Progressives for Obama

 title=

Today Tom Hayden, Bill Fletcher, Jr., Barbara Ehrenreich and Danny Glover published a open letter to American progressives urging them to join them and support Barack Obama. Why? Because Obama's campaign is a movement.


We intend to join and engage with our brothers and sisters in the vast rainbow of social movements to come together in support of Obama's unprecedented campaign and candidacy. Even though it is candidate-centered, there is no doubt that the campaign is a social movement, one greater than the candidate himself ever imagined

I think this is a very important letter and I'll take a deeper look at it in this essay.

First let's get write into the article and it's key point. Forming a progressive force within the Obama coalition.

All American progressives should unite for Barack Obama. We descend from the proud tradition of independent social movements that have made America a more just and democratic country. We believe that the movement today supporting Barack Obama continues this great tradition of grassroots participation, drawing millions of people out of apathy and into participation in the decisions that affect all our lives. We believe that Barack Obama's very biography reflects the positive potential of the globalization process that also contains such grave threats to our democracy when shaped only by the narrow interests of private corporations in an unregulated global marketplace. We should instead be globalizing the values of equality, a living wage and environmental sustainability in the new world order, not hoping our deepest concerns will be protected by trickle-down economics or charitable billionaires. By its very existence, the Obama campaign will stimulate a vision of globalization from below.

As progressives, we believe this sudden and unexpected new movement is just what America needs. The future has arrived. The alternative would mean a return to the dismal status quo party politics that has failed so far to deliver peace, healthcare, full employment and effective answers to crises like global warming.

During past progressive peaks in our political history--the late thirties, the early sixties--social movements have provided the relentless pressure and innovative ideas that allowed centrist leaders to embrace visionary solutions. We find ourselves in just such a situation today.

.......

Obama's March 18 speech on racism was as great a speech as ever given by a presidential candidate, revealing a philosophical depth, personal authenticity, and political intelligence that should convince any but the hardest of ideologues that he carries unmatched leadership potentials for overcoming the divide-and-conquer tactics that have sundered Americans since the first slaves arrived here in chains.

Only words? What words they were.

However, the fact that Barack Obama openly defines himself as a centrist invites the formation of this progressive force within his coalition. Anything less could allow his eventual drift towards the right as the general election approaches. It was the industrial strikes and radical organizers in the 1930s who pushed Roosevelt to support the New Deal. It was the civil rights and student movements that brought about voting rights legislation under Lyndon Johnson and propelled Eugene McCarthy and Bobby Kennedy's antiwar campaigns. It was the original Earth Day that led Richard Nixon to sign environmental laws. And it will be the Obama movement that will make it necessary and possible to end the war in Iraq, renew our economy with a populist emphasis, and confront the challenge of global warming.

Since I have came onto the blogs I have defended Obama from attacks saying that he is too conservative and that we as progressives shouldn't back anyone who is not perfect. However finally these leaders have put my point into better words.

Barack Obama is not a perfect canidate and he does not have the right stance on everything. However Barack Obama was a community organizer and thus more then any other major canidate in history he will listen. FDR wouldn't have proposed the New Deal in the 80's or at other conservative times. He proposed the New Deal and other progressive reforms because people organized for change. There was a groundswell of support for such change. That is how we passed civil rights, womens rights, economic rights, labor rights, environmental laws. Name any progressive legislation. It was not enacted by a bunch of politicians, it was enacted by a grassroots movement.

The writers suggest three issues in particular that must be in a larger progressive vision.


We should not only keep the pressure on but also connect the issues that Barack Obama has made central to his campaign into an overarching progressive vision.

  The Iraq War must end as rapidly as possible, not in five years.

All our troops must be withdrawn. Diplomacy and trade must replace further military occupation or military escalation into Iran and Pakistan. We should not stop urging Barack Obama to avoid leaving American advisers behind in Iraq in a counterinsurgency quagmire like Afghanistan today or Central America in the 1970s and 1980s. Nor should he simply transfer American combat troops from the quagmire in Iraq to the quagmire in Afghanistan.

  Iraq cannot be separated from our economic crisis.

Iraq is costing trillions of dollars that should be invested in jobs, universal healthcare, education, housing and public works here at home. Our own Gulf Coast requires the attention and funds now spent on Gulf oil.

*  Iraq cannot be separated from our energy crisis.

We are spending an unheard-of $100/barrel for oil. We are officially committed to wars over oil supplies far into the future. We instead need a war against global warming and for energy independence from Middle Eastern police states and multinational corporations.

