Rasmussen: Obama Up In PA & NM

Rasmussen Reports released two new polls today, one out of Pennsylvania and one from New Mexico, that basically tell us what we already knew: Obama is up where we expect him to be.

In Pennsylvania, Obama's lead is not enormous, but it is growing.

CandidateJune 22May 21April 24Pollster
Obama46454348
McCain42434440.5

It's unclear whether a unity bounce effect was at play here. Obama's support among Democrats in this Clinton country state rose 6 points since Hillary Clinton dropped out, although it's still relatively low, at 69% of Dems. This tells me Obama has a lot of room to grow in Pennsylvania, especially once Hillary Clinton begins campaigning with him this week. McCain on the other hand has 77% of Pennsylvania Republicans but is losing because of an 11 point deficit among independent voters. Interestingly, Obama's gains came principally among men; whereas last month they were tied, this month Obama leads by 8. Just because Barack's gains weren't among women doesn't mean they weren't a function of Hillary's endorsement of him, of course. If the bulk of this shift toward Barack was among former Hillary Clinton supporters who are just now embracing Barack, hopefully we can expect an exodus of her female supporters to follow in the coming months.

As Eric Kleefeld points out, Barack seems to have already convinced Hillary's Pennsylvania working class base he's their man (yet another myth to debunnk):

And despite the constant message in the primaries that Obama wouldn't be able to win "beer track" voters, the pollster's analysis has this: "Obama has a sizable lead among those voters earning less than $40,000 a year, with McCain well ahead among those who earn more than that annually."

Looking at the cross-tabs, Barack's said sizable lead amounts to 49%-34% among those making less than $20k a year and 51%-39% among those making $20-40k a year.

In New Mexico, while Obama's lead is larger, it actually ticked down 1 point since last month.

CandidateJune 18May 14April 8Pollster
Obama47504546.3
McCain39414240.2

As you can see, there was definitely no unity bounce here. In fact, 4% jumped to the undecided category since May's poll, which is puzzling and something to look out for in next month's poll. But overall, there's really no cause for alarm as things stayed pretty much the same otherwise.

He has an eleven-point lead among women, and just a seven-point lead among men. Those numbers have shown little change since last month.

Obama's support comes from 72% of Democrats in New Mexico and 15% of Republicans. McCain is backed by 76% of Republicans and 18% of Democrats. When it comes to unaffiliated voters, Obama has a 41% to 34% advantage. The results in that demographic are nearly identical to last month's numbers.

Some excellent numbers for Obama in New Mexico (those pesky Hispanic voters really do have a problem with him, don't they!) I agree with FBIHop, it's well past time that CNN took New Mexico out of McCain's column (they claim it leans McCain) on their electoral vote map.

Update [2008-6-23 20:32:37 by Todd Beeton]:And as if that wasn't enough good news out of New Mexico, check out this stellar headline and lede from Rasmussen's poll of the NM senate race:

New Mexico Senate: Democrat Udall's Lead Jumps After GOP Primary

Democratic Congressman Tom Udall has nearly doubled his lead over Republican Steve Pearce in New Mexico's U.S. Senate race. Udall now leads 58% to 30%...

Nice.



Display:


As I said at my blog (none / 0)

(and thanks for linking to me) -- so much for the unity bounce in New Mexico for Pearce.

I guess we don't much like unity here.


New Mexico politics from the local perspective.
by fbihop on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:35:06 PM EST

I sure hope (none / 0)

that before summer is out, we see Obama in the 50's across the country!


Washington Woman
theocracywatch.org
EENR Blog
by kevin22262 on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:36:55 PM EST

Wow (2.00 / 1)

kewl..


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 09:10:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Huzzah (none / 0)

The election is ours if we can keep things in the bag and work like hell for November.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:40:44 PM EST

Obama will essentially (none / 0)

have four de-facto VPs, regardless of who he chooses: Clinton, Warner, Udall, and Udall.

So I take it from the crosstabs that Obama is losing women right now to McCain in Pennsylvania while winning men?  That's 360 degrees from the Quinnipiac poll.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:54:50 PM EST

Why are the Udalls included? (none / 0)

I can almost see Warner and Clinton being included -- do you mean in those states to help him campaign?


New Mexico politics from the local perspective.
by fbihop on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:56:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why are the Udalls included? (none / 0)

Yeah that's the idea.  Whoever Obama chooses as his VP wouldn't help him more than the Udalls in New Mexico and Colorado.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:59:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Todd (none / 0)

thanks for the front page mention today as well.

By the way, what do the Rasmussen cross-tabs show about how Obama is performing among white women nationally, where he's up 49-43 in today's daily tracking poll?  Rasmussen has McCain up on Obama 49-42 among white voters; my suspicion is that we're up six among white women but down almost twenty among white men.


by Blazers Edge on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 08:57:51 PM EST

Re: Rasmussen: Obama Up In PA & NM (none / 0)


Rasmussen also shows that Obama is right back at the Kerry/Gore map, which Clinton was winning handily.

Plus ça "Change"....


by killjoy on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 09:49:07 PM EST

Re: Rasmussen: Obama Up (none / 0)

No reason for alarm. You keep saying this but the fact is given the parlous state of the Republicans and McCain wretched performance as a candidate, these numbers while not exactly sucking are nothing to shout about.


by ottovbvs on Mon Jun 23, 2008 at 10:29:54 PM EST

Well (none / 0)

"that basically tell us what we already knew: Obama is up where we expect him to be."

I guess "we" doesn't include Jerome.


Let's elect a Dem President!
by SpanishFly on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 10:36:59 AM EST

Re: Rasmussen: Obama Up In PA & NM (none / 0)

Umm ... these are NOT good numbers. I'm sorry, I'm a glass half full guy as much as anyone, but to have a lead within the MoE in Pennsylvania, which Kerry won by only slightly less and Gore won by MORE, is not great. Particularly now almost a month since the Dem primary finished. Similarly, for our presidential candidate to trail our Senate candidate by 20 points in NM is a sign of big trouble.

At some point, the bounce from winning the primary is going to be long gone, and if Barack isn't up more than this it's going to another nail-biter, which we have more than a decent chance to lose.

You all need a slice of reality pie.


by ColoradoGuy on Tue Jun 24, 2008 at 12:03:53 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.