`A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter

On May 8, 2008, Jimmy Carter wrote this short piece for Comment is Free, an internet site run by the London newspaper, The Guardian.

What is interesting about this article is that one cannot find a similar American publication of Carter's declaration about the human rights crimes going on in Gaza. Part of the problem may be that the Gaza seige is fully supported, even paid for by the United States under the Bush administration. The main issue, however, is censorship in which any news detrimental to Israel's government fails to find its way into the front pages of America's mainstream newspapers, even when terms like "human rights crime" are applied.

Nonetheless, here is what Jimmy Carter said:

The world is witnessing a terrible human rights crime in Gaza, where a million and a half human beings are being imprisoned with almost no access to the outside world. An entire population is being brutally punished.

This gross mistreatment of the Palestinians in Gaza was escalated dramatically by Israel, with United States backing, after political candidates representing Hamas won a majority of seats in the Palestinian Authority parliament in 2006. The election was unanimously judged to be honest and fair by all international observers.

Israel and the US refused to accept the right of Palestinians to form a unity government with Hamas and Fatah and now, after internal strife, Hamas alone controls Gaza. Forty-one of the 43 victorious Hamas candidates who lived in the West Bank have been imprisoned by Israel, plus an additional 10 who assumed positions in the short-lived coalition cabinet.

Regardless of one's choice in the partisan struggle between Fatah and Hamas within occupied Palestine, we must remember that economic sanctions and restrictions on the supply of water, food, electricity and fuel are causing extreme hardship among the innocent people in Gaza, about one million of whom are refugees.

Israeli bombs and missiles periodically strike the area, causing high casualties among both militants and innocent women and children. Prior to the highly publicized killing of a woman and her four children last week, this pattern had been illustrated by a report from B`Tselem, the leading Israeli human rights organization, which stated that 106 Palestinians were killed between February 27 and March 3. Fifty-four of them were civilians, and 25 were under 18 years of age.

On a recent trip through the Middle East, I attempted to gain a better understanding of the crisis. One of my visits was to Sderot, a community of about 20,000 in southern Israel that is frequently struck by rockets fired from nearby Gaza. I condemned these attacks as abominable acts of terrorism, since most of the 13 victims during the past seven years have been non-combatants.

Subsequently, I met with leaders of Hamas - a delegation from Gaza and the top officials in Damascus. I made the same condemnation to them, and urged that they declare a unilateral ceasefire or orchestrate with Israel a mutual agreement to terminate all military action in and around Gaza for an extended period.

They responded that such action by them in the past had not been reciprocated, and they reminded me that Hamas had previously insisted on a ceasefire throughout Palestine, including Gaza and the West Bank, which Israel had refused. Hamas then made a public proposal of a mutual ceasefire restricted to Gaza, which the Israelis also rejected.

There are fervent arguments heard on both sides concerning blame for a lack of peace in the Holy Land. Israel has occupied and colonized the Palestinian West Bank, which is approximately a quarter the size of the nation of Israel as recognized by the international community. Some Israeli religious factions claim a right to the land on both sides of the Jordan river, others that their 205 settlements of some 500,000 people are necessary for `security`.

All Arab nations have agreed to recognize Israel fully if it will comply with key United Nations resolutions. Hamas has agreed to accept any negotiated peace settlement between the president of the Palestinian Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, and Israel's prime minister, Ehud Olmert, provided it is approved in a referendum of the Palestinian people.

This holds promise of progress, but despite the brief fanfare and positive statements at the peace conference last November in Annapolis, the process has gone backwards. Nine thousand new Israeli housing units have been announced in Palestine; the number of roadblocks within the West Bank has increased; and the stranglehold on Gaza has been tightened.

It is one thing for other leaders to defer to the US in the crucial peace negotiations, but the world must not stand idle while innocent people are treated cruelly. It is time for strong voices in Europe, the US, Israel and elsewhere to speak out and condemn the human rights tragedy that has befallen the Palestinian people.

