A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillary Clinton

For your information the race is still going on and the fight is now with the superdelegates. So if we, the Clinton supporters, do intend to want Hillary to be our nominee, we should advocate the superdelegates to vote for Clinton rather than Obama. Hillary needs our support now more than ever and we should show her that support.

You have to remember that it's the obama's camp which said that the blacks will riot and the Obamabots will vote for McCain or not vote if the superdelegates chose Clinton instead. You have to remember that it was the Obama camp which paint the Clintons as racist while dismantling the legacy of Bill. You also have to remember that the Obama camp spent more on negative campaigning than Hillary does. So don't talk to us about who's the one being bitter. And not to say that the 50 state strategy is now 47 states.

TaylorMarsh and Co is different than DailyKos. DailyKos was our left trademark and it exacts real influence. Not to say that the Obama's surrogates had from time to time appear on the news and bombard Clinton, accusing her for the things which the Obama's camp were doing. I still remember Donna Brazille stating that "Latinos and Working Class people does not matter". Only blacks matter.

I am in no way throwing my support for Mc Cain and since the race is still on, i'll do my best to support Hillary Clinton. Frankly my vote will be up for grabs once Hillary is out of the race. And let me tell you why. Universal Healthcare and gay rights are my primary concerns, and i realized that once Hillary drops out, we won't have anyone advocating those 2 issues for at least another 16 years. So it is in my interest and the interest of the Democratic party to ensure that we get the right person in office.



Display:


Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 8)

its a vote against EVERY policy and position she has advocated in the last 16 months

no one who said Hillary was right on Healthcare can vote for McCain,
no one who said Hillary was right on Bush Tax cuts can vote for McCain

no its not voting against Hillary, its voting against EVERYTHING Hillary has fought for and believes in, voting for McCain says that McCain is right, and that makes Hillary wrong because she is on the complete opposite side of McCain.


Obama said, as Bill beamed. "Thank you, President Clinton."
by TruthMatters on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:30:07 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 1)

Keep telling yourself that.

Obama lied cheated and stole.  I cannot vote for him and am beginning to think I may not even vote for Obama/Clinton if she is VP.

Keep talking...


by DTaylor on Sun May 11, 2008 at 04:18:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 1)

Lied, cheated and stole???

Please, do tell......


by Rick in Eugene on Sun May 11, 2008 at 05:30:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (1.00 / 2)

just go away to dkos, don't pollute mydd.
we will not vote for obama. choice is very clear now:
Hillary is the first and the BEST choice;
if Hillary is not available, we will vote for mccain;
obama is not an option.
Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Sun May 11, 2008 at 06:41:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (none / 0)

So how many more of our children must die in Iraq?
How many more millions of children must go without health insurance?
How wide does the gap between rich and poor need to be?
How many homeowners must loose their homes?

I am sorry to hear your convictions to Democratic principles and ideals are so frail.  I guess all this stuff Hillary has been talking about means absolutely nothing to you.  That's OK, what could the Supreme Court possibly do in the next four years that could adversely impact your life? McCain??  Good thinkin... That'll learn me.  


by Rick in Eugene on Wed May 14, 2008 at 03:09:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

A vote for McCain IS a vote against Hillary. (2.00 / 4)

But more importantly, it's a vote against this country.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:38:15 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain IS a vote against Hillary. (2.00 / 1)

Of course it is.  I doubt you'll find anyone more loyal to Hillary than I am.  I honor her service to her country and to the American people, and I am very grateful to her for everything she has done and will continue to do for us.

How can anyone call themselves a Clinton supporter and then vote for McCain, even when she has so many times that would be a "foolish" thing to do? It really boggles the mind.

If someone is so incredibly bitter that they want to stay home, well OK.  But voting for McCain goes against everything that Hillary Clinton stands for.  She is first and foremost a Democrat - because she believes in health care for everyone, a clean environment, keeping America strong while retaining our constitutional rights, a woman's right to control her own body and limiting the power of big corporations.  That who Democrats are, and that's who Hillary Clinton is. John McCain is the polar opposite of everything Hillary fights for everyday.


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:01:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Well said! (2.00 / 1)

And spoken like a true Hillary supporter.


