George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops Richard Nixon's

I've recently gotten out of the habit of noting George W. Bush's abysmal approval rating. We all know that he is wildly unpopular, so passing on polling showing that fact does little to further the discourse. However, every so often a survey comes along that is worth a mention, either for some interesting data point or historical meaning. In this case, Gallup, which has been polling Americans about as long as anyone else, now finds that President Bush's disapproval rating, at 67 percent, is tied for the highest in American history. Here's Gallup's write up:

President George W. Bush's job approval rating has dropped to 28%, the lowest of his administration. Bush's approval is lower than that of any president since World War II, with the exceptions of Jimmy Carter (who had a low point of 28% in 1979), and Richard Nixon and Harry Truman, who suffered ratings in the low- to mid-20% range in the last years of their administrations.

[...]

Bush's current 28% job approval rating is at the very low end of the spectrum of approval ratings Gallup has recorded across the 11 presidents in office since World War II. The average presidential job approval rating during that time has been 55%. The highest reading, as noted, is the 90% for the current President Bush in September 2001; the lowest is the 22% for Truman in February 1952.

Only three presidents in Gallup's history have received job approval ratings of 28% or lower:

  • Carter's low point of 28% was measured in late June and early July 1979, as the country underwent significant gas shortages and amid perceptions of a failing economy.
  • Nixon had a number of readings below 28% in 1973 and 1974 prior to his leaving office as a result of the Watergate scandal.
  • Truman recorded a number of readings below 28% in 1951 and 1952 as his administration was beset, similar to the current situation for Bush, with problems relating to the economy and an unpopular war (in Korea).

Of note is the fact that George W. Bush has now descended below the low point of his father's (George H.W. Bush's) administration. The senior Bush had a reading of 29% in July and August 1992. The former president also recorded a high point of 89%, the highest on record until his son's 90% in September 2001. Both Bushes, in short, have undergone radical 60-point drops in job approval in the course of their administrations.

As you can see, there have been Presidents in the past who have had lower approval ratings than George W. Bush, thus there have been less popular Presidents in the past. However, never before has a President's disapproval rating been higher, according to Gallup -- no President has ever been this unpopular (notice the difference between the two metrics).

The only President whose disapproval rating has come close to matching George W. Bush's was Richard Nixon. Back in August 1974, immediately preceding his retirement announcing, Nixon's disapproval rating stood at 66 percent, with 24 percent approving. Although the 1 percentage point difference between the disapproval ratings of George W. Bush today and Richard Nixon then is not statistically significant, the history books will now have to record the current President as the one holding the record for the highest ever disapproval rating. How's about that?

Update [2008-4-11 21:45:31 by Jonathan Singer]: Well, it looks like Harry Truman's disapproval rating went up to 67 percent in a January 1952 Gallup poll. So George W. Bush isn't the sole holder of the highest ever disapproval rating, according to Gallup, he's just one of the two holders of that ignominious title.



Display:


Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops R (none / 0)

I truly think that even though Bush has been a terrible (and I mean TERRIBLE) president, he's going to be a Godsend in the general.  When you contrast the positions of McCain and Bush on most of the big issues that our nation faces, they are identical.  Even the issues that they used to differ on (torture, for example) McCain has slid to the right and backpedaled.  Bush isn't necessarily an albatross to hang around McCain's neck, but drawing similarities between the two is going to prove to be beneficial.  If we can get the public past the "Maverick" persona, we'll be able to paint him for exactly what he is: A continuation of George W. Bush policies.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 06:49:32 PM EST

Watch how fast (2.00 / 2)

the movement conservatives claim that the policy was ok, but that Mr. 68% just executed them badly. McCain, of course, will be competent...

It is not enough to tie McCain to Bush, we must make the case that Bush's failure is the failure of the conservative movement.


"Once in a while you get shown the light In the strangest of places if you look at it right"
by molly bloom on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 06:59:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Watch how fast (2.00 / 1)

Excellent point.  Conservatives had a virtual stranglehold over our government for 6 years and as of now, the vast majority (70 something percent) of Americans think we are on the right track.  Not only do we need to point out that conservatives were at the helm for this wrong turn, we need to make the case for what we will do to get us on the right path again.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:04:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Watch how fast (none / 0)

Surely you meant "the vast majority of Amercans think we are on the WRONG track"?


by creeper1014 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 09:48:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Watch how fast (none / 0)

They're already doing it.  Heck, I hear from conservatives now that Bush isn't and wasn't a conservative.

My answer to that is always the same: I ask if Reagan was a conservative.  They say yes.  They I say, "So Bush would become a conservative if he'd raise taxes like Reagan did, speak to our enemies like Reagan did with Gorbachev, pull our troops out of a mideast quagmire like Reagan did in Lebanon, apologize for some of America's mistakes like Reagan did over internment, and give illegal immigrants amnesty?"

I always point out that Bush is actually far more rightwing than Reagan, they just don't like how badly his policies have failed and are trying to rationalize, like die-hard Marxists used to do with the Soviet Union.


Saxby Chambliss
by bosdcla14 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:52:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops R (2.00 / 2)

Bush likes to compare his low approval to Harry Truman's. The difference is, Truman didn't have a fawning press to make excuses.

Without that, Bushboy would be in the teens.


The choice is simple: A President who voted for the worst of Bush's odius agenda, or one who didn't.
by Liberal Avenger on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:04:47 PM EST

Without the fawning press, he might (none / 0)

have actually gotten impeached.


by CoyoteCreek on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:00:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Without the fawning press, he might (none / 0)

That requires an opposition party.


