Alaska Is a Swing State

Today brings news of two new polls out of the state of Alaska, both of which show John McCain's lead in the state, which only once in its history (Lyndon Johnson's 1964 landslide victory) has given its electoral votes to the Democratic presidential nominee, is well within the margin of error. First, here's Rasmussen Reports:

In one of the bigger surprises of Election 2008, early polling shows Barack Obama as potentially competitive in Alaska.

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Alaska voters finds John McCain earning 45% of the vote while Barack Obama attracts 41%. Seven percent (7%) say they'd vote for some other candidate while another 6% are not sure (see video report). This is the third straight poll showing Obama within single digits of the presumptive GOP nominee. A month ago, McCain was up by nine. Two months ago, it was McCain by nine.

McCain is supported by 78% of Republican voters while Obama attracts 74% of Democratic voters. Among those not affiliated with either major party, it's Obama 48% McCain 33%. A month ago, Obama attracted 47% of unaffiliateds while McCain was supported by 41%.

McCain is viewed favorably by 57% of Alaska voters, Obama by 53%. Both figures are up a point over the past month.

Not only are these numbers within the Rasmussen poll's plus or minus 4 percentage point margin of error, according to Chris Cillizza, Democratic polling out of the state shows a very similar spread between McCain and Obama.

John McCain leads Obama 44 percent to 42 percent in Alaska, with Libertarian nominee Bob Barr taking 3 percent, according to the Global Strategy Group survey, which was conducted for the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and obtained by The Fix.

Alaska's three electoral votes aren't likely to be the ones that are going to swing this fall's election. That said, every additional traditionally Republican state that the McCain campaign is forced to defend this year is another headache that will siphon attention and money away from the other larger states McCain will need to carry in order to have any shot at winning the presidency (and judging by McCain's current performance in Ohio, Pennsylvania and even Florida, McCain's having some real trouble already in these states, too). And if McCain can be stretched ever so thin by being forced to defend a state like Alaska (and other states like Georgia and even Arizona) -- and it's looking more and more like this is a real possibility -- we could end up seeing a much wider electoral college spread than previously expected.



Display:


But, but, but (none / 0)

He can't win! He can't carry working class whites.

Oh, wait.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:04:34 PM EST

Re: But, but, but (1.00 / 0)

If barack adds anymore swing states...

The DNC will have to hold a second swingers convention for those states! :P


Rise / Repeat / But for god's sake don't spin!
by aliveandkickin on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:27:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But, but, but (none / 0)

Wait!  Better stop or you'll actually get Jerome excited!!!  We can't have that!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:18:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (none / 0)

This is great news for Alaska and even better news for the downticket races - with Mark Begich taking on Tubes Stevens and a strong challenge coming from Ethan Berkowitz or Diane Benson to Don Young.

There is a positive feedback loop here - competitive presidential race, competitive Senate race, competitive House race... the fact that a Democratic sweep of this state is even in the realm of possibility is a testament to how fed up Alaskans - and Americans - are with George Bush and his failed policies.


by Last Frontier Democrat on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:09:29 PM EST

A blue Alaska??? Amazing... (none / 0)

Agreed.

Markos has been advocating Obama's downticket abilities for eons now.

He just wrote an excellent piece on Mark Begich


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:17:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am going to get tired of saying (none / 0)

"I told you so" to Democrats.

This is not going to be an election that can be mapped using historical graphs.  My MyBO friends are sick of hearing me say this, already.  Now its you guy's turn. :-)

I am not calling for anyone to stand down - go team go! - but the hystrionics about potential DOOM in November are hot air.  McCain will not be president.

-chris


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:10:38 PM EST

I hope so (2.00 / 1)

But I believe complacency is BHO's biggest nemesis as we go through the summer.

I fear many people who are polling for him now are still suspicious of him, and subconsciosuly looking for an excuse not to vote for him.

I worry that a wrong step, a Dukakis tank moment or an Al Gore debate moment or any other faux pas that could paint him as out of step with America could turn this.

I voted for Obama. I'm an Obama supporter. I relish such positive news. But I am still very cautious. And from what I observe, so is BHO.


I attended PUMACon '08!!!
by iohs2008 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:14:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A little paranoia is a good thing... (2.00 / 1)

and I don't think BHO is taking anything for granted.  The campaign is a machine and it won't stop until the job is done.

Don't stop worrying, though.  Diligence is the creator of destiny.


Motley Moose: Progress Through Politics
by chrisblask on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:21:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Senate (2.00 / 2)

A trip to Anchorage, which is 40+% of the population  of Alaska, might be in order.  The relatively small population could be swung by Obama's presence (they can't have had many candidate visits) and help Senatorial candidate and Anchorage mayor Mark Begich.    


