Somebody emailed DONNA BRAZILLE to attack "trinity churches black theology," what an idiot

Donna Brazile, please.  Talk about a shrill.  She was key to Al Gore's loss.  Her only interest is her own self promotion.  Democracts must be crazy to listen to her.  She is the GOP's dream.

david

Brazile? A person who pretends to be objective but isn't? The one who gave Gore terrible advice? The one who ran the Dukakis campaign? Yes, let's take the opinions of losers.

Donna is wasting her time even responding to nutjobs like the letter writer. She's only feeding them what they want - attention.

Don't be nasty now.

Yes Donna, we know exactly how many undeclared supers are turned off by that: One

Poor Donna.  It sounds like she is all twisted up in knots.  She runs such a good campaign herself, that she ought to know how to do it.  Not.

Brazile is the worst of the lot, she was the one who intially stripped MI and FL of ALL their delegates. She was one who propagated the now debunked "fairytale" smear. She is partisan for Obama and should receive every grief that comes her way. I have no sympathies for her.

wow those people at that site are just plain freaky!

Donna Brazile is in the tank for Obama.  Nothing new here.  She wants Hillary to lose.

Has Donna Brazile read DailyKos? She is the same one who thinks Obama shouldn't be held responsible for Wright's actions, but she is now holding Clinton responsible for her supporters' actions?

O wow!

Donna Brazile is entitled to her opinions but she is pretending to be a neutral news analyst for CNN presumably so she can continue to rake in the fat fee they pay her.

She is not neutral.  In fact, I wrote to Donna Brazile recently asking her to please be honest and declare her support for Obama so she could be replaced on CNN with someone who actually is neutral.

She wrote me back and said this:

Yes, I have not declared. But no longer willing to stay parked in the neutral zone. Coming down on the side of reality.
Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry from T-Mobile.

Now I find it hard to believe that Hillary supporters are more aggressive than Obama supporters.  It would be nice to see some of the angry emails sent to Mayor Nutter publicized in the same way.  But you won't hear that story from Donna, and that's exactly why she should be removed from her CNN position.

I've tried reading over at echo chamber Hillaryis44, for giggles, but all the pink kills my eyes.

If Donna Brazile judges a candidacy by its most rabid blogosphere elements, then she has less insight than I thought (and I didn't think she was all that insightful).  I don't think I even need to expound on the kind of double-standard that implies.

Anyway, she has been a strong Obama surrogate in the media and played her part in unnecessarily hyping up the race issue.

I will say this - many times when I write a critical letter to an editor, the response I get is something along the lines of "I appreciate that you actually gave examples to support your argument."  So these guys must get a lot of e-mails from drooling fans on auto-pilot.

A word of advice to any Clintonistas planning to e-mail or write letters to folks - some of them are actually quite nice if you approach them by being reasonable.  I can't tell you how many times I have leveled a criticism of Obama, supported it with citation, and gotten the response "I didn't know that."  So your best bet is just to provide facts and leave it to them what they will do with those facts.

Oh, come on.  Brazile is neutral, but if she had to vote today, she'd obviously vote for Obama.  Does anyone find this surprising?  Is she really any less neutral than President Carter, Speaker Pelosi, Gov. Dean, who have remained neutral for various reasons, but I think we all know how they're going to vote.

The real question is where are the superdelegates who are still reasonably persuadable for Hillary?  The entire concept of Hillary continuing to tilt at windmills in this campaign was that the SDs could overturn the popularly chosen delegates, but where are these magic SDs?  On one of the cable shows today, they said that the majority of neutral SDs are from states Obama won.  I find it hard to believe that they don't know who they're voting for.

And given the seemingly herculean efforts the Clinton campaign has made to keep SDs neutral and not make a decision, its pretty clear where most SDs are in regard to who they would support.  If Hillary thought that the decision of the SDs would be at all favorable, she wouldn't be trying to keep them neutral.  So I don't understand the shock at a "neutral" SD who appears to be leaning heavily to Obama.  I'd be shocked if there were any who aren't.

