OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails?

The Suffolk University poll excepted, Barack Obama seems to be widening the gap with Hillary Clinton in Oregon. As Jonathan posted earlier, today's Survey USA poll shows Obama up 13 points over Hillary Clinton, a net increase of 2 points from a week ago. In addition, Public Policy Polling has released its final Oregon poll showing Obama beating Clinton 56-38, a net improvement of 4 points for Obama in the past week. PPP's take:

PPP has repeatedly found similarities between Wisconsin and Oregon in its polling of the two states. Both times polling more than two weeks out tended to show Obama with a lead in the single digits. A week out his lead moved into the lower double digits. And now it's in the upper double digits. Oregon is also the only state besides Wisconsin where we've found the war as an issue on par with the economy, and that works to Obama's advantage as well.

A widening Obama lead shouldn't be too surprising, of course, considering Obama's increased presence in the state and Clinton's increased absence, but what is interesting is the effect it may have on the Oregon senate primary between Oregon House Speaker Jeff Merkley and Democratic activist/consultant Steve Novick. This could be the first actual test of Obama's coattails. As PPP observes:

The better Barack Obama does, the better Novick's chances, our poll found. Novick leads 45-34 with Obama supporters, while Merkley has a 34-30 advantage with those who are supporting Clinton. [...]

Novick also has a strong advantage with men, while Merkley has the small edge with women.

Indeed, Obama's increased support in the state seems to be paralleling a late surge by Novick. It was just over a week ago that Merkley was demonstrating some real momentum but two more recent polls show Novick up, albeit within the margin of error.

CandidatePPP 5/17-18Davis Hibbitts 5/8-10
Novick3829
Merkley3323
Undecided1943

The absurdly high level of undecideds, especially in the Davis, Hibbitts poll, emphasizes that this is anyone's race, but one has to wonder if Obama's surge in the state will accrue to Novick's benefit. While both Novick and Merkley endorsed Obama, the Novick campaign has tried to inject the sense that Novick v. Merkley is a proxy for Obama v. Clinton into the narrative of the race and it just may be working. Merkley is a well-known progressive legislator in the state but because he was recruited to run against Smith, Novick has painted him as having an whiff of establishment to him, while skillfully casting himself as the insurgent outsider. If Novick does ride a wave of Obamania to the November ballot tomorrow, it would be somewhat ironic considering the insulting comments he made about the senator. At the same time, though, it may be a strong sign of the sort of coattails Obama may have for Democrats nationally this fall.



Display:


Tomorrow will be Interesting (2.00 / 1)

Obama could very well wrap it up.


by parahammer on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:33:14 PM EST

Re: Tomorrow will be Interesting (2.00 / 1)

I think Oregon is the end of the trail for Hillary. What will she tell the super delegates after small town white working class Oregonians come out for Obama?

After canvassing for Obama in the Portland suburbs these polls come as no surprise to me.

While both are damn good candidates, I'm glad to see Novick ahead in the polls.


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:45:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tomorrow will be Interesting (none / 0)

Are you predicting that Obama will win white voters without a college degree in Oregon?  He has accomplished that in one state so far.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:26:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tomorrow will be Interesting (none / 0)

You better check your facts.

Obama won every county in Washington State, and every county except one in Idaho. Most of these counties Obama won are very white and very rual.


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:58:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tomorrow will be Interesting (none / 0)

One state.

Claiming that a state is a "white working-class state" or a county is a "white working-class county" is just spin.  By straightforward demographics, Obama has won white voters without a college degree in one state.

Again, I was simply asking whether the commentor expected Obama to win this demographic in Oregon.  I get the sense that it's going to be a shell game where Obama wins Oregon, and this is submitted as proof he can win the white working-class vote because "it's a white working-class state."


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:08:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Tomorrow will be Interesting (none / 0)

It's a tight race here in Oregon and no one knows how it's going to turn out. I really hope Merkley pulls out a win because he can beat Smith and has been a fantastic progressive legislator.

