Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd

Both Edwards and Dowd had column space in Sunday's New York TImes op-ed page, but the substance and tone of the two pieces were worlds apart.

In the perfectly titled "Bowling 1, Health Care 0" Edwards implored the political press to start doing its job:

The problem today unfortunately is that voters who take their responsibility to be informed seriously enough to search out information about the candidates are finding it harder and harder to do so, particularly if they do not have access to the Internet.

Did you, for example, ever know a single fact about Joe Biden's health care plan? Anything at all? But let me guess, you know Barack Obama's bowling score. We are choosing a president, the next leader of the free world. We are not buying soap, and we are not choosing a court clerk with primarily administrative duties.

...

If voters want a vibrant, vigorous press, apparently we will have to demand it. Not by screaming out our windows as in the movie "Network" but by talking calmly, repeatedly, constantly in the ears of those in whom we have entrusted this enormous responsibility. Do your job, so we can -- as voters -- do ours.

And yet on the very same page, in almost defiant celebration of useless, self-indulgent process commentary, Maureen Dowd speculates about how much Obama's suits cost and proceeds to analyze...his bowling score:

At Joe's Junction gas station in Indianapolis, Obama did his best to shoo away the pesky elitist label. Accused by an Indianapolis reporter of looking like a GQ cover, he said he has only four pairs of shoes and buys "five of the same suit and then I patch them up and wear them repeatedly." But his campaign refused to reveal the brand, presumably because it's not J. C. Penney.

...

...he resumed wry whingeing about his 37 bowling score, explaining that he finished only seven frames, including two that "were bowled by a 10-year-old" and another by a 3-year-old.

In her defense, Dowd begins her column with the preface that "maybe I've been reading too many stories about the fad of teenage vampire chick lit."

LOL Maureen! Remember in 2004 when you wildly speculated about Kerry's use of Botox, or in 2000 when you called Gore a "pious smarty-pants" and speculated that he "is in a room somewhere right now playing Barry White CDs and struggling to get mellow?"

Point Dowd! I was wrong - politics are hilarious!



Display:


Seriously MoDo (none / 0)

gets front page billing here.

Boo!!!


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 11:49:18 PM EST

Re: Seriously MoDo (none / 0)

I suppose by your logic, so does John McCain.


by Josh Orton on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 11:52:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

John McCain is relevant (none / 0)

Maureen Dowd is not.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:01:46 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

yeah, great BO. Blame a ten and three year old for your bowling score.


by gomer on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 11:52:10 PM EST

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

Seriously? Of all the salient points presented in this post regarding the nature of the press this is what you seized on as worth a comment?


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:28:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (2.00 / 5)

Very keen observation - putting the two side-by-side.  EE > MD


by bobbank on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 11:56:11 PM EST

Alessandra Stanley of the NYT should replace (2.00 / 3)

Dowd.  Dowd is horrible.  She is totally out of touch, unfunny and damaging to important leftist causes (and then she writes books making money off the damage).  I think the only people who like her are complete cynics.

Dowd never says anything interesting.


by Molee on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 11:57:15 PM EST

can't stand MoDo (none / 0)

but don't think Alessandra Stanley would be much better. I remember her very poor reporting out of Moscow during the 1990s (when my full-time job was covering Russian politics).


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:31:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Elizabeth rocks. MoDo sucks. (2.00 / 2)

I never understood Dowd's fascination with mocking candidate clothing.  My girlfriend ran into her in public and told me her shoes were worth more than my entire wardrobe.  How elitist of her!


by Homebrewer on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:04:21 AM EST

I'm sure she has expensive taste (none / 0)

How many columns has MoDo written about Barney's in NY?


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:32:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Um, once. (none / 0)

Back in 1996. The place had gone bankrupt and she used it as an exegesis on foreign ownership of the economy and conspicuous consumption.


Dowd Report: All Dowd, All The Time
by Mo MoDo on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 06:38:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I think Dowd is realizing the Obambi (none / 0)

campaign waxes vacuous.
I've liked her wacky style at various points in time.  
Sooner or later, she'll make everybody mad, so she
doesn't bother me quite as much as Frank Rich, or
Alessandra Stanley, who is, at times, a 2nd rate
Dowd imitator.
i do wish she'd give HRC a break.
The poor NY Senator is working her butt off right now
for the health plan my kids desperately need.
(Just convinced myself to give her another donation!)
by internetstar on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:36:09 AM EST

Nice mimic of the (none / 0)

Hillaryis44 site there...


