This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is Costing[Updated]

This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount.  This style has dogged the campaign from the beginning and it seems to have only intensified as we progress on in this election.  That most likely explains why Obama has not been able to secure the nomination from his early surge.  

The reason I'm sure the Obama campaign set out to call for an end to the election early.  There was no way he could win the nomination the longer he had to campaign for it.  

This style doesn't just seem to be coming from the campaign itself, it is the attitude steeped in many supporters.  And  because his surrogates, media and bloggers seem to run with the campaign talking points and style, this is what the rest of America is coming to realize Obama for.

It's no longer chance comments, or isolated circumstances that causes Senator Obama and his wife to show this attitude.  Everyone speaking on their behalf shows this same attitude, one that is not admiring or a quality you would normally expect someone to copy.  More reason to worry that this attitude is growing and becoming an accepted, even admired quality to prevail.  

Did the Obama Campaign not pay attention to the tired, divisive, hateful and arrogance the American peoople grew weary with from these past 7 years of the Bush administration?  Obviious that Bush's claims of "compassion" and "uniting" were nothing but empty words, in turn receiving something they don't care to continue for 4 more years.  You can't put the same playbook in a new cover and say this is change.

And, it's not restricted to our mainland.  This infection is spreading.

Even while Senator Obama tries to give the illusion to continue campaigning for the nomination, making token visits in the most recent and upcoming Primaries, relying on money to pay for tv ads and marketing instead.  He is asking people, like Puerto Rico, to still vote for him in public, while belittling their importance and questioning their right to vote.  We heard the talking points be handed down heavy last week as all eyes turned to Puerto Rico's upcoming election.

Indeed, some of Mr Obama's supporters, if not his campaign, say it is wrong to include Puerto Rico in tallies of the Democratic popular vote. But Roberto Prats, the chairman of Puerto Rico's Democratic Party and himself a leading Clinton backer, said yesterday such people "need to be educated".

What arrogance.  Ask Puerto Ricans to vote for you, but try to deny them their voice.  What kind of Democracy does Senator Obama believe in?  It's ok for Puerto Ricans to pay taxes and fight our wars-disproportionatey I might add.  In person you tell them you want to represent them and you know their concerns, but because you aren't favored in polling, belittle their importance and even question their right the right for their vote to count?

There is a very sound and real reason Senator Obama is losing support the longer he is seen and heard.  

It feels like the real Senator Obama is nothing at all what his speech writers and marketing crew have tried to create.  If he's not standing with a prewritten words in front of teleprompters giving Ra Ra speeches that have nothing to do with what he will actually do in the job he is competing for, he is leaving little to want as the next Commander in Chief.

Is he for real?  Would he actually be so steeped in himself that he would allow something like this to be aired?

Obama, who has far more money than Clinton, launched his television ads last Saturday. They use a Spanish voiceover and show Obama speaking English with Spanish subtitles. The ad says Obama grew up on an island and in a family with few resources so he understands the concerns of Puerto Rican families.

I surely hope Puerto Ricans rise in numbers and loudly state, THEY DO MATTER and seal the deal for the person who cares, who is there for them and who will win and give the GOOD change our country so needs and elect Hillary Clinton.  Then the message will be clear and the Democrats can nominate Hillary, the leader in votes to carry them to a win in November.

Update [2008-5-28 12:39:32 by thebluenote]: It seems some wanted the links for the entire stories and articles of which I posteed from, so I have added them.

Display:


Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 4)

okay, this supporter DISAGREES WITH YOU:


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:08:08 PM EST

Does not this also remind you of the time (2.00 / 6)

Hillary said theis primary is over on Super Tuesday?


by StellarEvolution on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:13:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Does not this also remind you of the time (2.00 / 2)

Yea, oh the sweet irony of it all.

I love the fact that she lost, the fact she accepted the SD's one YEAR before the first vote was cast shows how much she LOVES our ELITIST SD system.

foward to the 5:00 mark, it ties into your point.

here is your elitism:


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:18:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 4)

"This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount."

Yeah, I know what you mean...

I guess you could call that a "record amount."


by not Brit on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:18:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

TYPO ALERT!

I think you meant "out" instead of "away".  Easy mistake- could've happened to anyone.


John McCain wants to stay in Iraq.
by ihaveseenenough on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:32:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

The Decembrists rock. I agree.


by redwagon on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:11:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah Man...They're like... (none / 0)

... total stadium rock!


by kraant on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:31:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

The Decembrists are bigger than Jesus!


by catalysis on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:45:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

That's my bird.  Thanks for linking him, we're looking to go over 120,000 hits mark today.


by Piuma on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:04:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

WHAT ARE YOU SERIOUS!