Merkley polls so much stronger outside liberal Portland. This boasts well for Merkley and not well for Steve in the GE against Smith. Another reason I really hope Merkley pulls out a win tomorrow.


Netroots Director for Oregon Senate Candidate Jeff Merkley
by Sarah Lane on Tue May 20, 2008 at 12:28:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

PPP (2.00 / 1)

is right about WI and OR being similar in the sense that most of the democrats are really liberal and the republicans are really conservative.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:36:19 PM EST

"A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats" - JFK (2.00 / 2)

► A rising tide lifted Mississippi, Louisiana, and Hastert's seat in Ill.  

► We're gonna WIPE THEM OUT - it's LBJ '64!!


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:44:28 PM EST

A possible disturbing sign with Obama's support? (none / 0)

According to the poll, 12% of those who already voted were "undecided".  I'm not sure if you just chalk that up to polling error, or if that means that these people just didn't vote.  I'm guessing it's due to both, but more due to those who voted in the Presidential primary, yet didn't vote in the Senate primary.  If we are to buy Obama's and the media's argument, that he is bringing in new voters, it's likely that many of these non-voting voters are Obama supporters.  If Obama's the nominee, he may not bring the support to his down-ticket Dems b/c his voters are only coming to vote for him.

Of course, it's just me thinking out loud.  Obviously, the cross-tabs are limited so they don't show which voters support which other candidate.  However, it would be interesting.  Also, it's hard to say that the PPP poll is highly accurate (though it might be) b/c it has Hillary with 50% of black voters.


by unabashed dem on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:58:52 PM EST

Re: A possible disturbing sign with Obama's suppor (none / 0)

That's probably more like "refuse to answer", which wasn't an option on this touch-tone poll.  Some people who've already voted might feel that it's inappropriate to answer after casting a secret ballot.


by lilnev on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:06:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A possible disturbing sign with Obama's suppor (none / 0)

I might be more inclined to accept that argument if the undecided numbers matched up.  Among those that declared "undecided" in the Presidential race was only 3%.  As I'm sure you know, 3% does not equal 12%.


by unabashed dem on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:31:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A possible disturbing sign with Obama's suppor (none / 0)

That 12% includes both "I don't know" and "I know, but I don't want to tell you."


Can't rec or rate -- next username, please!
by neeborMolgula on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:35:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

here's the answer on the black vote in that poll (2.00 / 1)

I emailed PPP and this was their response:

"...the number of black respondents (26) to the poll is so minsucule [sic] that I wouldn't make much of it.  The margin of error for that particular crosstab is +/- 19.2%!"

Still, we won't be seeing 85-90% of the AA vote like in some states (nor will we be seeing Clinton winning women by the same margins, either).


Want a progressive global warming novel, not a right wing rant? Go to www.edwardgtalbot.com for a free audio thriller.
by edparrot on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:15:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Golly... I didn't know there was a Novick-Obama correlation.  Always the contrarian, my bumper is stickered with Novick and Clinton.


by Susan in Oregon on Mon May 19, 2008 at 07:59:49 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Encouraging news, but I have to laugh.  "Upper double digits" - so he's winning by about 99% right now?


by rfahey22 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:04:49 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (2.00 / 1)

Tempted to make a "Hussein" joke here, but I'm afraid it might be taken the wrong way....


by lilnev on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:07:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

I appreciate the joke that you'd like to make, but I agree that it probably wouldn't go over well.


by rfahey22 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:10:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Consider the joke made and humorous (though definitely with a slight hint of offensive as well.)


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:25:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Oregon and Wisconsin (2.00 / 1)

Funny, growing up in Wisconsin, I always felt an affinity for Oregon.  Some similarities:

You have basically two urban areas in each state:  Milwaukee and Madison in Wisconsin and Portland and Eugene in Oregon.

Both states are overwhelmingly white working class.

