NBC/NJ: "Sir, what did you mean yesterday when you said that the Obama campaign was playing the race card on you?"CLINTON: "When did I say that, and to whom did I say that?"
NBC/NJ: "On WHYY radio yesterday"
CLINTON: "No, no, no. That's not what I said. You always follow me around and play these little games, and I'm not going to play your games today. This is a day about election day. Go back and see what the question was, and what my answer was. You have mischaracterized it to get another cheap story to divert the American people from the real urgent issues before us, and I choose not to play your game today. Have a nice day."
NBC/NJ: "Respectfully sir, though, you did say ..."
CLINTON: "Have a nice day."
Per NBC News, as well as the tape of the interview, what comes through is clear:
INTERVIEWER (RE: Jackson comment): "Do you think that was a mistake, and would you do that again?"CLINTON: "No. I think that they played the race card on me. And we now know, from memos from the campaign and everything, that they planned to do it along.
Do I think this will have a tangible impact on today's results in Pennsylvania? Not really. Do I even think that this particular exchange will have a long-term impact? Again, no. However, I'm just trying to figure out exactly what the former President is trying to do here. Clearly, he claimed the Obama campaign was playing the race card, and clearly just a day later, he denied saying as much.
I think President Clinton is as talented a politician as I've seen in my lifetime -- he knows how to connect with voters in a real and genuine way, and, what's more, plays the game as well as anyone. But this type of move, along with the statement in South Carolina linking Barack Obama with Jesse Jackson (the hubbub surrounding which was arguably the turning point, or at least a turning point, of momentum away from Hillary Clinton to Barack Obama), is just not politically effective. So in a Hillary Clinton administration, would we see the Bill Clinton who was virtually unbeatable during his own presidency, or would we see the Bill Clinton who, while no doubt adding significantly to his wife's campaign, has had a tendency to say things that are, shall we say, politically uncouth? Heck, in a general election against John McCain, which one would we see?
|
|
|
Permalink :: 92 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.