changed his mind over a year ago, according to the NYT:

But now, as Mrs. Clinton is running for the Democratic presidential nomination, Mr. Scaife's checkbook is staying in his pocket.

Christopher Ruddy, who once worked full-time for Mr. Scaife investigating the Clintons and now runs a conservative online publication he co-owns with Mr. Scaife, said, "Both of us have had a rethinking."

"Clinton wasn't such a bad president," Mr. Ruddy said. "In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways, and Dick feels that way today."

And:

Some of her former antagonists say that terrorism and war have made the political battles of her husband's administration -- gay men and lesbians in the military, the White House travel office, Monica Lewinsky -- seem remote, if not trivial.

"I think the country is burned out on it," said Cliff Jackson, a lawyer in Little Rock, Ark., who helped set in motion several scandals involving accusations of philandering by Mr. Clinton. Mr. Jackson said he had no plans to oppose Mrs. Clinton's candidacy, and in a personal blog he recently praised her husband's post-presidential efforts to fight AIDS in Africa.

The whole article is here: http://tinyurl.com/22v66p

That doesn't make it any less creepy, though.

no, i've just come to the realization that he's 95% business and 5% artist.  that's fine, but it doesn't make him qualitatively different from other big-name stars such as Led Zeppelin or Pearl Jam or P-Diddy.    Just how it is in the music biz.

I used to be an Obama supporter until the group think of my fellows started to really get to me.  The funny thing about being in a group of Obama supporters, is that everyone is so kind and generous to one another, until the pack comes across someone from the other side- its disgusting.

Yes, where is the proof that Clinton leaked this information?

Sounds like Olivia Newton-John to me.

Sorry.  It's late, that ad for "The Tudors" is becoming more disgusting every time it rolls by and the morphine is kicking in.

'Night, nurse.

Reading Is Fundamental.  I was pointing out that MyDD is (was?) better than that.  

I don't think asking you to back up an assertion with some facts is out of line.  It should be expected.

the actual question.

Just switch the conversation to something else.

accepted knowledge???

Where is your evidence?

come on, bring it!!!

Rambling is as rambling does.

Lori and then YOU are the ones who made the allegation, the burden of proof falls upon YOU to support YOUR argument.  

Apparently you're confused as to how this works.

something DID not happen?
How asinine is that?

Tell ya what?
I am gonna say you at some point stole retirements from 100 senior citizens.
Now prove it did not happen!!!

You can't prove a negative.

Drudge leaks anything he can.  And I belive that it is common practice for speech copy to be pre-released.

The righteous tone of some guy's comment on the internet has convinced me: Obama cannot win.  Math be damned!

Gee.  Good argument.

I'll not deny there is a circular dimension to a lot of the BHO-HRC chit chat.  It's like a dog chasing it's tail.  One side rolls out their stuff, then the other side rolls out the responses, then we do the whole thing over and over and over and.....

Occasionally we get new fodder, but it's mostly trite when compared to the questions of character and ability that make a good president.

I can do the discussion on the merits (which strongly favor BHO), but this other stuff seems to be more popular, so I participate.

As much as myDD folks may not like it, the dKos conversation is, on average, much more serious than it is here.  I often learn things over there.  Some of the hardcore HRC supporters see victory in a no holds barred fight.  This can only work for HRC if the BHO supporters don't respond.  But, that's not going to happen.  So, it is what it is.  And, it's just starting; this will be much worse before it's over.

Jennifer are you going to give the same advice to Alegre? Because she is the queen of cut and paste.