Even John McCain lusts after teh engels.
by sricki on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:02:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

She was mathematically eliminated today (2.00 / 2)

Wiht the super delegates Obama picked up today combined with teh mathematical realities of delegate apportionment, Hillary Clinton can no longer win the nomination mathematically.


Bill Foster would agree, Barack Obama has coat tails.
by Walt Starr on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:44:24 AM EST

Re: She was mathematically eliminated today (none / 0)

And this is helpful or on topic...how?


No Way. No How. No McCain.
by Denny Crane on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:51:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She was mathematically eliminated today (none / 0)

It demostrates the topic is moot.


Bill Foster would agree, Barack Obama has coat tails.
by Walt Starr on Sun May 11, 2008 at 06:44:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 2)

"...we should advocate the superdelegates to vote for Clinton rather than Obama"

Psst. FYI, that's not working out too well. Shockingly enough, some adults don't like it when other adults act like children.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/05/09 /clinton-supporters-send-l_n_100979.html


by upstate girl on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:44:47 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is (2.00 / 2)


You have to remember that it's the obama's camp which said that the blacks will riot

That's funny, I don't remember that....


Go back to Hussein Texas
by gobacktotexas on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:57:51 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is (none / 0)

Its called plausible denial.

Google it.

Some of us have actually followed politics before this cycle.


by DTaylor on Sun May 11, 2008 at 04:19:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I googled it (none / 0)

and I didn't find anything by the Obama camp but I did find a right-wing Fox News Radio host making that incendiary allegation.  Which you've apparently bought in to hook line and sinker, and are now falsely claiming that it originated from the Obama camp.  


Go back to Hussein Texas
by gobacktotexas on Sun May 11, 2008 at 08:13:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Are you mad? (2.00 / 2)

Do you really believe what you just wrote?

You have to remember that it's the obama's camp which said that the blacks will riot and the Obamabots will vote for McCain or not vote if the superdelegates chose Clinton instead.

What the heck?  Obama never said that.  And Obama supporters (some of which I will conceed are legitimate assholes just like there are some Clinton supporters who are legit assholes) are not his "camp".  Obama supporters have most certainly NOT said they will vote for McCain.  The most I have heard Obama supporters say is that they will NOT vote for Clinton (leave the president field blank) but I have yet to hear a single Obama supporter say they will vote for McCain at ALL.

What in the heck are you talking about??  That is the most ridiculous screed I've seen in a long time.


by DawnG on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:00:25 AM EST

Re: Are you mad? (none / 0)

I have read that threat multiple times on kos.


by DTaylor on Sun May 11, 2008 at 04:20:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain (none / 0)

"I still remember Donna Brazille stating that 'Latinos and Working Class people does not matter'".

How about either a link for that inflammatory "quote" or an apology to Brazille?


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:13:47 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain (none / 0)

Of course she never said it - she said with Obama we do not need to rely on just the working class vote.


by interestedbystander on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:58:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 0)

I still remember Donna Brazille stating that "Latinos and Working Class people does not matter".

Hahaha. Nice quote. Not only have you managed to completely misrepresent what Donna Brazille said, but you've also managed to word it so poorly that you come off looking like an idiot. Congrats.


by RP McMurphy on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:17:30 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 1)

"Obamabots"?

Grow up. And don't use the excuse that some Obama supporters insult people too, since they need to grow up as well.

But you need to grow up.


AnnMarie
by wiscogirl101 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:19:41 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against (none / 0)

I dont know many democrats who voted for Obama willing to vote for McCain in case Obama doesnt win. Those numbers attributed to McCain possible voters from the Obama contingent  seemed to come from the independents Obama attracted in the primary.

In Hillary's case, it seems like democrats themselves are thinknig of crossing party lines to vote for McCain in case Hillary loses. Big difference.