Should Americans be concerned about Gaza since, after all, the mass killings that occurred in Lebanon and Gaza in 2006, when over 1200 and 600 civilians, respectively, were killed, was fully supported by our government?

What have we become? This is only Israel's latest atrocity in Gaza, delivered by Israel's Minister of Defense, Ehud Barak.

Photobucket



Display:


This is depressing (2.00 / 1)

I'm an admirer of Israel and what they've accomplished in the world for themselves, but I cannot justify their subjugation of the Palastinian peoples.

Hamas needed to be taken off the list of terrorist organizations the moment they won a legiitmate election to represent their people.  Look at Sinn Fein in Ireland: they divorced themselves from the IRA and became a legitimate political unit, spelling the beginning of the end of the Troubles.

Our political candidates can't even endorse talking to Hamas while they're considered a terrorist organization; McCain has already used a Hamas leader's sincere admiration of Barack Obama as a political weapon against him.

The Clinton presidency tried, but were hamstrung by prevailing conditions, like the murder of Rabin by one of his own people.  They met with Arafat and his wife at the White House while the PLO was still a terrorist organization, but they had the authority to get away with it.

Our next president needs to pick up the pieces of Bush's lazy Palistine policy and start legitimizing the Hamas leaders.  There's always going to be extremists that try to break the peace on both sides, but the key will be to appeal to the majorities who don't want more violence.

Jimmy Carter is a true American, and it disturbs me how much flak he's getting for doing this good thing.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:52:50 AM EST

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

Carter lost all credibility right here:

Israel and the US refused to accept the right of Palestinians to form a unity government with Hamas and Fatah and now, after internal strife, Hamas alone controls Gaza.

"Internal strife"?!?  You mean civil war?  Murder?  Slaughter?  I guess when Israel does it, it's a war crime, but when Hamas takes over Gaza by force, doing lovely things like throwing chefs off rooftops, it's "internal strife."

Thank you for posting this.  It should clear up any questions anybody had about Carter.


by dhonig on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:07:09 AM EST

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

It was quite evident to most, perhaps not you, but most, that the US and Israel attempted to engineer a routing of Hamas in Gaza, in spite of their democratic election, by encouraging a civil war. Hamas did not buy into it, and took over control of Gaza.

Maybe you have been asleep. The Bush administration has not been a force for peace in the Middle East ever since the Iraq invasion, and continues to support strife between Israel and the Palestinians.

Given Israel's Greater Israel dream, Hamas has been Israel's greatest red herring, an excuse to avoid peace initiatives until it achieves its goal.

Only right wing Likudniks believe otherwise, or at least keep promulgating propaganda that the problem is Hamas and not Israel.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:15:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

You live in a self-deluded fantasy world where Hamas is the good guys and shooting rockets and elementary schools is acceptable behavior.  Your opinion means nothing.  I opine on the diaries only to point out the absurdities to those perhaps not familiar enough with you YET to look for them themselves.  


by dhonig on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:10:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

And that is your fantasy, that Israel's killing of Palestinian people including children like those above is legally and morally justified. Neither side is morally above the other, but only one of them continues this conflict, the Zionist nationalists who are opting to take all of original Palestine and turn it into Greater Israel.

You implicitly concur with the idea that Israel has the right to keep the Palestinian people under military occupation, while it colonizes, steals, that is, its lands. This has been going on for 41 years now. But you want everyone to believe that Israel is the victim here, and Palestinians, the terrorist perpetrators. Too bad international law does not concur with this twisted logic.

You also ignore the fact that Hamas has proposed a cease fire well over a half dozen times, and on two occasions voluntarily ceased fire for a month each time (as Carter reported). In the meantime, Israeli forces continue to kill Palestinians, mostly civilians, in Gaza as well as the West Bank. They have killed thirteen times more Palestinians, in fact. All this on the pretext that the Palestinians will rearm, as if they aren't doing that all the time, and Israel knows it. Israel's real fear is that Hamas will begin to look like they want peace. Then what? What excuse will Israel have left to continue the occupation.

