Toughening Up Obama

As someone who spent a decade and a half idolozing Hillary Rodham Clinton, and fiercely defending her from ridiculous and vicious right-wing smears, I've been reeling from a series of consecutive heartbreaks these past months. I've been devastated as she has crawled into bed with slime like Mark Penn, virtually campaigned for McCain, then assumed the very same empty, nasty, divisive right wing attack strategies so long and so unfairly leveled against herself and her husband.

Early in the campaign, Hillary's centrist and DLC tacking pushed me toward Edwards, but I was more than ready to stump for her in the general. But by now, I've been casting about for ways not to hate this woman with that special, thousand-white-hot-sun heat that only the faithful who've been jilted and betrayed can feel.

And I think I've found it.

For those others in my position, who once could only dream that Hillary might someday be a serious presidential candidate, who dutifully swallowed the bitter pills of NAFTA and the 1996 Telecom Act (neither of which Hillary opposed at the time), as well as Hillary's Iraq, Patriot Act and bankruptcy bill votes, trusting that she was just waiting for her moment and not really GOP-lite, perhaps you too have felt sucker-punched by Hillary's recent campaign choices. Perhaps, like me, you can't quite imagine how you might look past her shivving and shanking enough pull a lever for her, if it came to that.

Let us remember, though, that the Tonya Harding and kitchen sink treatment that Hillary is dishing out is kid gloves compared to what the GOP will do. Hillary may be scorched-earth, kamikaze campaigning as far as the Democratic party is concerned, but the fires of hell are the GOP's speciality.

The same swiftboaters who push-polled South Carolina in 2000 about McCain's "out-of-wedlock black baby," the same ones who called McCain "the canary" (because he was supposedly so eager to "sing" under interrogation, and eager to remain in Vietnam as an agent of the Viet Cong), the ones who called McCain "crazy" and "unstable" due to his years under torture--these are the cretins who will be turning their guns on Obama, if he is the nominee.

The GOP will not only play the predictable "elitist" card (with all the added punch of "uppity negro" subtext), they will ramp up the "Muslim" and "potential traitor" charges, they will call him a Marxist and a "snake oil" salesman and a Don King Rezko agent of smarm, and they will endlessly strike the Wright and Weather Underground chords. They may stage an October invasion of Iran. Whoever the Democratic nominee, we will see the filthiest, most malicious, evil campaign tactics from the GOP ever known to man.

And that is before the voting machines.

It is imperative that Obama continue to find ways to counter Hillary's lowest blows, and to practice fighting back hard without getting into the gutter himself. The high road is self-preserving in a Democratic race, but it will be the best tactic in the general as well, because for some reason the librul media will not brook anything nasty against their "maverick hero" McCain (shoot, they won't even report the fact that he still doesn't know Sunni from Shia).

Yes, we need to point it out when Hillary's attacks on Obama are outrageous and hypocritical (she's helped bust unions, she supported NAFTA, the bankruptcy bill, special deals with China, and the war, has taken lobbyist money from the worst corporate offenders, and acts like SHE'S the one who's had the workin' peoples' backs all along?). We can bemoan the fact that, when faced with GOP and GOP-lite, the voters go with GOP every time.

But Obama folks, because we need to not-hate Hillary, because we will ultimately need to rally behind her, either as Senator or Speaker or Secretary of State or presidential nominee, think of her as the harsh sensei, as the dirty-fighting scrimmage opponent, as the hurricane Wilma before hurricane Katrina.

She may not intend to be doing Obama any favors. But in the long run, she probably is.



Display:


Re: Toughening Up Obama (none / 0)

What doesn't kill us..


by rhetoricus on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:40:27 PM EST

Look out. (2.00 / 1)

What doesn't kill us might paralyze us for life.

But barring exessive force, there's a point to it, yes.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 01:16:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Toughening Up Obama (none / 0)

You offer no argument to consider, just hyperbole.  In fact, as soon as you wrote
"I've been devastated as she has crawled into bed with slime like Mark Penn, virtually campaigned for McCain"...your argument falls to pieces.  You see, while few Dems may hold Penn in high regard, to call him slime and avoid referencing the obvious "slime" in this campaign cycle, Rezko, makes you incredible.  
Additonally, you conveniently forget that Hillary ran a Primary campaign against an imcumbent President and the Republican Party.  After her fellow Dems, Barack included, started attacking her, and her polls and votes went south, she "returned the favor".  Now, she's still in it; to win it.
Purity! Or else!
by ChitownDenny on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 04:10:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Toughening Up Obama (none / 0)

So, Obama hired Rezko to the tune of 10 million to run his campaign? Obama didn't keep a dime from Rezko.

And you're comparing a CEO Professional Apologist for Blackwater, Monsanto, Enron, Chevron and Colombian death squads to some smalltime slumlord?

