Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy

This is cool. From an Obama campaign press release:

Senator Barack Obama's campaign today announced the kickoff of Vote for Change, an unprecedented 50-state voter registration and mobilization drive. The campaign will work with grassroots volunteers and partner with local organizations to register new voters and boost engagement in our Democratic process. The program will launch on May 10 with dozens of events around the country.  

"If we're going to push back on the special interests and finally solve the challenges we face, we're going to need everyone to get involved," said Senator Obama. "Over the next six months, Vote for Change is going to bring new participants into the process, adding scores of new voices to this critical dialogue about our future. I started my career as a community organizer, and I worked to register voters in communities where hope was all but lost. I've seen what can happen when Americans re-engage and take ownership in the process."  

"We've already seen amazing new enthusiasm and involvement over the course of this campaign, and now we're taking that excitement to the next level in all 50 states," said deputy campaign manager Steve Hildebrand. "We've seen too many elections where turnout was less than 50 percent. At this critical time in our history, we know we can do better--this year and beyond."  

This is going to pay dividends for the party well into the future, no matter who the nominee is, but I think Ben Smith is onto something that it's not entirely out of the goodness of his own heart, nor is the timing of the announcement, right after his PA loss, coincidental.

It's clearly nascent, and it's been rolled out now to make the case for his electability.

But six months, swarms of volunteers, and the sort of smart online infrastructure the campaign has built before will be a formidable thing, with possible consequences down-ballot, all over the place.

UPDATE: A reader makes the point that the Obama drive -- with its national map -- also sends a message to superdelegates, many of the members of Congress, of what Obama's nomination could do for them.

Another interesting part of the press release was this nugget:

The campaign's recent voter registration drives have registered more than 200,000 new Democrats in Pennsylvania, more than 165,000 new Democrats in North Carolina, and more than 150,000 new Democrats in Indiana. Those numbers just scratch the surface of what's possible.

Notable, considering the official, although admittedly incomplete, pre-primary increase in Dem registration in Pennsylvania since November was 161,000 and counting. I'd be really interested to see updated Pennsylvania numbers and to get a sense of the rate at which registration has continued even past the deadline to vote in the primary. By the looks of these numbers, I'd bet the excitement surrounding the Democratic primary continued to net new Democratic registrants even after the deadline passed.

Update [2008-4-25 20:14:47 by Todd Beeton]:Should have included the Vote For Change link.



Display:


Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

Way to go, Obama!!!


by chewie5656 on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:00:22 PM EST

what part of this your do not understand? (none / 0)

Its a national voting registration campaign.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:21:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Clinton campaign also registered voters in PA (none / 0)

There is a fundamental misconception that only Obama generates excitement and new voters.  Taint so...I worked in Philly and the Clinton campaign registered a lot of independent women and got lots of those voters tothe polls. After all this was triple the 2004 primary turnout.  the Obama people expected 1.5 million votes there were 2.3 million votes.

She generates excitement and new voters as well.


by debcoop on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 09:20:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Clinton campaign also registered voters in (none / 0)

All of which is good for the party.


by ProgressiveDL on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 11:19:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

Maybe his goal is to be the nominee, so that white, women, seniors won't have one of their own to choose from.  Makes sense to me.


http://www.yawnmccain.com
by enozinho on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:22:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 0)

Just regarding "seniors," Hillary is 60 (my age) and Barack is 46 I think.  I'm not sure she would
like to be referred to as one of their own!

Seriously though, you can't believe that "being just like me demographically" is what people want most in their elected officials.  I would think women and "white people" deserve some credit for looking at who is best for the job first, no?  


by mady on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:29:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

right now that goal is his job (2.00 / 1)

not as a dig at any demographic and the drive seems to be a standard GOTV effort if more ambitious then before that I, for one, applaud. don't you?


by zerosumgame on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:53:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

Welcome to silly season.  Getting people out to vote, and it's not a good thing.


by chewie5656 on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:26:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

as long as it's not in Florida and Michigan, it's an appropriate and legitimate strategy :-)


by reggie44pride on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:48:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

T: "Obama starts voter registration drive."

O: "Good for him!"

C: "STFU.  Can't win.  Vote Hillary."

Yep, still silly season...


by username2 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:50:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

it's not about that. baffling that you can't see the bigger picture.


!
by alex100 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 10:22:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

Smart timing.


by bobbank on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:02:13 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

This is something that needs to happen regardless of the nominee.  If we're going to move out of the 50+1 mindset, we need more of a presence nationwide.


by Capt America on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:06:25 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

hahaa, when are people gonna start saying how politically convenient this is for him!! well well well, no takers??? where is the firing squad now?


