Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Edwards did.

Hats off to Jack and Jill politics ( a very insightful and progressive blog) for addressing this issue.  David Gergen mentioned this last night during CNN's election coverage and I just wanted to amplify it here.

According to the exit polls in WV and KY, many voters openly admitted to voting against Obama and for Hillary because of race.  Now, although I do not find fault with those that support Hillary because they feel that a woman presidency will dispel negative stereotypes about women, and I certainly find no fault with those that support Barack because they would like to dispel the carictures and stereotypes that plague african-americans, voting against someone because you endorse those negative sterotypes is racist and should be denounced.  Edwards certainly addressed the issue during his campaign but Hillary has been silent.

In fact, it appears that she is seeking to court their vote.  Her comments discussing her support among white americans, hard-working white americans were roundly denounced.  In fact, after hearing from a number of her supporters, she rejected them but after I read her recent interview in the Washington Post, I felt that she exposed once again, a duplicitous stance.  Of note, when she stated that gender played a major role in this campaign but racism did not, she seemed to ignore the recent coverage of the racism that many of Obama's supporters have endured.  She also seemed to have forgotten that Obama had to obtain Secret Service protection pretty quickly because of the nature of the threats that he received.

From the Washington Post - Sen. Barack Obama's "phone-bank volunteers and campaign surrogates are encountering a raw racism and hostility that have gone largely unnoticed -- and unreported -- this election season. Doors have been slammed in their faces. They've been called racially derogatory names (including the white volunteers). And they've endured malicious rants and ugly stereotyping from people who can't fathom that the senator from Illinois could become the first African American president.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...

The leader that many of us are seeking inspires our better nature and rallies Americans to greatness.  Clinton's campaign is seeking to divide us as a nation.  In fact, based on her current statements that she wants to take this fight to the convention and further divide our party.   During a recent conference calls with supporters, she promised that she would not do anything to embarass them.  Well...
David Gergen's comments on this matter can be viewed here - http://www.cnn.com/...

Update - TexasDarlin - If you can find the link where Clinton denounced the racist voters, please post it in the comment line and I will update my diary. If she did indeed say that, those comments deserve media attention. To those who have stated that sexism has played a role in this campaign, I certainly agree with you but according to exit poll data, it has not played the same role as racism.

Display:


Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 3)

I find this problematic to say the least. Do you think he should denounce all those people who are supporting him because he's a man and they won't vote for a woman; or the Obama supporters that are saying things like "Life's a bitch-why vote for one"?

Come on now, get real


Hillary supporter for Barack Obama in 2008
by zcflint05 on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:09:59 PM EST

Lets not go there.. (2.00 / 3)

You are completely wrong..

Race has nothing to do with it for many (most? almost all?) voters

My big objection to Obama is that I don't think he is as progressive as Hillary, and I think his lack of a healthcare plan is going to end up with us not getting affordable healthcare for another eight years.

To be honest, I think he isn't at all what he says he is. That may have been business as usual in the past for politicians but it isn't going to cut it now.

BTW, many Obama voters probably would be voting for Hillary if it wasnt for her 'race',
she would be working much more in their interest.

See what I mean? Lets not go there.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:58:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets not go there.. (none / 0)

Actually race has a lot to do with Hillary's wins in W.VA and KY and you know it. The exit polls show more than 20 percent of her supporters in those states said race was a deciding factor for them in who to vote for. Edwards had the decency to say he didn't want the support of anyone who would vote against Obama because he's black or Hillary because she's a woman. But the silence from Hillary is deafening.


"No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." -Hillary Clinton
by fugazi on Thu May 22, 2008 at 12:50:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Agreed (2.00 / 2)

Should he denounce all of the African Americans who voting for him because he is black?  What about the people who "answered" yes to the infamous "Is race a factor in your vote" question and vote for Obama?

In the rush to manufacture outrage, some people seem to have forgotten that Obama got some of those votes as well.


Linfar's co-blogger opposing John McCain
by psychodrew on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:32:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Agreed (none / 0)

Show the polling.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:08:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You're welcome. (none / 0)

Pennsylvania

In deciding your vote for president today, the race of the candidate the candidate:

19% Important  Clinton 59  Obama  41
80% Not Important  Clinton   54  Obama   46


West Virginia

In deciding your vote for president today, the race of the candidate the candidate:

22% Important  Clinton 82  Obama  12
77% Not Important  Clinton   62  Obama   30

Further note that in West Virginia, 8% of voters said that race was the most important factor and 10% of those voters cast votes for Senator Obama.

