CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obama

cnn is reporting that "Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obama" by the end of the week:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Most of the seventeen Democratic senators who have remained uncommitted throughout the primaries will endorse Barack Obama for president this week, CNN has learned.

Sources familiar with discussions between Obama supporters and these senators tell CNN's Gloria Borger that the senators will wait until after the South Dakota and Montana primaries to announce their support for Obama.

Two sources familiar with the sessions said the endorsements will come sometime later this week.

the report continues that "the senators don't want to pound Hillary Clinton, and there is a sense she should be given a grace period."  perhaps they are hoping for a graceful exit on the part of the senator from new york.  

many delegates are reacting to the implied threat from the clinton campaign to continue this "battle," perhaps even going all the way to denver.  but clinton's own delegates are preparing to shut that option down:

Moreover, a number of Clinton backers signaled Sunday that they were wary of the kind of protracted fight that some of her aides said they might wage in the coming months.

"It would be most beneficial if we resolved this nomination sooner rather than later," said U.S. Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, a high-profile superdelegate who backs Clinton. "The more time we have to get through a general-election period and the more time we have to prepare in advance of the convention, the better."

Some of Clinton's closest advisors want the New York senator to challenge the party's unusual decision Saturday to shift four of Clinton's Michigan delegates to Obama in an attempt to reflect how voters might have cast ballots and to allocate Michigan's uncommitted delegates to Obama, even though his name did not appear on the ballot in the state.

Even if Clinton won those delegates in a challenge, it would be unlikely to alter the outcome.

"She'll do the right thing for America, and I don't think we're going to fight this at the convention," said Pennsylvania Gov. Edward G. Rendell, a top Clinton supporter and party superdelegate, speaking on CBS. "Because even were we to win it, unless it's going to change enough delegates for Sen. Clinton to get the nomination, then it would be a fight that would have no purpose."

Alice Huffman, a member of the rules panel and a superdelegate committed to Clinton, said she would not support an appeal if Obama had clearly won the delegate fight.

"What's the point for a challenge, if a challenge doesn't change the status of anything?" asked Huffman, the president of the California branch of the National Assn. for the Advancement of Colored People.

the latimes article continues:

"I don't think anybody's going to have much tolerance" for a convention fight, said Democratic strategist Bill Carrick, who is neutral in this race. "The big rationale for the Clinton campaign to continue among insiders and superdelegates was that they were going to get a big pickup of delegates from Florida and Michigan. There was no big pickup."

The events Saturday had seemed to portend a more combative course -- with Clinton loyalists openly jeering members of the rules committee and vowing to take her cause to the floor of the party's national nominating convention this summer in Denver.

That is exactly the nightmare scenario that party strategists believe could doom their hopes by further antagonizing key constituencies such as African Americans, women and working-class whites.

The question of Florida and Michigan has hung over the campaign for months. When Clinton fell behind Obama in the delegate count, she began to argue that the states should be fully counted. Clinton had hoped that the party would not only restore the state's delegations but would allocate delegates based on her massive victories, perhaps even denying Obama any Michigan delegates because he had pulled his name from the ballot.

That, Clinton aides believed, would have helped pull her close enough to Obama that she could convince party superdelegates to hand her the nomination.

Saturday's ruling dashed those hopes.

Clinton picked up just 24 more pledged delegates than Obama from the two states. Even with Clinton's decisive win in Puerto Rico, Obama is now within 47 delegates of victory. Clinton needs 202.5.

what is surprising is that clinton delegates are announcing publicly what we've been hearing privately:

Even Wasserman Schultz, despite her hope for a swift resolution, called it a "mistake" for the rules committee to slash half the votes of her state's delegation. She said she had heard from many upset constituents and predicted the party could have trouble revving up Florida activists in the fall.

Still, some Clinton backers said Sunday that Clinton might lose some avowed supporters if Obama clinched the nomination and yet she fought on.

Garry Shay, a rules committee member and Clinton superdelegate, said he would stick with her if she finished within 100 delegates of Obama.

But within 10 to 20 days, he added, "I'm going to reassess based upon the political reality."

democrats are getting impatient to move on to the general election (actually, we are behind schedule).  meanwhile, the hotline blog notes:

Hillary Clinton's campaign is holding its final primary eve event at the New York Baruch College Athletic & Recreation Center, 55 Lexington Avenue at 24th Street, New York City.

A sign that she won't be fighting on to the DNC's Credentials Cmte? Or Denver?

just in case we have some new york-based hillary supporters...


Poll
are you glad that the primaries are finally over?
sure
no, i like it!
they're not over!

Votes: 27
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


I'm sick of seeing Hillary on TV (2.00 / 1)

spewing specious arguments.  That's what Republicans are for, and I don't feel healthy being enraged by what another Democrat is doing.

