Preener Obama

O, showing it in jeans for the photo-op, saying "no flash".

Do we really have to have to nominate our version of Bush?

I really miss that good old site, "Media Whores Online."

Update [2008-5-13 19:15:46 by Jerome Armstrong]: Heh, Obama supporters are offended by the comparison of Obama's preening for the media with Bush's preening for the media. Certainly Obama's agenda will be different that Bush's, thank goodness, but in this regard, it is what it is I'm afraid.



Display:


Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

< pokes eyes out >


by mlr701 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:43:59 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (1.09 / 11)

We can't let this happen.....


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:53:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 6)

Again... absolutely disgusting.  You realize I could do the exact same cartoon with Hillary?  But then Jerome might ban me.


by brathor on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:57:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

You could, but the people would all have to be women of a certain age and beta males.


by venician on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:00:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (1.00 / 5)

No, THIS is disgusting....


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

And... knowvox posts this a third time.  Yee-ha!


Stop H8
by mikeinsf on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

It's easy to post when it's the person's wallpaper.


by rfahey22 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:09:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

LOL (2.00 / 4)

Some of the Clinton supporters here seem a little too obsessed with Obama...


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:18:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (1.80 / 5)

Something tells me there are a handfull of users (you know the typical crowd) who stay up in the wee hours of the morning drawing evil handlebar mustasches on photos of Obama, while dressed in tin-foil and eating mayonaise and vitamin snadwinches.


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:21:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

portia9 = TR abuse


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Wed May 14, 2008 at 11:51:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Luckily, I've already poked my eyes out so I can't see it.....


by mlr701 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:19:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (1.00 / 1)

This is hilarious!


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

what is in his hand? (2.00 / 1)

is that a taser?


For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:08:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what is in his hand? (1.00 / 2)

It's his own personalized transponder to communicate directly to heaven.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:29:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

But PLEASE!!!!

No photos of Hillary in jeans.


by Bush Bites on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:11:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

you add SO much to the discussion here...


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:05:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Words (and images) work! (1.14 / 7)

The Bush Jr. of our party makes Frank Luntz so proud.


by Zeitgeist9000 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:44:34 PM EST

How Trivial! (none / 0)

Hillary leaves all her preening to her makeup artist, and her hair stylist.


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:05:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 19)

Oh come on, this is a front-page story?  Good lord.

Can't a candidate have a bit of a sense of humor?  And how in the world does posing as a joke for a couple seconds in an informal setting turn Obama into "our version of Bush"?

This is pretty much a new low for MyDD, sadly.


by ChrisKaty on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:44:40 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Give it time. Hillary's still in the race.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:46:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I wonder (2.00 / 3)

if MyDD will end when Hillary's campaign does or will  it turn into Obama-bashing central for 8 years.

I'm still waiting for Jerome to explain how his support of Clinton is consistent with CTG. Doesn't seem to be at all. She and her minions are the establishment that he and Markos appeared to be railing at.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:48:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (1.80 / 5)

Partisan wise?  Do you really want to sell me that bridge that Obama is the partisan fighting Dem that CTG talks about, or the mapchanger, or the populist?

Come on now.


by Jerome Armstrong on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:54:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 6)

Compared to Clinton? Hell yeah. He created a movement from the ground up, beat the crap out of the Establishment using people power, and opens up the West in ways that no one else has.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 2)

I think you are overlooking one important factor in this movement - the media.  The media bought into first and pushed it.  It will be interesting to see who they favor now, since the media loves both Obama and McCain.


by badu on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:05:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The media didn't create the (2.00 / 1)

numbers of donors or the $$$. The media didn't get those boots on the ground. The media responded to the effectiveness of the movement not the other way around. McCain is a sacrificial lamb.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:09:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So when the media was telling us... (2.00 / 2)

that Clinton was inevitable, they were sublimely building the strongest fundraising and volunteer network in the history of the world.  Wow.  Thanks!


John McCain wants you to be poor!
by nklein on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:11:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Two Words: Fairness Doctrine (none / 0)

Obama hates the media, and With Good Reason.

I'm not so sure hillary would have that axe to grind, though i would if I were in her shoes.

Maybe if she had made that argument, I would have been more willing to vote for 'er.


yo mir kennen
by RisingTide on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:43:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's just advertising and you're buying it... (none / 0)

People Powered Movement:

But to capitalize on his celebrity, Mr. Obama's campaign has also employed novel tactics -- like counting sales of $5 speech tickets or $4.50 Obama key chains as individual contributions -- to pump up his numbers and transform grass-roots enthusiasm into more useful forms of support. No other campaign is known to have listed paraphernalia sales as donations.

Not Establishment-then who ARE his biggest donors:

Kenneth Griffin, head of the Chicago-based hedge fund Citadel Investment Group LLC and among Mayor Richard Daley's top financial patrons.; Robert Wolf, America's chairman for Swiss-based UBS Investment Bank; at least 17 of his major fundraisers are managers at either hedge funds or private equity funds; Exelon is the sixth largest donor to Sen. Obama's presidential campaign and the fourth largest career donor to Obama's federal campaigns (Exelon's CEO is a key advocate for storing nuclear waste at Yucca Mountain);there is the director of General Dynamics, the military supplier that has seen profits soar since the onset of the Iraq war and that has benefited from at least one Obama earmark.; partners from 18 top law firms, 21 Wall Street executives and power brokers from Fortune 500 companies;  Neil G. Bluhm, the billionaire casino developer who plans to put a slot parlor in Philadelphia.

Anyway, none of this means anything to Obama supporters who are looking for a movement messiah instead of a president. He's just a politician who saw an opportunity to parlay his persona and rhetoric into the next new thing neatly packaged as the candidate for all seasons by speaking in vague generalities with rhetoric designed to soothe the longing souls of people buffeted by years of Bush and Republican rule.

Preening for the press is just part of a hard day's work.

Just like I don't buy religion, I don't buy what he's selling-too thin on substance and too full of ego for me.


berkshiretrueblue Commited to helping elect a Democrat as President "Hypocrisy: prejudice with a halo" Ambroise Bierce
by berkshiretrueblue on Tue May 13, 2008 at 10:02:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 6)

Obama is the Mapchanger.  Clinton is the Partisan.  Edwards was the populist.  And I really believe that.


by NewOaklandDem on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 6)

Obama's campaign is a campaign of a community organizer.  Clinton's campaign is a campaign of a poll-testing DLC-loving Washington insider.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 2)

Rhetorically Edwards was the populist. Though his history is less than populist. However, as a trial attorney who took on the big guys for the little gyys there's no doubt that he has real populist blood in those veins. Same for Obama who skipped Corporate Land (i.e. Walmart) for public interest law has that same blood. He just can't use the same rhetoric as he has a different set of rules that he must play by.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 1)

Compared to DLC, Republican-lite Clinton?

Hell yes he is!


by Lawyerish on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 1)

Compared to the bridge you are trying to sell us tha he is the same as Bush...?  I'll buy the partisan bridge thank you... at least it is somewhat rooted in reality.


"If you ever post anything on that website again, I will shove a motherboard so far up your a$$...!" C.J Cregg
by JenKinFLA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:05:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (none / 0)

The bridge to 1995.


It's time to restore balance and fairness to our economy,... It's time to stop giving tax cuts to corporations that ship jobs overseas... - Barack Obama
by Lefty Coaster on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:09:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Clinton (2.00 / 3)

Is the epitome of our CTG boogeyman, along with cohorts Mark Penn, Terry McAuliffe, and Co.

As for map changing, Obama is exactly that. He, unlike Clinton, doesn't think OH-PA-FL is the only path to victory.


by kos on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:11:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Clinton (2.00 / 0)

That's what I got from the book so I just don't get it. Obama isn't the perfect CTG warrior but he's so much closer than Clinton that over-the-top defenses of her and attacks on Obama really damage Mr. Armstrong's credibility.