In either case, if you are thinking of voting for McCain, you better be ready to back it up with clear reasons on this blog.


by Pravin on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:36:16 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against (none / 0)

I don't always agree with what you say but you are far more logical than some of the people here. A vote for McCain is simply a vote against Obama for many people here. Every person can only cast 1 vote, so it doesn't make a big difference.
What a lot of people are also forgetting is that Clinton appeals to many centrists as does McCain. Many of those voters are not very partisan so they would be more inclined to support McCain.
by bsavage on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:28:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

That is why this country (none / 0)

is in such peril, a vote for McCain is not just a vote against Obama, it's a vote for his and the Republican party's agenda. You have no right to bitch about anything McCain does as President if you willingly cast your vote for him just out of spite.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 11:19:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That is why this country (none / 0)

For me personally what's the worst that can happen? Sure, I have been disappointed in the Bush admin. in the last 8 years, but none of his action affect me. So whatever happens- I'm not a woman, part of a labor union or gay so whatever happends in November really won't hurting me. It's selfish but 99% of the things politicians do dont affect me. Politics is more like sports, so what if McCain wins. Too bad, our majorities in the Senate and in the House are soaring each year. There is nothing to fear.


by bsavage on Sun May 11, 2008 at 03:56:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote (2.00 / 0)

Man can one diary be so much full of fail?


I would say at this point we're starting to see a little desperation on the part of the woman who I support... NY Governor Paterson
by obamaovermccain on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:38:10 AM EST

Who does this help? (2.00 / 0)

Another divisive diary. How many does that make in the last few days? Answer=a lot. Who does that help? Answer=McCain.


The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but newspapers. -- Thomas Jefferson
by pollbuster on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:47:19 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (none / 0)

Given that universal healthcare and gay rights are the two most important issues for you, I hope when this race is over that you will reconsider Obama if he is the nominee.

While Obama's health care plan may not be exactly what you want, it is much much better than McCain's. McCain wants to separate health care from employment, completely deregulate the industry, and create a "free market" in which individuals can choose to buy or not and insurers can choose to insure or not. Also there has been some rumors that Senator Clinton would be the primary sponsor and creator of the legislation if Obama is elected. Clinton would actually have much more power to shape the legislation the way she wants and will have a dem in the White House to sign it into law.

Gay rights are also very important to me. It is of the utmost importance to me that my sister and her partner and my niece and nephew have all the rights that any other family in the US has and I would not vote for Obama if I did not believe he would fight for this. In fact, he supports a complete repeal of DOMA while McCain voted for DOMA.

I know this election has not truly ended yet for Clinton supporters and I respect that. I understand the anger Clinton supporters must feel because I have felt it as an Obama supporter. We Dems have seem to fallen hard for candidates. I hope we can come together.


by batgirl71 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 01:51:11 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (none / 0)

I find the original poster's opposition to Obama based on his stance on gay rights to be bizarre.  Obama has a MORE progressive stance on gay rights than Hillary.  She wanted to only partially repeal DOMA such that the states would be left to decide whether to recognize gay marriage while only the Federal govt would need to extend such recognition.  Obama wants a full repeal such that the states would be forced, under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the US Constitution, to recognize gay marriages.  If gay rights are your thing then Obama's policy positions should make you want to go campaign for him immediately.  We have never had a main party candidate espouse policies with respect to gay rights which are as progressive as Obama.  I hope the poster reconsiders his stance in light of this.


by DreamsOfABlueNation on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:10:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 1)

It takes 18 comments for 1 positive to appear. If we have more people like you, i'm certain that we can bridge the gap fast and defeat Mc Cain.
I've worked to elect progressives candidates and propositions for a few years and haven't once seen a fight so divisive and dirty. I stand by my statements.
by stevent on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:31:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

NOT a vote against Hillary Clinton (2.00 / 1)

So if Clinton arrives at the convention with a majority of pledged delegates, is ahead in the PV, etc., and superdelegates give the nomination to Obama, you'll accept that as a totally legitimate result?

Because if you won't, well, how could you back Clinton's going after this sort of victory?  Think the chances of Obama's winning this way, actually, are probably greater than Clinton's chances of doing the same.

But really, I'm just looking for some consistency and reciprocity.  You'd be totally fine with that?  Wouldn't be a travesty?  What about poached delegates, totally cool?

Because if you would have a problem with all of those things, can you see how insulting it seems to those who supported Obama at this point?  I haven't met a single Obama supporter who wouldn't support Clinton if she emerges as the nominee of the party fair and square.

