Why I support Change Congress

(Crossposted at Veritosity.com)

NOTE: For an explanation of what Blogrolling for Change is and how to get involved, click here.

When I was a senior in high school, The Nation had a contest where they asked high school and college students across the country what the most important issue facing young people was. In writing my response I deliberately chose to misread the question - rather than telling The Nation what I thought young people cared about the most, I decided to tell them what I thought the most important issue was, period. The answer? Undue corporate power and influence, particularly when it comes to the American political process.

Why that? Why did I get the vapors over a little dirty money changing hands when people are fighting and dying in Iraq, when millions of Americans are going without healthcare, when we're facing a global environmental crisis and there are a million other problems that have a bigger direct impact on the lives of all of us as American citizens?

Because, as Lawrence Lessig said in the powerpoint presentation explaining what Change Congress is: This might not be the most important problem, but it is the first one. Without serious reform in the American policy process, we're going to continue to be deprived of the substantive policy changes that need to be made.

Our legislative process is badly broken. American democracy is wounded. And until we mend it, every other policy problem we face is only going to get harder to fix.

Change Congress



Display:


Re: Why I support Change Congress (none / 0)

Ooohrah, buddy, you got my support.


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Sun Mar 30, 2008 at 07:53:47 PM EST

"Change Congress" . . . (none / 0)

. . .is the slush fund set up by pseudo-reformer Lessig to avoid returning the money donated to his brief, abortive run for Congress. Lessig talks about "clean money" and "reforming" Congress, but only at the last minute did he announce that the money given to his campaign would not be returned to the donors, but given instead to this thing he has now created, and that he himself, is in charge of. It sounds awfully like a PAC to me. People are to give money to it, and then Lessig (and serial campaign loser Trippi) will decide which politicians to dole it out to.

Why can't people just donate money to the candidates that they think are worthy, or, even, that they decide meet the requirements that Lessig lays out, without his involvement? Sounds like Lessig wants to buy himself some influence with some U.S. Representatives. Maybe then some of them will support his next lame attempt to run for office, or his gross copyright infringing patron, Google.

By the way, your link to Lessig's little charade doesn't work. No loss though, because Lessig's videos are invariably pompous, tedious to the point of exhaustion, self-valorizing, and utterly unpersuasive anyway.

Lessig is a complete phony, a "coin-operated legal expert," and a hypocritical advocate of a "free culture" in knowledge who draws a handsome salary from an institution that could serve as a paradigm for the monopolization of knowledge: the elite, private, law school at Stanford University.


by freemansfarm on Sun Mar 30, 2008 at 10:05:03 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.