John McCain on social security.
by heresjohnny on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:43:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (2.00 / 4)

Jerome, large portions of CTG were about the freaking DLC, and you want us to go with their '08 standard bearer.  

Voting for the war, never agreeing that it was a mistake, sponsoring laws against flag burning, and giving Bush a standing ovation when he talks about the success of the surge, and blithering on about "obliterating Iran" are the ultimate in the faux Republican crap we put up with during the DLC period of dominance that ended in 2004-5 with Howard Dean's rise.  A time you seem determined to return us to.  

Hell, even the rightwingers are talking about how Hillary's running a rightwing campaign.  Complete with the smears not based on any issue.  As this site has become rife with, and as this post is a prime example of.

Also, what happened to "At this point, I'm personally about as detached from whomever wins as I've ever been. If Obama gets the nod, that's fine with me; but it does look like the Clinton campaign is going to keep on going and making their best argument for getting the nomination."

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/7/10541 5/6583

The only thing that's detached about you is your writing from your cognitive reasoning abilities.  


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:13:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not to mention video games! (none / 0)


yo mir kennen
by RisingTide on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:46:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A three line diary and an insulting attack... (2.00 / 8)

I'm reporting you to the admins of MYDD for making a contentless attack diary. You have been warned. I'm emailing Jerome now...

Oh. Oops.

Am I banned too now?


by duende on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:13:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A three line diary and an insulting attack... (none / 0)

That's pretty funny.  


Obama leads the popular vote too
by kellogg on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:00:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (none / 0)

so...tempted....to trollrate...must...resist...urge...


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:38:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (none / 0)

I get a sense that Markos wrote most of the book, no?


"More War Years! More War Years!" ~John McCain
by Tommy Flanagan on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:16:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wonder (none / 0)

And you're a moderator for a supposedly progressive blog. You should be ashamed of yourself.


by Djo on Wed May 14, 2008 at 07:39:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 6)

I agree... and from Jerome to use the term, "our version of Bush"..?  Come on...  are we that devoid of hyperbole at this point that THAT's the only comparison you think to be apt... no other Democrat you find similar...?  

But no, he's not YOUR candidate, so you feel justified in going for the ultimate smear...?


"If you ever post anything on that website again, I will shove a motherboard so far up your a$$...!" C.J Cregg
by JenKinFLA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:49:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

Look, we have members on THIS site who run this website:

http://777denny.wordpress.com/

And there is no consequences.
Don't be too suprised to hear a site moderator compare our best canidate in HISTORY to the most blood thirsty tyrant our nation has seen since Richard Nixon.

To compare Obama to Bush in any way is either completely juvenile or borderline psycotic, that is if you consider yourself a democrat.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

I'll give the benefit of the doubt and say juvenile...

But, that comment (or the entire diary) should be deleted.  

Front page...?  Really....?  Of a progressive blog...?


"If you ever post anything on that website again, I will shove a motherboard so far up your a$$...!" C.J Cregg
by JenKinFLA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (1.00 / 1)

No, its easy to see the similarities if you aren't drinking the Obama Kool-aid.


by badu on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:07:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

Go ahead.
Give us some.
by Benjaminomeara on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:10:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 4)

Similarities between Bush and Obama
They both wear jeans from time to time.
They have both been photographed wearing cowboy hats
They are both male
They both have 1/2 white blood (of course Bush's other half is also white... but that doesn't mean the first half isn't just a white as Obama's.)
They are both Christians (well, at least Obama is.)
They both live in the United States
They both are going to be ex-presidents someday.  

See... lots of identical characteristics.   I rest my case.  :)


by ruscle on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:47:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Let me try to be juvenile (none / 0)

I have noticed this for many months now (since Janurary) that Obama is the Democratic version of Bush.

-- uniter, not a divider? check.
-- I don't have Washington experience? check.
-- Press darling? check.
-- end of partisanship, bipartisanship? check.
-- doing something and then accusing your opponent of that? check.

I could go on.  But the important thing is PRESS. Neither Bush, nor Obama would have been here without the press.

That's why the blame for the War, and the mess in America is first with Bush, but a very close second is Press.  I have said it to those (Big Tent Democrat at TalkLeft) who prefer Obama b/c the press likes him (or he plays the press well), and say it again.  Just remember who they are.  


I have yet to see what [Obama] has done to take the highest office in the land. He is no Martin Luther King. --Helen Thomas
by ghost 2 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:15:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let me try to be juvenile (1.66 / 3)

Indeed the very fact that the PRESS luvs them some Barry should give any thoughtful progressive pause.

Really, really should.

I can hear the sounds of millions of head exploding when, having gotten The Bitch out of the way...just as they eliminated JRE, the PRESS does what is has planned all along and uses the Cerebrus of Wright, Rezko and Auchi to utterly destroy Precious.

Heads....popping like popcorn as they realize.....

They've been 'bamboozled'.

Hahhhahaaaaahhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhahhhaaa!
.


by Pericles on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Let me try to be juvenile (none / 0)

You really are a complete tosser!


by telfishbackagain on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Didn't you see!? (2.00 / 4)

I totally saw him flip someone off in that video!

/snark


by protothad on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:00:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

I agree - this isn't really worthy of the front page. All candidates preen and joke and perform for the camera. It's not really a big deal.


by edgeplot on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:41:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Our version of Bush? No. He's not a gun-totin (2.00 / 2)

shot drinker and he's at the head of the class rather than bringing up the rear.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:46:42 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

already saw that video once today, that's enough.

ugh.


TexasDarlin blog
by TexasDarlin on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:46:42 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 8)

Really running out of astute political commentary these days, aren't we?


by rfahey22 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:46:55 PM EST

Bush succeeded. (none / 0)

His administration accomplished more neoconservative goals than could possibly be predicted.

So to answer your question, yes.

ps. he's the nominee, deal with it.


BHO/HRC 08
by omar little on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:47:02 PM EST

This is not what I like about MyDD (2.00 / 12)

Jerome, when are you going to stop this?  Obama is most likely going to be our nominee, and I would really like to see him beat McCain.  Would you?  What do you plan to do to help our nominee win?


I voted for Hillary!
by deepee on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:47:06 PM EST

Jerome, your hate is showing (2.00 / 6)

might want to cover that up once Obama is the nominee, for the sake of democracy


by Slim Tyranny on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:47:28 PM EST

Re: Jerome, your hate is showing (2.00 / 3)

Little too late for that.


My candidate lost fair and square. So did yours. Get over it and let's kick McSame's ass!
by RLMcCauley on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:04:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

heh, point/counterpoint (none / 0)

RLM, you win this round


by Slim Tyranny on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:08:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 12)

That's true, Obama really is just like W.  I mean, after all W was also raised by a single mom, got scholarships to the best schools, made his way to Harvard on his own merits, and then became the first african american to serve as head of the Harvard Law Review.  Before walking away from a guaranteed huge pay check to serve the community.  Yep, that's W all right.

Wait...


by HSTruman on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:49:35 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

well, you could have just described Bill Clinton, whom Obamans despise now (flip flop).

But Obama has run a very similar campaign to Bush's, believe it or not.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:54:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

I don't despise Bill Clinton. And actually Obama's campaign is a whole lot like the Clinton of 1992.  


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:04:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

Agreed.... from a poli sci point of view, the comparisons between Obama and Clinton's ('92) campaigns are numerous...


"If you ever post anything on that website again, I will shove a motherboard so far up your a$$...!" C.J Cregg
by JenKinFLA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:08:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

we do know things like this! (none / 0)

glad people remember them!


yo mir kennen
by RisingTide on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:51:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

Obama doesn't despise Bill and neither do I.  Criticism doesn't = hatred, it means that Bill isn't perfect.  Nobody is.  

Also, are you really arguing that Bill's preisdency wasn't a let down on some level?  He was a good president, but for such a singular political talen he didn't accomplish near as much as a lot of us hoped for in 1992.  


by HSTruman on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:10:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

I said Obamans, not Obama, and the rhetoric from his supporters toward both Clintons is impossible to tell from Republicans' from the 1990s. That is the only unity I've seen Obama compel, btw.