Wisconsin is right above Chicago, the denizens of which Wisconsonians refer to as FIBs for Fucking Illinois Bastards.  Oregon is right above, well, California.


by kaleidescope on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:07:21 PM EST

Don't forget the beavers and badgers thing. (none / 0)

Did you know that the leading cause of death in beavers is falling trees?


by JimR on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:53:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

I love the Wisconsin/Oregon connection. I wish we could distill down into a potion the thing that makes these electorates (at least the progressive elements) into a powder and sprinkle it on the rest of the country. Thanks Todd for pointing this out and for the comment about Obama's possible coat-tails. We can only hope.


by wasder on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:11:55 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (2.00 / 1)

What is the deal with everyone saying Obama can't win the white vote?

Here are the 15 whitest states:

Maine BARACK
Vermont BARACK
West Virginia HILLARY
New Hampshire HILLARY (BARACK lost by 2.6%)
Iowa BARACK
North Dakota BARACK
Montana
Kentucky
Wyoming BARACK
Idaho BARACK
South Dakota
Minnesota BARACK
Wisconsin BARACK
Nebraska BARACK
Indiana HILLARY (BARACK lost by 1.1% to 2%)

Couresty of barackoblogger.com.


by agpc on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:34:10 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (2.00 / 1)

It's the only slightly credible misinformation they've got left.  What they're really talking about is Appalachia, no more, no less.


by rfahey22 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:36:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (2.00 / 2)

Facts aren't important. It's more useful to marginalize him as a "black candidate". thereby furthering the "he's unelectable" argument. Real pretty stuff.
Stop H8
by mikeinsf on Mon May 19, 2008 at 08:42:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Caucuses have an inherent Obama skew and the campaign wasn't so racially polarized in January as it is today.

The "race chasm" argument is the most accurate on this topic.  It states that the divide is most pronounced in states with over 6% but under 17% AA population.  Essentially, it proposes that in states where there is racial tension but not enough AA presence to give Obama an outright win, Hillary performs best.  

The Midwest has no racial tension because it has no diversity.  Hence, race is less of a concern there.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:22:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

"The Midwest has no racial tension because it has no diversity."

Appalachia has no diversity. What then is its excuse?


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:31:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

There isn't much racial tension in Appalachia either; it's a pretty homogenously white area of the country.

For racial tension, see: Philadelphia, Detroit, Boston, Washington D.C., Los Angeles, Houston, Newark.  

Look up "white flight" for added edification.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:52:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Don't need to edify the attempt to divide people along concocted lines which only serves the cynical political interests of people who share Karl Rove's thought process.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Mon May 19, 2008 at 11:29:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Open your eyes (none / 0)

If you can't recognize inequality, you can never rectify it.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Tue May 20, 2008 at 01:08:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Open your eyes (none / 0)

Some create inequality where it doesn't really exist in order to exploit. It's Karl Rove's specialty. And sad to say, the Clintons, whom I once admired, have lately made it theirs as well.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Tue May 20, 2008 at 02:02:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Open your eyes (none / 0)

"Some create inequality where it doesn't really exist in order to exploit."

Inequality that doesn't exist?  

"And sad to say, the Clintons, whom I once admired, have lately made it theirs as well."

Surely you don't blame the Clintons for the horrifically disparate gaps we have in education funding between inner city (black) and suburban (white) schools?  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Tue May 20, 2008 at 06:18:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

No straw agument, please. (none / 0)

I blame Clinton for creating and exploiting a division between "hard working Americans, white Americans,"  and those she doesn't think fit that description. She, Bill, and their surrogates, have been trying to drive a rovian wedge of racial politics into the Democratic Party since December.

It's speaks well of the majority of Democrats who have rejected it.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Tue May 20, 2008 at 06:48:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Caucuses have an inherent Obama skew

False. There's no political rule that says that caucuses will favor the black guy or the guy who's name starts with 'O' or the guy with big ears.

Caucuses favor those who make an effort to win them. Clinton did not.


John McCain
by Mandoliniment on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:36:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Caucus favor academics, English Speakers, and college students who have more latitude with their free time.

