Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan Didn't Negotiate With Iran

Look at what John McCain, Mr. Foreign Policy Experience, said today while agreeing with Bush's repulsive remarks in Israel:

"Yes, there have been appeasers in the past, and the president is exactly right, and one of them is Neville Chamberlain,'' Mr. McCain told reporters on his campaign bus after a speech in Columbus, Ohio. "I believe that it's not an accident that our hostages came home from Iran when President Reagan was president of the United States. He didn't sit down in a negotiation with the religious extremists in Iran, he made it very clear that those hostages were coming home.''

The Obama campaign and we in the liberal blogosphere need to jump on these comments. Once again, McCain has demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge about foreign policy and American history. First he got confused over Sunnis and Shiites, now this.

McCain seems to be forgetting something kind of important that happened during the Reagan administration.

It's called the Iran-Contra Scandal.

Reagan & McCain

I'll let Wikipedia tell the story:

The Iran-Contra affair was a political scandal which was revealed in 1986 as a result of earlier events during the Reagan administration. It began as an operation to increase U.S.-Iranian relations, wherein Israel would ship weapons to a moderate, politically influential group of Iranians opposed to the Ayatollah Khomeni; the U.S. would reimburse Israel with those weapons and receive payment from Israel. The moderate Iranians agreed to do everything in their power to achieve the release of six U.S. hostages, who were being held by the terrorist group Hezbollah. The plan eventually deteriorated into an arms-for-hostages scheme, in which members of the executive branch sold weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of the American hostages, without the authorization of President Ronald Reagan. Large modifications to the plan were conjured by Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North of the National Security Council in late 1985. In North's plan, a portion of the proceeds from the weapon sales was diverted to fund anti-Sandinista and anti-communist rebels, or Contras, in Nicaragua. While President Ronald Reagan was a supporter of the Contra cause, he did not authorize this plan, nor was he aware that the funds were being sent to the Contras.

After the weapon sales were revealed in November 1986, Ronald Reagan appeared on national television and stated that the weapons transfers had indeed occurred, but that the United States did not trade arms for hostages. The investigation was compounded when large volumes of documents relating to the scandal were destroyed or withheld from investigators by Reagan administration officials. On March 4, 1987, Reagan returned to the airwaves in a nationally televised address, taking full responsibility for any actions that he was unaware of, and admitting that "what began as a strategic opening to Iran deteriorated, in its implementation, into trading arms for hostages."


John McCain was in Congress during the 1980s, in fact he was moved up to the Senate in 1986, so surely he couldn't have forgotten about this. Iran-Contra was the biggest scandal of the Reagan administration. They traded arms to Iran in the hopes that the Iranians and Hezbollah would release U.S. hostages. John Kerry, who was one of the lead Senate investigators into Iran-Contra, should be the go-to man for the Obama campaign on this.

Regarding the 1981 release of hostages, McCain also misses the facts. Again, from Wikipedia:

In 1979, Iranian students took hostage 52 employees of the United States embassy in Iran. On January 20, 1981, the day Ronald Reagan became President, the hostages were freed following the Algiers Accords.

Who negotiated the Algiers Accords? Warren Christopher and the Carter administration. Ronald Reagan had nothing to do with it.

Unless...John McCain is accidentally giving credence to the "October Surprise" conspiracy theory.  You know, the one that say the Reagan campaign secretly negotiated with Iran to prevent the release of hostages until Reagan took office?

The October Surprise conspiracy was an alleged plot that claimed representatives of the 1980 Ronald Reagan presidential campaign had conspired with Islamic Republic of Iran to delay the release of 52 Americans held hostage in Tehran until after the 1980 U.S. Presidential election. In exchange for their cooperation, the United States would supply weapons to Iran as well as unfreeze Iran's monetary assets being held by the US government.