As Siegman said recently, Israel has no interest in peace, and as Carter said, Israel wants the land, not peace. You have to be pretty dull not to have come up with that conclusion some time ago.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 08:37:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

And you also ignore the fact that collective punishment, especially of a people living under military occupation, is illegal by international law. And that is Gaza's story.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 08:38:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hamas won their election (2.00 / 1)

Hamas was a legitimately elected government.

Carter is a good man, and it's pretty wretched to disparage him for wanting peace.

Israel is a standing army, the Palastinians are a subjugated people.  Both sides have done some horrible things, but Israel has more power.  They have to be greater partners in this.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:15:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hamas won their election (none / 0)

Hamas is a TERRORIST organization. They blow up buses and cafes, hold schools hostages, burn US and Israeli flags/effigies, and expect leverage? Its the Jew's land, and Carter's mentality of dealing with Hamas is why he lost the Presidency: by being too nice nice with enemies. He should have never let the Sha into the US so they could take our men hostage, and look what happened. 12 years Reagan/Bush, because they all framed their opponents in the mold of Jimmy Carter.

It is the Israeli's country, they control it, and the Palestinians just keep whining for land that is not theirs. Someone has got to tell them they lost. Just the fact that Israel is even nice enough to offer them any land, they should take, and shut up.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sun May 11, 2008 at 05:34:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wretched. (none / 0)

Why do the Jews control it again?  Have they been there for the last thousands of years?

No.  After World War 2 they were given the land in the re-drawing of the borders and the Palastinians were driven out, causing much hardship and death.

You don't seem interested in hearing any other side of the story.  To you they're terrorists.  To them, they are freedom fighters.  The truth is somewhere in between.

If we're going to promote democracy, we need to acknowledge the choices of sovereign peoples, even if we don't agree with them.  Democracy isn't democracy only if we approve of the people fairly elected.

Hamas was elected legally.  We need to start treating this more as a conflict between governments and less as a terrorist problem.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 06:30:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wretched. (none / 0)

Israel had been the land of the jews for thousands of years before the diaspora in 132 AD being thrown out by the Muslims and another diaspora in the 600's by the Holy Roman Empire. It was their land dammit and they had every reason to be there and reconquer it. They didn't just take it over you know. The jews have been persecuted for thousands of years, slaughtered and oppressed by every country they wound up in, and they deserved their homeland. We also need a strategic ally in the region. Even as much as the Palestinians don't live in the best conditions, they need to stop thinking they have the right to kill Israels, as Hamas believes. The Jews have every reason to be there. Hamas believes the Jews have no right to exist, and they are wrong. That is just like the Nazis, another "duly elected" party, as they won a big Reichstag victory in 1933, just as Hamas. Hamas must understand the jews right to exist before we send ex presidents over to them, and Carter should know that.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:04:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So what you're saying is... (none / 0)

Millions of wrongs will eventually add up to a right?

George W. Bush would be proud of you.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:49:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hamas won their election (none / 0)

Hamas was not deemed a terrorist organization until after they won the election; it was a propaganda ploy to dislodge them from the reigns of government. Apparently, some democracies are not what they seem to be.

The hoax of it all was that the Palestinians were under military occupation and their democracy was only as good as the last Israeli rifle in their faces.

You apparently have never seen Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land. Please click on below and find about Israel's propaganda farce to turn itself into a victim of terrorism.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 08:44:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hamas won their election (none / 0)

"They blow up buses and cafes, hold schools hostages (where did this happen), burn US and Israeli flags/effigies, and expect leverage?"