North Carolina

In deciding your vote for president today, the race of the candidate the candidate:

18% Important  Clinton 35  Obama  64
80% Not Important  Clinton   44  Obama   54

More than 25% of African American voters said that race was a factor and Obama got 92% of their votes.

Look, I'm not saying that there is no racism among the white voters who said that race was a factor.  I'm not arguing that African-American voters are racist for supporting Obama in record numbers.  They should be proud that a member of their community, a loyal constituency of the Democratic Party, is on the verge of becoming the Democratic nominee.

The point I am trying to make is that you cannot read "racism" into how people answered this question.  Race and racism are complicated issues that cannot be understood by looking at one poll question.


Linfar's co-blogger opposing John McCain
by psychodrew on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:23:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Agreed (2.00 / 1)

I'm sure you're correct, but there's a drastic difference between a group that's historically oppressed and disproportionately worse off in every important measure of quality of life voting FOR someone who they believe can address those woes and a group that has dominated Presidential power for 100% of the existence of this country voting AGAINST a candidate from another racial group.

Voting for empowerment and voting for oppression are two VERY different things.


No way. No how. No McCain.
by freedom78 on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:59:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Agreed (none / 0)

You're assuming that they were voting for oppression.  Given the wording of the question )"Was race a factor?"), you cannot draw that conclusion.  There is no way to infer the intent of the voters.


Linfar's co-blogger opposing John McCain
by psychodrew on Thu May 22, 2008 at 03:24:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Agreed (none / 0)

White people voting for white candidates BECAUSE they're white?  In other words, people who used race as a factor in choosing between the white candidate, for whom the voted, and the black candidate, for whom the didn't vote, are we're expected to believe they weren't voting to keep a black guy from winning?  

I'd love to hear another explanation.


No way. No how. No McCain.
by freedom78 on Thu May 22, 2008 at 09:23:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why won't Barack? (2.00 / 2)

Since 90% of blacks are voting for Barry, it's a good assumption that quite a few of them are doing it because he is black. Why doesn't Barack renounce them?


by gaf on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:03:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Barack? (none / 0)

Why? African-Americans vote for white candidates over African-American candidates.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:06:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (none / 0)

Where's the polling to back up that assertion?


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:06:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, he should. (none / 0)

If there are people out there supporting Obama but saying they won't vote for Hillary because she's a woman -- and I suppose there probably are such people, although I have not yet heard of any publicly -- then Obama should denounce them and set them straight.

But I don't know anybody who is against Hillary because she's a woman.  She entered this contest with only one big disadvantage -- she was FOR the war authorization.  Any gender problem was miniscule in comparison to that.

But I am amazed at how the closer we come to the end, the more openly racist the tone of the campaign, and the more troubling the results of the exit polls become.  

Is Obama a damaged general election candidate because some white Democrats won't vote for him in the fall?  If he turns out to be damaged, you can be certain where many of us will lay the blame for it should Obama lose this November, which I don't think will happen.  

There is no happy ending for the Clintons OR their supporters in the case that Obama loses in November.  Poison the well at your own peril.


by Dumbo on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:34:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

she did (2.00 / 3)

She did.  I heard her say recently in an interview that no one should cast a vote based on race.  Don't have link at my fingertips at this moment, but heard it on TV a few days ago.

Has Obama denounced and rejected the rampant sexism on display?


TexasDarlin blog
by TexasDarlin on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:10:35 PM EST

Re: she did (1.50 / 2)

Please don't make us out you, darlin. The race issue isn't something you should be commenting on.


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:12:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

oops, too late (2.00 / 1)

I went there.  Can't help it, I hate listening to someone speak on the issue of race when it's clear they have their own disgusting agenda in the background.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:14:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes.. (2.00 / 1)

I have to say, I think race should be irrelevant to this discussion. To be honest with you, even though I am 'white' I would love to see more CAPABLE, PROGRESSIVE black candidates for anything. And I would like to see them win. I just DON'T think Obama is that person, at this time, I think Hillary is FAR more qualified.

Sorry, but thats just my opinion. I know in my heart that many black people will probably realize that I was right and I hope that they will appreciate the fact that not all of us bought into the hype.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:01:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes.. (2.00 / 1)

"I think race should be irrelevant to this discussion."

That's quite aspirational, but not realistic.  Race is relevant to the discussion because racism exists in America and is affecting this primary.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:26:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

youre vile (none / 0)


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:43:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

here's another question: (2.00 / 1)

Have you denounced and rejected the "Obama's Muslim roots" smears on display?

