One of the most common arguments among Clinton supporters is that Hillary has been let down/betrayed/attacked by "the party" because superdelegates are moving toward Obama, and will ultimately hand him the nomination. This, in turn, makes some feel as if they can no longer be part of the party, and we all know what that means.
That's not what this diary is about. This is a legitimate inquiry into how the Party could've treated her better. I thought they were already massively behind her when she began the primaries with a top heavy schedule seemingly favorable to her, a 100 superdelegate lead before anyone voted, and the backing of regional machine controllers like Rendell.
Apparently, that wasn't enough. So, I genuinely ask - no snark or meanness intended - what else could've been done for Hillary? Go back and really think this through before you answer. Think about from Iowa onwards. And let's keep it civil. Thanks.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 13 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.