No president can accomplish everything he or she wants, and Obama will be no different if he's president, and hopefully if he is, he will not have the GOP trying to hound him out of office every second of every day.

But you too sound like Republicans, and I'm sure they're enjoying the newfound 50% of Democrats who suddenly agree with them about Clinton!


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:22:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

What a nonresponsive response.  Bill wasn't perfect, and I didn't like some of the things he did.  And losing Congress for the first time in a generation, along with statehouses accross the country, is not a good mark for anyone's resume.  He also did lots of good things.  The idea that saying that makes me, or any other Obama supporter, "like a republican" is laughable.  I mean seriously, whose "drinking Koolaid" when any criticism of someone you like is automatically out of bounds.  Yikes.


by HSTruman on Wed May 14, 2008 at 09:36:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I criticise Clinton for lying about Inflation (none / 0)

I think that was downright immoral.

But... that's about the only thing I have against him -- and compared to REPUBLICANS? man, there's no contest. We haven't elected an honest Republican since Eisenhower -- who I would have voted for.


yo mir kennen
by RisingTide on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:53:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I respect Bill Clinton (2.00 / 2)

for his principled stand on balancing the budget if nothing else.  There is plenty to like about the Clinton years, but also plenty to criticize.  He caved in to the Republicans in some areas he should not have and deregulated some industries beyond what should have been allowed (with consequences we can see now).

No President, no matter how effective and well loved, is beyond criticism; all leaders make mistakes and it is the duty of those who come after to recognize and learn from them.


by protothad on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:49:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

Spot On!


Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 13)

This diary disgusts me on so many levels.  I might as well be on Red State.


by brathor on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:50:52 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

It disgusted me too, I'm glad we agree on something.


by Jerome Armstrong on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:52:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

How old are you?  

<waits for answer>

THEN ACT LIKE IT.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 4)

Real amazing analysis.  Both have mugged for the cameras, therefore they are the same.

Forget background, ideology, education...


Stop H8
by mikeinsf on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:09:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome, I usually like how you run this site... (2.00 / 2)

But was this really necessary?  I wouldn't care if Hillary gave a twirl for the cameras, and neither should anyone care about this.  This is a complete non-issue.  Yeah, the die-hard Obama-haters are going to find a way to see a mortal character flaw in it... which is all the more reason you should rise above feeding such irrational behavior AND ACTUALLY FOCUS ON FREAKIN ISSUES!  Sorry, I'll stop yelling now.

I mean come, on... this is actually our likely nominee you are tearing down with this pointless crap.  Do you actually WANT four more years of Neocon rule?


by protothad on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:12:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

I'm really interested in getting some democrats elected in 2008, which is why I really liked this site. Now, as they say, 'screw this noise.' Off to get banned!


by SupremeCourt on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:40:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

how can you have a (2.00 / 0) rating?


by semiquaver on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:51:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

It probably has something to do with hide-rating Jerome. GBCW!!!


by SupremeCourt on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:58:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

I'm zero-rating your post because your diary is so bad it deserves to be deleted.  I expect I'll have my ratings ability removed soon, and probably be banned.  It's okay.  Enjoy the traffic you've gained Jerome by letting the hillaryis44 and noquarter trolls take over your site, WITH your encouragement.

As you can easily tell, my userID number is 4310, and I have been here for four years now.  Most of your current users are over 30,000.  This is both due to the trolls that have invaded, as well as the fact that most of the oldtimers have long-since left in disgust.  This is not the mydd that I remember.


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:47:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Jerome's removed all ratings from the users who zero-rated him. A brilliant rebuttal - we've now clearly seen the error of our ways. Thanks for the insight, Jerome.


Unable to rec or rate
Still supporting Obama
Still not putting up with "preening" posts
by jaiwithani on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:56:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Yup.  Knew it was coming.  Still worth it though.  This site is a joke.


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:36:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Have a 2 in spirit.

(2.00 / 1)


Unable to rec or rate
Still supporting Obama
Still not putting up with "preening" posts
by jaiwithani on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:42:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Have an invisible 4 on me. :)


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 10:13:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

say whaaaa?? (2.00 / 1)

You're disgusted by your own diary?  That makes no sense whatsoever.


by N in Seattle on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:10:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama is so much more intelligent (2.00 / 4)

than W.

Jerome is this necessary?


by puma on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

Seriously Jerome, this is complete junk.  Why did you bother with this?  
Oh, and our own Bush?  Seriously, I know it was sarcasm but lets not even go there.
Vote Change in '08!
by iowa dem on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:51:26 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Not sure what the big deal about this video is, I don't see anything offensive here, but I have seen a lot of similarities to Bush in Obama, from the beginning.

It's kind of creeped me out, but at least Obama isn't sinister like Bush.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:53:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Bush's defining characteristic is that he's a slow-thinking moron.  Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review.

Charisma isn't bad if it's backed up by smarts.


by jere7my on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

"Charisma isn't bad if it's backed up by smarts."

Exactly!  One of the most ridiculous talking points from the Clinton folk is that having a bit of charisma and giving a good speech is a bad thing.


Stop H8
by mikeinsf on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:12:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

No one said it's a bad thing.  We're saying it doesn't qualify one for the presidency.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:51:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

You're absolutely right. My point is that Obama has many qualifications that Bush does not, and that the presence or absence of charm is not a litmus test.  Charm is largely irrelevant to the Presidency, so why bring it up?


by jere7my on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:17:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Bush's defining characteristic is that he got by on looks and charm all his life.  And he was not qualified to be president, which has given us 8 years of disaster.  Obama is not ready for the presidency but his greed has pushed him into this.  If he had just had the sense to wait until he had at least completed one term as senator, and had some real accomplishments, his candidacy wouldn't be so hard to take.  Another similarity is his aversion to the press.  He has not been very open with the press on his plane.  Do you want another 8 years of that?


by badu on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:16:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Do you not see the contradiction... (none / 0)

in calling him a media whore and saying that he has an aversion to the press?  Perhaps you should figure out which b.s. to go with, before you type.  Oh, wait.  I thought you were trying to use reason.  Obviously, I was mistaken.


John McCain wants you to be poor!
by nklein on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

My point stands: looks and charm aren't that important when measuring a President.  You can have great good-looking Presidents and great fugly-ass Presidents.  You should ignore them when you make your judgments, yes, but you should not presuppose failure because of their presence.

Bush failed because, among other things, he was a dumb jock with as much depth to his thinking as a skating rink.  His charm helped him to conceal his shallowness, but even in 1999 it was clear to most of us on the left that he was not an intellectual -- that he was, in fact, a C-student oilman who happened to be related to the VP of a popular President.

Obama is also charming, I agree.  But his charm is backed up by a depth of intellect that's frankly staggering.  He's given us two books worth of proof.  He's demonstrated his quick thinking, and his deep thinking, on the campaign trail. He's a constitutional scholar, for Pete's sake. That is sufficient, in my eyes, to take any statements like "He's got nothing behind the charm, just like W!" off the table.

Since he's going to be our nominee, I think Jerome's linking of Obama to Bush is divisive, disingenuous, and bad for the party.


by jere7my on Tue May 13, 2008 at 11:33:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Frat site (2.00 / 6)

What's with this crap on the front page?  Some great diaries go down without anyone reading them, and you know this is going to get hundreds of comments.  Not sure about anyone's judgment these days I guess.  There's a whole diary with half the comments about Chapaquiddick.  There's this joke of a clip.  There're articles about the environment and criminal justice and the military that go down without a splash.  

I don't get it.


by mady on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:52:26 PM EST

Bitter Jerome (2.00 / 8)

Do we really have to have to nominate our version of Bush?

Uncalled for.


Check out McCain.
by you like it on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:52:46 PM EST

To quote a trailblazer (2.00 / 5)

Jerome, please elaborate with detail what you mean by this.