The choice is simple: A President who voted for the worst of Bush's odius agenda, or one who didn't.
by Liberal Avenger on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 04:10:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops R (2.00 / 1)

I've lived under both Nixon and Bush and I would much rather have Nixon.

Of course, I would much rather have had Mario Cuomo or Howard Dean than either.

Nixon was paranoid and competent. Bush is a megalomaniac and incompetent.


by antiHyde on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:05:29 PM EST

funny, (none / 0)

my opinion of w hasn't changed a bit in eight years. he could hunt puppies and it wouldn't change. he could eat babies and it wouldn't change. he could............... (maybe i should stop now)


by citizendave on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:19:34 PM EST

Oh, please....go on! (none / 0)

I agree, totally.


by CoyoteCreek on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:01:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He could... (none / 0)

huff kittens?

Levity aside, I agree with you.  I despised the man when he was appointed by the Supreme Court.  My outrage has not increased...it's been at full throttle since then.


by creeper1014 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 09:54:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval (none / 0)

The only thing that could top this off would be McCain picking a Bush cabinet member to be his running mate.  Four more years indeed.


by Skaje on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:28:18 PM EST

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating (2.00 / 1)

I think we're all suffering from "outrage fatigue" when it comes to George Bush.
I remember back in 2004,when he got reelected, I thought we had seen the worst stuff we could possibly see out of him and his administration.
And then another scandal would break (attys gen'l, mishandling of billions in Iraq), and another and it just kept going.
Anyone who wants 4 more years of THAT needs their head examined.
"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:48:10 PM EST

Four More Years (none / 0)

Indulge me in a moment of tinfoilhattery, please.  Is it not pragmatic to look at this administration's actions over the past four years as an indicator that perhaps they may not be thinking of leaving?  Is it such a reach to believe that people who have treated the Constitution with total contempt for eight years would not hesitate to ignore it once more?

I think if McCain's not doing well in the polls come fall we're gonna get the mother of all October Surprises.

Returning now to the corner of my padded cell.


by creeper1014 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 10:03:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Four More Years (2.00 / 1)

Before 2004, I used to think that was tinfoilhattery.
Now, not so much...
"Who are you for? That is the wrong question. It should be who is for you?" HRC
by skohayes on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 08:59:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Four More Years (2.00 / 1)

Considering a speech GWB gave two years ago in the Rose Garden about how well he slept at night considering the deaths in Iraq...he went on to say how 'exciting' this job was and planning for 'our next 10 years'. Tin foil hat or not- that sent shivers up my spine. I have no false sense that he wouldn't take all those executive powers he has emassed over the last 7 to suspend elections in 'time of war' but Iraq won't do it for him. I'm holding my breath and won't exhale until we have elected a new CIC.


by Justwords on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 03:36:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I have always wondered what Bush - (2.00 / 1)

actually "does" as President each day.  Do you notice that he is silent, then does a fund raiser, then is silent, then goes to Texas and repeats that pattern?

He has to have been the laziest person to have ever held this office.

A QUESTION:  Unrelated to this topic (sorry).
When do you get permission to post a diary?


by CoyoteCreek on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 07:58:08 PM EST

Re: I have always wondered what Bush - (2.00 / 1)

I don't know about laziest ever...but laziest in modern history for sure.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:34:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops R (2.00 / 1)

Nixon was right on so many things, Bush doesn't even deserve to be in the same solar system with him.  And of course I'm no fan of Nixon overall, that's the point!

Every Republican President has a way of making us nostalgic for their predecessor, notwithstanding how we felt about them at the time.  I mean, when you're like "if only Bush had the good foreign policy judgment of his dad," you know something pretty fucked-up has happened in the world.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:28:53 PM EST

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval (none / 0)

This does not suprise me at all, but for the life of me, I can't figure out why McCain polls essentially tied with our Dems in a GE matchup-this makes NO sense to me....sigh...


by Roberta on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 08:48:41 PM EST

Why Is McCain Polling Even? (2.00 / 1)

It's because there has been no Democratic campaign aimed at hanging the Bush albatross around his neck.  He's getting a pass from John Q., who still hasn't figured out that Republicans are dangerous.  

And the way our Democratic Congress is behaving, can you blame him?  John Q. thinks all politicians are crooks.  Party doesn't mean that much to him any more.   He's just looking for a great guy to have a beer with.


by creeper1014 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 10:09:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval (none / 0)

Because McCain is not Bush no matter how hard we try to pin Bush's mistakes on McCain it won't work in the general. We can't use the Iraq war in the general when the MSM and a majority of people think the 'surge' is working, whether it is or not. We can't use anti-war statements against a decorated veteran when our own Nominee's intend to take the same war to a different location. (Afghanistan)


by Justwords on Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 04:24:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Disapproval Rating (none / 0)

However, never before has a President's disapproval rating been higher, according to Gallup -- no President has ever been this unpopular (notice the difference between the two metrics).

I can't find anything in the quoted material to indicate what the "disapproval" rating is.  Given than some must have "no opinion", one cannot assume that the disapproval rating is 100 minus the approval rating.  The story is is all about his high disapproval rating but the only figure cited is the 28% approval rating.

Or am I being dense?


by creeper1014 on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 09:46:07 PM EST

Re: George W. Bush's Disapproval Rating Now Tops R (none / 0)

Time for the Old Media to think about hanging their own Mission Accomplished banner. They should be quite proud of the job they have done enabling the wrecking of America by this current gang.


by usedmeat on Fri Apr 11, 2008 at 11:38:04 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.