Have you denounced and rejected the rampant racism on display (those oh-so-many white voters who won't vote for an African American, calling Obama "uppity" --- oh wait, that was you)?


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:13:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

STOP (2.00 / 1)

You should be ashamed of yourself..

I couldn't care less what Obama's religion is or whether he has one at all.

ITS NOT RELEVANT...


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:03:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

ha (none / 0)

I agree it's not relevant, that's why I disagree strongly with the commenter I responded to, who has used the "Obama has Muslim roots" smear in the past.

I am not ashamed of myself because my actions are not the problem here.

You seem like you'd prefer it if we all buried our heads in the sand and pretended everyone was colorblind and racism and bigotry didn't exist.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:25:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: she did (none / 0)

Yes he has. They both have denounced their demons, but neither has fought actively to prevent them. Just words, all around.


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:15:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Did she denounce (2.00 / 1)

blog posts like this one? http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/04 /29/mystery-man-obama/ I don't share venecian's sense of decorum when it comes to peddlers of bigoted smears.
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:28:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did she denounce (2.00 / 2)

Oops. Formatting got screwy. Here is SoCal in all her fair-minded and decent glory: http://texasdarlin.wordpress.com/2008/04 /29/mystery-man-obama/
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:29:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

screw it. cut and paste. (none / 0)


by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:29:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I have a question too (2.00 / 3)

This diary's author is only addressing half of the equation:

Why won't Obama denounce racist voters? Edwards did.

"exposed once again, a duplicitous stance", indeed.


by phoenixdreamz on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:33:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have a question too (1.00 / 1)

A no-win situation for Obama --- if he denounces racist voters, he'll get accused of playing the race card by half of mydd.com, never mind Fox News.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:41:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's a no-win situation for Hillary also (2.00 / 4)

and it's intellectually dishonest to suggest Hillary's being duplicitous for not denouncing people who voted for her when it's Obama's problem, one he did precious little to address himself by basically blowing off W. Virginia and Kentucky.


by phoenixdreamz on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:53:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What about people who have ignored the fact (2.00 / 1)

that he doesn't have a viable healthcare plan and have voted FOR him 'just because he is black'?

Thats their business. Its their right.

I may think its not smart, but do you see me calling them racists? NO. That is their right.

So shut the f*** up.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:06:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

now, let's not lie (none / 0)

"basically blowing off W. Virginia and Kentucky" is a pretty dishonest statement.  He made appearances and bought plenty of ads.  He certainly didn't "blow off" those states.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:27:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm not attempting to lie (none / 0)

I can only go by what I gather from following cable news. I heard a distinct consensus of opinion among Obama supporting pundits that he missed good opportunities to carve out inroads with them now by only making what amounted to token campaign efforts, leaving the bulk of his work there until the general election campaign.


by phoenixdreamz on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:43:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have a question too (2.00 / 4)

My question also.  I have not heard (actually have not read, as I do avoid listening to Obama speaking) that he has denounced the Black racists who have verbally criticized and also threatened death to those who have not decided Obama is the one they should support.  Poor Tavis Smiley got a wake up call when he made negative comments about Obama's not attending the the State of the Black Union Forum.  He along with his brother and MOTHER got death threats from Obama supporters.  How strange that Hillary Clinton found time to attend the Forum, but Obama was just too busy (distancing himself from Blacks when he doesn't need their votes).  


by BARB on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:59:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have a question too (none / 0)

Smiley had issues with Michelle Obama representing her husband. Strange you missed the sexism there. Sigh. I guess it's like Carville's jokes relating courage to teticles. Some sexism escapes under the radar....


McCainuire, The Wrath Of Not Enough Naps.
by catilinus on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:04:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why is Obama avoiding black neighborhoods? (2.00 / 2)

The MSM isn't talking about that, but the black media is.

The reality is that Obama is trying so hard to please the insiders who are sending him most of that money he is getting (note that I did not say most of his donors, I said 'sending him most of the money') that he is avoiding the people who originally elected him (after he had cleared the field of Democratic opposition by suing them)

Its a pattern, Ive heard, that Obama uses one group of people to get to the next level, and then abandons them.

Ive met people like that, of all races (race has nothing to do with this) and I DON'T like them.

The reason the Obama insiders are screaming so many insults at Clinton is because SHE IS GOOD.

The crap they are saying is just that, crap, when you look at it in the broader context of WHO IS GOING TO GET THIS COUNTRY OUT OF THE MESS ITS IN.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:12:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why is Obama avoiding black neighborhoods? (none / 0)

"Its a pattern, Ive heard,"
Can I ask what websites you've heard that pattern mentioned on?
McCainuire, The Wrath Of Not Enough Naps.
by catilinus on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:25:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have a question too (none / 0)

You should listen to Obama speak. You could learn a lot.


