McCain's Energy Flip Flop

On Tuesday, John McCain announced that a pillar of his energy plan is to lift the ban on offshore drilling.

Sen. John McCain on Tuesday proposed lifting the ban on offshore drilling as part of his plan to reduce dependence on foreign oil and help combat rising gas prices. Sen. John McCain says it's time for the federal government "to put our own reserves to use."

"The stakes are high for our citizens and for our economy," McCain, the presumed Republican nominee for president, said at a press conference Tuesday in Houston, Texas.

This announcement represents a shift in policy of just about 180 degrees from his prior position, a flip flop that did not go unnoticed by Barack Obama.

"John McCain's support of the moratorium on offshore drilling during his first presidential campaign was certainly laudable, but his decision to completely change his position and tell a group of Houston oil executives exactly what they wanted to hear today was the same Washington politics that has prevented us from achieving energy independence for decades," he said. "It's another example of short-term political posturing from Washington, not the long-term leadership we need to solve our dependence on oil," he said.

Hell, even CNN called McCain out. Check out this piece from The Situation Room that frames McCain's entire energy policy as one big flip flop after another.

As Dana Bash says:

"What really came across in John McCain's speech [on energy] is how challenging it is for him to find his way...what you get are some contradictions."

Seriously, it makes you wonder if McCain is losing his base. Watch it:

Of course, one key point CNN misses is just how tied to big oil John McCain actually is. Brave New Films has a great new video in their Real McCain series that reveals exactly what big oil's $1 million+ worth of donations they've made to McCain has gotten them in return: his refusal to require oil companies to use their profits to invest in alternative energy.

But I think my favorite part about McCain's blatant pandering yesterday was that despite his ongoing efforts to distance himself from Bush, McCain just can't seem to catch a break. Guess what Mr. 28% is going to be doing today:

Hours [after McCain's speech], White House Press Secretary Dana Perino said President Bush on Wednesday will ask Congress to lift the ban on offshore drilling.

Hilarious.



Display:


Re: McCain's Energy Flip Flop (none / 0)

You may not be aware of this, but the outrageous anger about John Kerry's "flip-flops" wont be there  this year, although seeing "flip-flop" every day for 5 months got to the point where swift boats was a welcome diversion, which is saying something.


"Is there no keeping with class in whom we mingle with anymore?"
by Brandon on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 06:36:27 AM EST

Re: McCain's Energy Flip Flop (none / 0)

These ain't Kerry's "flip-flops", which generally came within anywhere between 2-10 years or more. McCain's are GENUINE turnarounds. Most of which extend as hardcore direct reversals. Flip-flop is a term whose purpose has worn out, but the concept has not, and is extremely valid. Because not even conservatives know how he is going to rule when in office.

In fact, I suspect McCain doesn't know either.


"Tell me about your work ethic." "Well, I don't think ethnics do no work. I mean, that's they problem, really." "Overt racial prejudice. Impressive."
by vcalzone on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:53:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Todd, you need to update the electoral map (none / 0)

Quinnipiac has Obama ahead of McCain in Florida now, 47-43.  Also, ahead in PA and Ohio.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x2882.xml?Rele aseID=1187

In the three states, Obama leads McCain 10 to 23 percentage points among women, while men are too close to call. The Democrat trails among white voters in Florida and Ohio, but gets more than 90 percent of black voters in each state. He also has double-digit leads among young voters in each state.


by Dumbo on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 07:15:06 AM EST

Re: Todd, you need to update the electoral map (none / 0)

Ouch! That's kinda unexpected.


"Tell me about your work ethic." "Well, I don't think ethnics do no work. I mean, that's they problem, really." "Overt racial prejudice. Impressive."
by vcalzone on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:55:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You mean... (2.00 / 1)

...After months about hearing how he can't win any of the Three Big Swing States, he's positioned to win all of them?


Proud member of the Wikipedia Generation of American politics
by BishopRook on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 09:41:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Yup... (none / 0)

You can hear Gilda Ratnor as Emily Letella now, saying, "Nevermind!"


by Dumbo on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 09:38:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCain's Energy Flip Flop (none / 0)

McCain's campaign looks desperate already. Taking big risks on changing positions that could blow up in their face in the hopes of gaining some traction. Demanding multiple debates. Those are the actions of losing campaigns.

Obama would need to make some monumental screw up for McCain to reverse the slowly building tide. Polls in PA, OH, FL, IA are looking terrible for McSame. His hope of making inroads with Hispanics and woman are turning out to be pipe dreams. Obama is crushing him with those voters.

There is much work to be done but this is not a bad place to be starting from.


by hankg on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 08:05:02 AM EST

Re: McCain's Energy Flip Flop (none / 0)

Is it possible for the Dem's to turn the energy crisis into a STRENGTH?


by Hammer1001 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 11:43:55 AM EST

Re: McCain's Energy Flip Flop (none / 0)

Sorry, hit return too soon.

What I mean is this:  Does the Dem party even have a clue as to how huge promoting PERSONAL energy production could give them HUGE in-roads with Independants and Moderate Republicans...let alone plain US voters?

My thoughts:  Offer a direct rebate for Homeowners who buy/install either a solar array or a wind turbine.  Offer a direct rebate for homeowners who invest in some sort of energy storage system (batteries most likely).  This would be the Fed. (and state?) Govt. putting resources DIRECTLY into the hands of the public who would then become PRODUCERS.  Also, make all INDIVIDUAL energy production tax-free.  THAT will produce energy independance AND put one of the most volitile portions of a citizens budget into their own hands.  Need more "juice"? Invest in more solar or wind.

And yes, there are now, in the market, some very good home-based systems to offer to the public.  Not enough production capacity...Federalize it like they did a lot of production during WWII...this is something that could really get a lot of traction right now and hit the right cord with the voting public.

Or am I alone in this?


by Hammer1001 on Wed Jun 18, 2008 at 11:53:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.