- until I read this: just look at how marvelous Chelsea turned out.

And that just puts everything else in perspective.  Nice diary.  Recced.


by hello world on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:13:00 AM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (1.50 / 6)

I voted for Bill Clinton the first time with optimism and a sense that he was going to be a great president.

I voted for him the second time, after his denial of the genocide in Rwanda, and after some other terrible policy failures, holding my nose.

I always really liked Hillary Clinton and voted for her for senator, but in examining why I did not automatically vote for her in the primary, Bill's failings came up front and center.  He dismantled part of the New Deal structure that kept the financial markets safe.  He called the genocide in Rwanda genocide-like.  I know it is not popular to mention his personal failings but his behavior as a man (not president, man) was sexist and degrading to his family.  

He has a great mind in service to a needy personality.  He could have been a fantastic presiddent but something in his character prevented that.  

One other thing:  As far as Chelsea who seems like a lovely young woman.  What father, what good father, puts his kid though the public scrutiny of his sex life with someone about her age.  I can't imagine a lousier thing to do to your family.  

This is not being written to pointlessly trash Bill Clinton, he has many good qualities and some things flourished during his presidency.  Let's just not romanticize this man though.  

I believe Hillary would have been a much better president than her husband and support her for VP.  I don't think her alliance/marriage has helped her a great deal though.  


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:30 AM EST

Probably the same (1.00 / 6)

kind of father that takes their kids to a church where someone like Rev. Wright and Rev. Meeks preach their divisive crap from the pulpit.


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (2.00 / 2)

I almost did not post because I new, in spite of the fact that this had nothing to do with Obama, someone would troll rate me.  I hope you enjoyed getting that off your chest.  I was not ranting, nor did I say anything vindictive, just my own assessment.  I guess that is not permitted these days though.  Oh well.


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:02:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (2.00 / 2)

new=knew


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:03:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (2.00 / 2)

I suppose censorship because of fear of ratings is the way to go here now, no?  I never troll rate, if I disagree with someone I am explicit about it in a post.  I guess it is easier just to run the comments section blasting away as one chooses.


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:05:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (2.00 / 1)

Would have been fine were it not for one line.
I'll let you figure out which line it was.

Other than that....keep posting, don't let tr's bother ya.


by Kysen on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:07:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (none / 0)

Look, you troll rated me then tell me not to mind being troll rated and to figure out why?  I don't really get any of this.  Too much game playing.


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:27:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (2.00 / 2)

Not meaning to play games....just not trying to inflame things further.

As to me telling you not to mind being tr'd....when I replied, based on your typo, I thought that you were new to the site. Was trying to encourage you (the presumed 'newbie') to continue posting and not be upset by being tr'd on your 'first' comment (granted, I could have checked your history...but, I didn't).

Big picture, I think that you know exactly why you were tr'd....no need to hash it out any further. I apologize for presuming you to be newbie and, as such, trying to give some encouraging words.


by Kysen on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:34:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (none / 0)

Okay, then please tell me how to be critical of Bill Clinton without getting troll rated?  I think others have had the same problem with a reasoned post critical of Hillary or Obama getting TR'd.  I'm not a troll.  There are no falsehoods.  I am clearly a good Democrat (check out my posting history if you doubt that).  

How can one not be permitted to criticize without the threat of trusted user status revoked?  Doesn't that put a huge damper on discourse?

I'm not sure what the reasoning of TRing here is.  If you lie, that's one thing.  But to not be allowed to take exception to anything any Democrat does; that is unproductive and unrealistic.  

I would not want to see the next Democratic president make the errors Clinton did.  If we idealize our presidents, we run that risk.  I think a critical eye is necessary as we move on.  I think FDR was a great president, but I can still point out things he did that were not okay...why not the same with Bill Clinton?

If this is about bringing up the personal scandal during his tenure, is it not okay for a Democrat to say that kind of behavior was just wrong.  


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah right! (1.50 / 2)

There was nothing vindictive in saying he wasn't a good father because he placed her in public scrutiny.