"No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." -Hillary Clinton
by fugazi on Thu May 22, 2008 at 12:56:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I have a question too (1.00 / 1)

Ummm ... because te racist voters are voting for Hillary. So it's up to HER to denounce them.


"No matter what happens, I will work for the nominee of the Democratic Party because we must win in November." -Hillary Clinton
by fugazi on Thu May 22, 2008 at 12:53:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: she did (none / 0)

Can you provide the link?  I would like to place it in my diary.


by mishiem on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:45:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

abc interview with bill clinton today (2.00 / 2)

"The former president strongly rebuked the suggestion that the Clinton campaign ever played the race card against Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

"I was really hurt about it at first. I am way over being hurt. This was cold-blooded, calculated, manipulated and a revolting strategy," Clinton said, in reference to the accusation that the Clinton camp stoked racial fears during his wife's bid."


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:45:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 4)

I find it interesting that the media is resoundingly calling on Hillary to denounce any racist supporters she may have, but they don't say a word about whether Obama should denounce any sexist supporters he may have.  It says a lot about the media and the issues that they deem important and unimportant.

I'm always happy to see Hillary denounce racism.  But at this particular point in the process, I can't really blame her if she doesn't want to reinforce the media narrative that WV and KY are racist states full of racist Democrats.  And really, when people are accusing Hillary of intentionally tailoring her campaign to target racist voters, I consider that claim to be contemptible and unworthy of a response.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:12:05 PM EST

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 2)

90 %  AA voting for Obama... no racism here.


Wisdom Is The Reward For Listening Over A Lifetime
by gunner on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:17:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That's not racism (1.00 / 1)

There is not anti-white sentiment there.  Clinton's high level of support from women isn't because women are sexist, and Obama's high level of support from African Americans isn't because African Americans are racist.

There is plenty of footage and polling data that should that a substantial portion of white voters will NEVER vote for an African American --- you won't find similar results the other way around.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:20:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Just drop it.. (2.00 / 1)

People like you are the reason so many people dislike Obama.

Are you proud of yourself?

>There is plenty of footage and polling data that should that a substantial portion of white voters will NEVER vote for an African American --- you won't find similar results the other way around.


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:15:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just drop it.. (2.00 / 1)

I believe what he is saying is that you won't find a substantial portion of black voters who will never vote for a white candidate.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:19:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just drop it.. (none / 0)

hahahahaha I'm not the reason.  Talking honestly about race isn't the reason.

That statement is sadly true.  Me saying it out loud isn't the problem here.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:23:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Just drop it.. (none / 0)

What's wrong with that comment?

Blacks vote for white candidates all the time. But whites don't always vote for black candidates.

I live in Appalachia and I've heard first-hand the kinds of comments that show how unlikely people here will vote for a black man.


by elrod on Wed May 21, 2008 at 11:47:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 2)

That's not what I'd consider racist, any more than I'd consider my wife sexist for wanting Hillary to be the first female President.  However, I do find it kind of ludicrous that 90% of African-Americans vote for Obama in every state and yet two-thirds of them tell exit pollsters that race is not a factor at all.  Come on, who's kidding who here.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:29:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Of Course! (none / 0)

Of course you would find it ludicrous because we can't think, right? That's what you are saying. Interesting that no one found it ludicrous that AA's were voting 90-10 for all of the WHITE Democratic nominees.

Hmmmm.


by sweet potato pie on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:38:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Of Course! (2.00 / 2)

I can't recall any prior Democratic primary, at least not a tightly contested one, in which black voters have gone 90-10 for a white candidate.

I'm not saying that all black voters view race as a factor and I wouldn't presume to tell any particular individual that they're lying if they claim race didn't enter the equation.  But on the whole, when two-thirds of black voters claim race wasn't a factor in the least and yet 90% of them vote for the black candidate, there are at least some people who are kidding either the pollsters or themselves.

In the 2004 South Carolina primary, John Edwards got 37% of the black vote.  In the same primary in 2008, he got 2% of the black vote.  Did he burn a cross in the interim or something?


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:46:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Of Course! (none / 0)

Kidding ourselves? Again it sounds like you are trying to tell black folks like myself how we think.  Unless you can provide proof that we are "kidding ourselves" I think this conversation is over.


by sweet potato pie on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:17:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Of Course! (2.00 / 2)

Again, if you say race is not a factor in your vote, I believe you 100%.

