TX-07: Michael Skelly is the Real Deal

Reading The Politico last night, this really jumped out at me:

Businessman Michael Skelly is positioned to be at the top of the Democratic fundraising list for the year's first quarter, according to a Democratic operative, raising about $750,000 from individual donors without even tapping into his substantial personal wealth. Another Democratic operative said it could be the "best first quarter ever" for any House Democrat in his first filing period.

[...]

By contrast, [the incumbent Republican Congressman John] Culberson reported only $82,200 in his campaign account in mid-February but claims to have worked over the past month to quickly refill his coffers. Culberson estimated he raised $250,000 in the past 45 days -- largely in response to Skelly's strong early fundraising and his ability to self-fund. [emphasis added]

Raising $750,000 in a quarter without a personal check is what a decent candidate for the Senate in a smallish-medium state does, not what a Democratic candidate in a very red district does. I was really floored by the numbers and started calling and emailing around. This is what I found out from folks in Texas, as well as Oregon Democratic Congressman Earl Blumenauer:

Texas 7 would be a fun district to play in, let alone to win in -- it was once held by George Herbert Walker Bush and has been in Republican hands ever since. Looking at the topline demographics from the district, one might come away with the conclusion that there's no way a Democrat, Skelly or someone else, could win. According to the Cook Partisan Voting Index, the district tends to lean about 16 points more Republican than the nation as a whole in presidential elections. However, those numbers were weighed against elections in which a Texan, George Walker Bush, headed the GOP ticket, so that number might be a bit lower in reality. Indeed, last fall Culberson won with 59 percent of the vote -- not bad, but not overwhelmingly great, either. The Politico adds a bit more on the demographics:

Texas Democrats point to a state legislative race within the district, where a Democratic state legislator unseated a two-term Republican by 10 points. And they are encouraged by the roughly 88,000 districtwide Democrats (out of 410,000 registered voters) who participated in the Democratic presidential primary in March, with one Democratic operative calling the voter information a "gold mine."

Via Texas über-blogger Charles Kuffner also comes a bit of internal polling (.pdf) from the Skelly team. Skelly, who was largely unknown at the time the poll was taken in January, trailed only 52 percent to 33 percent in a named head-to-head against Culberson. The incumbent's favorable rating stood at just 32 percent, while his approval and re-elect numbers, at 46 percent and 44 percent respectively, weren't much better. The survey also found that the current President's disapproval rating stood at 54 percent in the district.

Taking one more step back, I'd like to pass on some thoughts from my old boss Congressman Earl Blumenauer, who has been keeping an eye on this race and whom I spoke with about Skelly this morning. Blumenauer calls this "one of those intriguing districts," one "that the Republicans can't afford to throw a lot of resources to." While Culberson has "ruffled lots of feathers back home" by "hewing the Tom DeLay line," Skelly is a really attractive candidate. As an entrepreneur, Skelly became a real innovator in the area of wind energy, a sector of the economy that is bringing a lot of growth to the state of Texas. What's more, Skelly isn't yet drawing a whole lot of institutional support, so the remarkable fundraising numbers that he has been posting truly reflect "grassroots support," according to Blumenauer.

I don't think anyone should kid themselves: This is a tough district for the Democrats. Nevertheless, the Democrats already hold one district in the state that's even more red that the 7th (Texas 17, which is home to George W. Bush, is represented by Democrat Chet Edwards), and the nearly neighboring 22nd district now represented by Democrat Nick Lampson (and formerly represented by Tom DeLay) is nearly as Republican-leaning as Culberson's. And with a candidate as strong as Skelly, who knows, maybe this one could jump out of nowhere, a la the race against Richard Pombo last year, and cause real headaches for the GOP.



Display:


Wow! (none / 0)

I saw Skelly's fundraising yesterday on Swing State Project, and I was sure that it was a typo. I mean, $750,000 only happens when you're planning a bid for statewide office or you're spending a lot of your own money. The fact that he managed this much all from individual donors is amazing.

I am curious, though: how is he raising it? Is this a case of a strong Texas netroots and Dean-like internet fundraising? Or is he using local connections and direct mail? Either, of course, is equally valid, but anything that strengthens local netroots (or shows off their strength) is a good thing.

Of course, now that he has everyone's attention, I wouldn't be surprised if he was picked for the next round of endorsements by Blue Majority or Blue America. As long as he's relatively decent on progressive issues, I'd love to see the national and Texas netroots get really involved in this one.

(You know, once the presidential primary is wrapped up and Blue Majority's endorsement of Obama isn't an issue anymore, regardless of the nominee, maybe MyDD should consider joining the Blue Majority group of blogs again. The folks here tend to be enthusiastic, but they aren't being directed to down-ticket races where they can help. Most of the focus is on the primary race, where there really isn't much left for anyone outside PA, IN, NC, etc. to do. You've got some enthusiastic Clinton and Obama supporters who I'm sure would be willing to open their wallets for most of the candidates on the Blue Majority list.  At the very least, there should be a MyDD ActBlue page for endorsed down-ticket races.)


Walberg Watch - Following Radical Conservative Rep. Tim Walberg in MI-07
by Fitzy on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 12:33:07 PM EST

Re: Wow! (none / 0)

Yes to downticket endorsements. But move carefully. Blue Majority just casually blasted through their original stated purpose and requirements:
____________
* It can't be a top-tier race. We can have a bigger impact in races which, so far, have received less attention and institutional backing. Simply put, the netroots isn't capable of raising millions of dollars, so the less money a campaign has raised so far, the further our dollars will go. And what's more, we can help bring attention to worthy races and inspire the big-dollar players to follow our lead. In any event, there's no hard-and-fast definition for this, but one rule of thumb is that if a challenger has raised over $1 million, it's probably already a top-tier race.
----------------------------

But this year they endorsed Al Franken -- you may have heard of him. He's famous. He has many fans and friends. He has been a prolific fundraiser. His opponents tried to run to the left of him, out-progressive-ing him. And for this race we should send our little money? I'd let Minnesota handle this one without us. More recently Blue Majority took sides in a race in NOVA, smack in the costly Washinton-Baltimore media market, that involves two self-described anti-War progressives. Even if ALL of the Blue Majority money went into this big-budget race it might not tip the outcome. Meanwhile deserving Dems are challenging Repubs in three other Virginia districts, and they got squat.