Holy shit, you are a celebrity!

I love your bird,  one of the best moments when he was on tv.

common now, are you serious?


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:06:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

I'm completely serious, well at least about being his owner, and I've got the scars to prove it.  It's been quite amazing watching it go viral and seeing him show up without warning on Hardball.


by Piuma on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:10:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

Oh thats awesome, you should have diaried it!

I had no idea their voices went so deep, when he coughs it sounds SO human.

Well he has brought much happyness here,  great for breaking up depressing diaries, or in his case troll diaries, or concern ones.

Anyways I love the Parot joke Mathews made!

You should be very proud and use this as an opportunity to get a pic with Barack  :D


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:14:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

I put it up on DKos where they could understand the fun aspect of it but over here I didn't want to go through all the lame remarks the Hillaryis44 crowd would make.  I'm glad you enjoyed it.  He cracks us up daily.


by Piuma on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:19:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

OK, totally love your bird.  So do my kids.


by niksder on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:37:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Great! (none / 0)

Great imitation of an Obama supporter.


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:15:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great! (none / 0)

Wow, attacks on birds.

really scraping the barrel.

So, if there was a Hillary parot, what would it parot?


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:18:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great! (none / 0)

I love the bird! Are you saying that I'm insulting the bird because I stated that he imitated an Obama supporter??? Heh, I've heard of everything now.

BTW, it's "parrot"


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:23:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great! (none / 0)

Gee, if only you had heard everything now, maybe you'd have gained some knowledge, instead of just bitterness.


by venician on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:30:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great! (none / 0)

Let's see...I say "I love the parrot" and you say "maybe you'd have gained some knowledge, instead of bitterness.

I'd say that you're the one that's bitter.


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:32:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Grow up, please. (none / 0)

We'll wait for you, but hurry.


by niksder on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:38:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is coming from.... (none / 0)

...a person that claims that everything is a "snark" when he/she disagrees with it.


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:52:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great! (none / 0)

Dude, you made a lame attack on Obama supporters, and he called you on it. Let it go.


by SupremeCourt on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:40:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Sensitive (none / 0)

Is it not an imitation of an Obama supporter? Dude you're not a realist. The owner of the bird is an Obama supporter. Sheesh!


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:43:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sensitive (none / 0)

Who said the owner taught the bird.

It coulda been the pro-obama media conspiracy?

Maybe the bird sits next to an MSNBC box all day?

Stop judging birds for Obama,  you know if that bird was outlisde of the R&B committee and the HRC protestors wouldnt tear the poor thing apart  [/snar]


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:48:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sensitive (none / 0)

Who said the owner taught the bird.
The bird goes to school?
It coulda been the pro-obama media conspiracy?
You believe in conspiracy theories? So does Rev. Wright.
Maybe the bird sits next to an MSNBC box all day?
I'm incline to agree you except the bird would be saying "it's over" rather than "yes we can"
by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sensitive (none / 0)

Do you see how enthused Smokey is and how he's enjoying himself?  Well, you're right, he is just like an Obama supporter.  There is something joyous about the prospect of real change coming to this country.


by Piuma on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:51:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sensitive (none / 0)

Hey I forgot to mention that for ten years we owned and bred cockatiels.

When I left my parents decided to move the remaining mother bird and husband (no more babies) to a good home of a friend (they were their pets, not mine, I just helped 95% of the time)

Anyways,  watching your bird as family was quite touching.
We have a connection to parrots and obama so it was a feelgood moment.

Their personalities are amazing, I mean this seriously, the closest you can get to a cat is a Parrot family bird!

Sooooooooo when is the next video?

You got to teach him some of the GE talking points!


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:56:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sensitive (none / 0)

I totally agree with you, "Smokey" is "just like an Obama supporter." So, what's the problem?


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:58:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Like I said before.... (none / 0)

Great bird! I love parrots. I own a quaker and once owned an Amazon parrot. The Amazon's bite was lethal :D


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:02:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The real question... (none / 0)

is how do you feel about Obama supporters?  I am taking it, from reading this thread, you have realized they are great and you love them.  Perhaps you still fear the lethal bite?


by tonedevil on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:18:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Generalization.... (none / 0)

Love them? I don't know them! If you want to know how I feel about them politically...I think in general, they're shortsighted.


by soyousay on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:25:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No need... (2.00 / 1)

I understand your feelings you just protested so much that the bird/Sen. Obama comparison was not malicious in the least.  I take you at your word on that and thought your comment on how much you love parrots was to further show you didn't have an intent to insult.  
I probably just over thought.
by tonedevil on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:34:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jake Tapper is spreading the word (1.75 / 4)

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/ 2008/05/gallup-analysis.html?cid=1166492 48#comment-116649248

He puts up for discussion the Gallup analysis that Hillary is the stronger candidate.

