Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in 'Dead-Heat' Race

With the race for the Democratic nomination gearing up for two more contest in Indiana and N.C. on May 6, Hillary Clinton has gained considerable momentum as the media shifts their attention to the dynamics of her campaign. For months Hillary supporters were accustomed to a media bashing as pundits and pollsters alike would relentlessly write her off as the candidate on a downward spiral. From New Hampshire to Pennsylvania, the media would treat each contest as if it were the last for Hillary Clinton, and each time she would prove them wrong.

Since her impressive victory in the Pa. Primary, the media is now shifting the focus of attention towards Clinton as more pundits and media commentators are painting her in a more favorable light. With the momentum to her back, Clinton's predominance among White Democratic voters, especially among Blue-Collar workers, Catholics, Women, Hispanics and senior citizens is 'turning the tide' in this race for the nomination.

For his part, Howard Dean the DNC Chairman has joined the media pundits in announcing that the race for the Democratic nomination is now in a "virtual dead heat" between Hillary and Obama. According to Dean the superdelegates must break the deadlock by deciding on a nominee after the last primary date of June 3. His surprise announcement on "Meet the Press" is great news for Clinton while unpleasant for the Obama campaign.

The media for their part have jumped off the Obama bandwagon into Clinton territory. Many analysts are now convinced that Obama must reach out to White Blue Collar workers if he has any chance of winning the nomination. If he is unable to successfully appeal to the all important demographic groups that have overwhelmingly supported Clinton in previous contests, then his ability to win over undecided superdelegates will be greatly diminished.

Obama's refusal to debate Clinton (even in an unmoderated forum) in N.C. and/or Indiana is not helping his cause either,before the next round of primary contests. Obama's whimsical excuse for not debating, "I'm going to talk directly to the people" is playing into the hands of Hillary Clinton and makes him look like the candidate that is not up to the challenge and unwilling to answer to the will of the people.

As the Rev. Wright continues on his "holy crusade" to place blame on the media for his own misfortunes and statements of vengeful disregard, he is creating another round of controversy that invigorates the doubts that voters have about the character and judgment skills of Obama. The more we here the Rev Wright in his infamous remarks of "God Damn America" the more the voters are turning away from Obama. The campaign that was once considered  by many to be one of moral solidarity, is now by many considered to be one of political pandering and immoral solitude.

Obama's campaign may look nice on the outside from first observation, but after taking a second look it seems more like one of choas and frustration, unable to close the deal by its failure to unite all regions and all voting blocks. Hillary has learned to make adjustments along the way, and has learned from her previous campaign mistakes, that is why she looks like a winner to many, one who fights and never gives up. Obama must do the same if he wants to carry the torch of frontrunner in this race. He cannot expect to win the nomination by just sitting on his small delegate lead and acting as if the party owes him the nomination  .

Furthermore, the argument he presents that Florida and Michigan votes should be discounted because he name wasn't on the ballot or he didn't campaign in that region is flimsy at best. Obama voluntarily removed his name from the ballot in Michigan and yet he wants to disenfranchise the voters of that state because of his own actions. In Florida he wants to disenfranchise those voters because he didn't campaign there. Yet he overlooks the fact that Hillary didn't campaign in Florida either and yet she won by more than 300,000 votes. You see he wants to have it his way, which is so similar to the manner in which George Bush has governed the past eight years, utilizing the "my way, or the highway" approach with congress and the voters.

Indeed we are hearing a different tune these days from the media and its pundits and commentators. They now visualize a new race that may swing this election in a different direction, certainly one that would not have been envisioned just a month ago. The 'tide is turning' but how far and in which direction? Soon we shall know the answer.

http://themoderatevoice.com/at-tmv/newsw eek-blogitics/19194/media-conventional-w isdom-shifting-towards-belief-clinton-co uld-defeat-obama/

http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Vote2008/story? id=4736271&page=1


Poll
Is the Race Shifting Towards Clinton
Yes: She has the momentum and the determination
Yes: She has Obama on the Ropes
No: She will never win the nomination

Votes: 28
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (1.00 / 2)

The media can shift all it wants, but Obama will be the nominee.  Hillary's supporters (women) better get on board with Obama are they are going to be left at the train stop.  


by Spanky on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:55:48 PM EST

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (2.00 / 1)

'Hillary's supporters (women) better get on board with Obama'

----uhh..h.....?


