The answer is yes.  But Hillary wont't do that.  She is already promising a credentials fight on the floor of the convention.

I have said it earlier  , the elites , the media pundits and obama allies would try there best to get here out of the race before Pennsylvania because they fear what would happen in that state.

Her support is firm in Pennsylvania and if I were you I won't bother with it.

She is not going anywhere

I would caution about making too many "assumptions" about this particular presidential election.  So far, most assumptions have been wrong.

We are assuming that we are hurting the party in November. But who is doing the "assuming"? Mostly Obama supporters who want Hillary out, or vice-versa.

Truth is, we don't know what will happen in the next 6 months.  

The race is probably great for downticket contests because of the infrastructure buildup.  Whether it's good for our presidential chances remains to be seen.

Don't mean to be a centrist here, but I think it is both bad and good.  First, the bad.  The long primary fight is bad only in that each side's heavy partisans have hardened their position against the other so much that it will be hard to get them back to not only supporting the other candidate in the general election, but losing them to McCain.  Right now, you have between 20% - 25% of their supporters saying that they will not support the other in the general election.  What makes it that more damaging is that many of those 20-25% are saying they would vote for McCain over the Democratic nominee.  Any of those people who do that are basically giving 2 votes away.  One to McCain and subtracting one from the Democratic nominee.  If, for instance, those people simply sat out the presidential race, it is only 1 vote lost which, in theory, could be made up by increased turnout.

Now, the good.  This long fight is definitely energizing Democratic voters throughout all 50 states.  That can not be over emphasized.  Many of those states have basically been ignored for 25 years as unwinable and therefore not worth the effort.  If we've learned anything since Howard Dean took over the DNC, it is that building the Democratic Party everywhere is not only necessary but productive as well.  Without the 50 state strategy, would we have won as many Congressional races in 2006 and won special elections like IL-14 this year?  I don't think so.  The primary season has forced the candidates to build organizations in all the states and ID'ing these voters now, means we don't have to start from scratch in September and October.  

What has the extended primary cost us? Look around. McCain rising in the polls. Intra-party war. How about the cost? It's going to cost each of the candidates $100 million or more to finish this out. All money that could be used against McCain. I like Begala, a lot, but in any question where one answer coincides with what the Hillary camp wants, that's where he's going.