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:38:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

got a link so I can see what I'm mimicking? (none / 0)


by internetstar on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 09:10:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Anywhere (none / 0)

in the comments at Hillaryis44.org

You might like that place better as there aren't any evil Obama supporters over there.


Student Guy=JoeMentum. No really Student Guy=JoeMentum, after all JoeMentum was an embarrassment so is Student Guy. This sig is FAIL!!
by Student Guy on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:01:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Anywhere (none / 0)

And you might the color Orange better here, because they allow nothing but Obama worship.


by muggle on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 05:05:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (2.00 / 1)

MoDo didn't let HRC off the hook either, giving us a strange description of Clinton's two-fisted chip-eating methodology.

Sheesh.  Almost makes me want to talk about lapel pins.


If yer after gettin the honey, then you don't go killing all the bees.
by Fluffy Puff Marshmallow on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 12:47:03 AM EST

Re: Maureen Dowd (2.00 / 1)

Dowd's method is gender psychoanalysis dotted with pop-cultural metaphors. Her constant refrain is to expose famous political men as wimps and famous political women as traitors to their gender.


by blueflorida on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:17:16 AM EST

Re: Maureen Dowd (2.00 / 1)

finishing that thought...she is infuriating but also self-conscious entertainment.


by blueflorida on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:18:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

Why do I keep having this fantasy where I call Twinkies like Dowd, Russert, Matthews, Stossel, Couric, Lauer, etc. into a room and announce that they;re all fired?


by spirowasright on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:27:40 AM EST

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

NBC really is a cess-pool, isn't it?

BTW, anyone think that Morning Joe on MSNBC has a kind of weird gender politics going on between Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski? I halfway expect them to open one of their programs, "Hello America, I'm Joe and this is my old lady, Mika..."


by blueflorida on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:37:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

LOL, good point... (none / 0)

...I think they're just hanging on to Scarb & Pat B until they get hard confirmation that the Bush-loving crowd is done for in American electoral politics. And yes, one day soon Mika is gonna get bored with carrying that ass-clown, and deliver a knock-out blow to Joe's pompous ass...


by Kordo on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:20:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

MoDo is a ghastly person. (none / 0)


by sricki on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:28:41 AM EST

what a waste of prime journalistic real-estate (2.00 / 1)

I had to laugh to see that she is now questioning the cost of Obama's suits.

Last year when we had to suffer through endless stories about the $400 Edwards haircut, I was always thinking, I wonder when someone is going to ask how much Obama pays for his suits and his shoes?

The answer is, only after Obama has pretty much locked up the nomination.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:34:07 AM EST

I'm prolly sexist scum for mentioning this, but... (none / 0)

...This was the author of the NYT bestseller "Are Men necessary?" Not to denigrate her literary talents, but I tend to think of my gender as vital.


by Kordo on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 03:25:03 AM EST

Re: I'm prolly sexist scum for mentioning this, bu (none / 0)

Yes you are sexist scum for thinking that us males are necessary... thinking we are necessary is an attack on feminism.

;-)


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 01:31:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Dowd's column would fit much better (none / 0)

in the comic section of the New York Times instead of the opinion section.


by SleepingWillow on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 05:43:27 AM EST

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

While MoDo should never be taken seriously, I thought I detected a shift in her thinking about Hillary, to a certain admiration and acceptance she might win.


by Bob H on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 06:25:03 AM EST

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (none / 0)

For MoDo everyone is fair game. And I emphasize "game." Because that is what she is playing. She played an important role trying to knock Bush down a peg when everyone was afraid to take him on right after 9/11 and the run up to the Iraq War.

But she really isn't that interesting otherwise. Very predictable - trying to provoke readers - but it only really works when the person being poked is seen as invincible - otherwise its pretty pedestrian stuff.


by CB Todd on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 08:32:46 AM EST

i said it before (none / 0)

this is just another example of the MSM turning on BO.

Sadly, MoDo is poison, she did nothing but vilify gore, hillary, and now is setting her sights on Obama.


vote blue in 2008
by sepulvedaj3 on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 10:34:41 AM EST

Re: Elizabeth Edwards v. Maureen Dowd (2.00 / 1)

Dowd is a waste of time. I don't bother reading her column any more. Besides a lack of substance, she thinks she's being witty when she's just being sarcastic.


by jerseygirl on Mon Apr 28, 2008 at 11:11:35 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.