Months before they blew up buses and cafes, Israel was busy applying state terrorism inside the West Bank and Gaza, killing hundreds of Palestinian civilians, including children, like those described below. Their acts, however, deplorable, were done out of vengance not terrorism, which you probably are unable to define. Look it up. In the meantime, read on:

The first suicide bombing in the second intifadah was on Dec. 22 (no Israelis died in it). By that time, 86 Palestinian children (<18 years of age) had been killed by Israelis http://www.rememberthesechildren.org/rem ember2000.html

The first Israeli child was killed on Jan. 17, 2001 (http://www.rememberthesechildren.org/rem ember2001.html) So by that time, almost 90 Palestinian children had been killed by Israelis.

Alison Weir, in her documentary Off the Charts, noted the following about some of those children:

Before a single suicide bomber had entered Israel after the start of the Second Intifada, sometimes called, after Sharon's provocative visit to the Temple Mount, the al Aqsa Intifada, during its first month, 27 Palestinian children had been killed by Israeli Defense Forces in the West Bank and Gaza, the youngest only four months of age, and the majority due to gunshots to the head. Numerous children were also wounded. In the first three months alone, 159 children lost an eye presumably to rubber bullets shot from IDF rifles. Clearly the IDF were intentionally targeting these children, aiming at their heads with either rubber bullets or real bullets in the case of the child kills. We are talking here about a trained, mechanized army versus civilians, children participating in the intifada, the nonviolent resistance instituted by child and teenage Palestinian boys and girls. Oh, yes. Let's be fair. We did hear that an Israeli soldier lost his eye from a rock thrown by a Palestinian boy from a pretty IDF spokeswoman, but it was the only such incident reported in three years.

In addition to these children, many more innocent adult civilians were killed, in the month before suicide bombings commenced. If terrorism is the intentional killing of civilians, then clearly, Israel's armed forces were deep into terrorism, state sponsored terrorism, long before the Palestinians engaged in it to any degree. As a people fighting a military occupation, it would seem that the ultimate cause of all of these horrors on both sides rests with Israel and the purpose for which it continued its long occupation, the stealing of Palestinian lands.  

See Alison Weir's short documentary, Off The Charts: Media Bias and Censorship in America for the names, ages, places, and dates of these child killings.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid= -5600677940569035557&q=Alternate+Foc us

To be accurate, there were sporadic bombing incidents engineered by Hamas extremists in Israel during the Oslo period. None at all occurred between 1998 and 2000. But the strong resumption of attacks after 2000, over fifty in the first year, was directly related to civilian and child killings by IDF, and it was not just Hamas, but Islamic Jihad and other Fatah associated organizations that were involved.

This Time.com article apprises of what motivated them:

"Until recently most Palestinians believed they had alternatives to the kind of militancy practiced by Hamas. For years after the 1993 Oslo peace accord, which brought limited self-rule to the Palestinians and the prospect of an independent state, polls showed a strong majority of Palestinians supporting the peace process with Israel and only a minority endorsing suicide bombings. Thus, in their headhunting, the fundamentalists were limited to stalwart followers of their doctrine, which holds that any kind of peace with Israel is anathema. Even then, Hamas and Islamic Jihad had to cajole--some might say brainwash--young men into believing that the rewards of paradise outweighed the prospects of life on earth.

But with the breakdown of the peace process in the summer of 2000 and the start of the latest intifadeh that September, the martyr wannabes started coming to Hamas--and they didn't require persuading. "We don't need to make a big effort, as we used to do in the past," Abdel Aziz Rantisi, one of Hamas' senior leaders, told TIME last week. The TV news does that work for them. "When you see the funerals, the killing of Palestinian civilians, the feelings inside the Palestinians become very strong," he explained."

From the mouth of Rantisi, but it also motivated Fatah supporters, to exact revenge for the killing of Palestinian civilians. Revenge is not a formal use of terrorism. See Alison Weir's film, Off The Charts, at Google Video.

