Demystifying McCain

The last couple of days I've found myself setting the record straight about John McCain with a couple of friends. This brand that he has fashioned for himself, of an independent-minded man of principle, of a moderate who bucks conventional Republican orthodoxy, is stubborn indeed. Yesterday I was talking to my friend, a long time Democrat, and he spoke admirably about McCain's appearance in Memphis yesterday; he thought the fact that he even went there to commemorate the 40th anniversary of Martin Luther King's death showed he was a man of principle. I had to call my friend on his knee-jerk reaction to see McCain through a prism of principle, when really he's nothing but a political opportunist, a panderer and a liar. He then said, "oh yeah, you're right" and recalled how much respect he'd lost for McCain when he went to Bob Jones University to make nice with the fundies. OK, one down. Then this morning, a Republican friend insisted that McCain is pro-choice. I told her he didn't have a pro-choice bone in his body and she said "well good, that makes me like him more." I later sent an e-mail to her and another conservative friend to clarify that there are many reasons that conservatives distrust McCain, but choice ain't it.

Anyway, I raise this because this education of the electorate is going to be central to beating him in November, an education that is necessarily somewhat delayed due to the ongoing search for a nominee. That's why outside groups, such as the DNC have been doing such good oppo work on McCain. Today I received a great e-mail from MoveOn setting the record straight on 10 issues with sources that every one of us should be armed with when discussing why McCain is unacceptable to our friends and family (which we should all be doing on a regular basis, by the way.)

From MoveOn's e-mail blast:

10 things you should know about John McCain (but probably don't):

1. John McCain voted against establishing a national holiday in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Now he says his position has "evolved," yet he's continued to oppose key civil rights laws.

2. According to Bloomberg News, McCain is more hawkish than Bush on Iraq, Russia and China. Conservative columnist Pat Buchanan says McCain "will make Cheney look like Gandhi."

3. His reputation is built on his opposition to torture, but McCain voted against a bill to ban waterboarding, and then applauded President Bush for vetoing that ban.

4. McCain opposes a woman's right to choose. He said, "I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned."

5. The Children's Defense Fund rated McCain as the worst senator in Congress for children. He voted against the children's health care bill last year, then defended Bush's veto of the bill.

6. He's one of the richest people in a Senate filled with millionaires. The Associated Press reports he and his wife own at least eight homes! Yet McCain says the solution to the housing crisis is for people facing foreclosure to get a "second job" and skip their vacations.

7. Many of McCain's fellow Republican senators say he's too reckless to be commander in chief. One Republican senator said: "The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine. He's erratic. He's hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me."

8. McCain talks a lot about taking on special interests, but his campaign manager and top advisers are actually lobbyists. The government watchdog group Public Citizen says McCain has 59 lobbyists raising money for his campaign, more than any of the other presidential candidates.

9. McCain has sought closer ties to the extreme religious right in recent years. The pastor McCain calls his "spiritual guide," Rod Parsley, believes America's founding mission is to destroy Islam, which he calls a "false religion." McCain sought the political support of right-wing preacher John Hagee, who believes Hurricane Katrina was God's punishment for gay rights and called the Catholic Church "the Antichrist" and a "false cult."

10. He positions himself as pro-environment, but he scored a 0--yes, zero--from the League of Conservation Voters last year.

You can sign up to be a part of spreading the truth about John McCain over at MoveOn HERE.



Display:


"One of the richest senators." (none / 0)

I don't reckon we should risk pushing the "McCain is rich" line given Hillary Clinton may still end up our nominee.  Glass houses.


John McCain: He flunked ECON 101.
by Shem on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 09:54:49 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

He's a moderate and a great American. Both Clintons keep telling me so.


by BlueinColorado on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 10:26:58 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

I just put on the titanium battle helmet and headed over into Free Republic, NRO, and a couple other right-wing websites... someone tell me why Clinton supporters would associate with those people? Because if they think Obama and HIS supporters are horrible for how they're treating Senator Clinton... I got news for 'em.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 10:36:06 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

KUDOS! McCain is NOT Ghandi . . . both DEMS CAN and WILL demolish him!