I assuming 20 different things.

Also, did I just hear you compare Obama and Bush?


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:52:49 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 6)

I get the feeling that this is the post that's going to kill off whatever credibility you still had left as a serious commentator on American politics.


by Barrett Brown on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:52:58 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

There is something very very wrong with the whole tone this post.  Something way too personally upset.  There is no distance, no judgment, just hate.


by mady on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I agree (2.00 / 1)

Dare we say... Bitter?


by duende on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:07:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I agree (none / 0)

I think we dare.


by mady on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:52:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jesus (none / 0)

I wonder which media trainer told him to put that leg up. Here's 50 bucks that we see the 'how do I look in these', 'turn around, let me see your butt' and leg up in an ad, somewhere- assuming Obama gets the nod.
by linc on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:53:00 PM EST

Re: Jesus (2.00 / 2)

Give him a break, he's trying to win the cougars over!


by venician on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

can we test (none / 0)

that by counting how many write raaaar! after their vote for Obama on their ballot?
by linc on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:07:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You are totally uncredible. (2.00 / 1)

Totally.


by tracey webb on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:53:53 PM EST

I can't believe how many posters are (none / 0)

attacking Jerome for this.  Pull the mote out of your own eye first.  It is the low brow way of the Obama supporters that destroyed reasonable progressive dialogue in the blogosphere.

In case you all need a primer - here you go

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/article s/2008/05/clinton_campaign_brought_sexis .html

At this point I think Jerome is literally trying to bail out a party that is about to hurl itself over a cliff with a weak nominee the year we should be trouncing the Republicans.  You think McCain's staff won't be using this video?


by Molee on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:54:36 PM EST

Re: I can't believe how many posters are (2.00 / 3)

Ahh, I see, so by saying Obama is "our version of Bush", Jerome is restoring "reasonable progressive dialogue in the blogsphere."

Sort of like this post:

http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/05/07/ i-call-a-spade-a-spade/


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

When I see tripe like this on FP at DailyKos . . . (2.00 / 3)

Oh, that's right, I don't.  Because Kos editors have standards, whether their candidate is up or down.  And I don't recall a frontpager that came close to comparing Hillary Clinton (or Obama, or any other Dem candidate back when most Kossacks supported Edwards) to W.

Again, I expect to see stuff like this from random users in comments, and even a few crazy diaries, but the front page?

Pathetic.


by Spirit of Fighting Bob on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: When I see tripe like this on FP at DailyKos . (2.00 / 1)

Your kidding right?  DailyKos has posted much worse on Hillary.


by badu on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: When I see tripe like this on FP at DailyKos . (none / 0)

Uh huh. I see. I'm sure there's a perfectly good reason you couldn't be bothered to provide a link or anything. Just keep repeating "but THEY did it first!" Also, I'm glad you're sticking up for the "but they started it!" defense - I haven't tried that one since I was in third grade.


by SupremeCourt on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:30:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not on the front page - the editors have stds. (none / 0)


by Spirit of Fighting Bob on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:09:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

so why is Obama ahead of McSame by 7 (2.00 / 1)

Obama v McSame 51-44

Clinton v McSame 46-43

Listening to you, it should be the other way around.

you're hero, with her 390 years of experience, is tied by McSame.  Some savior, she is.

And, she's $20,000,000 in debt.  HA!  Some savior.


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:07:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: so why is Obama ahead of McSame by 7 (1.33 / 3)

Look at the top of the page, pal.

See those maps?

Not just pretty pictures.

Check numbers on maps....

These are the numbers that matter.

Not raw national polling numbers.

Pull yer head out and realize what site you are on and what  it was founded on.

.


by Pericles on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:31:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

so you don't have an answer (none / 0)

why is Hillary polling so badly, in overnight polling?  


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Tunnel Vision (2.00 / 12)

Jerome,

I have been a regular reader of MyDD for a long time. I am also an Obama supporter. Truth be told, for the most part I appreciate the fact that you and Todd and co. provide a perspective on the race that is not skewed by an overly idealistic view of Obama's candidacy.

But I have to be perfectly honest: I think your disdain for Obama has grown over the months to unreasonable proportions. I think it's the function of 1) what you perceive to be unfair attacks/criticisms/etc. on Hillary and 2) what you perceive to be unduly positive assessments of Obama and "the promise his candidacy holds."

Let's get real, though: "our version of Bush?"

Obama is not a dilettante. He is not a phony any more than Sen. Clinton is. They are more similar than they are different. He has a different organizational perspective and approach to politics in general (as in, she is more confrontational) and personal relations.

I think maybe you should revisit some of the core substantive things that drew you to Clinton in the first place. Perhaps make that a front page post: this is why I still believe this country needs Clinton. I know you outlined that rationale extensively a few months ago, but I think you are getting caught up in the process and losing your perspective.

Short of that, maybe just try to draw back a little and think--what would you say if Obama supporters were using similar issues (the jeans and a joking comment about flash) to criticize Clinton?


by lafftaff02 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:16 PM EST

Mediawhores Online... (none / 0)

Sigh...
Whenever I hear their name I get a case of the weepies.  I haven't been the same since they closed up shop.

No one has succeeded in taking their place.


by Radiowalla on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:21 PM EST

THIS Warrants The Front Page?? (2.00 / 3)

Comparing Obama to Bush?  I'd expect to see that in comments, but a FP?  Wow.

Is mydd still considered a top-tier progressive blog?  Maybe not.


by Spirit of Fighting Bob on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:25 PM EST

"top tier progressive blog" (2.00 / 1)

only in the minds of some.

a steadily diminishing number.


by rabidnation on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It;s Too Bad, Really (2.00 / 1)

Because the FP articles here sometimes have interesting and insightful reporting and commentary (the rec list used to, but now it seems to be All Primaries All The Time -- I have hope that will pass).  We shall see if mydd recovers, but this is discouraging.


by Spirit of Fighting Bob on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:04:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: THIS Warrants The Front Page?? (none / 0)

The key words here are "the Democrats' Bush", and Jerome is correct about that.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:18:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

"our version of bush" (2.00 / 1)

words come to mind:

deluded. petty. small. paltry. meager. bereft. pointless. infantile. cheap.

you seem to have really, really run out of ideas.


by rabidnation on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:54 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Probably the same media trainer that coached him on this shot:


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:56:59 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Right, because Sen. Clinton is the most genuine person ever, and has never posed for publicity shots.    Nice double standard.  


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:00:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

The difference is that we KNOW Clinton panders and admit it while Obamans actually believe the stuff about Obama not being politics as usual or acting in politically expedient ways, and they deny it.

The other difference is that Clinton isn't running on a campaign of changing all that.  Obama is.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:17:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

That's a wee bit silly.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:18:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

It actually isn't.  IT's quite substantive, in fact.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:50:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

[Slams head into desk].

Obama is a politician.  I'm aware he plays politics.  I'm sure the majority of Obama supporters are aware of it as well.  Do I think he plays it less than Clinton?  Yes.  Could I be wrong?  Yes.  

Yeesh.


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:28:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

No, I've been aware of it from the beginning, but his campaign, and he, deny it outright.

What was the ONE thing Obama finally got upset with Rev. Wright about, again?  His saying he's just a politician like all others.

You cannot have it both ways, although the Obama camp seems to think they can, and perhaps they can.

Bushlike.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:47:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

We can't say that the guy we is more principled than other politicians?

Well, this might be a bit flip, but: YES WE CAN!  :)


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:54:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Just 3 more weeks and this will be over (2.00 / 1)

I can't wait!!!!


by puma on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:05 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

I got a "this video is no longer available"


by JustJennifer on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:58:55 PM EST

Incendiary recipes (2.00 / 5)

Tense time. Lots of hot air around. Tempers flare. The party is combustible. They look for leadership...

One of the founders of the progressive net roots movement gets some cheap gasoline from youtube, a spark of an ad hominem attack and...

whoosh

Burns his own reputation.