(Why Suicide Bombing Is Now All The Rage)
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articl e/0,9171,1101020415-227546,00.html

This commentary is from an article by Rami Khouri, editor of the Beirut newspaper, The Daily Star, which cynically denounced Olmert's statements professing concern for the well-being of Palestinian children:

(read Ehud Olmert's Profound Ethics and Deep Lies,
http://www.ramikhouri.com/)

"For anyone interested in the facts about the impact of Israeli policies on Palestinian children, a good place to start is the carefully checked data disseminated by the Palestinian Nongovernmental Organization Network (www.palestinemonitor.org). Their data is compiled and verified on the ground by the Ramallah-based Health Development Information and Policy Institute, which has been honored by the World Health Organization for its work in promoting Palestinian health needs. So these people know what they are talking about when it comes to health conditions on the ground in Israeli-occupied Palestine. Some of the facts they provide are as follows.

In just the first two years of the second intifada, from September 2000 to November 2002:

* 383 Palestinian children (under the age of 18) were killed by the Israeli army and Israeli settlers, i.e. almost 19% of the total Palestinians killed; those figures have increased since then.

* Approximately 36% of total Palestinians injured (estimated at more than 41,000) are children; 86 of these children were under the age of ten; 21 infants under the age of 12 months have been killed.

* 245 Palestinian students and school children have been killed; 2,610 pupils have been wounded on their way to or from school.

* The Israeli policy of widespread closure has paralyzed the Palestinian health system, with children particularly vulnerable to this policy of collective punishment. Internal closures have severely disrupted health plans which affect over 500,000 children, including vaccination programs, dental examinations and early diagnosis for children when starting schools.

* During the first two months of the intifada, the rate of upper respiratory infections in children increased from 20% to 40%. Almost 60% of children in Gaza suffer parasitic infections.

* An overwhelming number of Palestinian children show symptoms of trauma such as sleep disorders, nervousness, decrease in appetite and weight, feelings of hopelessness and frustration, and abnormal thoughts of death.

* There have been 36 cases of Palestinian women in labor delayed at checkpoints and refused permission to reach medical facilities or for ambulances to reach them. At least 14 of these women gave birth at the checkpoint with eight of the births resulting in the death of the newborn infants.

The Israeli army killing of Palestinian children continues apace. In its annual report May 16, the respected global human rights organization Amnesty International accused the Israeli army of killing 190 Palestinians, including 50 children, last year (2005)."

Here is some commentary from Jonathan Cook on a grandmother suicide bomber:

"If one thing offers a terrifying glimpse of where the experiment in human despair that is Gaza under Israeli siege is leading, it is the news that a Palestinian woman in her sixties -- a grandmother -- chose last week to strap on a suicide belt and explode herself next to a group of Israeli soldiers invading her refugee camp.

Despite the "Man bites dog" news value of the story, most of the Israeli media played down the incident. Not surprisingly -- it is difficult to portray Fatma al-Najar as a crazed fanatic bent only the destruction of Israel.

It is equally difficult not to pause and wonder at the reasons for her suicide mission; according to her family, one of her grandsons was killed by the Israeli army, another is in a wheelchair after his leg had to be amputated, and her house had been demolished.

Or not to think of the years of trauma she and her family have suffered living in a open-air prison under brutal occupation, and now, since the "disengagement", the agonising months of grinding poverty, slow starvation, repeated aerial bombardments, and the loss of essentials like water and electricity.

Or not to ponder at what it must have been like for her to spend every day under a cloud of fear, to be powerless against a largely unseen and malign force, and to never know when death and mutilation might strike her or her loved ones.

Or not to imagine that she had been longing for the moment when the soldiers who have been destroying her family's lives might show themselves briefly, coming close enough that she could see and touch them, and wreak her revenge.

Yet Western observers, and the organizations that should represent the very best of their Enlightenment values, seem incapable of understanding what might drive a grandmother to become a suicide bomber. Their empathy fails them, and so does their humanity.

Just at the moment Fatma was choosing death and resistance over powerlessness and victimhood -- and at a time when Gaza is struggling through one of the most oppressive and ugly periods of Israeli occupation in nearly four decades -- Human Rights Watch published its latest statement on the conflict. It is document that shames the organization, complacent Western societies and Fatma's memory."