NO 100 year WAR, NO McConnell run Senate, & NO GOP-led Supreme Court!!!
by Veteran75 on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 10:46:27 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

I rooted for McCain against Bush in 2000. While I don't think his Presidency would be that disastrous, he would still be a pretty bad President. The wealth thing doesn't bother me as much though. THe other points certainly bother me and I have been saying this to no avail to some of the Clinton supporters who talk about voting for McCain in case Obama gets the nod.


by Pravin on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:00:38 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

This list disqualifies McCain from being the Democratic nominee, but the Democratic nominee has lost seven of the last ten presidential elections.

The Democratic nominee has won the popular vote in three of the last four elections, and lost the fourth by the narrowest margin in the twentieth century.


by BlueinColorado on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:13:21 PM EST

twentieth century? (none / 0)

GW Bush won the smallest margin of reelection for a sitting President IN HISTORY. We beat the GOP handily in 1992, blew them out in a landslide in 1996, and beat one of the toughest most moneyed opponents in history in 2000. but we must tread on careful ground with religious pastor affiliations if Obama is the nominee


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:20:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

D'oh!! (none / 0)

Since 1900, I meant to say. I thought it was in American history, but I wasn't sure.


by BlueinColorado on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:49:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

There's actually this new book (none / 0)

called "FREE RIDE: John McCain and the Media" I just bought. I suggest all read the book and spread the gospel of doing so.


"there is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right in America"-William Jefferson Clinton, forty-second President of the United States
by DiamondJay on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:15:19 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

thanks, this is a great post, unfortunately, Jeromes post will be more popular because its divisive.


summer is for swimming
by susu1969 on Sat Apr 05, 2008 at 11:47:37 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

we need more such posts and more such DIRECT action
put the "d" back in mydd!
by gil on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 02:03:36 AM EST

this is a big problem for us (none / 0)

Even my stepmother, who would never vote for a Republican, thought McCain was pro-choice.

I had to set her straight so that she could correct her less-Democratic friends who thought the same thing.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 08:14:59 AM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

I think what you are witnessing is, in a year when the Dems should have had an easy path to the White House, McCain is the best available Repub to win it in '08.  The Dem party is split.  There will be push-back from the Dem primary losers' supporters, McCain appeals to Reagan Dems and Indepents.  IMO, the question to determine the GE is will the Christian Coalition come out to vote?
It's no longer the Dems GE to lose, it's McCains.
Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 03:54:54 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

I LOVE this list from MoveOn - flagged it in my email so I can refer back to it in a couple months when the time comes to start convincing people to vote Dem. This is great ammo for that battle.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 05:17:04 PM EST

Re: Demystifying McCain (none / 0)

I think it's great to "witness" to McCain supporters one-by-one because it can have a pyramid effect. They will tell two friends who each mention it to two friends etc.

But there is an issue so much more upsetting to me: the fact that the Dem candidates don't shout these things from the rooftops at every possible moment. Obama can give a televised speech on race to save his butt but if I were him, I'd make it a weekly affair to give similar speechs, a la "a fireside chat", to constantly remind the voters across America about the contradictions in McCain's past. Where was the counter MLK speech calling him out as a hypocrite? Why is it that every lame Democratic nominee seems never to take the reigns and aggressively attack the Republican? First Gore, then Kerry (oh GAWD, don't get me started), and now maybe Obama or Clinton? Attack, attack, attack. Don't back down. Don't wait for the press to bring it up because they won't do it to the extent that it needs to be if at all. Debate doesn't need to wait for the actual debates.

The Democratic party, and I don't mean people here, but the party candidates, are some of the worst at focusing on the things that win elections, namely making the other candidate seem like a ridiculous choice. We lost to Dubya twice, people. Twice! Why? Because we didn't fight as hard as them. Period. But we in the grassroots can only fight so hard. If the candidates themselves don't fight, we have no chance.


by neverfox on Sun Apr 06, 2008 at 07:42:31 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.