Great stuff. Check out those Election Night Hillary supporter diaries where Obama supporters are congratulation Hillary supporters, and wonder whether you need to learn something from your own community.


by duende on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:05 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Please ban me.  Thank you.


http://www.yawnmccain.com
by enozinho on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:05 PM EST

Me too (none / 0)

I've been sitting on my ominously titled "final warning" demanding I "change my tone" because of this post for more than 6 weeks now.

I used to value this site in my daily read, and since I honestly couldn't see what was so bad about that post -- I figured it was best I stayed away.

But with this?

Screw it.

Ban me, too.

Want a reason?

Fine.

JEROME - If Obama is "our George W Bush" -- you're "our" Dick Morris.


by zonk on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:59:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome... (2.00 / 4)

Have you noticed the childish ugly tone from the Hillary supporters that follows your every post?  Any guesses why that happpens?



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:34 PM EST

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

Take a stroll on over to HuffPo to get a glimpse of the rhetoric of the inspired, hopeful, change-wanting Obama unicorns.

Ick.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:16:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

We aren't on HuffPo.  This is MyDD, and I find it sad that the lowest troll on the site also happens to be the owner.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:23:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

This is typical Obama:

Make a critical accusation, implying that the negative trait is limited to Clinton or her supporters, then when it's pointed out that Obamans behave in a similar and often worse way, decide that  "we are not talking about Obamans."

Well, of course not!  

I'd have pretty good arguments if I could also limit criticism solely to Obama!  That is another Bush-like trait in the Obama camp, btw.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:45:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 7)

Excuse me for saying this - but what the hell is wrong with you?

Obama was the editor of the Harvard Law Review. You have to be incredlbly smart and hard-working to hold that position. Normally the Editor gets a position right after law school working with a Supreme Court Justice. These are absolutely the best legal minds in the country.  And you're comparing him to Bush?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:34 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Not in brains, not in platforms, not in philosophy, but in style and in what he's brought out in his supporters, yes.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:14:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Obama's supporters are more willing to vote for Clinton than Clinton's are to vote for him. To me that suggests that Obama's supporters are more willing to see the good in the opposing candidate.

And how exactly is his style like Bush's?  You've given no examples and I can't think of any.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:19:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

To me it suggests that Clinton was more successful in bringing back the white, male, blue collar voter Dems lost to Repubs years ago but who will go back to McCain because they perceive Obama as being too liberal and too drastic a change, too unknown.

I see similarities like the deification of the candidate; the candidate being above the fray and talking about unity while his surrogates get down into the dirt; their arguing AGAINST counting votes; using Rovian tactics, ie: turning as asset into a liability (accusing the Clintons of being racist and race baiting); the campaign photos shot from below to give Obama an aura of divinity...

I've seen a lot of disturbing similarities.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:38:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Absolute crap. In the national polls and in the comments of superdelegates, it's Clinton who is identified as the more negative of the two.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:46:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

You really believe that?

Then how do you square that with Mr. Knowledgable's voting to 'allow' credit card companies 'cap' their late fees at 30%.

I'd have to say that based on our nation's performance the last...oh....40 years led by the graduates of Harvard, Yale and the rest of the Ivy League along with George Washington and many other institutes of 'higher learning' that being President of a student run org there really isn't very indicative of any sort of competence.

Or did you forget that Bush got an MBA from Harvard Business School.

I reckons me that that is one of them 'singularities' you'd jes as soon as fergit.

Right pal?
.


by Pericles on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:45:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Junk sad diary. Grow up you whiner.


Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 06:59:41 PM EST

I think Jerome might be shutting MyDD down? (2.00 / 4)

Why else would he post this damning diary.

I can't believe what I just heard, I hope this is Snark or some joke.

Maybe it is just for controversy just to make more hits or to bring peeps from other blogs here.

Maybe his account was hacked, I didn't think of that.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:00:25 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

Bottom of Barrel, meet scraper. Scraper, say hello to the bottom of the barrel.


by xdem on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:00:28 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 7)

I don't think this diary, or this site, represent the best of what the Clinton campaign offered. Really, you guys are just pathetic right now. Try to lose with dignity, please. Your side ran a good race.


by Clipper on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:27 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Heh, got all the Obama people's knickers in a twist Face it guys, those JFK/MLK/Lincoln/Jesus comparisons are made not begotten.


by souvarine on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:01:31 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

If any of these people had MyDD around they would have been labeled as sexist mediawhores too.


by brathor on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:22:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

If you click on the About MyDD link on the bottom right of the page, here's the first sentence you'll find:

MyDD is a group blog designed to discuss campaigns, the progressive movement, and political power. We do polling, research, commentary, analysis, and activism.

A front page video post, supported by all of three full sentences--one of which compares the Democratic frontrunner to the worst POTUS in history--is somehow in keeping with what MyDD is supposed to be about?


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:02:25 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

This is the only blog I've found that actually allows people to post their opinions, isn't moderated like the Chinese gov't. (or the Bush Admin.) is doing the censoring (see Talkleft), but is pretty civil nonetheless (unlike HuffPo), and FDL is a very intelligent site and very civil...until you express support for Clinton, then you see their dander and double standards (okay to bash Hillary over there, but it's called 'poo flinging' if you merely express an opinion as to why you think Obama isn't the wiser choice, and they're hypersensitive as to what is civil and what isn't.  

I'm new here, but mydd seems to have the right balance.  Glad I found it.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:08:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Welcome to MyDD!

There is some measure of civil discourse to be found here, but it comes and goes.  Respectful dissenting opinion should be welcomed, but baseless lies, racist screeds, and

If all out racist echo chamber poo-flinging is your bag, try Hilaryis44.org.


I'm as strong as a bull moose, and you can use me to the limit. - Teddy Roosevelt
by fogiv on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:52:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

What a joke you've become, Jerome.


by DeskHack on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:02:36 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Definitely a relative of the Mission Accomplished crotch straps.
I'm so impressed.  Manly arrogance is my number one presidential requirement.
On to the Convention Floor!
by oh puhleeze on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:02:51 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (1.80 / 5)

I've avoided commenting on mydd for awhile (probably since Bowers left), but this is just over-the-top, Jerome.  It's being incendiary to remain relevant.


by ChgoSteve on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:13 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Holy crap - look at my comment right below yours...I too have stayed away from commenting recently.


We don't need a thinker. We need a doer: someone who'll act without considering the consequences. (H.J. Simpson)
by Newcomer on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:04:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Huh? (2.00 / 4)

This diary really raises the question of MyDD's ability to be relevant should Obama become the democratic nominee.


We don't need a thinker. We need a doer: someone who'll act without considering the consequences. (H.J. Simpson)
by Newcomer on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:40 PM EST

There is No Way (2.00 / 3)

There is No Way Jerome wrote this.

You can't tell someone who runs a blog and has been part of netroots for years would make a 3 line attack diary on his own site.

Either his account was hacked, or he lost his mind.

I mean, he broke his own rules with this diary.

Again, I can't beleive Jerome actually wrote this.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:47 PM EST

Paging Arthur Fonzarelli... (2.00 / 2)

MyDD may have just jumped the shark with that one.

Comparing a non-blue dog democrat to Bush is like a subset of Godwin's law.  And that applies to Obama fans as well, for what its worth.


by quixote27 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:03:54 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 5)

This is embarrassing. I'm sure you would be able to go run the show at RedState or LGF if the democratically elected nominee of the Democratic party is show disgusting to you, Jerome. What of those rumors that all this bitterness is because he wouldn't give you a job?

MyDD: A new low. Daily.


by craigk724 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:05:18 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

I think I know the trick pulling. He wants to draw all the Obama supporters into the pit and then he can shut the clap door on us.
Ban Ban Ban!
Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:05:39 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

Well good job Jerome - you just lost a mydd reader. This was my favorite blog since Adam came to OH-1, but I'm done with you attacking the Democratic nominee.

I'll delete my account after posting this comment.


