Corporate Money and Obama

Obama's Lobbyist Connection article from Newsweek.

"It's corporate money trying to hoodwink the public," the state's Democratic Lt. Gov. Pat Quinn said. What got scant notice then--but may soon get more scrutiny--is that CORE was the brainchild of ASK Public Strategies, a consulting firm whose senior partner is David Axelrod, now chief strategist for Barack Obama.

ASK last year proposed a similar "political campaign style approach" to help Illinois hospitals block a state proposal that would have forced them to provide more medical care to the indigent. One part of its plan: create a "grassroots" group of medical experts "capable of contacting policymakers to advocate for our position," according to a copy of the proposal. (ASK didn't get the contract.) Public-interest watchdogs say these grassroots campaigns are state of the art in the lobbying world. "There's no way with a straight face to say that's not lobbying," says Ellen Miller, director of the Sunlight Foundation, which promotes government transparency.

More after the flip

One of them, Exelon, lobbied Obama two years ago on a nuclear bill; the firm's executives and employees have also been a top source of cash for Obama's campaign, contributing $236,211.

Lobbyists are a reality in American Politics. Nobody should condemn any candidate for taking corporate money. It's not possible to fight any big election in the USA without corporate money. However, Obama should not try to hide this.

From an older article

Obama told the crowd that's why he doesn't accept contributions from political action committees or lobbyists.

"They're not funding my campaign. They won't run my White House," he said.

However, campaign finance records show that Obama has received tens of thousands of dollars from people in many of the same groups and industries he regularly rails against.

"He may not take money from (political action committees) or lobbyists, but he is taking interest money," said Sheila Krumholtz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, which tracks campaign finance issues.

"He's getting a lot of money from individuals representing lawyers and law firms, security firms, real estate and Hollywood," Krumholtz said. "You can't say that he doesn't take special-interest money."

State lobbyists and non-wage-earning spouses of lobbyists and lobbying firm employees have contributed $115,163 to Obama's campaign through March 20, according to the center.

People in the oil and gas industries have given $222,309 to Obama. He received $528,765 from the pharmaceutical and health industry, making him the largest recipient of the sector's largesse.

From Commondreams


But the Illinois Democrat's policy of shunning money from lobbyists registered to do business on Capitol Hill does not extend to lawyers whose partners lobby there.

Nor does the ban apply to corporations that have major lobbying operations in Washington. And the prohibition does not extend to lobbyists who ply their trade in such state capitals as Springfield, Ill.; Tallahassee, Fla.; and Sacramento, though some deal with national clients and issues.


Obama's biggest single source of corporate money - $160,000 - came from executives at Exelon Corp., the nation's largest nuclear power provider, and its subsidiary, Commonwealth Edison, an Illinois utility.

Exelon spent $500,000 to influence policy in Washington last year. Although Obama took no money from Exelon's Washington lobbyists, he accepted $1,000 checks from lobbyists John P. Novak and James Monk of Springfield. In Springfield, Novak represents Exelon., and Monk is president of the Illinois Energy Assn., a trade group that represents Commonwealth Edison.

Monk and Novak said they do not lobby in Washington. But their clients care about federal issues, including where to store nuclear waste and what restrictions to place on coal-fired plants.

"I'm not going to second-guess his policy," Novak said. "I think it is appropriate for me to support a presidential candidate from Illinois."

Lobbyists from other states also gave Obama money. In California, Obama accepted $2,300 from a partner whose lobbying firm represents AT&T, United Airlines and the Recording Industry Assn. of America in Sacramento.

In Tallahassee, Obama held a fundraiser attended by several statehouse lobbyists, taking checks from lobbyists for trial attorneys, the insurance industry, fast-food chains and sugar cane growers. State and federal issues often are related, as noted by the law firm Akerman Senterfitt, whose Florida-based members donated $7,000 to Obama. On its website, Akerman notes it combines Tallahassee connections with "an involved federal political action committee" to provide its clients "with an enviable level of access."