--++++Stay Gold, Ponyboy!++++--
by amde on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:08:23 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

This, perhaps?


by username2 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 08:55:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 3)

Why waste your donor's money on registering democrats when you can pound your opponent into the ground with negative ads and show how tough you are?  Barak Obama is an elitist wasting the money of the low-income latte-sippers supporting his campaign.  I mean, he didn't even finish those waffles!

Shame on you Barry!  You elitist, race-baiting, registering, vote-getter you!


http://www.yawnmccain.com
by enozinho on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:14:28 PM EST

ok (2.00 / 1)

you totally forgot the

*shakes fist* line.

;)


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:22:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ok (none / 0)

Get off my lawn dagnabbit!!!!  You little whippersnappers!!! ;-)


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:29:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

...and I really like waffles.


by emptythreatsfarm on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:59:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

Brilliant and Timely.

Lets get the Republicans on the run!


by edmandspath on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:15:37 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 2)

Let's hope that Hillary joins the effort!!!


"This was never part of our arrangement, Specter" "I am altering the deal! Pray I don't alter it any further!" "This deal keeps getting worse all the time!"
by LordMike on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:17:50 PM EST

Sttrategy to lose (1.00 / 1)

in a landslide?


You may not agree with What I say but don't forget I am a Democrat
by indydem99 on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:32:30 PM EST

Re: Sttrategy to lose (1.00 / 1)

It is nothing more than a pure PR stunt! I am from Illinois and voted for him in 2004. He is a fake. He jumped on the anti war bandwagon when he realized 9 out of the 12 in the illinois Democratic delegation were going to vote agaist the war resolution. Now he claims he was anti war. Once he got to the senate he did not do any thing to stop the war. He is worse than Hillary and McCain. he is the biggest hypocrite.


You may not agree with What I say but don't forget I am a Democrat
by indydem99 on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:59:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sttrategy to lose (none / 0)

If this is nothing than a PR stunt, why did me and many other Obama volunteers hold multiple registration drives signing up voters in Western North Carolina at the urging (and with the support) of the campaign? We weren't the only ones, groups in all the surrounding counties were doing it also.

This is real, and it's been going on for awhile. Now it's going to kick into overdrive for the GE.


by tysonpublic on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 09:44:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

TR Abuse!!! (none / 0)

No call to downrate comment.  Pure chickenshit behavior, indydem.


by nwgates on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 01:51:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Sttrategy to lose (none / 0)

voting to go to war is different then voting while in war. That's a huge difference.

but yeah, he should have done more. but how dare you make him out to be worse then Hillary or McCain who actually put us in Iraq. You can bet your ass he would have been alongside Durbin in voting against the war and then subsequently voting to "protect" them.


!
by alex100 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 10:26:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-States (1.25 / 4)

50 state malarky:

Obama has shown zero respect for the millions of Democratic voters of Florida and Michigan.  He's going to make it up now with a new voter registration drive?  Good luck to him.


by moevaughn on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:35:32 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-States (none / 0)

Do you realize how silly you sound with that crap?

Most states wind up without a say in most nominating processes and not because of anything that they did to themselves.

Obviously Michigan isn't stupid enough to blame Obama as even SUSA has him winning there.

Florida is a red state anyway.


Government derives its power from those that it governs.
by lockewasright on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 09:43:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Oh my God (none / 0)

Really, with the FLA MI crap.

At this point, that argument is really just pathetic.  It holds no water, and does not stand up to logic.

If this is HRC's last great hope, she really is finished.


by nwgates on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 01:53:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ratings (none / 0)

Why on earth does my comment deserve zero ratings?  Those who did so should be punished.  It's not ok to even criticize Obama?  This is ridiculous.  I will keep criticizing him for Florida and MIchigan.  And you can multiply my displeasure by the over two million loyal Democratic voters who cast their votes in these two states.
p.s. thanks to Caldonia and SluggoD for pullling me back up some.
by moevaughn on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 07:28:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 2)

Hmmmm. Aren't there only 48 states that count to Obama?


by georgiast on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:37:41 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

I hope that anyone who ever even considers signing an agreement with you first gets a chance to see here, in this comments section, how you feel about honoring agreements.

I can see that obviously such honor means nothing to you.

I wonder if Senator Clinton is ever as good as her word or if you even care.


