I think that Obama is working pretty hard to win over all voters.  I never implied that HRC has not demonstrated her commitment to supporting the democratic ticket.  But one of her prominent supporters, who is also a historic personage in this party, is participating in a harmful smear of the likely (not presumptive, not official) democratic nominee.  I call on her to denounce this because she is in a position to credibly oppose it, not to establish her credentials.  But what this has to do with Obama and his responsibility confuses me utterly.  And your smear that he never takes responsibility and only offers excuses is just that, another smear that represents our likely nominee in the worst possible light to no advantage to his primary opponent and in a way that is detrimental to the cause of party unity and the success of a potentially progressive agenda.  If you care to peruse my comments, you will find that I have consistently argued that Obama supporters bear the lion's share of the burden for helping bring the party together.  How does your tit for tat response serve the goal of electing a democratic president who would be in a position to grow legislative majorities and further an agenda that ends a war, strengthens families, ensures a woman's right to reproductive choice, increases access to affordable health care, and reinvests in education?  Those are my goals.  Do you share them?

She was asked if she could support her not campaign:

According to your bunch, that sort of sexism is a reason not to vote for someone.  Shouldn't you be as anti-McCain as you are anti-Obama?