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 08:59:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

Carter increasingly sounds senile.


by optimisticBoy on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:25:28 AM EST

Good thing he's not running for office, then. (2.00 / 1)

He doesn't have anything to prove, yet he keeps proving himself as a good and strong person, over and over again.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:39:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

Very interesting.  I'd also be interested to know if Carter submitted this piece for domestic publication anywhere.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:45:47 PM EST

Re: `A human rights crime' by Jimmy Carter (none / 0)

Good question.

Yet Carter has said several times (while discussing his book on Palestine) that Americans just don't know the truth about what is going on, and he undoubtedly knows why that is the case: censorship and propaganda, of which the US State Department is fully complicit in. State did even more than Israel to cast Hamas as a terrorist organization, even though it was well aware that Israel was conducting an illegal military occupation/colonization in the Palestinian territories.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:04:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Carter is a great man (2.00 / 1)

Carter does not get enough credit. Those who manipulate and control the Mass Media clearly see fit to demonize this man. Those that play along with this demonization are clearly apart of the larger conspiracy against informing the American people about there world and the further development of our civilization. We cant run our country on the hatred of other peoples. We cant run our country to benefit the hatred of those in another country. No religion deserves special treatment and our government ought not defend land rights because some feel they were delivered by their god. We are striving to be a just nation of laws and principals. Those principals should not be compromised in the name of Jewish supremacy, white supremacy, or Christian supremacy. All men(persons) are created equal. Thats what we need to remember and advocate around the world.


by edtastic on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:56:43 PM EST

what about the Israeli people? (none / 0)

who suffer suicide bombings in stores, buses, assasinations of their leaders, people saying that the Holocaust wasn't real, that they should be thrown into the see, what about them? Jimmy Carter really should get his priorities straight. And he wonders why he lost and gave us 12 years of Reagan/Bush.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:56:48 PM EST

Re: what about the Israeli people? (2.00 / 1)

And what of the people who were once in concentratin camps, now forcing people to live in concentration camps? Did Irsaelis' learn anything from that experience? The Palestinians are fighting for the right to exist in THEIR land, with the only weapons they have, themselves.


by venician on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:20:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what about the Israeli people? (none / 0)

it is not their land, its the Jew's land. Its their country, and the Palestinians keep acting like the Jews don't have a right to exist. They are the terrorists.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sun May 11, 2008 at 05:30:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

see my response to you above (none / 0)

The land was taken from the Palastinians after WWII because the Jews wanted their own state.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 06:32:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: see my response to you above (none / 0)

and the land was taken from the jews by the arabs/muslims long ago in the early 100's and the remaining jews were finally expelled or killed in the mid 600's. Its their land.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:06:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That's psychotic. (none / 0)

You're invoking 1400-year-old grievences to justify forcibly ejecting an entire people from their homes?

If you hadn't noticed, that's the same reason Shiites and Sunnis murder each other to this day.

The Palastinians in 1948 didn't do squat to the Israelites or, more importantly, modern Jews.


You can't stop the signal.

President "That One"

by Dracomicron on Sun May 11, 2008 at 10:46:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: see my response to you above (none / 0)

There is nothing wrong with your historical narrative that a good high school education wouldn't cure.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Mon May 12, 2008 at 08:23:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: what about the Israeli people? (none / 0)

I provided a long answer to your question above. You are mired in the post 9/11 propaganda about the Palestinians.

Once again, I invite you to click on the documentary: Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land at the end of this post.

Here are some excerpts:

Rabbi Michael Lerner, Founder & Executive Director, Tikkun Magazine: "When you have a population that is being occupied, when their fundamental human rights are systematically being denied, when they are not allowed to move from city to city and place to place, without a huge amount of harassment, when they are being subject to torture, when people are essentially in desperate conditions, it is not a surprise that they are going to be very, very angry. There is no understand by the public media, or the American media, what creates this circumstance. Israel occupies, people strike at Israel against that occupation. They use means I think are wrong means, namely, the terror, and then Israel imposes punishment on the entire people, which creates a climate which makes it easier to recruit."