If two-thirds of black voters say race is not a factor in their vote, I find it impossible to believe they are all telling the truth, based on the actual election results.

I don't think it's out of bounds for me to believe that there are some black voters who are not being 100% honest with themselves or with the exit pollsters.  I wouldn't be offended if you told me that you don't think 100% of white people are totally honest when it comes to racial issues.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:22:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (none / 0)

"However, I do find it kind of ludicrous that 90% of African-Americans vote for Obama in every state and yet two-thirds of them tell exit pollsters that race is not a factor at all."

Sigh... yet another repetition of yet the same stupid argument.

2/3rds of 90% are 60%. What's so ludicrous about the idea of Obama getting 60% of the vote even without his race being taken into account? And yes racial solidarity towards Obama may boost this 60% into 90% among black people -- same way that white racism may lower it to 30% among certain white demographics in the South or Appalachia or whatever.

What's so stupid though about 2/3rds of the people saying race wasn't a factor for them?


by Aris Katsaris on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:43:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 1)

Your math is incorrect.  If Obama gets one-third of the black votes based on his race, and 60% of the remaining two-thirds based on other considerations, he'd have less than 75% of the black vote.

Here's how the math actually shakes out.  For Obama to win 90% of the black vote, if we assume he wins every last one of the one-third segment that take race into consideration, he would have to have won a whopping 85% of the black voters who claim that race was not any sort of consideration for them.  That's just not believable.

I don't mean anything perjorative by this whatsoever, I'm just trying to demonstrate that the exit poll numbers clearly understate the number of Obama voters for whom race was a factor.  If I had to guess the reason, I'd say it's because Hillary has been much more open with the "vote for me because I'm female" narrative than Obama has been with the "vote for me because I'm black" argument.  Thus Hillary's supporters have more permission, in a sense, to admit to the exit pollsters that it was a factor for them.  But this last part is just my speculation; it's the numbers that I think are indisputable.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:52:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

they wont hear you... (none / 0)


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:48:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (none / 0)

No, it's identity politics, which is different than racism. Women who vote for Hillary because she's a woman are using identity politics, not sexism. Same for blacks and Obama. But the reverse is sexism and racism.

I shouldn't think progressive Democrats would find this so hard to figure out.


by elrod on Wed May 21, 2008 at 11:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Do exit polls suggest (none / 0)

that people are voting against Hillary because of sexism? I don't think so. That may explain why nobody is calling on Obama to denounce whatever sexist supporters he may have.
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:24:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (2.00 / 1)

Yes, exit polls certainly suggest that many people are voting against Hillary because of her gender.

If your argument is that people who say "race was a factor in my vote" are automatically racist if they voted for Hillary (an argument I would disagree with), then you must equally concede that people who say "gender was a factor in my vote" are automatically sexist if they voted for Obama.  And you can find thousands and thousands of voters like that in every single state.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:27:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (none / 0)

You are right on the polling results, though I disagree a bit with your analysis on the "race was a factor" point.

If white voters say "race was an important factor" (as the question was phrased in West Virginia), I think the overwhelming majority of those voters did, in fact, engage in racist decision-making.

"Automatically" may go too far, but "presumptively and very likley" is probably about right.

Same with Obama voters saying gender was an important factor; sexism was involved in that decision-making.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:30:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (none / 0)

In Kentucky, since I have these numbers in the back of my head, about 20% of voters said race was a factor, and they split 90% - 10% for Clinton. About 15% said gender was a factor, and they split 60-40% for Clinton. So we can't really equate them, at least in that state. I suspect the "Race was a factor" vote would be more split in a state with more diversity, but I think even in PA it tilted to Clinton, though I don't have the numbers at hand.


John McCain wants to make abortion illegal
by Lost Thought on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:31:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (2.00 / 1)

In general, I'm not a fan of pitting one minority group against another, or trying to compare racism and sexism to see which is worse, because I think it's not a very helpful debate to have.

But setting that aside, let's assume that there are more racists voting for Clinton than there are sexists voting for Obama, just for the sake of argument.  Does that excuse Obama from denouncing sexism just because it's not as big a problem?  Does it explain why the notion of Obama denouncing sexism never, ever crosses the media's lips?  I don't think so.

I also think, by the way, that some of the exit poll numbers are just absurd.  For example, I forget which state I'm thinking of, but 90% of the black voters voted for Obama and two-thirds of them said race wasn't any sort of factor in their decision.  That's just not a believable figure.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:39:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

depressing (none / 0)

he should denounce them.
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:01:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (none / 0)

They do.  In West Virginia, I believe 20% of Obama voters said gender was an "important factor."  Only slightly lower than the 25% of Clinton voters who said race was an "important factor." (Anyone feel free to correct these numbers, but I'm pretty sure they are right).