Take Back Cincinnati
by belili on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:06:00 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 4)

A new low. Even for this site.


Obama/Warner 2008
by MissVA on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:06:14 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

So who is gonna cross post this to other blogs.

Its gonna get out there.

Look, I have said some embaressing things where my emotion oversteped my logic.

I could reread comments and blogs and admit I sound silly.

BUT,    you will never see me saying a Democrat, let alone any decent human being would ever compare to Bush.

George W Bush might be Americas' greatest enemy.
He has destroyed our country more effectively than Bin LAden could only dream off.

I guarantee you in the best case scenario Bush will be remembered as Nixon,  for me he's no better than any other tyranical dictator.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:10:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Thanks Perez (2.00 / 1)

Any more fashion tips?


better luck next universe
by thenew on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:08:03 PM EST

do you really get paid to write this shit? (none / 0)

cause i want that job.


BHO/HRC 08
by omar little on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:08:04 PM EST

Clinton Supporters Please (2.00 / 1)

It would be terrific if some of her supporters rallied around this being an ridiculous and inappropriate way of treating Obama, in the same way I would hope that if a similar piece on Hillary was presented, there would be Obama supporters of good will protesting it.  


by mady on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:10:11 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Jerome is just a little behind the stages of grief....

Some here are in denial, i.e. "she STILL can win..."

Some are bargaining, "she can be VP?"

Jerome is seemingly in the anger phase, and as OR gets closer, he will probably even top this?

Really the kind of crap I expect on KOS against Clinton, but I guess it all evens out?


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:10:40 PM EST

Weak Sauce (2.00 / 2)

Really
you think Markos would be so low as to write this.

This is beyond Anger,  this diary makes me not trust Jerome anymore as a Democrat.

He allows Republicans to post propoganda, Check out that ChiDenny guy.

Yesterday there was a thread posted by some Aryan nation neo-nazi-wannabe group.  The thread sat here for 2 hours.

After ALOT of emails, and almost 200 comments it was removed.

Someone put up a recipie on how to make brownies as an ironic joke and that was removed in 10 minutes.

Jerome willfully banned people in mass 2 weeks ago simply because they were Obama supporters.

Go ahead and ban me Jerome, I could give a shit.
Coming from you, since you run this site from the top down (to quote a great politician) I should feel relieved to not deal with the militant wing of the DLC.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:20:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Weak Sauce (2.00 / 1)

No, NOT KOS, but I have seen some crap at the DK?

If you look above, I posted about seeing Jerome and Marcos on the "Crashing the Gates" tour.

And, I commented, I thought Jerome was keeping better company then, compared to the Pericles poster on this thread.


Support the separation of Church and State: Vote YES on WA R-71!
by WashStateBlue on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:31:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Weak Sauce (2.00 / 1)

Ok that is understandable,  we will always see crap, its the internet.

Oh Jerome, thanks for removing my rec and TR privledges,
Im touched because at least you are paying attention.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:38:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think it's becoming obvious (2.00 / 2)

That this site isn't about getting a Democrat elected but rather driving up traffic with the sort of randomly mean things that get the attention of people off-site and which increase hits.

That this site isn't about being intelligent but being immature.

Where are the posts on the front page about tonight's special elections in Mississippi? Or the Kleeb primary in Nebraska?

Or half the things that an intelligent member would engage in rather than posting something I don't even understand.

What did Obama do that was so bad is what I don't get?

He twirled around? Did he say something? Or do something that makes him George W. Bush?

Last time I checked, people like to goof around. I lecture at a university but I still like goofing around.

I really don't understand this. I haven't been unfair to Senator Clinton when she does silly things - but you, someone who speaks for a site - has engaged in that.

I guess it's acceptable now to do that on this site.

Cool.


Commissar: Canadian Gal; Proletariat Policemen: ragekage, Lord Hadrian. "For the Proletariat!"
by Lord Hadrian on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:13:17 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

I'm not usually in the ---- Derangement Syndrome thing but I hereby nominate Jerome as the first once normal blogger who has come down with the dreaded ODS.  You should backup slowly from the keyboard and have a nice shot of whiskey.


by GobBluth on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:15:56 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

You're going off the deep end Jerome.  Really losing it man, it's sad to see.  I know a lot of your readers here will hop on the Straight Talk express once Clinton concedes, but I'd hope that you at least would avoid joining them.


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:16:42 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

It's certainly easy to see where the nasty, dismissive, doomsday, condescending tone about Obama comes from on this site - right from the top.  

Jerome, I loved your book, but you've lost your marbles.


by travelerkaty on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:16:51 PM EST

Dammit, Obama's showing his humanity (2.00 / 2)

and appeal to superficial voters - NooooOoooooooOoooo. MUST BE ALL SERIOUS ALL THE TIME.


by grass on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:16:51 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 4)

Your update is perhaps even more moronic than the original diary.  At least the original diary didn't pretend to be making a legitimate point.


by rfahey22 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:19:38 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

Hey Jerome,

You own this sight right? You make money off of it I assume?

You just lost a loyal reader. This really sets the bar low, and you have really lost any credibility in my eyes. Commentary, criticism, etc are all valid, but this crap is deserving of a troll rating as far as I'm concerned. You can take your "our version of Bush" and shove it. You apparently have nothing of substance left to add to the debate.

Kiss my white working class ass.


by AllergicToBS on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:19:56 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

RIP MYDD


by Bargeron on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:21:16 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

This is not a diary becoming the supposed nature of this site.  Embarrassing.


by Lawyerish on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:21:55 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 3)

I love that the update begins "Heh."  Pretty soon he'll be adding "indeed" and getting the linklove from Instapundit and Drudge.  


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:22:34 PM EST

ooops (none / 0)

I'm outta the loop, what do the references mean.

thnks in advance.
:)


"McSame: He's Constipated and Ready to GO!
by Al Rodgers on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ooops (2.00 / 1)

Well, not sure quite how out of the loop, so to explain everything, Instapundit is the king of the rightwing sphere.  But he's not much for the analysis.  Instead, he just quotes something and writes "Heh.  Indeed."  A lot of liberal blogs, like Atrios, mocked him for that.


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:59:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

MyDD has officially jumped the shark (2.00 / 3)

I'm outta here. There's not enough substance left to justify increasing Jerome's pagerank.


Unable to rec or rate
Still supporting Obama
Still not putting up with "preening" posts
by jaiwithani on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:22:37 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

I've figured out based on this post what this site is going to be like for the next 8+ years.

Until the Convention - Clinton should be the nominee!!!  What if MI & FL would have counted!!!  Clinton would do better than Obama against McCain!!!  The SDs can switch anytime, there's still a chance!!!

After the Convention - Why isn't Obama doing this?  Why is he doing that?  Hillary would have done this and that better.  We're doomed in November with Obama!!  WHY? WHY? WHY?

After Obama is elected President until 2010 - Hillary would have done this better.  Hillary would done this.  Hillary's better!!!

Or After Obama loses to McCain because  thousands of Clinton supporters stay home - We told you so!!! We told you so!!!  McCain sucks.  He's running the economy into the ground, he's not getting us out of Iraq, he's not doing anything about global warming, he's appointed two more conservative supreme court justices.  But we told you so!!!!

Comparing Obama to arguably one of our worst Presidents is absolutely disgusting.  You should be ashamed of yourself.

Every Democrat should denounce and reject this diary!!!!


by chewie5656 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:23:50 PM EST

Has this been Cross Posted yet? (2.00 / 1)

Jerome is obviously so proud of the intelligent discourse he just started Im sure he can't wait for the other blogs to see what the Site Admin is writing here.

I would like to see how other blogs view the brilliant discussion here.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:10 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Everyone relax.

Let Jerome get in his one liners, he only has a few more weeks to do it.  We can give him his last hurrah.

Oh, and when Obama officially wins the nomination, try your best not to throw it in his face.


by Boshwok840 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:24:41 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

That should be very easy for inspired, hopeful, changing uniters!