And do you really want to play the "who's been in bed with more scum buckets" game? Shall we start with the dozens of high-level criminals that WJC pardoned, presumably with the knowledge and approval of his "#1 advisor"?

And sorry, Obama's "attacks" on Hillary haven't compared.

Next.


by rhetoricus on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 05:21:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 2)

Now, I would be happy to grant you the fact that before this contentious primary season, Obama was certainly unready for a fight of this caliber, and this has prepared him and his people more than just about anything else could.

However, Senator Clinton has still been more than happy to engage in behavior bordering on political suicide and a total disregard for the Democratic party, for the sole purpose of furthering her own political career- in my opinion, anyway.

When Senator Obama gets the nomination, if she plays it off has having toughened him up, campaigns for him for the general, and he does win against Senator McCain, she will restore a great deal of political prestige to herself, and history can look favorably on this whole sordid ordeal.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:45:13 PM EST

Re: Toughening Up Obama (none / 0)

Yup, I'm hoping her concession speech, if one is warranted, will go something like:

"I said Obama wasn't ready to be president. I was proven wrong. I threw everything I had at him, and he came back stronger. He is a classy, smart, and tough man of integrity. He is everything we need right now. If you ever truly supported me and all I stood for, you will work hard to elect Barack Obama."


by rhetoricus on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:51:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 2)

I was about to agree with you wholeheartedly. Then my infant daughter squealed "EeEeEEEEEIEIOOOOOOUUU" and pooped- so I'd say she agrees, too.


Hooray for John McCain!
by ragekage on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:56:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Wow (2.00 / 1)

That's about the strongest endorsement you can hope for.

"Baby poop-worthy."


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 01:17:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for the sanity and logic.

I am an Edwardian. I still think he was our best chance in November. I will work for either remaining candidate because we can't afford another 2000. Everyone, please remember that.


by IowaMike on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:50:05 PM EST

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 1)

Great Diary.  Clinton is really helping him become a better candidate in the general.

So, I say thank you linfar, alegre, and all of the other mydd members who showed us what we're up against this fall.  Seriously.


by NewOaklandDem on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 12:57:50 PM EST

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 1)

I think the worse thing that Hillary and Bill Clinton have done is endorse John McCain to be CIC.  This will be shown in ads against Obama if he is to be the nominee.  Also, Hillary and Bill Clinton have been doing McCain's dirty work for him which I will never forgive, ever.  That aside, Hillary is better than having McCain, but it would be hard to vote for the Clintons if Hillary was to be the nominee.  Thankfully I feel strongly that Obama will be our nominee, son I won't have to pull the lever for Hillary.


by Spanky on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 01:32:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I've kinda thought this for awhile (2.00 / 1)

I have a hard time believing that Clinton could be so myopic that she'd literally try to destroy another Democrat outright... especially so incompetantly.

I'm not quite willing to dismiss the notion altogether, however.  In unguarded moments, Clinton seems haughty and arrogant ("when I last shot a gun makes no difference," "how could I possibly answer that incredibly incisive question about my husband's potential conflict of interest, you make me laugh, sir!")... but I'm truly glad that the primary has gone on this long, because it essentially vaccinates Obama against a lot of potential attacks.

Wright came out with six weeks until the PA primary, after he'd essentially locked the nomination mathmatically and gotten his true message out.  If the primary hadn't been going on, someone might've sat on it until October.  The "elitist" attack was going to be used anyways... it's a venerable chestnut in the Republican arsenal... so it's good to get it out of the way now.

Clinton has a classy way out of this.  If her concession speech discusses all the ways that Obama is beyond reproach in the various areas that she's attacked on, then both of them gain big.  She retains increased standing in the Senate and still gets her bills passed, while he shores up her demographic and probably gets Bill Clinton on the campaign trail for him (who can stay mad at Bill?).


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 01:25:58 PM EST

Re: Toughening Up Obama (2.00 / 1)

Good diary, though there is one thing I am still afraid of throughout this whole ordeal - the idea that Clinton giving the Republicans free ammo letting them dredge up even more. I'd rather let them figure out how they're going to attack Obama rather than saying "Hey, here's things we can use against him that are already prepared by someone else...and time to come up with even more of our own!"

At the very least, I do agree that the attacks he's weathered have indeed toughened him up and shown that he can do a good job at dealing with them. I just wonder if he really needs to deal with more in the primary to prove himself.


by Jaffee on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 01:28:31 PM EST

You're not giving Republicans enough credit (none / 0)

You're suggesting that they're not sleazy enough to think up the attacks Clinton has made.  Don't think that.

Clinton bringing this stuff up now just means it's coming up now instead of October.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Apr 15, 2008 at 03:59:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.