So yes, he has sexist Democratic supporters. Just like Clinton has racist Democratic supporters.  Depressing, isn't it?


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:27:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (2.00 / 1)

I think it's an error on our part to claim that anyone who says race or gender was an important factor is necessarily racist/sexist.  Frankly, I think we liberals throw those terms around a bit too loosely and diminish them thereby.

Consider, for example, a hypothetical person who believes there is no way Americans are willing to elect a black President this year, and therefore votes for Hillary because he thinks she's the only Democrat with a chance to win.  (This scenario can be played in reverse, of course.)

Consider a hypothetical person who believes that the Middle East is the most important region in terms of foreign policy, and that it would be a mistake to elect Hillary because the leaders in the Middle East come from backwards societies and won't be willing to listen to a woman.

Consider someone who thinks race is a major asset for Obama (the John Kerry argument) but ultimately decides to vote for Hillary for whatever reason.  That person might well tell an exit pollster that race was an important factor for them, even though it ended up not being the decisive factor.

Some or all of these people might be misguided, in your opinion.  But are they all racist?  I think we overestimate the amount we can learn from a single, imprecise exit poll question.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:35:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do exit polls suggest (none / 0)

The trade-off, of course, is that such highly calculated (and not personally racist) voting is likely outweighed just by the racist votes that go undisclosed.  For every racist who will admit that Obama being black was a major concern, there is another one unwilling to admit that out loud.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:40:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I do not find that argument persuasive (none / 0)

To allow people to excuse their behavior because of their fear that other people are racist/sexist is wrong, and perhaps even more pernicious than the more straightforward bigotry. We wouldn't, in my view, allow an employer to refuse to hire a black employee if he the reason he gave was that he was afraid his customers would not like to deal with a black person. I believe you are a lawyer, and though I'm not familiar with the case law on this point, I think that would not be considered a legitimate non-discriminatory rationale. Even if it is, I think that is wrong. Bigoted attitudes should condemned, not accepted as a fact of life and acted upon, albeit indirectly.
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:07:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I do not find that argument persuasive (none / 0)

I agree with you, but my point is, the argument might be misguided but I don't think racist is the right word for it.

One thing I've found ironic in this campaign is certain Obama supporters who have commented that he'd need a white guy as VP to balance the ticket. While that might be true as a pragmatic matter, I wonder if they stop to think what would happen if people started applying "pragmatic" logic to the top of the ticket!

By the way, I suspect there's a limit to how far most of us would be willing to press this argument.  As an employer, I'd hire anyone if they're qualified, but would we all insist on nominating, say, a twice-divorced gay atheist because it would be wrong to discriminate?  At some point I have to think most liberals would say, okay, that person is clearly unelectable.  I offer this thought merely in the interests of academic discussion.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:50:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

indeed it is (none / 0)

he should denounce them. Not only would that be the right thing to do, but it would probably be helpful politically in convincing some Hillary supporters that he's on their side.
by JJE on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:09:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Frankly, (2.00 / 1)

we as Democrats should all denounce racist AND sexist voters.  We should take strong stands on these issues, and make it clear that (1) Fox News can't accuse Obama of being a Muslim manchurian candidate and (2) McCain can't laugh along with "How do we beat the bitch [Clinton]?" jokes from his supporters.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:16:48 PM EST

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? (2.00 / 1)

Sexism has not been explored in this campaign nearly enough.  It has gotten no respect, although it clearly exists.  And guess what, it is making women (myself included) super-angry.  Don't underestimate the results this will have in the coming months.


by findthesource on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:18:07 PM EST

I don't underestimate the results (none / 0)

In fact, I have full confidence that sexism is going to play a large part in November.

It's going to be a big reason why Obama soundly beats McCain ---- the GOP's sexism, disrespect for women in general and reproductive rights in particular and complete disdain for feminism is going to hit them hard this year.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:22:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Back Hillary for President. (2.00 / 2)

Vote for Hillary because she's the smartest, has the most experience, and can deliver.  Not because she's a woman.


JohnnyB
by JohnnyB on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:20:08 PM EST

Re: Back Hillary for President. (none / 0)

Show us the proof?


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:29:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

you are really quite a rude fool (2.00 / 1)


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:50:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (none / 0)

Sexism is just as rampant as racism...