--++++Stay Gold, Ponyboy!++++--
by amde on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:00:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (2.00 / 1)

I'll gladly take the train stop over Obama any day.

I do have to hand it to Obamites for being funny.  They, like Obama, think they can tell women what to do.  Tres amusing.


by RobinLB on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:10:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (none / 0)


   They, like Obama, think they can tell women what to do?

  what the hell did you mean by that statement?


by southernman on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 04:07:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (none / 0)

It's a disease called Jeremiah Wrightinitis; symptoms of delusion, slurring, drunken-like blogging, and memory lapses.


by SHIBAM8P on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 09:49:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in (none / 0)

yeah - wtf does that mean?  you give BO supporters a bad name.


"Democracy! Bah! When I hear that I reach for my feather Boa!" Allen Ginsberg
by canadian gal on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:52:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Media Shifts Attention to (none / 0)

I wouldn't say that she has him on the ropes, but alot of doubt has been cast on him. Enough doubt for the MSM to actually follow the narrative that many have been saying.


--++++Stay Gold, Ponyboy!++++--
by amde on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 02:56:29 PM EST

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton (1.00 / 1)


Obama's campaign has a huge money advantage, so they can't blame that for the way things are going.

But there's a palpable sense that politically they're running out of appeal.  They're gassed and hoping to just barely make it, white knuckling that the clock runs out on Clinton's surge and they have just enough delegates and vehement narrowminded righteous determination to win at the convention.  And everyone sees it.

What is there to say but: this is how very close but long campaigns decide...one candidate runs out of gas in the tank first.


by killjoy on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:05:22 PM EST

Re: Media Shifts Attention to Clinton in 'Dead-Hea (none / 0)

Excellent diary - rec'd!

However, this is still about execution - Hillary needs to do well in NC and IN.  If she wins Indiana and keeps NC close, then I would say Obama is on the ropes.


by mikes101 on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:12:06 PM EST

So what? (2.00 / 2)

Does this mean that the high pitched shrieking and whining from hrc supporters about the imagined victimization of hrc by media will end?

Heh.Probably not.


"Beauty, more than bitterness, makes the heart break." Sara Teasdale
by april34fff on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:28:12 PM EST

Re: So what? (none / 0)

imagined? you must really be in imaginary land.


by swissffun on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 04:11:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So what? (none / 0)

No, I'm reality based. Maybe if the hrc crowd stopped bitchin and crying long enough, you would
be able to see reality too.

Here's a tissue..now you can wipe your eyes.


"Beauty, more than bitterness, makes the heart break." Sara Teasdale
by april34fff on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 04:52:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama disenfranchises voters???? (2.00 / 2)

I love the way this diary states thae Barack Obama choses to disenfranchise voters. I thought the DNC chose to disenfranchise the voters. Howard Dean may hold the key on that one. Obama, right now is abiding by party rules, which is convenient for him. Hillary Clinton is trying to flaunt the rules, which is convenient for her. I wonder what would have happened were the situation were reversed???


John McCain: Everyones nowhere man
by johnny sexton on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:39:31 PM EST

Re: Obama disenfranchises voters???? (2.00 / 1)

The party is based on Democracy, named for Democracy, when the party turns its back on Democracy it will cease to exist.


by DTaylor on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 04:08:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the party is the same as the other one (none / 0)

with a few policy differences.

the race for the nomination has shown that quite clearly. i am so often amused by the clinton supporters that live here shooting down any progressive idealism and claiming political necessity....but then.... broad sweeping statements about how the democratic party is actually democratic.


by citizendave on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 08:49:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama disenfranchises voters???? (none / 0)

OBAMA HAS A GOOD HEAD START BY NOT COUNTING MICHIGAN AND FLORIDA....WTF are you still complaining?  ...

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IS ALREADY AT WORK HERE.


by SHIBAM8P on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 09:54:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.