Again what you wrote:

One other thing:  As far as Chelsea who seems like a lovely young woman.  What father, what good father, puts his kid though the public scrutiny of his sex life with someone about her age.  I can't imagine a lousier thing to do to your family.

Do you mean to tell me there is no scrutiny in running for politics and there was no scrutiny in the association with Wright? What kind of good father puts his kids under that kind of scrutiny?

Don't be a hypocrite because what's good for the  goose is good for the gander. And I troll rated you because what you were doing was obvious trolling and a pathetic cheap shot.  


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:17:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yeah right! (none / 0)

I was not talking about Obama.  This thread is not about Obama.  I was talking specifically about Bill Clinton and subjecting one's child to one's indiscretions.  It was not vindictive, it was an awful lapse in judgment on his part and would have been had he been a private citizen or president.  That is my personal view.  It was not vindictive, it was simply what happened.


by mady on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:26:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Probably the same (none / 0)

Ahhh yes, the old "he should have left when the preacher breathed a single controversial word!" line.

You appear to have received all your information about TUCC from Fox News.  Have you watched every sermon from the last 20 years at Trinity?  If not, you really have no idea just how much of the preaching was "divisive crap" and how much of it was the Gospel.

If I had children, I'd proudly take them to TUCC any Sunday of the year.  Rev. Wright, hot as he may have been at times, remains a true leader in his community and a preacher of the Gospel - including the parts that make people uncomfortable.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:07:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Get over yourself. (1.50 / 2)

I've known about Trinity for years. As a resident of the South Side of Chicago it isn't some secret to me, and I knew about Wright before Barack ever met him.

And yes he (like most people of conscious) should have left when he preached a single controversial line. In my family there are several pastors and I've never heard anything as divisive and race baiting as what Wright preaches. So don't lecture me about the Gospel.


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:20:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Get over yourself. (2.00 / 2)

And yes he (like most people of conscious) should have left when he preached a single controversial line.

See, there's the rub.  Define "controversial."

In the context of Scripture, there was absolutely nothing controversial about what Wright said.  "God damn America" is not substantially different from the words of the prophet Jeremiah in the Old Testament.  Certainly, Wright said things we all disagree with, but my pastors have said things I disagreed with in the past too.  Know what I've done?  Stayed in the church, because the church is much bigger than a single line preached by a single pastor on a single Sunday.  It's a community.

Moreover, I think your claim that "most people of conscious [sic]" should have left TUCC is rather problematic.  If you're making that claim, though, I'd like to see you make it where it counts.  You're in Chicago; next Sunday, I challenge you to stand outside TUCC after the service and tell every single person you see coming out of the church doors that he or she is not a "person of conscious [sic]."  If you're going to make that claim, you need to put your money where your mouth is.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:25:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

In which of the books (2.00 / 1)

in the bible can I find sermons railing against white people? Can you quote me chapter and verse where it says that "white folks greed runs a world in need?"

And the pastor is the church. The pastor is the reason why people go to certain churches. If all churches were the same and the pastor made no difference we'd all attend one mega church in our towns or cities that were part of our denominations.


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:29:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: In which of the books (none / 0)

in the bible can I find sermons railing against white people? Can you quote me chapter and verse where it says that "white folks greed runs a world in need?"

Read the Hebrew prophets.  Pay particular attention to Amos and Malachi, who certainly do call out the leaders and the rich of Israel for continuing in greed while the poor suffered.  Take, for example, these verses:

This is what the Lord says: "For three sins of Israel, even for four, I will not turn back my wrath. They sell the righteous for silver, and the needy for a pair of sandals. 7 They trample on the heads of the poor as upon the dust of the ground and deny justice to the oppressed. Amos 2:6-7

It's got a few more words, but Amos is basically saying that the greedy are oppressing the poor.  Not much different from Rev. Wright - or, for that matter, from any pastor who is willing to preach the truth in this day and age.

And the pastor is the church. The pastor is the reason why people go to certain churches. If all churches were the same and the pastor made no difference we'd all attend one mega church in our towns or cities that were part of our denominations.

