So, if Hillary pulls off a win in IN and keeps Obama's lead to single digits in NC, is that a game changer?

If Obama is only winning the AA and young vote, and hillary clearly wins the white vote and middle class vote, do supers start to feel that Obama can't carry the groups we need to carry to win in the fall?

if they ignore all of the above and still hand the nomination to Obama, are we doing a repeat of Mondale and McGovern elections?

Distortion #1: Obama conflating Hillary's gas tax suspension proposal with John McCain's proposal.  Hillary pays for it with a windfall profits tax while McCain doesn't pay for his idea at all.

Distortion #2: Hillary claiming that Obama wants to do noothing about gas prices; his idea is a second Congressional stimulus package that will cover other things than gas.

Just trying to be fair and balanced.  While I agree with him on policy grounds, I think Hill played Obama big time politically.  His argument should have been more focused on the idea that oil companies would just raise prices to make up for the gas tax being suspended instead of this thirty cents a day stuff; I would never have ever uttered anything about "just twenty-eight dollars on average."

Are we really going to cede the 27 EV in Florida to the Republicans and give it to McCain without a fight or help the down ticket democrats? Seems there is some discussion that the national DNC doesn't intend to participate in Florida in the general election.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/05/0 5/politics/politico/main4069713.shtml?so urce=RSSattr=Politics_4069713  

Tomorrow, NC has the opportunity to put to rest the idea that AA's vote in a monolithic bloc in southern states in particular.

Spurred by Hillary's gas tax holiday proposal and to a far lesser extent, Rev. Wright's attack on the black church, we won't see a 92-93% landslide by AA.  

To the contrary AA's preferring Hillary's position may account for 15-19% defections from Obama.
 

MYDD hates my mac.  It keeps crashing on me.  So the question is:

A)  Is my computer such a sign of elitism that the site intentionally crashes, just to irk me?

B)  Is MYDD so elitist that a dual core laptop isn't sufficient to handle its Obama-hating awesomeness?

C)  Are MYDD programmers such salt-of-the-earth, working-class, really real dems that they can't find time to fix the bugs?

Love you!

There's not a thing to talk about.  Everything in the world is cool and calm.  I can't stay out of my garden.  That's all I got.

if  90% aa will not for hillary ,,,,right

then what about those 60% all white women who will not vote for obama,,,,,

what about 60-70% latinos who will rather vote mccain but obama

what about 65% of older voters who been always voting for obama

what about 65% of catholic vote

what about 80% of jews vote

what about 80% of jewish vote

yes obama is in lead ,,,,,but because of cacus syatem where older,workingfolks,,women with kids ,,don,t go to vote ,,,,,but youngs have no problem in it

so i look at it this way ,,,,

look at the math ,,,yes obama is the winner

but look at the general ,,,obama will be looser unless hillary will really really endorse him ,,,,,which is something we hill supporters will not follow (we r personally insulted by media,sexist society,someobamabots ,kennedy,kerry,and dean)

sorry i wanna correct

what about 65% of older voters who been always voting for clinton
what about 65% of catholic vote for clinton

what about 80% of jews vote for clinton

what about 80% of jewish vote for clinton

I just watched a commentary by Towery of the Insideradvantage poll , he says the gas tax debate is really damaging Obama in NC and IND and that the media has failed to pick it up.

That was one of his explanation of the consolidation of the white vote especially in NC for Clinton.

Hillary will sweep tomorrow. Because of the 'gas tax' nonsense. Real Americans really are this retarded. They'll fall for this trick hook, line and sinker.

The fact that she's a member of a para-christian doomsday cult won't bother them in the slightest.

I moving down to DC for through September to work with the Obama folks on outreach to religious groups (And, if he looses, the DNC instead).  I'd like to find housing on the cheap - so if anybody knows somebody with a spare room they could rent out...send out my email at BGrant@princeton.edu

I don't know how pointing out how long John McCain's lived is going to help him win the election...

Wow, here I was, happy to see a McCain comment thread with 33 commments...and going in and finding its all Obama-Hillary.

McCain is a fool, and there's no fool like an old fool.  Either of our candidates can beat him, and either would be an infinitely better President.  

A League of Nations?  Wow!  I knew McCain was old, but older than Woodrow Wilson?

THAT is why all the Obama supporters thought it was hilarious -- that graph has been crisscrossing forever.

is that McCain thinks this is an original idea.

Could have been a great success. It failed as much because the U.S. never joined it as for any other reason. Thanks to a small group of U.S. senators known as the "Irreconcilables" or "Bitter Enders", the U.S. Senate failed to ratify the treaty that would have let us join. I guess it shouldn't have been any big surprise that almost all of the Bitter Enders (16 out of 18) were Republicans. I think that if the U.S. had been on board from the beginning, as Woodrow Wilson had hoped, the League could have been effective. We'll never know of course, but it could have done something to stave off World War Two.

From Laura Bush castigating a country for not taking care of its people to McCain criticizing Iran...come on, people in glass houses!