I would also note that Survey USA has McCain beating Obama in Michigan.


by katmandu1 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:10:28 PM EST

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (1.00 / 2)

Trolled for citing tabloid journalists.

Show me how or where Tapper gets a drop of respect from any of his peers.

Why Fox hasn't dangled a contract in his face is beyond me, he has the look and lack of a brain.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:12:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (2.00 / 2)

That is pathetic.  This childish act has no merit, especially for anybody who has followed the fawning for Obama- Jake Tapper .


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:17:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (none / 0)

The man has no credibility.

Find me one of his peers, journalists who give this hack any credit.

He is a tabloid journalist, link me ONE legitimate article and I remove the TR.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:20:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (2.00 / 1)

Citing bad journalists doesn;t merit a TR.


The primaries are over!
Focus on McCain
by really not a troll on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:07:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (none / 0)

Wow.  I'm an Obama supprter but that's really inappropriate.  He's a senior national correspondent from a major media outlet.


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:32:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (none / 0)

Well it has nothing do with Obama.

They guys is a shitty journalist, if I am wrong please someone correct me.

People here FREELY bash on of my heroes Keith Olbermann for the most weak minded reasons.

I bash this loser for not doing his job ever in his life and get grief for it.

This election is serious and I would prefer the US Weekly crowd to stay there.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:00:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (2.00 / 1)

There is a difference between bashing someone and troll rating a person for disagreeing with you.

The person you TR'd pointed to a poll you disagreed with. You could have responded by saying why you disagreed instead of TR'ing.


by redwagon on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:10:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (none / 0)

No, it seems that Jack Tapper has been the "weapon of choise" for Obama bashers.

I have never read any article from him that wasn not misleading.

So now TR's are only allowed if you cite a right wing source outright?

What line does Jack need to cross so he gets the same treatment.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:16:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (none / 0)

He may be a shitty journalist, but TRing someone for citing to a major, generally accepted national new outlet is kind of extreme.


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 04:04:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What goes around comes around (none / 0)


by lombard on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:01:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (2.00 / 1)

Yes, a definite trend that should be worry every Democrat, le alone Super D, that should make the right decision.


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:18:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jake Tapper is spreading the word (2.00 / 1)

So which is it? Super delegates should "make the right decision" in opposition to the results of the pledged delegates or the super delegates should follow "the VOTERS" in picking the nominee?


by not Brit on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 2)

Well you are certainly entitled to your opinion.

FYI he now has another ad up in PR where he is speaking spanish.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:11:08 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

Geee, thanks.  (snark)

...Oh, so he learned how damaging that was finally too.


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:19:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 5)

Serious question.  This has to be one of the most hypocritical, bullshit fulled rants I have read in a while.

If I may quote a fitting line...(paraphrased of course)...

"Mr. Bluenote, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent "diary" were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."


Congratulations Steny Hoyer! Our 2008 Chickenshit Leader Of The Year!
by RockvilleLiberal2 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:12:27 PM EST

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 3)

gameshow


Obama in November.
by Artemis Jax on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:15:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 1)

Indeed - any chance to interject a great American like Billy Madison into a Hillary/Obama debate is an opportunity not to be missed - kudos on the quick visuals, I couldn't find one...plus I don't know how to embed stuff.


Congratulations Steny Hoyer! Our 2008 Chickenshit Leader Of The Year!
by RockvilleLiberal2 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:21:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 1)

I happened to have this on my photobucket from like 2 years ago. haven't used it in a LONG time, you just triggered it.


Obama in November.
by Artemis Jax on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:22:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (none / 0)

Mojo for you good Sir, quite a bit of mojo indeed.


Congratulations Steny Hoyer! Our 2008 Chickenshit Leader Of The Year!
by RockvilleLiberal2 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:27:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 1)

Really.  Let's not have facts get in your way, heh?


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:19:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (none / 0)

You didn't ask the question,

Is this Snark,  seriously?

just a yes or no will suffice.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:21:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 3)

Wow...two in one day.  A Hillary supporter saying don't let the facts get in the way.  Can I get another helping of that sweet irony?