For someone whose family apparently includes clergy, you don't seem to understand ecclesiology very well.  The pastor is not the only reason why people go to certain churches; in fact, I've known many people, including myself, who went to a church because they liked the community, despite the fact that the pastor wasn't exactly ideal.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:35:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Uhm. (2.00 / 1)

They're talking about rich v poor not greedy whites and poor. Are there no poor whites? Did the bible separate the poor whites from the poor of color?


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:46:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Uhm. (none / 0)

Did Wright?  Please link me to Wright claiming that all white people are rich.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes Wright (2.00 / 1)

did speak about rich whites. Should I link you to the video on Christmas Day where he railed against "rich white people?" Have you read Obama's book where he talked about the first sermon he heard Wright give that included the line "where white folks greed runs a world in need?"

Are you telling me that you are that ignorant on the subject that we're discussing?


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:11:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes Wright (none / 0)

That isn't what I said, and you know it.  I asked you to link me to a statement where Wright says that all white people are rich.

As for rich white people, are you denying that this country's wealthiest citizens are predominantly white?


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:48:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

When did I say (2.00 / 1)

that Wright said all white people were rich? How the hell should I respond to something you pulled out of your ass?


by LatinoVoter on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:10:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: When did I say (2.00 / 1)

Are there no poor whites? Did the bible separate the poor whites from the poor of color?

I took that as an implication that Wright was denying the existence of poor whites.  If it wasn't, I apologize.  Nevertheless, Wright had a point; the predominance of white skin among the wealthy is evidence that our culture still has a great deal of white privilege and white supremacy to deal with.  And the fact that the wealthy are exploiting the poor of all colors is something that I think would hardly be in dispute among Democrats.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:23:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Neat Diary (2.00 / 2)

I particularly like your Update on DKOS, great chuckle-fodder.

My own modification (since I missed the "worshipping" bit) would just be to add that both sides can afford to be gracious.  That's why the meme of "gracious loser" is as honorable as "gracious winner", but certainly the winners have an easier job of it.

Recced.

-chris


"Because after an eight-year hiatus it is vital to have a president who leads the country instead of lassoing, roping and branding it." Shaun Appleby
by chrisblask on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:27:41 AM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 0)

Yes, finally, someone who admits that Bill C is awesome.  Yes, the burden is on the winners to be cordial and forgiving, not the loosers, especially in this instance when so much was done to destroy the opponent personally.

For folks who just can't give up detesting the Clintons, they will never see this side of things, never understand what your point is, and never admit anything good from the Clinton years.

For the folks who were not Obama supporters and still have not resolved to do so, they will never acknowledge any Clinton gaffe, nor any Obama positive trait.  Perhaps they will come to their senses, perhaps not.  It's as useless to dwell on PUMA types as it is to dwell on Wright types.

Personally, I know that Bill will eventually endorse Obama, but I would rather he sit this one out and become a statesman, leaving all the things he could do to help the DNC and the Dmeocratic party undone.  It's not that I don't want the help of a powerhouse like BIll, it's that I feel his help is definitely NOT deserved this time around.  He has every right to feel 'dissed', because he has been.


Hell's bells, even the GOP didn't have to crucify Eisenhower's record in order to make Reagan their 'saint'. We can have two great ones, you know?
by emsprater on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:00:19 PM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 1)

I wish Bill Clinton had stayed out of the primaries entirely.  There's simply no way Bill Clinton could reconcile four things: the presumption of respect which Americans readily given their ex-presidents (which is supposed to be bipartisan and is for the office); the level of deference which Dems are supposed to give to their party elders (esp. former presidents);  the divisiveness which results when politicians endorse in a highly-competitive primary; the fact that Clinton was endorsing his wife (because you're right, who expects anyone to be objective about family?).