I agree with the diarist about reading hillaryis44 for entertainment value. Ditto for Taylor Marsh's site. I like to hear/read dissenting views from my own and sometimes this takes the lower form of pure spectacle which is all those sites really are.

To be fair, hillaryis44 is more extreme than Marsh's site. I've seen vile stuff on both, but nothing tops one commenter's wish to douse Obama in gasoline and watch Hillary immolate him. For context, that comment took place during the Ohio debate. Things have gone down hill since then.

The funniest part is how enthusiastic they are about watching Fox. "Hey man, did you catch Geraldine Ferraro on Hannity last night? Guess what Bill O'Reilly said on his radio show..." LOL

So, let me get this history right.  Hillary strong arms the superdelegates:  Carville calls Richardson Judas, something any self respecting SD is going to take offense at.  Sponsors threaten Pelosi with financial blackmail if she doesn't support Hillary's point of view.  Bill yells at the SDs over the weekend.  Hillary claims that the SDs should overturn the voice of the people to back her. Ickes threatens the SDs with racism on Wright, a heart warming topic there.  And, following Hillary's example, her supporters send nasty email to the SDs.

How is this supposed to lure the SDs to Hillary's side?  It's pissing them off.

Brazille replies to the email and to Hillary to tell her to cool it, a piece of advice Hillary and her supports might heed if they want her backing, as she is still neutral, possibly because she sees Hillary having merit.

Then, Hillary's supporters post Brazille's private comments on a website for all to see, lacking any shame, and blast her on the internet?

And this is strategy?  This is how you support your candidate?  By pissing off the superdelegates?

Your girl's only chance of winning is through your good behavior, with the public and with the SDs.  

Sometimes I think you guys are actually working to undermine Hillary.  I would feel sorry for her, but she does the same thing.  

This is called pissing in the wind.

As an Obama supporter, I would like to thank you for your dedicated service to helping him get elected.   These tactics are why I left Hillary in November.  

I dare say, he couldn't have done it without you.

Thanks again!

"tragic" is a more accurate word

Along with Kos these are the two sites with the most vile content. At least Kos has the courage to associate his name with his site, nobody knows who runs Hillis44. Heck I am not even sure if it is not just one ``crazy'' person posting on the site.

This is truly repugnant, and a sad commentary on the kind of Americans who make these comments.

Right now some of the folks who are being demeaned by this invective are fighting and dying in Iraq.

This is the kind of dialogue corporations are trying to stir up among Americans so they can create anger between social groups so they can split the vote, and get people to vote against their own self-interest.

This has been a Republican tactic for generations, and it is this tactic, above all others, that has closed down our economy, and is ruining protections for citizens in our laws, and eroding the Constitution.

Because while people are busy hating, the wealthy interests are skimming off the cream.

This kind of abusive language is usually the hallmark of someone who feels pretty lousy about themselves and needs to pump up a weak ego by hating some other group.  Strong, wise people don't think this way.

Did it ever occur to any of you that a lot of the invective could be sabotage by operatives that want to see the democratic party implode?  I don't see any democrat that I know calling anyone a 'brillo head'.  That would be so opposite to any progressive, I know in my heart that the anonymity of the internet is allowing outsiders to agitate and try to destroy us from within.  I don't care who they say they are supporting.  Every time I see flaming rhetoric, and I start to get a little heated myself, I take my head out of the clouds, and turn off my computer.  Once I am back down to earth, and grounded, I realize that democrats and progressives don't act this way, it must be outside influence.  Come on people, the in-fighting is not helpful.  Whenever you see it, you should find a bucket of water and throw it at the argument to cool it off.  How come no one sees that.  I am a HRC supporter, and I am telling you that this type of fighting is not helping anyone, not Hill or Barack.  Sheesh!