Facts:

Obama leads in the following categories:

Delegates Won
 - pledged delegates
 - super delegates
Popular Vote
States Won
Majority of all delegates won
Fundraising

oh, and fewest gaffes involving assassination


Congratulations Steny Hoyer! Our 2008 Chickenshit Leader Of The Year!
by RockvilleLiberal2 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (2.00 / 1)

Facts like he's turnign voter away in "record numbers"?  Where'd you get that fact?  What was the previous record?

And do we forget that it was the Clinton campaign that first deemed states "insignificant."


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:34:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Is this a snark? (none / 0)

Those numbers are only available in caucus states.


by niksder on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:41:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Record voter turnout (2.00 / 3)

This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount.

Well since you started off this diary with a complete falsehood I didn't even bother reading the rest of your daydream.


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:13:01 PM EST

Re: So many lies and unproven theories (2.00 / 2)

all collected into one steaming mass of words.

This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount.

Record amount? Link? Any proof? Last I heard his campaign was attracting Democratic voters in record amounts.

The reason I'm sure the Obama campaign set out to call for an end to the election early.  There was no way he could win the nomination the longer he had to campaign for it.  

A massive lie. Obama and his campaign has repeatedly said Clinton can and should stay in as long as she can / wants.

Really, you're not even trying.

And what's with the unsourced quotes?

Did you put any effort into this baseless hit job?


Obama in November.
by Artemis Jax on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:13:25 PM EST

But he IS turning them away in (2.00 / 1)

record amounts. Did you see pictures of the Portland rally? Only 75,000 in a city of almost a million. Where were the other 900K? Obviously his attitude turned them away.

</snark>


by 79blondini on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:53:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What did you mean? (2.00 / 3)

"This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount."

Do you mean turning voters away from the Republicans Party?

Because I'm all for that.


by emptythreatsfarm on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:19:36 PM EST

Re: What did you mean? (2.00 / 1)

So you're like the DLC thinking that acting like a Republican is a winning strategy?  Hardly.  When if Democrats want a Republican, they'll vote for one.  If Republicans want a Republican, they'll vote for the real one, not the light one pretending not to be one.  Think about it and let history teach you something.


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:22:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What did you mean? (2.00 / 1)

Right.  That' why I support the non-DLC candidate, Senator Obama.


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:35:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McSame Troll Brigade Pvt No Class. (2.00 / 2)


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:22:15 PM EST

Re: McSame Troll Brigade Pvt No Class. (none / 0)

Yea, this is it.

McBloggers fail again.

Damn they are soft.

Demoted.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm always tickled (none / 0)

by the 'arrogance brigade' - who fling accusations like monkeys fling poo - and do so in such an all-powerful voice steeped in omniscience, completely without citation or evidence beyond the usual "I said it, my circle of agreers is completely representative, therefore it is true" method.

Arrogance?

That, my friend, is arrogance...

The irony is deep with this one.


by zonk on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:24:08 PM EST

This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning (2.00 / 1)

Very good observation.


by LindaSFNM on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:12 PM EST

Whatever (none / 0)

Thank you for your concern.


accepting McLettuce is like being 9 years old and forced to eat your own cooking
by Sychotic1 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:23 PM EST

This is actually a major problem... (2.00 / 1)

...and it will continue to be so going forward.

I've seen this play out in many elections in recent years, as well (mostly at the Federal--i.e.: congress--level, however). It may be one of the underriding issues of the GE, too!

I'll refer to it as "aloofness," although it's much more and much more complex than that. Perhaps more like "aloof disingenuousness!"

So, I've seen "aloof disingenuousness" cause more than one candidate to lose an election.

Ignore or mock my comment at your own risk!


by bobswern on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:25:52 PM EST

Re: This is actually a major problem... (none / 0)

I hereby mock your comment.


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:36:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

OK (none / 0)

I call "ignore".


by zonk on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:39:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OK (none / 0)

So we're done with the mocking?


by niksder on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:43:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yup. (none / 0)

Just waiting around to see what happens now.


by Same As It Ever Was on Wed May 28, 2008 at 04:05:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

Earth to diarist!! Obama has ALREADY secured the nomination.