Government derives its power from those that it governs.
by lockewasright on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 09:48:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

Do you have any idea of the truth of what you are saying? Google is your friend.


by georgiast on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 10:38:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

Are you actually going to try and deny that Hilary and all of the other candidates didn't agree before Iowa even started that that the contests wouldn't count?  You gonna pretend like Hilary's campaign didn't participate in crafting the agreement?  Are you also going to pretend like Hilary voiced any objections to the agreement before she started getting her ass whipped and needed the farcical contests from january to count if she was to have even a small chance?

Or do you just assert that she had her fingers crossed behind her back when she SIGNED THE DAMN AGREEMENT?


Government derives its power from those that it governs.
by lockewasright on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 10:51:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

And the solidly Democratic ones.  Those Republicans ones are a lost cause anyway, right?


by ProgressiveDL on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 11:22:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He had a one state strategy in PA and lost big (none / 0)

He thinks he's in the super bowl and the regular season hasn't even finished yet. Someone should tell him.

He better win in IN or its over.


by mmorang on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:42:54 PM EST

Re: He had a one state strategy in PA and lost big (2.00 / 0)

that's nonsense.


by reggie44pride on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:50:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

dont bother responding to the unhinged (2.00 / 0)

let them scream in the dark. meanwhile join the movement and volunteer whatever you can.


by highgrade on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:56:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He had a one state strategy in PA and lost big (none / 0)

The voter registration drive will go on regardless.  Can we stop attacking our own party for a second and start working to win the election?


by catalysis on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:50:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes (none / 0)

And McCain is Ohio State!  (By the way, Go Blue!)


by ProgressiveDL on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 11:23:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (2.00 / 1)

I hate how these kinds of posts get hijacked by candidate pro and antis...

No one seems to be looking at the reality of the program, which benefits progressives everywhere, regardless of the presidential candidate.

Most of the people who are not currently registered are more likely to cast progressive votes than the people currently registered. You expand the electorate like this and you are expanding the progressive base and you are doing it everywhere so its not just in battelground state, but will help county supervisors and state legislators in places like Idaho and Oklahoma and South Dakota.

Having said all that, I'm totally skeptical of his numbers. I have lots of personal experinece with VR drives and I can tell you that (1) he doesn't know how many "new" democrats he's signed up yet and (2) he doesn't know how many of any voters have been added to the rolls.

This is because for (1) there hasn't been enough time to check his registration lists versus the part registration lists maintained by the states and (2) he doesn't yet know how many of his registration cards have been rejected by county boards of elections for not being complete, or not providing proper ID (Indiana) or what-have-you. Also because there hasn't been eough time to match his list of applications versus the county/state's list of registered voters.

But so what? The larget point is that with over 30% of eligible Americans unregistered, this will have a major impact on the expansion of the voting rolls in the US and could end up being the single largest expansion of the electorate since the voting age was lowered to 18. It is likely to be the biggest partisan VR drive in US history.


by nathanhj on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 08:52:35 PM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

I can buy a CD full of all the registered voters in my county in NC for the grand total of $2 - I know this for a fact because I just did. It contains all of the newly added registrations as of the cutoff from a week or so ago. It would take me about 5  mins to import this data into a database, and maybe another minute and a half to write a SQL query to compare new vs previous registrations.

Now granted, I live in a smaller county, so in areas with thousands of new registrations it could take the Board of Elections slightly longer to process them, but I know the goal for North Carolina was  to be ready last Thursday for the start of One Stop voting.

Failing that, the campaign knows what they turned in, and have plenty of experience from previous VR efforts to have a pretty good idea of the 'problem' rate. I know it was stressed to us, and we stressed to the voters we signed up to double and triple check the voter registration forms upfront for errors. I know I looked them over very carefully before letting the new registrants walk away.

All that being said, this is nothing but good news for the party, regardless of what candidate is doing it.


by tysonpublic on Fri Apr 25, 2008 at 10:00:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

Is Obama claiming that all the new voters are his, even in states where he gets thumped?


by Bob H on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 06:20:46 AM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

I would say that in Pennsylvanis and Ohio, there were lots of newly registered voters that did so just to vote against Obama. In Florida, we've had quite a few voters switch their registration to Indepemdent (NPR) from Democrat because of the DNC. My problem is the "Dem for a day" campaign by the Obama camp. How does that help the party?


by glennmcgahee on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 07:42:04 AM EST

Re: Barack Obama's 50-State Strategy (none / 0)

you'll find every imaginable possiblity to why people registered.

but regarding the dem for a day campaign. Well, I thought it was hooey, except I doubt people actually heeded these calls in any type of significant numbers. If they did I have no doubt that the Rush Limbaugh call to vote for Hillary was more successful for her campaign.


!
by alex100 on Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 10:40:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.