And the thing is, I don't think this would have hurt Hillary Clinton at all.  It's difficult to imagine Bill Clinton's staying out of the fray, but it would be nice if he recognized that the situation was problematic by its very nature.  


by IncognitoErgoSum on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:15:24 PM EST

Whew. After popping into (2.00 / 1)

dKos for the first time in many months, I see from the comments to your diary that nothing has really changed over there.

Still not time to re-engage with that community, I guess.


by aggieric on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 12:16:05 PM EST

beh. (none / 0)

It all depends on what your definition of 'awesome' is, I suppose.


by rabidnation on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:04:36 PM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (2.00 / 3)

Good diary, the comment section looks like a bloodbath though.  Geeesh.  Good thing many of these posters aren't politicians, they'd never make it.  Bill, Hillary, and Barack are moving on together to get dems back in control to clean up this mess the Bush Adminstration made and you'd think Dems would be ecstatic about the fact that we are polling high and generating a unified buzz around the country while McCain and GOP are scrambling away from each other.


Democrat for the democratic nominee
by KLRinLA on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:20:26 PM EST

Re: Bill Clinton is awesome. (none / 0)

Thank you for this gracious diary. I imagine over half of the Bill haters are too young to haver remembered his presidency.


by NY Writer on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 01:58:45 PM EST

Yup (none / 0)

So common for young people to disregard anything the older generation says.


by Al Depansu on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:57:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Though I was too young to really remember (none / 0)

the Clinton years. I do remember how much I admired him as a kid and it was because of his administration and good times that really converted me to become a Democrat. (well that and the fact that my parents were HUGE Clinton supporters) I only wish I would have been able to participate during those political cycles. But Barack is right, it is no longer the 90's. We live in a very different world and it is time to turn the page on all the distractions of the 1990's. But that is not to say Bill and Hillary Clinton are irrelevant, it means that in order to move forward we can not be beholden to the conflicts and arguments of the 90's.

Very good diary and rec'd


by SocialDem on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 02:40:40 PM EST

Different world? (none / 0)


by Al Depansu on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:00:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Different world? (none / 0)

Different world politically. I think with the coming  demographics people are ready to move past the familiar wedge issues and get to work on things that really matter. Guns, abortion, and religion if you notice are not a big part of the campaign.(though still part of it.)


by SocialDem on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:39:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Awesome? Maybe once upon a time (2.00 / 1)

Bill Clinton was a damn fine president for his era, he get's a lot of points for it. But that era is over now and he loses a lot for his behavior in the primary, espeicailly his playing of the race card.

I'm willing to chalk a lot of that up to good old fashioned campaigning, but he continues to lose lustre for his very weak and tepid statement of "support" for Obama this week. I'll grant that he needed some time to lick his wounds, but he's had that time and now he needs stop feeling sorry for himself and get with the program.

It's time for all of us to come together, even Bill Clinton.


by Phil In Denver on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:17:26 PM EST

For the dopes arguing above (2.00 / 2)

Not going to bother increasing their ever-lengthening threads, but here goes.

Plenty of Obama supporters have gotten banned from MyDD, and a sizeable number of those deserved it. The same goes for Clinton supporters.

It's unfortunate that not all those banned deserved it, but that's what the recent amnesty diary was for.

But anyone who thinks Obama supporters didn't troll-rate other Obama supporters when they said super-offensive shit, and that we all deserve to be held accountable for each other, is f**ing on crack.

And now that the primaries are over, some of you babies are going to need to get used to the idea of civility. Now that the vast majority of Democrats are on the same page, you simply can't get away with lies and distortions and sheer a*holery because we're not divided anymore. Criticism is the healthy functioning of democracy - go ahead. I'm talking about Obama, Hillary, and Bill here.

If you hate any of these people with a fiery passion, and can't contain your inflammatory rhetoric, MyDD will survive without your pageviews.


Visit Election Inspection for analysis, polls, and predictions!
by X Stryker on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 03:34:43 PM EST

November? (none / 0)

I think he needs to get fully behind the nominee a bit sooner than November. How much political grieving time do you think he needs? A week? A month? There's an election to win.


by mswaine on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 04:40:27 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.