First the other story:
Gas prices are rising rapidly : Oil just topped $135/barrel. We all understand that there are many reasons for this which all boil down to: too much demand, not enough supply.
But, there has been one extra push recently: shortage of coal in China's coal fired power plants. This coal shortage has pushed up demand for diesel in China's diesel fired power plants (electricity is fungible, it seems), which has increased demand for crude, and pushed up crude oil prices.
So, the question becomes: why is there a shortage of coal in the coal-fired power plants ? The answer is: mine safety.. in response to the recent spate of mine accidents they have had, the Chinese authorities have shut down some of the unsafe coal mines.
So, now the question for you, O_Progressive_Reader_of_MyDD_Who_Insists
that_Chinese_competition_is_Unfair_becau
se_of_their_Lax_Safety_
Environmental_Rules
is this: Would you prefer that the Chinese shut down even more unsafe mines, and drive up crude oil prices even further ? Or would you suspend your "workers safety" agenda in favor of lower crude oil prices
Truly a moral conundrum, isnt it... and it is the subject of the poll question
And now for the Congresswoman who walked away:
As the real estate market softened in 2007, the new owner of a three-bedroom, 1,600-square-foot house in Sacramento's Curtis Park neighborhood ran into trouble. The house that was purchased for $535,000 in January had lost equity. The owner fell behind in her payments, and eventually, the bank seized the home.What makes this story different from the thousands like it is that the owner of this house was a member of Congress.
The story of the foreclosure of Long Beach Democrat Laura Richardson's Sacramento home is a tale of a real estate market gone sour. It is also an illustration of how far many candidates will go to seek elected office, even if it means quite literally mortgaging their own financial future.
So, this poses the 2nd moral question: should a member of Congress who cannot manage her own finances be allowed to manage ours ?
And if you say yes to the question above, the counter question is: Isnt that elitism ? What level of mastery of your own finances is required before you are allowed to manage someone else's ?
So many moral conundrums...so little time =)
|
|
|
Permalink :: 3 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.