With the news of Obama's disparaging gaffe spreading like 'wild fire' across the country, Obama is playing defense in an attempt to ward off criticism that could potentially damage his candidacy for the Democratic nomination. If the news wires are any indication, then he is going to have a long and hard climb trying to explain to the American people what he "really" meant by those demeaning comments he uttered at a private-event held in San Francisco.
Obama's poorly chosen words are creating a furor, especially among 'small-town' rural and suburban voters. What is so disturbing about Obama's now "infamous" remarks, is not the context in which those words were uttered, but rather how Obama is handling the critical situation he is now faced with. Instead of denouncing his comments as "a terrible mis-statement" in the course of a campaign, he is defending his statements, and attacking his critics for attempting to make political 'hay' over the week-end.
There is no one better able to portray the meaning of the word 'bitter', then Barack Obama himself. Point in hand. It's now evident that he has trouble when it comes to dealing with controversies that surround him, and is unable to handle negative news that makes him look less like the "angelic" candidate that he portrays himself as, and more like a "demeanic" and "crazed" candidate, that is forced to backtrack on his statements in order to appease or pander to his supporters.
Now that he finds himself over a "hot stove" he is trying to divert attention away from his remarks and towards Hillary Clinton for criticizing him over his self-spoken insulting remarks. Obama seems to think that his remarks are a joke, or at the least is making a joke out of his remarks, as was evident today, when he referred to Clinton, as "Annie Oakley- packing a six-shooter on the trail", in reference to her criticism of his 'Bitter' remarks made in San Francisco. Yet with all the rhetoric that is being made in recent days over this controversy, it now appears that the 'joke' is on Obama.
When new poll numbers are released this week, and people have had an opportunity to digest the context of his speech in San Francisco, we will then know what "legs" those poorly chosen words will have in the upcoming primaries, and when the time comes for superdelegates to decide on a nominee.
See: Most Voters Disagree with Obama Comment,
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/poli
ticalintelligence/2008/04/most_voters_di
s.html
For the time being, Obama has much explaining to do, as he tries to calm the debate over what he really meant by those now regrettable comments in San Francisco. At the very least, what momentum he may have had going into Pennsylvania's contest next week has been quenched.
Furthermore, if the voters of America continue to talk about his political gaffe the way it is being portrayed at this moment, then Obama may just find himself standing on the "other side" of Pennsylvania Avenue after election day.
MSNBC-VIDEO
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/
24106234#24106234
OBAMA'S 'BITTER' COMMENTS HALTS HIS MOMENTUM
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/politics/bu
lletin/bulletin_080414.htm
OBAMA STILL FACING FALL-OUT OVER PRIVATE COMMENTS
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/
7010632115
BLUE-COLLAR DISTRUST OF OBAMA IN THE RUST-BELT
http://www.spiegel.de/international/worl
d/0,1518,547227,00.html
OBAMA'S GARY HART BLUNDER?
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/pol
itics/blog/2008/04/obamas_gary_hart_blun
der.html
|
|
|
Permalink :: 6 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.