It made my blood boil to see our funding diverted from worthy candidates out in FlyoverLand, where our little help can indeed make the difference, to these marquee races in big metro areas.

So maybe a MyDD page on Act Blue, with a handful of targeted races. One way to make it different from Blue Majority would be to let some poll decide who goes on the Act Blue page. Perhaps a free-for-all with everyone encouraged to nominate a candidate, he site's frontpagers pick say 9 contenders, and then put up a poll to chose 3 of the 9 to go on the MyDD Act Blue page.

BTW Here among Hillary fans, may I point out that 2008 is NOT going to be a good year for women in Congress. Most of our women candidates, it seems, are up against women Repubs, so if we win, net nothing for women. There are only a handful of races where Democratic women might defeat Repub men, truly, only a handful. Women make up a mere 16.1% of the House today, 16% of the Senate, and expect no improvement next January.


by Woody on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 08:44:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: TX-07: Michael Skelly is the Real Deal (none / 0)

There's more reason for hope in this district.  Culberson has really angered many in this area by his support for the I-10 expansion (at the expense of local businesses and homeowners) and his opposition to the METRORail expansion.  It's become clear to many that he's in the pocket of certain construction companies and is doing their bidding at the expense of his constituents.  He also doesn't seem to have endeared himself much to anyone else.  I expect to see strong opposition to and only lukewarm support for his reelection.  Granted, it's an uphill district, but it's certainly winnable if the blue wave in Houston is large enough.


by kenfair on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 12:50:19 PM EST

Re: TX-07: Michael Skelly is the Real Deal (none / 0)

The comparisons to Edwards and Lampson are not really on point.  Edwards was an incumbent who was redistricted into a much more Republican district and managed to hang on.  Lampson, of course, benefitted from DeLay's late resignation and DeLay's replacement had to run as a write-in.

The fund raising is extremely impressive, however, and the low numbers for Culberson are encouraging.  As noted, the PVI numbers for all Texas districts skew Republican because a Texan was running for president--probably 3-4 points.  Also, Texas seems to be trending blue, so there's definitely reason for hope.


John McCain vows to overturn Roe
by soccerandpolitics on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 01:11:54 PM EST

Re: TX-07: Michael Skelly is the Real Deal (none / 0)

Some say TWO Texans were running for President. That stuff about the Halliburton CEO residing in Wyoming was a forerunner of all the lies to come, and one of the first that showed them that they could indeed get away with lying and violating the Constitution.


by Woody on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 08:47:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I wonder; How much is TX-17... (none / 0)

... a reaction of the locals to all those press and outsiders hangin' around the area and pokin' their noses into other people's business while Shrub has been in the White House?

I suspect that, while some may have prospered as a result, more would be peeved, at best, and might express their displeasure by voting D.


Ignorance is weakness. Get strong.
by tbetz on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 01:20:44 PM EST

Harris County is set to go blue in 2008 (none / 0)

One thing that Yankees might not realize is that Harris County government is set to flip to the Democrats this year.  Virtually all of the county offices are on the ballot in November and the Harris County Democratic Party is making a strong effort to sweep every seat.  They carefully screened candidates for the primary to make sure the best won and are really pushing straight ticket voting and higher turnout among traditionally low turnout elements of the Democratic base.  This will help Skelly (and Lampson, BTW) tremendously.


by Irvingguy on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 06:04:48 PM EST

Quite Astonishing (2.00 / 1)

The GOP knew that this district would eventually slip away from their hands, and the Democrats knew that this one would eventually be in reach. But this soon? I'm quite surprised. Coming from someone originally from this place.
This is already a pretty awkward and Gerrymandered district. Upon looking further, It's actually pretty carefully and skillfully gerrymandered. It contains the Sam Houston Racetrack, but not adjacent Carriage lane (a relatively poor neighborhood)... It doesn't contain the poor neighborhoods along the inner side of 290 from the beltway, but does contain the more middle-class / affluent parts. It contains the Champions area, and part of the Willowbrook corridor, but not the mall itself nor all of the apartment complexes it contains... brilliantly done if I must say.

Still, the inner Houston parts, despite being very affluent, should be Skelly's base, including Bellaire, West University, and even River Oaks (one of the richest neighborhoods in the country if not the), but also the Montrose area too (the centre of gay and artistic life in the city). The Katy Freeway corridor, and most extending up to 290, should be Culberson's most reliable votes. Many of these places are still relatively undeveloped and have quite an exurban feel to it. To win the district, Skelly must carry the "swing" part of the district, the parts northeast of 290 (and perhaps the adjacent parts southwest of it too), the Jersey Village / Cy-Fair area (from which I originate). Here, there's a lot of middle class places, but also a substantial number of working class homes, and rapidly built appartment complexes. It probably also has most of the districts minorities, with a large amount of hispanics, blacks, and asians (including south asians), and probably increasing in hispanic population. This part, as well as the Katy Freeway corridor, probably accounts for most of the district's growth, which I'm estimating has grown at least 200,000 since 2000.

I didn't think this would be a race just yet, but this certainly does excite me.


by KainIIIC on Wed Apr 02, 2008 at 07:09:26 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.