Right?


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:27:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Hell I think I might just pack it up for a few weeks until Clinton concedes, then I'll come back to watch the fireworks here.  I figure most of the trolls will announce they're starting a fundraising drive for McCain, they'll put it on the rec list, Jerome will leave it on the rec list for most of the day before finally deleting it, and then maybe this site will get some of its respect back.  Or not.


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:31:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

No.  Not any more.  Jerome wants to be a progressive leader.  He wants to help build progressive politics in America.  

He needs to act like a leader and not act like a child. I'm pretty sure at this point he doesn't care, but there are a LOT of people who used to frequent this site that have been turned off by his postings and comments over the last 9 months or so... Kos has been doing the same thing except with a different candidate and BOTH have lost a lot of standing and respect because of the way they have been acting.  

Bowers and Stoller are both supporting Obama.  Yes as all bloggers do, they piss some people off, but most people who frequent MyDD, Openleft, Kos, Huffington, etc respect them.  I miss the Crashing the Gates Jerome who posted rational, well thought out posts trying to make us better as a party and as progressives.  That Jerome went to work on Mark Warner's campaign and came back a different person.  A person who not only seems to have lost the rationality and passion, but someone who just turned into a nasty person on this site.  

I'm ok with him criticizing Obama's stances or making well thought out arguments on why he thinks another candidate is a better choice.  But the attack posts or the posts such as this one that if done by ANY user of this site would be called a trolling diary are not acceptable.  When the guy who runs the sites starts acting like a troll, he has shown he has lost his way.  Maybe he needs a vacation or a break, but regardless, I'd like the old Jerome back... the Jerome I respected as much as anyone in politics.  


by yitbos96bb on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:54:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

My goodness Jerome (2.00 / 0)


   you've really lost it when it comes to this race.

  I swear, if Obama kissed his wife, you'd complain he was pandering to the family values crowd.

  Unbelievable!


by southernman on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:26:13 PM EST

This just embarrasing (2.00 / 0)

I used to think this site was going down the toilet in spite of Jerome... now I think it's because of him. Seriously... he's our version of Bush because he does a bit of kidding around with the media?

I don't know if you realize this, Jerome, but presidential candidates need to ingratiate themselves to the reporters covering the campaign. Nothing worse then being followed by a bunch of people who hate you, whose job it is to tell everyone else what you are doing, saying and thinking.

You can bet your ass that McCain is running around trying to kiss some press behind. He invited them to his house for BBQ. It would be irresponsible of any candidate to not try to have some camaraderie with his press core. The fact that he's willing to show some humor, make fun of himself, and goof around with these people is a HUGE plus, and you're trying to spite him for it?


by Tatan on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:27:03 PM EST

Heh, great update (2.00 / 0)

"it is what it is I'm afraid"

That line speaks volumes, Jerome, about you.  You posting this, and mocking Obama as similar to the vacuous Bush, certainly "is what it is."

You're like Jetblue Airlines: no class.


by Slim Tyranny on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:29:11 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, Obama definitely gave Hillary the bird in this video.  What a childish jerk!  He knew what he was doing!


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:31:31 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 4)

I watched the video 3 times and can't figure out why everyone is so pissed?

You hate him that much that anything he does brings out the hate even more?

Man, Jerome I loved Crashing the Gate and was inspired to become a PC in my district because of you and Markos. The day the nominee is selected that sign will be in my front yard and I'll be walking, and donating to the nominee.

But this crap doesn't become you or MyDD AT ALL! Obama is really so heinous a candidate that he needs to be destroyed?

I voted for Hillary in the AZ primary but she is losing the race and it's no one's fault but her own. She's the New England Patriots with all the talent and the cash to start and the guy who had the strategy and learned the lessons of Howard Dean and the failures of Penn, Shrum and the DLC is eating her lunch.

Blame the politicos in FL and MI for screwing with the primaries in a presidential election year. I think there should be a more equitable system of rotating primaries but let's work it out when there's a lot less at stake.

This video is grasping for straws and I expect more from this site.


by TimO on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:32:01 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

extremely well said.

I used to come here for awesome political analysis.  It really went south after Bowers and Stoller left.  Thats not necessarily a potshot at the people who are left (I think Jon and Todd do some great work) but this is just sad.


by quixote27 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:38:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Geez, chill out, everyone.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:32:11 PM EST

Jerome... (2.00 / 2)

you are an ass.


by rebop on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:32:16 PM EST

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

Inspired by Obama?

That change is a-comin'!

Not.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:40:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

No, Jerome is awesome.

He banns and restricts accounts of people he doesn't like.

This site will soon be as irrelevant as TaylorMarsh.

Its just sad that with the top down strategy here is that if the sites founder jumps the shark, by proxy the whole site does.

It's funny how ONE post can make all of his work completly irrelevant.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:42:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome... (none / 0)

My reply was to the a presumably Obama inspired, hopeful, change-wanting Obama supporter calling another person an ass.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:02:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I call it like I see it. (none / 0)

This is a sorry excuse for a Dem site. I realize he still thinks there Hillary has a chance to win, but personal attacks on the likely Dem nominee are stupid and counterproductive. This site has become an irrelevant cesspool, which is sad considering it's proud history. And Jerome is an ass. Plain and simple.


by rebop on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:58:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

Clearly this video proves that Obama is exactly the same as the guy who led the country into war based on lies.


by vinc on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:34:49 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

Low Class Jerome.  I expect this crap from users on the site.  You are supposed to be a leader on the blogs and a leader in the progressive movement.... Yet you fail to act like it with crap like this.  YOU BLASTED the media and the republicans for saying and pulling this shit with Edwards then you give credence to this type of stupidity when you post crap like this.  

Quit acting like a petulant child, start acting like an adult and the progressive leader you are supposed to be.... not like a spoiled child who starts throwing a week long tantrum because he didn't get his way.


by yitbos96bb on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:42:27 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Waiting for Jerome to close comments, or even delete the diary.  This is an embarrassing post for him.

Also,


by Skaje on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:42:45 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

LOL @ that picture, omg.


by soros on Wed May 14, 2008 at 03:36:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Let me be clear about something. This is an acceptable diary, but progressives discussing the reality of racism in this country -- an issue important to progressives for many decades -- is off limits?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:43:11 PM EST

You've figured it out. eom (none / 0)


Obama leads the popular vote too
by kellogg on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:27:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A comment on your update (2.00 / 1)

Not everyone who thinks this was an asinine post is an Obama supporter.  I voted for Edwards in my primary even though he had dropped out long before.  If there was a front page post on DK calling Hillary a Democratic Ann Coulter, I would be disgusted by that too.
You're really better than this and mydd doesn't deserve it.  This blog isn't all about you, Jerome.  
by ChgoSteve on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:51:11 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Yuck.  We need some estrogen in the Whitehouse.


by Si Ella Puede on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:51:12 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

we had some, her name was Monica.


by venician on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:06:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome (2.00 / 1)

you are really trending towards Ben Smith territory,  is your dislike of Obama that strong that you are becoming a hack like he is?


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:52:45 PM EST

its a giant clusterf*#k (none / 0)

want some input from noquarters?

"Michelle Obama needs to learn how to run her own house before angling for the White House. I guess hubby Obama is bored with Michelle."

"I know. Michelle Obama needs to learn to run her own house. Daddy is looking for some free press at Michelle's expense."

Sounds somehow strangely familiar...


by standd on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:54:02 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 1)

This site is a now a joke. What a ridiculous smear post. All of a sudden I thought I was on Michellemalkin.com.


by Graham1979 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:55:56 PM EST

Preening? (none / 0)

Have you lost your mind?  All I see is a homemade video of Obama talking on a cell phone.  No media, no preening.


by Chango on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:56:14 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 2)

Bye-Bye Jerome.  Good luck to Todd and Jonathan who are bloggers that I respect and who happen to be Democrats.  I can't imagine what the Clintons promised you but it must've been good.  