"I am standing with Barack Obama to say, `Yes, we can!'" Hillary Clinton 6/7/08
by feliks on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:26:27 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

Earth to feliks, the nomination isn't secured until the convention in August.


by Denizen Kristine on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:29:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is this snark? (2.00 / 1)

Serious question.


by Builderman on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:46:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Flick (none / 0)


by Denizen Kristine on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:55:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Flick (none / 0)


Congratulations Steny Hoyer! Our 2008 Chickenshit Leader Of The Year!
by RockvilleLiberal2 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:04:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Flick (none / 0)

My favorite as always:


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:20:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"Turning away voters in record amounts" (none / 0)

Please, please, PLEASE provide some context for this hilarious masturbation of a statement,


by Lieber on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:28:56 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 3)


This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount.  This style has dogged the campaign from the beginning and it seems to have only intensified as we progress on in this election.  That most likely explains why Obama has not been able to secure the nomination from his early surge.  


by Casuist on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:30:44 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 7)

This attitude that has embodied Senator Obama and his campaign is turning voters away in record amount. [emphasis mine]

Evidence or retraction.

the Obama campaign set out to call for an end to the election early

Evidence or retraction.

It's no longer chance comments, or isolated circumstances that causes Senator Obama and his wife to show this attitude.  Everyone speaking on their behalf shows this same attitude [emphasis mine]

Evidence or retraction.

He is [...] belittling [Puerto Ricans'] importance and questioning their right to vote.

Evidence or retraction.

No more free rides.  Extraordinary generalizations are expected to be met with extraordinary evidence; claims that Obama or his campaign are saying certain things or engaging in certain actions are expected to be supported with citations or quotes.  

Intellectual honesty demands that you support the above-quoted assertions with evidence, or retract them and apologize for making assertions you could not support.  If you do neither, then you are exposed as a dishonest writer, willing to make any claim in order to support your hate.

So, let's see it.


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:32:06 PM EST

Man, I really feel sorry for you (none / 0)

You're really disconnected from reality. This diary proves you can convince yourself of anything if you stew in your own juices too long. But you know what? You're no good for participating in politics. Politics is about the real world. Have you ever participated in a community group, local political campaign, or grass roots political movement?

I didn't think so.


by drmark on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:36:31 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

For those not completely committed to spreading the one-sided and unfair portrait constructed by Obama's political opponents and reinforced by this diary, and particularly for those opponents who are open to re-evaluating the likely democratic nominee as opposed to continuing to portray him in the worst possible and least productive light, I recommend the following artical by Cass Sunstein, a respected liberal intellectual and legal scholar.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cass-r-sun stein/the-obama-i-know_b_90034.html

Here you will find a sympathetic analysis that shows his many strengths as an intelligent and respectful and dedicated thinker and leader and an idea of what kind of leadership he would likely display if elected president.


The future is unwritten
by Strummerson on Wed May 28, 2008 at 12:57:23 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

Thank you for that productive comment and link. While I will remain a HRC supporter to the last minute, this is the kind of thing that shows respect and encourages unity.


by redwagon on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:15:04 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (none / 0)

State Party Chairs of CO and OR, both happen to be women...endorsed Obama today..
Guess you forgot to send them your thoughts bluenote eh?
"harlequin speech of suicide, demanding instantaneous lobotomy"
by nogo postal on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:17:04 PM EST

Ugh, whatever. (none / 0)

I'm getting tired of "elitist" being used as an insult, anyway.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:17:09 PM EST

Re: Ugh, whatever. (2.00 / 1)

If you think Elitism is a good thing, then it shouldn't bother you that I or others don't.


by thebluenote on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:42:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's a hollow, idiotic insult. n/t (none / 0)


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:45:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice. Obviously you think so. nt (none / 0)


by environmentally blue on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:57:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Nice. Obviously you think so. nt (none / 0)

and so does everyone else,  this is a democratic site.

Just because McCain wants to stroke the ego of the 10 republicans who know how to use a blog doesnt give you the right to make pathetic spam attempts.


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:04:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Terrible diary (none / 0)


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:21:21 PM EST

Re: This Elitism, Arrogance, Demeaning Tactic is C (2.00 / 1)

Want to talk about elitism?

How about a candidate who tells super delegates to overturn the will of Democratic voters because she is convinced that the party and the country needs her.

http://www.politico.com/static/PPM43_080 528_delegateletter.html


by WellstoneDem on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:34:09 PM EST

true (2.00 / 1)

Good diary.


by environmentally blue on Wed May 28, 2008 at 01:59:29 PM EST

Re: true (1.00 / 2)

Wow another McBlogger.

I can tell, Democrats don't say such stupid things.

but dont worry my little McBlogger you will learn.

I LOVE your screename, I bet you spent all night thinking of it.

"hmm leebrals,  um they want to preserve the environment and they like the color blue"


http://www.truepat.org/
by CrushTheGOP2008 on Wed May 28, 2008 at 02:03:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.