They disfavor the working class, the disabled, single mothers, and anyone who can't afford to sacrifice up to 8 hours of their day navigating the caucus system until the wee hours of the morning.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:56:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes caucuses suck. (none / 0)

Hopefully those whining about it now won't wait until the next time their preferred candidate loses them to call for their elimination.

But then, I've sctually seen few calling for their elimination in the future; but rather some just trying to invalidate a process that has already occured in this cycle in order to serves the Clintons' narrow interest.

My guess is they won't give a fig about caucuses once again when Hillary's political corpse finally stops twitching.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Mon May 19, 2008 at 11:36:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes caucuses suck. (none / 0)

I've called for their future elimination in the future several times, publicly.  Your rancor is misplaced here.  


Young lifelong Democrat. One of over 3,000,000 voters who kicked McCain and Palin out of Pennsylvania, permanently.
by BPK80 on Tue May 20, 2008 at 01:08:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes caucuses suck. (none / 0)

Just you and the crickets, apparently.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Wed May 21, 2008 at 12:57:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Obama does very well with college-educated white voters.  He has won white voters without a college degree in only one state, Wisconsin.  He even lost that demographic in Illinois.

You can agree or disagree that we should concern ourselves with the white working-class vote, but no one has been saying Obama can't win white voters.  That's been a strawman argument at least since Iowa.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:30:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It seems a narrowing (none / 0)

Because previious polls HAD shown B O with a large margin in the double digits.

I guess we'll just have to wait until tomorrow's results to see what the actual numbers are.


by LindaSFNM on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:09:46 PM EST

Re: It seems a narrowing (none / 0)

The only actual number that will matter is the one that puts Obama over 2025 delegates. That will be the story.


Anybody's vote is worth having. But not everybody's vote is worth campaigning for.
by Freespeechzone on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:28:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (2.00 / 2)

This ad sold me on Steve Novick:


Join the Matthew 25 Network and help Democrats win the next generation of evangelicals.
by mistersite on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:21:48 PM EST

Steve Novick for Senate! (2.00 / 1)

Go Steve.


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:26:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Seriously? Do you live in Oregon? Do you think an ad like that is going to win him the nomination statewide? Novick and Merkley are nearly identical on policy positions. Merkley has been probably the best progressive legislator Oregon has had in the last 30 years. He has been so effective in the House and I just don't come across talented progressive pols like Merkley often.

Merkley polls stronger with moderates, conservatives and outside of liberal Portland. He can beat Smith. That's important too.


Netroots Director for Oregon Senate Candidate Jeff Merkley
by Sarah Lane on Tue May 20, 2008 at 12:32:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Sarah, they're not identical. Novick is clearly to the left on a number of issues, particularly fair taxation.

Merkley doesn't poll stronger with conservatives; if anyone does it's Novick, but the crosstab is way too tiny.

In that poll, "Portland" also includes Washington and Clackamas counties. Clackamas is the Christmas tree capital of the country, so while it has some areas close in to Portland, it also looks like the rest of the state in a number of places.

The idea that one Democrat doing marginally better in a red area than another Democrat, says nothing about either Democrat's ability to poll well against a Republican.


by torridjoe on Tue May 20, 2008 at 02:42:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Two sides to the coattails issue (2.00 / 1)

In Eugene, I have not seen the Novick-Clinton pair in bumper stickers or yard signs.  Obviously, this isn't universal, as Susan in Oregon is a counterexample, but I think that most Novick supporters are also Obama supporters just from what I've seen talking to friends and walking/biking around.

Regarding whether or not this is a test of Obama's coattails, I'm of two minds.  On the one hand, because I see the Novick-Obama correlation I could forsee Obama increasing turnout, and that would help Novick.

On the other hand, because Obama hasn't campaigned for Novick or ever expressed a preference in this race (that I know about...feel free to correct me), whether Novick wins or not doesn't seem like a legit test of Obama's coattails.


by Oly on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:30:54 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Merkley has an ad up using Novick's blogging against him - including a bit where Novick said

"Obama is just another captive of special interests fraud"

After a bit of research, I gather Novick has said that was out of context, but ya' have to wonder if that has a decoupling effect.


by tietack on Mon May 19, 2008 at 09:57:39 PM EST

Merkley's negative ad against Novick (none / 0)

clinched my vote for Novick (I voted for Obama).  Prior to that I was on the fence.