Jim Cooper, Obama's healthcare spokesperson s in the pocket of health care providers & insurance companines. Jim Cooper was the one who was actively involved in derailing Hillary's healthcare reforms in the 90's.

From A NYT 1994 article

It has also become a pocketbook issue for Mr. Cooper, and whatever the fate of his health plan, he is already a winner.

In less than a year, the mild-mannered Democrat from the most rural House district in Tennessee has become the toast of health care providers and insurance companies, which have channeled tens of thousands of dollars of contributions to his campaign for a Senate seat.

Mr. Cooper is only one of the many politicians benefiting from the fund-raising frenzy set off by the national dialogue over health care.

Since drug companies, hospitals, insurers and doctors have so much at stake in the legislation that may emerge from the Congress, many are investing all they can in lawmakers whose proposals would be most favorable to them -- or the least damaging.

They are showering millions of dollars in donations to members of Congress with prominent roles in the debate, like Mr. Cooper, whose plan is the alternative to President Clinton's proposal most often preferred by business because it neither requires employers to provide coverage nor limits insurance premiums.

X-posted at dKos



Display:


Tip Jar (2.00 / 1)

Tips for an honest statement from Obama.


by gaf on Tue May 27, 2008 at 12:52:47 AM EST

not accepting lobbyist and PAC (none / 0)

money is an honest statement. Not accepting money from individuals who work for companies/organizations that have D.C. lobbying practices would be absurd.


by Casuist on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:03:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama's OPPOSITION to universal heathcare (none / 0)

and his support of INCREASED PENTAGON EXPENDITURES must be worth trillions of dollars to somebody - Do you think that suddenly, these groups, which have been VERY active lobbying - in the past, are going to SIT OUT AN ELECTION?

Why the silence?


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Tue May 27, 2008 at 07:43:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tip Jar (none / 0)

You forgot to mention 'Hillraiser' David Crane, President And CEO Of NRG Energy. Must have slipped your mind.


John McCain
by Mandoliniment on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:03:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (2.00 / 2)

So let me get this straight- in Illinois, Axelrod was not considered a lobbyist, and this diary is now trying to smear Obama because an entirely different state considers something only tangentially related lobbying?

Wait, hold on.

David Axelrod is the senior partner at ASK. ASK came up with the idea for CORE, a consumer activist group. CORE then made a commercial, paid for by Exelon Corp, which Lieutenant Governor Pat Quinn seemed suspicious about.

So... Obama is connected to a man who did consulting work for a consumer activist group that might or might not be considered a lobby.

Please, someone tell me what i'm missing. Because this seems an awful lot like another six degrees of Obama, except this time they haven't even found something scandalous at the other end. They've just linked him through several degrees to a corporation paying for an ad that supposedly was promoting their interests.

Is the corporation paying for the ad supposed to be scandalous? I really don't get why I'm supposed to care.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 12:57:03 AM EST

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (2.00 / 1)

And I found another corporate rivaling Exelon with contributions- The Home Depot. Why not do a post on that- I've been trying to get someone to realize the danger of having a President who's in the pocket of Big Home Improvement, but nobody seems to care, and I can't figure out why.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:01:38 AM EST

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (none / 0)

Has Tim Allen endorsed yet?


by Shaun Appleby on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:09:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (none / 0)

Heh, excellent question.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:14:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Got anything else? (2.00 / 3)

Seriously, I work for the largest real estate company in the country, and when I donate to Obama, it registers as such, even though they didn't tell me to give him money and don't have anything to do with my decision.

What you're doing is blaming Obama for supposed loopholes in a policy that Obama made for himself.  He chose to tie one arm behind his back, and you're now insinuating that he's doing something wrong because he can still wiggle his fingers.

What you're doing is spreading a sleazy and disingenuous line of attack meant to cast doubt on Obama's willingness to practice what he preaches about campaign finance reform.  

To change the system, you have to beat the system, and, in this case, beating the system takes a whole lot of money, because classically that is the advantage that Republicans have had over Democrats.  Obama has chosen to get over 40% of his money from small donors (comprising 90% of his total donors) like myself who, while some of us might look like we come from the biggest companies, are actually private citizens who know that Obama will use our donation wisely to win the election and help change our country for the better.

