Obama Shifting 'Working Class' Strategy

The New York Times revealed a more humble Barack Obama emerging in Indiana, searching for a connection with the working class Democratic base.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/28/us/pol itics/28obama.html?_r=1&hp&oref= slogin

One of the things which gets lost sight of is both candidates have a massive organization surrounding them. In Philadelphia, students -- mostly from the University of Pennsylvania -- were relied upon to advance the campaign along with Progressive Philly; these are both groups which represent quite well the Obama 'elite' stereotype that Hillary has tried to pin on him. During those six weeks, those groups alienated the traditional Democrats and if it wasn't for the African-American churches, I believe the damage would have been deeper.

One thing Obama does well is learn fast and correct himself.

His next big battle is to remove himself from the shaddow of the Chicago machine, which the Republicans will try to taint him with as a tactic. This is the main reason Hillary is so livid about Obama's asscent: she fears the machine stench will loose Democrats the election to McCain. It is a legitimate fear.

I believe if he deals with the accusations squarely and robustly instead of shifting his feet and looking sour, he will be able to overcome the half-truths that the GOP flack machine is cooking up.

Every Democrat, pro-Obama or pro-Hillary should read this interview with Grover Norquist in the UK Sunday Times in which the GOP strategy against Obama is revealed. Article here: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/wo rld/us_and_americas/us_elections/article 3382313.ece

I think the call for unity has come through pretty clear from DNC chair Howard Dean so I'm just going to say that I will support whoever the Democratic nominee is. For the first time in my life, we have a Democrat dominated culture (accounting for the infighting, because it is a bigger tent now) and I believe that will have a greater effect than any one candidate.

Since I have a public relations background and have worked for the New York Sun and another newspaper in the Republican media machine, (I had to eat until the manufacturing of propaganda literally made me want to starve rather than sin), I am going to be focusing my efforts in the next two months on building a site that will robustly counter many of the Republican lies that are going to be concocted about the candidates. I don't think we do enough as a party to tell the full story when the tale is ugly and the truth is deeper than the dented surface.

In the next two weeks we will pick a candidate and as Chairman Dean said, we should heal and then unite. The culture of caring that has traditionally been part of the Democrat ethos (along with some really stupid high-horseyness and holier-than-thouness we all need to stop, including myself) is an important force that needs to be harnessed in bringing America back on track and making us a country that, once again, holds the beacon of possibility as high as the Statue of Liberty does on the Jersey side of the Hudson. (oh, snap! did I say Jersey? Did I mean that as an analogy for our country?)



Display:


Re: Obama Shifting 'Working Class' Strategy (2.00 / 3)

Wow... are you suggesting we unite and move forward together?

Kudos to you, sir!


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:50:06 AM EST

Re: Obama Shifting 'Working Class' Strategy (2.00 / 2)

ragekage,

I agree with you a lot. This is dangerous. But do tell me Sir, do you, DO, YOU, or have you ever, believed in... hope?


_____________
changiness
by lizardbox on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:53:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

stare him down (2.00 / 1)

stare him down lizardbox


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:18:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama Shifting 'Working Class' Strategy (2.00 / 2)

I appreciate diary and its underlying message. Often, Democrats here and elsewhere throw their hands up in the air saying "here goes the election" as they diary a potential attack that the Republicans "will" use in the GE. Always leaves me wondering, who took the damn fight out of this here dog? I really don't understand how everyone has this demeanor of lying down and taking it. Where's the toughness? The swagger? Where's the bring-it-motha-fuckers-dness?


_____________
changiness
by lizardbox on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:52:52 AM EST

Re: Obama Shifting 'Working Class' Strategy (2.00 / 2)

The fierceness of the infighting I think is evidence of the fact that the White House this year is such low-hanging fruit.  Folks can't wait to run against McCain.


by Mostly on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:53:09 AM EST

Yes, but (2.00 / 2)

a lot of us are starting to worry that whoever emerges from this primary may be too damaged to win in November. I'm staring to get seriously worried.


"This election is not about ideology, it's about competence." -Michael Dukakis
by MBNYC on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:01:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, but (2.00 / 1)

Thats because you back a candidate

With 2 years total experience at the level normally associated with running for president

With fresh scandals related to corruption, racial bias, patriotism, relationship with domestic terrorists, fighting against democracy, blackmailing the DNC related to his voters staying home.

There is pretty much no way your guy can win...

Karma is as karma does


by DTaylor on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:37:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, but (2.00 / 1)

Hillary herself said that Obama can win.

Sorry, but your scare tactics won't play. Not when your own candidate has admitted that they're bullshit.


by Angry White Democrat on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:47:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, but (2.00 / 1)

"Patriotism"?

"relationship with domestic terrorists"?

"fighting against democracy"?

Are we in Venezuela? You're actually calling Obama's refusal to wear a flag pin a "scandal"? You're calling his relationship with Ayers a scandal?

You know what then, I think Obama, Clinton, and McCain need to apologize for being in the Senate with Senator Byrd, you know, being an admitted member of the KKK at some point in his life. That should be the biggest "scandal" of all.

This is becoming more pathetic by the minute.


_____________
changiness
by lizardbox on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:49:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, but (2.00 / 1)

"Racial bias"?

You've become unhinged.


by Mostly on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:06:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh good. (2.00 / 1)

Finally one of the dead-enders admits that Obama is going to be the one. I look forward to more such breakthroughs in the weeks to come.

As to your ridiculous assertions, Obama has more legislative experience than his competitor, of course, and more meaningful accomplishments in his own right. But that's not even the point.

The point really is how unacceptable Hillary must be to so many people that this rookie came out of nowhere, out-organized, out-debated and out-campaigned her, all to the point where he's going to take away her turn.

The question isn't what's wrong with Obama. The question is what's wrong with Hillary.


"This election is not about ideology, it's about competence." -Michael Dukakis
by MBNYC on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 06:36:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Well... (2.00 / 2)

...points well taken, but as a Sun reporter and fellow New Yorker, you probably know the names Clarence Norman, Vito Lopez, Efraim Gonzalez and Diane Gordon, Hillary backers all. So I have to be skeptical that Hillary is concerned about the Chicago machine; she owes her seat in the Senate to the New York City Democratic machine. Norman and Lopez organized Brooklyn for her, Gonzales The Bronx, Joe Crowley brought Queens, Rangel Harlem.

Without the machines, Hillary would not be a Senator today. They even forced Nita Lowey out of a primary in 2000, and she was a life-long New Yorker.


"This election is not about ideology, it's about competence." -Michael Dukakis
by MBNYC on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:59:03 AM EST

Re: Well... (2.00 / 1)

Oh wow, I forgot about that.  Nita Lowey was all set to run - she was my congresswoman at the time, and I was in high school.


by Mostly on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:07:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "learning fast" (none / 0)

One thing Obama does well is learn fast and correct himself. There's actually not a lot of evidence to support this statement, and the Times article reflects that: they talk of him being bored, and of not wanting to do these events, nor wanting to spend time running against Clinton. "Learning fast" it seems to me, would have meant learning something about what failed in Texas and Ohio, and trying to reverse it; instead the approach in PA was to spend a lot of money and do events in places where he had little chance of winning, doing things (like the bowling) that made him look worse. I agree entirely that we need a good candidate who's quick to adapt... I'm just not sure it's Obama. I think his campaign has been, rlelentlessly, about finding one idea and sticking with it, even where it fails. That may not be the way tow in in November. It may not even be the way to fix what's broken in his campaign between now and June.
by nycweboy1 on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:16:10 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.