McCain = Iraq. John McCain = overturn Roe.
by PantsB on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:11:31 PM EST

Re: Senate (2.00 / 2)

I hope he makes the time to trek up to Fairbanks quickly, as well. It's as close to a "college town" as you'll find in Alaska, and there's a fairly strong Democratic grassroots organization in the Interior.


by Last Frontier Democrat on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:27:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Good point (none / 0)

How long a flight is it from Seattle?


by RandyMI on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:54:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (2.00 / 6)

I guess it's time for McCain to fire up the Alaskan Straight Talk Express...

Or... maybe not...


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:15:24 PM EST

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (none / 0)

i'm wary of Alaska being a so called "swing state" at this juncture. come November I'd be surprised to see Obama within 10 points.

However, what is obvious to me at this point is Obama will NOT hinder down ticket races in places like Alaska. The poll is great news in that respect as we would normally be losing Alaska by 25 points.


!
by alex100 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:06:43 PM EST

But Obama's the messiah (1.00 / 4)

he can win anywhere. By the time Alaska gets to know Obama, he'll lose pretty bad there. Its just that he's having his PR honeymoon right now. Mccain will be for drilling, driving his polling up there.


by Lakrosse on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:53:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: But Obama's the messiah (none / 0)

By the time Alaska gets to know Obama, he'll lose pretty bad there.

Is that you Mark Penn?  weren't you saying that back in January, too?

Whoops!  How's that book coming?


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:12:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

i'll bet a grand (none / 0)

with you that Obama gets blown out in Alaska.


by Lakrosse on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:24:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Troll Rated (none / 0)

for the boring, mindless "messiah" slur.

Try harder! You'll never get your souvenir McCain merchandise this way!


by JoeW on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 09:11:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (none / 0)

Ohhhh what a sweet thing it would be for Alaska to flip.  Surely the Obama campaign has the resources to send him there for a visit.  I wonder who has the coattails here, Obama or Mark Begich?


When I grow up, I want to be a superdelegate!
by robitude on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:26:13 PM EST

Well (none / 0)

On the one hand, I wonder if Alaksa isn't too red and too far out of the way for him to make a shot. On the other, it's democraphically the youngest state in the country and has a good portion of non-white voters. But in the end, it's only 3 EV's. If I were Obaam, I would go only if the election is sewed up by mid October and for no other reason than to help Mark Begich and Ethan Berkowitz.


by RandyMI on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:53:45 PM EST

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (none / 0)

Alaska is a state with a population similar to Baltimore. Its similar to Memphis, too, and who knows how many other medium sized cities throughout the US. The fact that it should be discussed as a swing state... we just seriously need voting reform.


by weltec2 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:09:21 PM EST

Dangerous to be too optimistic, BUT... (none / 0)

I think we need to keep our eye on three other  potential battleground red states as well:  North Carolina, Georgia, and Louisiana.  Let's be greedy.  Eating into the south would be devastating to the GOP.  Bob Barr could very well get enough votes to put Georgia into play, and with a strong black turn-out in GA, that could well provide us with a stunning upset.  North Carolina has already shown some softening and shown Obama ahead of McCain in past polls (not recent ones), so a little infrastructure work and hope might put the GOP on defense there as well.


by Dumbo on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 09:57:03 PM EST

More interesting news (none / 0)

But there is still a lot of hard work ahead and best not get overconfident and complacent.

Still, Id love to see Obama make a stop in Alaska - good will is good will.  Just like the long primary was good for late primary states in voter registration and excitement, there is no down side for Obama to make a one day trip to Alaska.  

Maybe go up to ANWAR and get some pictureque photos of him in that natural splendor and he can use that as part of his alternate energy campaign and butress against the republicans arguments to drill there and destroy that beauty.


by pattonbt on Thu Jun 19, 2008 at 02:04:42 AM EST

Re: Alaska Is a Swing State (none / 0)

The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do in the closely divided battleground states, but that we shouldn't have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states.

The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral vote -- that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).

The major shortcoming of the current system of electing the President is that presidential candidates have no reason to poll, visit, advertise, organize, campaign, or worry about the voter concerns in states where they are safely ahead or hopelessly behind. The reason for this is the winner-take-all rule which awards all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who gets the most votes in each separate state. Because of this rule, candidates concentrate their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. Two-thirds of the visits and money are focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money goes to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people are merely spectators to the presidential election.

Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.

The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 18 legislative chambers (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, North Carolina, Rhode Island, and Washington, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, and Vermont). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring this legislation into effect.

See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com  


by mvymvy on Thu Jun 19, 2008 at 01:16:00 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.