Exellon is an Illinois-based company.  Big surprise that they're supporting the Illinois candidate, eh?

As for the lawyers at the same firm as lobbyists, you want him to perhaps refuse donations from the janitors, mail room staff, and secretaries as well?  Where should he stop in his self-mandated rule of not taking money from lobbyists?  Perhaps the clients of those lawyers might be influenced, too...

But no, your accusations aren't thought through beyond the need to smear Obama.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.

That One/Another Fella '08

by Dracomicron on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:07:19 AM EST

And I work in a bar (none / 0)

... does my contribution mean that he's beholden to Bacardi?


by mikeinsf on Tue May 27, 2008 at 04:25:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama watered down nuclear safety law - Excelon (none / 0)

Thank you for this information.

The New York Times said that the Excelon money was a corrupting influence on Obama too. Evidently he watered down a nuclear plant safety law for them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/03/us/pol itics/03exelon.html


http://www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Ep isode.aspx?sched=1242
Confused by the 'Bailout' Lies?
Listen to NPR's The Giant Pool of Money
by architek on Tue May 27, 2008 at 07:48:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Corrolation is not causation (none / 0)

That article says that the bill was weakened, and that Obama recieved money from Excelon employees; there is no direct link between the two.

Bills get weakened and killed in Congress all the time.  I'd imagine that the majority do.  Just because this particular bill suffered a certain fate doesn't mean that Obama is somehow money corrupt.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.

That One/Another Fella '08

by Dracomicron on Tue May 27, 2008 at 09:26:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (none / 0)

so much for the politics of hope and change.


by nikkid on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:19:38 AM EST

YES! (none / 0)

We've all given so much for the politics of hope and change.  I agree completely!

Thank you for recognizing the efforts of over a million small donors who give what we can.

That was a nice moment of non-partisanship on your behalf, nikkid.

More Clinton supporters like you keeps a positive attitude towards Obama and his supporters, we might all win this thing for the good guys yet.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.

That One/Another Fella '08

by Dracomicron on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:26:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (2.00 / 1)

Draco's right. I'm proud of you, nikkid. For awhile, I thought your only purpose was to bash Obama and his supporters irregardless of content or if the poster was a troll, and you've shown us that you have more depth than I gave you credit for! Kudos to you, ma'am.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:30:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Corporate Money and Obama (none / 0)

Jim Cooper actively derailed Hillary's healthcare plan?  Hahaha, now thats some great revisionist history right there.


by KevinT on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:21:25 AM EST

man (none / 0)

this six degrees from seperation has got to end!


I would say at this point we're starting to see a little desperation on the part of the woman who I support... NY Governor Paterson
by obamaovermccain on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:23:35 AM EST

Re: man (2.00 / 1)


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:29:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: man (none / 0)

hahah mojo for you!


I would say at this point we're starting to see a little desperation on the part of the woman who I support... NY Governor Paterson
by obamaovermccain on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:39:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

You guys will say anything won't you. (2.00 / 1)

Anything at all whether it is true or not, deceptive or not, it doesn't matter.

Your accusation failed to mention how many donors gave the 160,000 from Exelon. Was it 80 donors giving 2,000 or was it 1,600 giving 100. That would make a big difference wouldn't it.

Given that Obama has over 1,000,000 donors it would be quit possible that over 1,000 of them worked in company wouldn't it and if they were unionized and had endorsed, it wouldn't be unusual  for many or most of the employees to give would it?

Obama has over a million in donors and an average contribution of around $100.

That really steams you guys doesn't it because our candidate can raise money with groveling to special interests like yours does.


We shall overcome. Yes we can.
by Sam Wise Gingy on Tue May 27, 2008 at 01:37:41 AM EST

Re: You guys will say anything won't you. (none / 0)

Meh, he's a troll. If he cared, he'd have stuck around to debate this.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Tue May 27, 2008 at 02:11:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.