I stopped giving page hits to Taylor and I'm gonna stop giving them to you.  


Bitter voter for change.
by Hope08 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 07:59:22 PM EST

Obama supporters and their Orwellian Newspeak (2.00 / 2)

by Lirwin2
'There is a word in Newspeak,' said Syme, 'I don't know whether you know it: duckspeak, to quack like a duck. It is one of those interesting words that have two contradictory meanings. Applied to an opponent, it is abuse, applied to someone you agree with, it is praise.' -1984

-When Barack Obama does it, it's reaching out, when Hillary does it it's pandering

-When Barack Obama does it, it's mis-speaking when Hillary does it it's lying

-When Barack Obama does it, it's bringing race to the forefront, when Hillary does it it's racist

-When Barack Obama does it, it's changing washington, when Hillary does it it's throwing long-time Dems under the bus

-When Barack Obama does it, it's because he's willing to work across the aisle, when Hillary does it it's because she's a conservative

You may now commence with the typical "Thoughtcrime against the party = death" crap that we've all come to expect from the nutroots these days.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/dis cuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum= 132&topic_id=5949984&mesg_id=594 9984


by observer5 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:00:19 PM EST

Re: Obama supporters and their Orwellian Newspeak (2.00 / 1)

BINGO!!!


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:02:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama supporters and their Orwellian Newspeak (2.00 / 1)

Absolutely right on the money.


by Pericles on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:06:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama supporters and their Orwellian Newspeak (2.00 / 1)

Amen! And another abuse of Zero ratings by Skaje


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:35:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So who else got banned/restricted tonite (2.00 / 1)

It seems when ever Jerome gets mad he starts restricting people witout any reason or warning.

Oh well, I am tired of being afraid of Jerome.

I see the trick in his "account restricting"

It allows him to keep getting hits and comment activity but keep his reclist pristine and to his agenda.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:02:22 PM EST

Re: So who else got banned/restricted tonite (none / 0)

Hmmm. I lost a couple of recs on my comments and suspect some users have been 'disappeared'. But have no fear, a new sock puppet is always near.


by duende on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:04:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Another Bush trait: hubris.

Obama's supporters cannot understand how anyone could support Hillary and have no tolerance for it.

And btw, it's Obamans who need to get over her loss. They're pulling the Karl Rove "I don't want to just defeat them, I want to leave them bloodied" thing.

Gracious winning is a good thing.

Psst: telling someone to "grow the fuck up" seems contraObaman to me.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:05:14 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Another Bush trait:  mockery

Jerome sure has that one down.

And you talk about 'gracious winning' on this site?  After this post?  On this night?  

Unreal.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:13:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

I can totally understand how someone could support Clinton. The 90's were good times. We're long past due for a female president. And while not experienced in the traditional sense, she's bound to have picked up a lot simply by being so close to the other Clinton. She's brilliant, confrontational, and has access to the amazing network the Clintons have been building for close to two decades.

That said, I think she'd be a sub-par nominee, for reasons I'm not going to go into here. Point is, I can completely understand why some people would back Clinton, though I've been a fervent Obama supporter for over a year.


Unable to rec or rate
Still supporting Obama
Still not putting up with "preening" posts
by jaiwithani on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:21:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I am another (none / 0)

who will NEVER come to this site again.


by Bluebeard on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:06:22 PM EST

I miss Media Horse also (none / 0)

where did they go?  You know there were rumors that it was Carville and Begalla running that site.


For Obama it now becomes: Faith, hope and CHANGE! And the greatest of these is Change!
by TeresaInPa on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:11:04 PM EST

Re: I miss Media Horse also (none / 0)

Two stand up Democrats,  one of them even spied for the RNC.

And the same one married a Republican strategist.

Wow, great guys all around.

I hope Obama returns Carville's check, I will never forgive him for working for the republicans, and he calls elected officials Judas.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:22:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (2.00 / 0)

Funny.  I heard this was a progressive blog and that the commenters were actually people concerned about progressive politics.  

Turns out it is a website for poo-flingers.  Looks like I can leave now having wasted but a small amount of my time.


by zadura on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:19:35 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Yet another junk diary, except this is a front page one. Very sad indeed.


by telfishbackagain on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:23:05 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Man, Jerome, you really need to look in the mirror and question why your negative feelings are so personal? You really have stretched to interpret a totally innocuous 30 sec clip to being evidence of some serious parallel to Bush. You really need to take on some self-examination. I think you've been an awesome progressive leader but you're slipping.


Senator Obama will be formally nominated on August 28, 2008 - the 45th Anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have A Dream Speech."
by brimur on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:27:15 PM EST

Cynicism (2.00 / 1)

Cynicism is a sorry kind of wisdom, Jerome.


_____________
changiness
by lizardbox on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:28:56 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Slow news day? A guy talking on a cell phone is news? And Obama=Bush? Get a grip.


by joeldanwalls on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:37:40 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Slow news day? A guy talking on a cell phone is news? And Obama=Bush? Get a grip.


by joeldanwalls on Tue May 13, 2008 at 08:38:11 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Hey!

When Obama is called the equivalent of a "big fucking whore", THEN you can complain.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:00:07 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Two wrongs make a right?  Neat!


by quixote27 on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:03:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

No, but proportion and perspective are pretty important.

I remember when Rhodes said that. I was blogging over at Obama Central, aka the Huffington Post.

Not ONE Obama supporter condemned it. Indeed, they all decided she was correct, albeit roughly said.

Gross.  Especially for people who are supposedly inspired to a better politic!


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:17:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

I expect more from a progressive blogger than I do from a radio shock jock.  But hey, now I know what level of discourse Jerome is shooting for.  Thanks.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:04:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Why do you expect more?  And what is the difference between a progressive radio jock and a progressive blogger?

Sorry, but that was far worse than putting up some silly video of Obama, which isn't in the least bit offensive.


by Juno on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:15:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

If you think people are upset about a cute little video of Obama on a cell phone you've completely missed the point.  I suggest you read Jeromes post again.



Lost rate and rec for issuing a '1' to a trollish comment. The troll, not so much.

by map on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:51:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This diary contributes what? (none / 0)

[crickets]

hillaryis44 and Taylor Marsh must be so proud.


Obama leads the popular vote too
by kellogg on Tue May 13, 2008 at 09:25:39 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

This post is so incredibly lame.  I can't believe that an allegedly progressive blog would compare the Democratic Party's frontrunner for the nomination to the worst president in U.S. history and perhaps one of the stupidest humans alive.

If a similar post had been made about Clinton before today, I have no doubt that the diarist would have been banned.  But I guess rules only apply to the 'other guy'.  Both rules of the blog, and rules of the Democratic Party's nomination process.

Oh Mr. Shark -- you have been jumped.


John McCain the flip-flopper...
by chinapaulo on Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:16:53 AM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

Jerome,

your mia culpa is weaker than your orginial post.

Can someone help me figure out how to delete my account?


by AllergicToBS on Wed May 14, 2008 at 12:20:51 AM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

All you have to do is rec diaries that are not already in the rec list.

The sad thing is with this site is Jerome owns it.

Therefore if he becomes a pariah of netroots than it's the site that loses, since everything from militant like sweeps to posting of this garbage lies on him.

It seems that this sight is losing it's bearings.


Unable to rec or rate

Read this: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/15/1427 30/254

by GeorgeP922 on Wed May 14, 2008 at 01:42:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

WTF (none / 0)

What am I missing? He's on his campaign plane making a phone call.


Saxby Chambliss is a disgrace.
by ATL Dem on Wed May 14, 2008 at 02:24:43 PM EST

Re: Preener Obama (none / 0)

This is posted by a mod? Good lord, why don't the mods just quit pretending that this site is to promote the "democratic" party and start calling the intrapartisan garbage dump it's turning into.

And you guys think the rhetoric on Kos is in the gutter...


by Djo on Wed May 14, 2008 at 04:21:56 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.