Major Stav Adivi, reserves, Israeli Defense Forces, Israel: "we have to understand that these (suicide bombings) are the effects of the occupation."

Robert Jensen, Professor of Journalism, University of Texas-Austin: "In contrast to the international press, in American media, there is a reversal of cause and effect in that the occupation is framed as a response to the suicide bombings. All of the Palestinian actions are attacks and Israel actions retaliation, is meaningful. Retaliation suggests a defensive stance against violence initiated by someone else. It places a responsibility for the violence on the party provoking the retaliation. In other words, Palestinian violence like suicide bombings is seen as cause and the origin of the conflict. Since the September 11 attack on the US, Israel's PR strategy has been to frame all Palestinian actions, violent or not, as terrorism. To the extent that they can do that they have repackaged the illegal occupation as part of the war on terrorism."

News headlines: "This is Israel's war on terrorism. F16s hit a Palestinian in the Gaza Strip this morning....The case the Israelis are trying to make: this is no different than what the US is doing in Afganistan (air attacks in the West Bank)...Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declared on television tonight, that he was determined to root out what he called `the terrorist infrastructure.'"

So the myth of the Palestinian terrorist, who just happens to be fighting a long and incessant military occupation that the UN has called illegal. It is malarkey, since the suicide bombings were done out of retaliation, however, awful they were. Yet, Israel forces ended up killing five times as many Palestinians in their homes and in their streets. Is a home or street less important than a bus or cafe?

Summary of the documentary:

Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land provides a striking comparison of U.S. and international media coverage of the crisis in the Middle East, zeroing in on how structural distortions in U.S. coverage have reinforced false perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This pivotal documentary exposes how the foreign policy interests of American political elites--oil, and a need to have a secure military base in the region, among others--work in combination with Israeli public relations strategies to exercise a powerful influence over how news from the region is reported.

Through the voices of scholars, media critics, peace activists, religious figures, and Middle East experts, Peace, Propaganda & the Promised Land carefully analyzes and explains how--through the use of language, framing and context--the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza remains hidden in the news media, and Israeli colonization of the occupied territories appears to be a defensive move rather than an offensive one. The documentary also explores the ways that U.S. journalists, for reasons ranging from intimidation to a lack of thorough investigation, have become complicit in carrying out Israel's PR campaign. At its core, the documentary raises questions about the ethics and role of journalism, and the relationship between media and politics.

Biographical Summary:

Seth Ackerman Media Analyst and Contributing Writer, Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR)
Mjr. Stav Adivi, IDF (Reserves) Courage to Refuse | Board Member, Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions, Israel
Rabbi Arik Ascherman Executive Director, Rabbis for Human Rights
Hanan Ashrawi Founder & Secretary General, The Palestinian Initiative for the Promotion of Global Dialogue and Democracy (MIFTAH), Palestine
Noam Chomsky Professor of Linguistics, MIT | Author, Hegemony of Survival
Robert Fisk Journalist, The Independent, UK
Neve Gordon Ta'ayush: Jewish-Arab Partnership | Professor of Political Science, Ben Gurion University, Israel
Toufic Haddad Co-editor, Between the Lines, West Bank
Sam Husseini Communications Director, Institute for Public Accuracy
Hussein Ibish Communications Director, American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee
Robert Jensen Professor of Journalism, University of Texas-Austin | Board of Directors, Third Coast Activist
Rabbi Michael Lerner Founder & Executive Director, Tikkun Magazine
Karen Pfeifer Professor or Economics, Smith College | Contributing Editor, Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP)
Alisa Solomon Journalist, The Village Voice
Gila Svirsky Co-founder, Women in Black | Coalition of Women for Peace, Israel



Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:11:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.