Every single word(s) was pulled from Steve's blog posts and were taken out of context.  The posts were between 2 and 3 years old, long before he was serious about a Senate run.

I'm disappointed that Todd linked to it.  It's an attack website, paid for by Merkley, against another Democrat.

I'm not sure that I would consider a win by Novick as "ironic", but possibly because people were turned off by the Novick ad.


A ship adrift in a sea of rhetoric & recycled clichés.
by DemsRising on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:30:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Merkley's negative ad against Novick (none / 0)

I thought Novick's attack was much worse. He held a press conference and told everyone that he was going to run a positive campaign, then the next day their campaign sent out a mailer blaming Merkley for 125,000 uninsured children. Horrible.

Merkley championed a UHC bill for uninsured kids, he was able to get it through the House but he didn't get a super majority with his razor thin majority. I  think bashing Merkley for all his work on UHC for kids was pretty low IMO.


Netroots Director for Oregon Senate Candidate Jeff Merkley
by Sarah Lane on Tue May 20, 2008 at 12:35:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I didn't get that mailer (none / 0)

so I did some Googling to see what I could find out.  It appears this goes to the issue of the Healthy Kids legislation that didn't pass voter approval.  FWIW, I don't agree with either Novick or Merkley, and voted against it.  I thought it unfair to burden one class of Oregonians only.

I read the quote of Novick's and I don't see it as "bashing" Merkley on "all his work."

Novick said:

"(Jeff Merkley) failed to deliver on Healthy Kids legislation that would have increased taxes on cigarettes. The result, 125,000 Oregon kids today are without health care."

While we can't put the full blame on Merkley for this, I certainly don't consider Novick's statement above worse than the negative ad that aired on TV (not just a mailer) and took almost each and every word Novick said out of context.

All this is water under the bridge now.

I've voted, as I'm sure you have, so I suppose we'll just have to wait and see what the rest of the voters say tomorrow.

Either candidate will be 110% better than Smith.


A ship adrift in a sea of rhetoric & recycled clichés.
by DemsRising on Tue May 20, 2008 at 01:12:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

I'm not sure. It's an Obama-Clinton proxy in that Novick seems to represent change, not in that Novick is an Obama clone.

The allure of the new, rather than the allure of Barack.


Visit Forgotten Countries, my new foreign policy-based blog
by Englishlefty on Tue May 20, 2008 at 05:52:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

Novick seems like he would be a Senator along the mold of Wellstone, and Merkley one akin to Wyden.  So I don't think Oregon would go wrong with either.  

Are there any exit-like polls in Oregon that would indicate if there was a correlation between Obama and Novick votes?  That would be interesting to note.


by Mr DC on Mon May 19, 2008 at 10:47:44 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

I think they're both super progressive. Merkley is a very talented legislator and has been able to pass a ton of progressive bills with a slim majority. Plus, he's electable statewide which is quite important considering a candidate can't just depend on Portland to oust Smith.


Netroots Director for Oregon Senate Candidate Jeff Merkley
by Sarah Lane on Tue May 20, 2008 at 12:38:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I would trade (none / 0)

Coattails for actual electoral vote confidence.  It's getting closer and closer, he's being crownded the nominee- yet his electoral polling is still awful.  That's all I'm saying.


by easyE on Mon May 19, 2008 at 11:04:04 PM EST

Re: OR-Sen: Barack Obama's Coattails? (none / 0)

There is a long, long history of kinship between Oregon & Wisconsin in voting behavior going back to settlement trends and ethnicity.  

Obama's huge win in Wisconsin surprised even me, a rabidly partisan Obama backer.  I doubt he can equal that margin in Oregon.


by howardpark on Mon May 19, 2008 at 11:04:34 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.