What makes us flinch are these meta-contests AND the strong suspicion that Clinton supporters would never accept this sort of outcome if it were applied to their candidate (the true dead enders, let's be honest, don't seem to think there is any way Obama can win this thing legitimately).


by IncognitoErgoSum on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:28:18 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillar (2.00 / 1)

I still remember Donna Brazille stating that "Latinos and Working Class people does not matter".

Wow.  You are a liar.  I'm not name-calling here -- just stating a fact.


John McCain the flip-flopper...
by chinapaulo on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:38:26 AM EST

Why do gay folks support the Clintons? (1.00 / 3)

As a 47-year-old gay man, I will never understand how any gay American can support either of the Clintons. They've done nothing for us, and a fair amount against us. And yet we keep kissing their asses and writing checks. Color me mystified.

And BTW, saying that they are better than Bush is no great compliment.


by Rationalisto on Sun May 11, 2008 at 03:37:24 AM EST

The other question can be asked (1.50 / 2)

how can any gay person support Obama?  What has he done except praise McClurkin, Wright, and other people who have homophobic streaks in them? Have you heard Michelle Obama on gays?

This is one of the reasons I'm not voting for Obama.  And no, I am not voting for McCain, either.


by 4justice on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:27:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

See now you're showing your ignorance (2.00 / 1)

Wright, as much of a bastard as he is, is a huge support of gay rights and Obama's church is a faction of the United Church of Christ, which is the only denomination that sanctions same-sex marriage.

and now I haven't heard Michelle Obama on gays, elighten me with some proof since I have heard her say that ENDA is something her husband will fight for.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:42:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: See now you're showing your ignorance (none / 0)

The one disappointment I have in Obama is his support of civil unions over gay marriage. Is it pandering, or is he realizing that most of the country might be ready for one and not the other? I am of two minds about this.

On the other hand, during the SC primary Obama challenged a congregation in a traditionally black church on the homophobia often so present in that institution. He didn't have to. It wasn't politically convenient. It was a risk.

And he firmed up my vote then and there.


by Rationalisto on Mon May 12, 2008 at 07:31:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

A vote for McCain is.... (2.00 / 1)

...a vote for the most conservative Supreme Court in living memory.  Has anyone checked up on the relative ages of the justices.  For God's sake Kennedy is old enough to have attended a Cubs World Series!  The conservatives seem to younger and in revoltingly good health.  And McCain has already drafted Ted Olsen (former Solicitor General-you remember him) and Sen Brownback to select the right (emphasis on the Right) justices.

So if you are willing to risk that, well the rest of us will just have to work harder.  If the party survived the Dixiecrats in '48, we can pitch in and try again.


"You might well think that. I couldn't possibly comment"
by xenontab on Sun May 11, 2008 at 03:47:42 AM EST

Re: A vote for McCain is.... (2.00 / 1)

Bit late for that.

Maybe should have thought about it before.


by DTaylor on Sun May 11, 2008 at 04:22:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Maybe YOU (1.00 / 4)

should think about it now.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 11:21:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Well, Obama wanted Roberts (none / 0)

until his staff talked him out of it.  With the "post partisan" OBama, what faith you have in him to appoint supreme court justices that are not conservative?????  


by 4justice on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:29:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Russ Feingold (none / 0)

voted for Roberts.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Sun May 11, 2008 at 12:44:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Well, Obama wanted Roberts (none / 0)

"until his staff talked him out of it.  With the "post partisan" OBama, what faith you have in him to appoint supreme court justices that are not conservative?????"

Are you seriously saying that somehow because he considered all sides before making his ultimate "nay" vote on the confirmation that he is going to put forward the same conservative judges that President Bush did???

