Still not sure where you are seeing it.  Are you talking about the news media? Or music and the internet?

My personal oppinion it is religion and the religious taint our society has.  Attaching shame to sex and sexuality causes so many problems, and allows for so much victimization, while at the same time repressing willingness to come forward.

I never really consider opinions allegations, and my "I think" was indicating it was my opinion.  Because I cannot imagine that someone that derogatory can exist and call himself a liberal.  Also the only insult was that he is a coward.  Arn't we past thinking sexual orientation is something negative?  If I said I think he is purple or a Republican, would you consider that enough to troll rate me?

And you don't have to explain why troll rating anymore, better than 75% of the diaries that make the Recommended list are nothing more than trolls.  It's almost a badge of honor these days.

Hey canadian gal, how does the canadian media treat Hillary?  Is it the same as here?

referring the over the line supporters, but I still wanted to make the distinction to be sure.

You're kidding, right? Hillary Clinton has paved a path that no other woman before has done, and in the process made it easier for all those that follow - and you're ready to throw it all away to make some petulant little point because she came up a little short?

I believe that it's been a hard road for her. It's a hard road for anyone who wants to be president. But when I read what you wrote I think that I hold your candidate in higher regard than you do. And that's too bad.

To make the leap that because Hillary is not going to be President this time around, NO woman can be President is fairly disgusting. Hillary has a lot of positives, but she also has a lot of negatives, and ran a not great campaign. There is plenty of room for another woman to run without Hillary's deficiencies and take the White House. Don't sell the rest of the female gender short because Hillary didn't quite make it this time around.

I'm not lifting the TR.  He HR'ed my comment that is neither offensive, content-less, script-generated, nor meant to abuse the reader.  As for bobswern, he called me a troll.  When someone uses that term when I have regularly made conciliatory comments about HRC and her supporters, I'll call him whatever I like.  You can use your TR however you like.  I'll be sure to return the favor when you're being bashed.

but I freely admit that over on Dkos, I called Jerome biased, and maybe even referrence a would that rhymes with mack that starts with an H to refer to him (as he was cherry picking).  Also I am pretty sure that I called myDD my Daily Dixiecrat on the day the George Wallace=Obama diary went up and stayed up for a long time.  Possibly the same on the day of the slave card diary.

I am just saying that I have plenty of faults I just try not to piss off people by doing my venting in appropriate areas (except for my analysis of the racist vote (also on the day of the George Wallace diary) which I really should delete but it is really far buried in my diaries)

and i thank you... ;)

I took your comment last night to heart, the only time I'll step into the primary war is to smack down idiocy/fear/republicans (like in NewHampster's diary about the "leader" of the NH republican party) or to comment in diaries like this.

I'm on to hitting John McCain with the corn belt (he will run poorly there due to ethanol, see the states of IA and IN and possibly NE as well as IL and MN being solidly blue).

Well, there's this diary on the math:

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/5/12/9282 2/7106

And perhaps you aren't aware, but Obama has gotten 80% of the superdelegate endorsements since February.  I don't care who each of them endorse; they're free to endorse whomever they like according to DNC rules.

What I said if you care to read what I wrote before you TR it, is that she lost the nomination in February.  Yes, there was still a long way to go, and there are still a few more states to vote, but the lead Obama has goes back to the wins from February.  And he will probably still win with that many delegates or even less.  The wins that will take him to the nomination come from February, not any of the contests after that.

"and why are people still voting?"

The Republicans are still voting, and McCain has won.

You do understand that when everybody but the presumptive nominee has dropped out they still hold the remaining contests, right?

Those people still get to vote.  Their votes still count.  They just don't matter.  However, they just don't matter in the same way voting for a Democrat in California won't matter (they'll win anyway) or a vote for a Democrat in South Carolina won't matter (they'll lose anyway).

Go out and vote.  Do your part.  It actually matters quite a lot.  But don't expect that just because a particular state is among the last five states to vote it will somehow be determinative.  As we run out of states, the significance of any particular one drops - we're amassing results from nearly the entire country already.