A useless "Community Organizer" from Pennsylvania as noted by Republicans, Rudy Giuliani and Sarah Palin
by hootie4170 on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:20:44 PM EST

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 2)

Obama is getting 92% of the black vote , It's not a stretch to think a substantial number of African Americans are voting for him because of his race.

Should he condemn them ?


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:22:20 PM EST

Should we condemn John Kerry? (none / 0)

Seriously this argument doesn't work if Blacks weren't ALWAYS voting for Democratic nominees like this.  Why can't it just be that Obama appeared to be the nominee and they decided to back the apparent nominee. Alot of folks knew this was over after Super Tuesday which is when you started to see the black vote go for Obama 90-10. Before that, Hillary was still getting  a decent amount of black support. She got almost 20% in South Carolina.


by sweet potato pie on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:42:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

thats ridiculous (none / 0)


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

you don't understand (2.00 / 4)

in Obamaland, white voters vote for HRC because we are uneducated racist. AA voters vote for Obama 92-8 because "Yes We Can".

Republican woman vote for HRC due to devious meddling in the Democrats process. Republicans vote for the anointed one because "We are the ones we have been waiting for".

Democrats vote for HRC because we are just bitter typical white people. Democrats vote for Obama...well you go me there because I have not figured it that out yet.


by Newport News Dem on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:45:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (2.00 / 2)

You always know it is a day after a big HRC win when BO supporters starting bring up race and demand HRC apoligize about something to do with race.  Funny how HRC is always a racist on wed after she wins a state big.  Lets see this happened after OH, it happened after PA, it happened the wed after WV and of course today after her big win in KY.

We can all agree it all about race and the clinton's are racist.  By the way did there reagan democrats also vote against Kerry because of his skin color too?

david


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:23:38 PM EST

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

You always know it is a day after a big Obama win when HRC supporters starting bring up sexism and demand Obama apoligize about something to do with sex.  Funny how Obama is always a sexist t on wed after he wins  big.  


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:32:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

And do you remember calling HRC voters "ignorant white voters"?  Do you think that is racist?

david


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:42:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

Were they educated? Were they white? So put two and two together.


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:46:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

I have put it together.  Maybe these voters dont support your candidate because they dont like being called racist or anything else.


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:49:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

Randi Rhodes called us "White Trash" after calling HRC a f-ing whore.


by Newport News Dem on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:47:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

Look, I know it feels like Obama supporters are raining on your parade, but it's clear that race is an important, material factor when it comes to voting, especially with respect to the states of Appalachia.

Not all Clinton supporters are racist, but a sizeable portion are when it comes to certain states.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:32:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (2.00 / 1)

Really were they racist when they didnt vote for Kerry, or Gore, or Dukakis, or Mondale.

There is nothing sader than people going around screaming racist when the truth is there voters just done support BO on the issue or just support HRC more.

And one last thing these are not racists they are democrats and it is too bad you feel so comfortble going around calling they racist.

david


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:40:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

I really don't get your point.  Are you trying to say that there is not a single racist Democrat?

Are you trying to say that race doesn't play a big role in this race?

Are you trying to argue that every single Clinton supporter has come to that support solely based on the issues, and race never played a role?

Because that is nonsense.

Look, you are going to lose a lot of credibility if you say something like "people going around screaming racist" when an African American is running for President and he is clearly losing votes based solely on his race.

Racism is real, it's affecting the Democratic primary, and I have no idea why you want to deny that simple fact.


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:44:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

No what i am saying is it is wrong to going around calling democrats racist ever if you think there may be some who are.  Because the overwhelming majority are not. Unless you think it is ok collectively blame all reagen dems based on the actions of a very very small number.

That is not only wrong but it the long run it pisses off there voters, who by the way dont consider them selfs racist, who we will need in the fall to win states like OH.  

And this doesnt help BO in the GE and it doesnt help my party and if you cared about the democratic party you would not go around making blanket statements like that.


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:54:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What are you talking about? (none / 0)

What blanket statements?  I said that some Democratic voters are racist? Not ALL, but SOME.  That's just true.

If any given Democrat isn't racist, then why would they be pissed off?


by Slim Tyranny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:21:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

There is a difference (none / 0)

When you openly state that you won't vote for a candidate based on race, that is racist. If voters said that they weren't voting for say John Kerry because of his beliefs then that wouldn't be controversial but when people are openly stating that race was a factor and they are voting against the black candidate on that reason,  that is racist.


by sweet potato pie on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:44:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

"And one last thing these are not racists they are democrats"

Um, do you really think these two are mutually exclusive? They are not.


by Aris Katsaris on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:52:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

And you have proof that these voters are racists.  Which ones.  Since you are collectively branding them.  Tell me how do you thinks these democarts, who are not racists and dont think of them selfs are racist, feel about your comments?