I'm also looking forward to the "nomination bump" and hitting HRC supporters over the head with the new EV projections.


by corph on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 12:49:17 PM EST

Over? (2.00 / 1)

Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no!


by reconad on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 12:49:44 PM EST

Re: Over? (none / 0)

The Germans?


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 12:58:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Over? (none / 0)

Animal House...


by rf7777 on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:02:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Over? (2.00 / 1)

The correct response is: "Forget it, he's rolling"


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:04:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Must be Snark (none / 0)

seriously did the Germans really bomb Pearl Harbor?


by parahammer on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 12:59:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Over? (none / 0)

It was over when landed in Japan on D-Day.

Snark.


We shall overcome. Yes we can.
by Sam Wise Gingy on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:18:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obam (2.00 / 1)

Sorry but I have to do this...



Obama 08!
by comingawakening on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 12:55:33 PM EST

The Germans!?! LOL! (2.00 / 1)

A little issue with history on that, IMHO.

Back to reality...

It's over when Hillary decides it's over, or in Denver, whichever comes first.

She has over half the votes cast. A SuperDelegate's statement of support is totally worthless until they conclude the deal at the Convention.

If Obama exceeds the required amount of delegates to obtain the nomination by 10-20 votes, as of Tuesday night or Wednesday morning, this is an EXTREMELY tenuous victory for him at best, no matter what spin we hear to the contrary.


by bobswern on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:00:27 PM EST

Re: The Germans!?! LOL! (none / 0)

It's over when Hillary decides it's over,

and some kooks say she has a sense of entitlement.

Where do they get that?

If Obama exceeds the required amount of delegates to obtain the nomination by 10-20 votes, as of Tuesday night or Wednesday morning, this is an EXTREMELY tenuous victory for him at best, no matter what spin we hear to the contrary.

Okay. It was a close race and she didn't lose by as much as she could have. It's still over. She still lost.


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:28:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wrong. Let's quote the rules. (none / 0)

Rule #1: The nominee's chosen at the Convention.

Rule #2: If any candidate or their supporters claim victory up until the Convention, please see Rule #1.


by bobswern on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 02:11:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wrong. Let's quote the rules. (none / 0)

Well, hell, why stop there.

HILLARY MUST FIGHT THIS RIGHT THROUGH TO THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 02:15:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Japanese bombed the Alamo n/t (none / 0)


by parahammer on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:01:55 PM EST

Nuh-uh (2.00 / 1)

It was Saddam Hussein. Under secret sealed orders from Achmadinajahd.


by BlueinColorado on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:06:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obama (none / 0)

I personally think the DNC RBC was batshit crazy to do that with the 4 MI delegates.  Completely arbitrary and leaves the door WIDE OPEN for an appeal.  And Hillary has every right to appeal that part of the decision.

HOWEVER...

On Wednesday, it is over.  Virtually all remaining SDs will come out for Obama and the primary will end.  4 delegates won't matter.


by rf7777 on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:05:49 PM EST

Vilsack calls it (2.00 / 1)

also on CNN, says Obama will be the nominee and time for Hillary to get behind him.


by parahammer on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:06:44 PM EST

Re: CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obam (2.00 / 1)

The Clinton staff are now being asked to turn in all of their receipts.

This will be over very shortly.


by Pat Flatley on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:09:02 PM EST

Re: CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obam (none / 0)

I hope they get paid.


by parahammer on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:11:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obam (2.00 / 1)

very unnecessary comment.  It is common for nominees to be in debt


by colebiancardi on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:37:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: CNN: Most uncommitted senators to endorse Obam (2.00 / 1)

"Extremely tenuous victory"

Meet the new Clinton denial meme, which is to delegitimize Obama's clean and hard fought win

People:  the primary was nearly a tie, but in life "nearly" does not win the game

Technically, it is not over; in any practical and pragmatic and intelligent sense, it is, unless you like shooting yourself in the foot because you missed the bus


by fightbull on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 01:14:16 PM EST

Excuse me, but... (none / 0)

...all projections of Obama "closing the deal" tomorrow were based upon a victory in South Dakota.

Clinton will--most likely--win South Dakota, and by a significant margin.

Back to the drawing boards Obama supporters.

It's not over 'til it's over. Go ask the Fat Lady. Ooops! Looks like she just took an unscheduled vacation.


by bobswern on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 02:14:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excuse me, but... (none / 0)

You're calling South Dakota based on the ARG poll?

I'm not attacking you, friend, I'm just a little surprised.  It's possible that she wins, sure, but that poll is waaaaaay out of line from what other, far more reputable pollsters have concluded.

She may win, but I cannot believe that ARG has it even remotely right.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 02:50:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.