Jimmy Carter had been attempting to deal with the Iran hostage crisis and the hostile regime of the Ayatollah Khomeini for nearly a year. Those who assert that a deal was made allege that certain Republicans with CIA connections, including George H. W. Bush, arranged to have the hostages held through October, until Reagan could defeat Carter in early November, and then be released, thereby preventing an "October surprise" from the Carter administration in which the hostages would be released shortly before the election. The hostages were released the day of Reagan's inauguration, twenty minutes after his inaugural address.


No matter how you interpret McCain's remarks, they are completely out of step with history. This needs to get major play now, and the only way that will happen is if we raise a ruckus.

[Cross-posted at Old Man McCain]



Display:


Thanks for reading! (2.00 / 1)

Hopefully this will get some attention, considering that today is "Who's the biggest terrorist appeaser?" day.


by existenz on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:09:23 PM EST

Very interesting (none / 0)

I was too young to really follow Iran-Contra at the time.  This is interesting.  And horrible.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:14:44 PM EST

Well (none / 0)

He didn't.

He illegally sold them arms, in exchange for some pie in the sky promise on hostage negotiation help, so he could illegally funnel money to a Central American terrorist group in defiance of federal law.

He "negotiated" with them the same way a numbers racket "negotiates" with the mafia.


by zonk on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:29:49 PM EST

Re: Well (2.00 / 1)

HE DID

I worked for Sen Moynihan when Iran-contra went down and the, the investigations and teh hearings all came down to two irrefutable facts.

1. The Reagan Administartion was desparate to fund the contras despite the Congressional prohibition

2. The Reagan Administation sent emissaries to Iran to negotiate with the radical government there to achieve Item 1 above


by kmwray on Thu May 15, 2008 at 08:05:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan DIdn't Negoti (2.00 / 2)

I would be grateful for anything that lets us resurrect Iran-Contra.  I still can't believe we let those fuckers get away with it.  Iran-Contra was a million times bigger than Watergate.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:33:28 PM EST

Re: Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan DIdn't Negoti (none / 0)

And they call him their greatest President.  I'm amazed at how well he was able to fool everyone (and still is!).


by The Distillery on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:38:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Thanks for posting here. (none / 0)

I emailed some media outlets with a link to your other diary.  Hope you don't mind.  :)  Hopefully, this will get some play in the MSM.


by The Distillery on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:37:03 PM EST

Re: Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan DIdn't Negoti (none / 0)

Reagan was either a liar or an incompetent buffoon if he didn't realize his administration was selling weapons to the Iranians and funneling the money to rightwing terrorists in Nicaragua.  Oliver North should be rotting in prison.  The whole lot of them are traitors, they betrayed America and what we stand for.

And Reagan had jack shit to do with the hostages being released.

Anyone here still feel like voting for McCain?


by Skaje on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:39:22 PM EST

Re: Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan DIdn't Negoti (none / 0)

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOPS!!!!

My greatest fear is that John McCain is going to get his act together before we have an official nominee.  


by Jordache on Thu May 15, 2008 at 04:45:26 PM EST

Fraud (2.00 / 1)

It is increasingly clear with each public utterance that Sen. McCain's claim to command of foreign policy is a fraud.

He lacks an understanding of the basic on the ground realities in the Middle East (Sunni and Shia).

He appears historically uninformed and disinterested.

He relies on childish platitudes about the functioning of the global system and nostrums about possible future directions.

He is nothing but a media fraud.  I hope Democrats who are considering voting for him because their preferred candidate may lose will take these facts into account.  Particularly those who say that they prefer McCain to Sen. Obama because the latter is "inexperienced" on national security.  I join the many who say McCain has not crossed the CiC threshold, though sadly this is a minority opinion.

Obama is no less experienced than Bill Clinton upon assuming office and equally smart.  I think he is more experienced, though experience on these issues is overrated.


"We live entangled in webs of endless deceit, often self-deceit, but with a little honest effort, it is possible to extricate ourselves from them". -- NC
by Trond Jacobsen on Thu May 15, 2008 at 05:04:50 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.