What would you say to them.  You are part of a specific demographic and based on that you think you are a racist.  

david


by giusd on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:57:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Race is a legitimate issue here (none / 0)

"And you have proof that these voters are racists."

Which voters? I certainly believe the following:
a) Racists exist.
b) Some racists vote.

So, yeah, give (a) and (b) I believe that some voters are racist.

As for the rest of your comment, it doesn't make much sense. What would I tell to who? The racists I accuse of existing?


by Aris Katsaris on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:48:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

EVERY TIME!! (none / 0)


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:52:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't (none / 0)

It's because of the exit poll showing a disturbingly high number of people who voted for Clinton because of race. It showed up first in Ohio and has continued through Kentucky.

Those people are not Democrats as I understand the party. They are Republicans who haven't changed their registration. And yes, most of them voted for Bush over Kerry. 30% of WV Democrats and roughly the same number of KY Democrats voted for Bush.


by elrod on Wed May 21, 2008 at 11:54:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama must denounce (2.00 / 3)

ALL MALE VOTERS that vote for him because he is a man and who won't vote for a woman.

This must happen immediately - otherwise it completely proves that Obama is the SEXIST we all know him to be.....

(now do you see how stupid this diary is?)


by nikkid on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:44:21 PM EST

I am basing my comments on polls, yours are based (none / 0)

on conjecture.


by mishiem on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:46:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I am basing my comments on polls (2.00 / 1)

With some of the polls I've seen, conjecture has been more accurate.


by Scotch on Wed May 21, 2008 at 07:55:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is "Bro's Not Hos" Tshirt an official (2.00 / 1)

..Obama product?

(Bluntly, If THAT isn't sexism, WHAT IS?)

if it is, and if there are ANY SANE PEOPLE left on this planet, how can somebody justify voting for somebody who allows THAT?


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:21:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yep (2.00 / 1)

I forgot about that example.  There are oh so many of them! Although I don't expect Obama to say something about each example. But at least acknowledging and discouraging the tone would help.


by Scotch on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:26:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Too bad everything can't be perfect (2.00 / 2)

Give it up.  The need for some people to endlessly label people as racist is tiresome to say the least.  Until I am able to pick apart your reasons and agenda for voting as you do, and approve it down to every last detail, I won't be party in the continuing attempts to shame.  People have always voted on their own reasons.  The difference is that every little detail has not been put under a microscope.  People vote on race, gender, age, nationality and every thing else.  It will always be like that.  The best we can hope for is to lesson it more and more each election. People are afraid of change and if Obama is a president and a good one, the number who will vote on race will be less in the future.  Hillary knows the reality of life as such.


by Scotch on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:01:27 PM EST

abc interview with bill clinton today (none / 0)

"The former president strongly rebuked the suggestion that the Clinton campaign ever played the race card against Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.

"I was really hurt about it at first. I am way over being hurt. This was cold-blooded, calculated, manipulated and a revolting strategy," Clinton said, in reference to the accusation that the Clinton camp stoked racial fears during his wife's bid."


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:53:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Ugh (none / 0)

When did Barack Obama stop beating his wife?

Same kind of question.


99% perspiration
by DaveOinSF on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:31:30 PM EST

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (2.00 / 1)

this is incredible stupid. I canvased for Barack before I canvassed for Hillary. I found more people saying they didnt want a woman president than AA. So cut this crap out. Barack has problems- his whole campaign  premise is phony. No actual evidence of bipartisanship all his background of activism is in AA community. He started with the D punjab slam


by rocky on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:35:12 PM EST

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? Ed (none / 0)

Since her supporter called her that and she said that she could probably be elected there in response, and wasn't offended, that seems to be a manufactured issue.

As far as your claim about women how about some polling numbers to back it up. That would be better than your anecdotes which aren't meaningful.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:15:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

WHAT?! (none / 0)

IT WAS A VILE OBAMA ATTACK PIECE!


by Wilbur Rogers on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:57:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Your lack of knowledge (none / 0)

is providing me with much amusement. Thank you.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Wed May 21, 2008 at 11:01:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why won't Hillary denounce racists voters? (none / 0)

Obama is half black, half white.  Yet why does he feel compelled to only cling to the black half?

Obama must be racist against himself! (well of course he said as much in his book)

Shouldn't Obama denounce himself???


by wblynch on Wed May 21, 2008 at 09:06:47 PM EST