And what faith do I have.  For one thing read the remarks he made on the confirmation.  The deciding factor was the 5% of Supreme Court cases where there was no clear cut cutlines/answers.  Where the court would be making precedent.  Here is the link.

http://obama.senate.gov/press/050922-rem arks_of_sena/index.php

If this is being used as a serious arguement against Obama, then this race is over because there is nothing left to throw at him


"You might well think that. I couldn't possibly comment"
by xenontab on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:19:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

its the war....stupid (none / 0)


by citizendave on Sun May 11, 2008 at 07:55:41 AM EST

A vote for McCain is NOT a vote against Hillary! (1.00 / 2)

i had enough of Dem's stupidity:

  • i sent money to Gore, but none of Democratic Senators supported Gore - the notion when election should be certified by senate in January 2001;
  • i sent money to Dean but they still managed to nominate the loser Kerry;
  • Dems was elected in 2006 on premise to stop the war, but they did nothing;
  • DNC and Dean had 4 years to eliminate caucus fraud and open primaries, to introduce direct voting for nominee and introduce one day national primaries - instead turned to be an idiot Dean prolongated the most anti-democratic nomination process;
  • i sent money to Hillary and support her for more than year now and Dems still trying to convince me to vote for worst possible candidate.

i had enough: Vote for McCain is the duty as soon as Obama is nominated.
Democrats never learned and they need to be punished. And yes, we will.
There is no amount of anti-logic, propaganda, whining and begging will change that.
And my wallet is closed for those idiots from now on.

Obama supporters dreaming that all Hillary supporters will vote for their Cult Leader.
Not so fast kids: we all heard different estimates from 16% to 22% to 28% and even to half of Hillary supporters will not vote for Obama and will vote for McCain.
Guess what: even if just 10% will switch from Hillary to McCain, it will be more than enough to crash Obama everywhere.
It seems to me that Democratic leadership has no brain to understand simple facts.
Than don't whine in November, losers.


Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Sun May 11, 2008 at 09:25:07 AM EST

Don't Tread On Me (none / 0)

The various iterations of why Clinton supporters MUST back Obama are instructive and so far amount to little more than threats disguised as reasons:

1) At one point it was, vote for Obama not McCain or your abortion rights will be taken away. Presumably this one was aimed at the "sex crazed" female segment of Clinton support. Donna Brazille, no less, spat out this one in her dueling emails with Clinton supporters.

2) Then it was vote for Obama not McCain or there will be riots. The youth and African American voters will destroy Denver. So far shrug.

3) When that did not appear to work, the silver bullet of reasons to end all reasons has now become. A vote for McCain is a vote against Hillary. In other words another veiled threat implying that we will blame your candidate if you dare vote against Obama.

4). The 4-alarm chili of threats: Vote for McCain and don't come back to Mydd or leave the Democratic party, like Adam and Eve, Clinton supporters that even express this sentiment must be cast out.

5). The ultimate circle of hell: Vote for McCain not Obama and you are, gasp, A RACIST is the ultimate shocker.

Obama supporters just don't understand why we won't just fall in line already. Its rather like a doctor screaming at a patient to just "take the god damn fucking medicine I am prescribing and just don't ask me why." The presumption is the doctors (i.e. Obama supporters) know best and us Clinton voters should just "quit asking so many God damn stink'n questions."

The intellectual backhand slaps to "just support Obama already damn it," that is rife in certain diaries implies a certain contempt for Clinton supporters, but paradoxically it also betrays the weakness of Obama, right now he has all the power and none of it. Quite simply he needs a certain percentage of Clinton voters to put him over the top. Unfortunately, these kind of "vote or die" dictats on behalf of Obama will never work, because they trample on the dignity of the voter.


by superetendar on Sun May 11, 2008 at 02:49:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't Tread On Me (none / 0)

yep.  And when I read of the glowing praises of putting a republican as a VP on an Obama ticket or a anti-choice, anti-gay democrat as a VP on an Obama ticket, I vomit in my mouth.

I tell you, if THAT does happen, I will write a nasty letter (no email, this one deserves a LETTER) and send it to all of my democratic representatives and Howard Dean, stating that their "win at all costs" just cost them a loyal democratic member of their party to flip to independent.   That MY party and the party of millions have sold their souls to get the shiny ball with a D next to it, while selling out the core principles of the party.  I still haven't forgotten the "blue dog" dems they crowed over in 2006

that's what they will get.  The democratic party might as well be the republican party at that point.


by colebiancardi on Sun May 11, 2008 at 03:21:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.