And despite past support of other canidates all urge a strong call to action

We did not foresee the exciting social movement that is the Obama campaign. Many of us supported other candidates, or waited skeptically as weeks and months passed. But the closeness of the race makes it imperative that everyone on the sidelines, everyone in doubt, everyone vascillating, everyone fearing betrayals and the blasting of hope, everyone quarreling over political correctness, must join this fight to the finish. Not since Robert Kennedy's 1968 campaign has there been a passion to imagine the world anew like the passion and unprecedented numbers of people mobilized in this campaign.

I will say it again. Barack Obama is not perfect. I disagree with him on many issues. I also agree with him on a lot of issues. But if we as progressives want to make progress on the major issues of our day attacking Barack Obama will not help. We need to build a progressive force within the Obama campaign and a independent social movement for change outside of the campaign. Attacks won't get Obama to change, organizing groundswell support will.

The Obama campaign has brought millions of new people into politics. People who didn't care about about politics before. People who are realizing the scope of problems that we face and are finally feeling empowered to do something about it. We need to make sure those people are still working for change after the election so we can pass Obama's bold agenda. In areas that could be stronger we must organize so they are stronger. In areas that are perhaps to strong for some in Congress we will have to organize to get them to listen.

Barack Obama would be the best listener to the grassroots that we have ever had as a president. If we can build as strong of social movements as we had in the 30's and 60's he will listen and he will fight for change.

Right now there are three ways we can start working towards that goal.

1. More Voices: At the key of all progressive social and political movements is involvement. If we are going to build a Obama movement we will need more voices in the political process. We will need to register more voters. Barack Obama lead a voter registration drive that registered 150,000 new voters after he finished collage. I recently wrote a essay about that and how we can get involved. Read it and help bring more voices to the political process.

2. Elect Barack Obama: If we are to build a Obama movement we need to elect Barack Obama. Outside of registering new voters the best way for people not in a upcoming state to help is by donating to him via the Obamathon and calling delegates in Texas. There are lots of other ways to help though. What is one that you have been doing?

3. Build an Obamajority: No agenda will be passed unless there are open-minded progressives in Congress. If we want a Obama presidency and a Obama movement we also need an  Obamajority in Congress. Yesterday I launched a fundraising drive to get there featuring three canidates, Darcy Burner, Rick Noriega and Patrick Murphy. Donate today and build an Obamajority.

However you are helping the Obama movement, whether it is by working for Obama, working for a Obamajority or working to build a independent social movement or even all of those things the time is now to take action. I always like this quote from Paul Wellstone

The future also will not belong to those who stand on the sidelines.

So what are you waiting for. Get active. Get involved in Progressives for Obama.

Yes. We. Can.



Display:


I wish I could consider Obama progressive.. (1.50 / 2)

but I am not convinced..

I'd like to be, but I am not. Quite the opposite.. I am afraid he is a stealth right wing candidate...


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:02:30 PM EST

Lets just put it this way.. (2.00 / 1)

IF Obama was progressive, the right would be spending millions tearing him to shreds..

Why the silence?


Universal healthcare IS a core Democratic value
Comprehensively cover 100%, not only the healthiest 80%
by architek on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:03:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets just put it this way.. (none / 0)

They are spending millions trying to tear him to shreds.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:09:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets just put it this way.. (2.00 / 0)

Well, they are only just getting started on Obama, because stopping Clinton was job one. But rest assured, they will be attacking full force in the fall, whoever we nominate.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:14:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why are we taking cues from the right? (none / 0)

Obama is a progressive.  Look at his issues platform.

I don't understand why we're waiting for the Republicans to decide on how we should feel about our candidate.

The Republicans are legitimately torn by the Obama issue.  Some of them realize what a hash they've made of the country.  Others are party loyalists, long-term with no questions asked.

The rational ones can be won over if the right stance is taken.  Their party has been propped up by BS pandering to the Religious Right and other social conservatives, and it's starting to finally take its toll.  Chickens coming home to roost, indeed.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:15:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why are we taking cues from the right? (2.00 / 0)

If Obama is such a progressive, then why did he choose the chief economist of the DLC -- Austan Goolsbee, an economist even George Will can love -- as his chief economic adviser?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2007/10/03/AR2007100302003. html

Have Obama dismiss Goolsbee -- and Jeffrey Liebman and David Cutler while he's at it -- and maybe, just maybe, I'll start believing that he's a progressive.


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:39:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why are we taking cues from the right? (none / 0)

Goolsbee is one of the most brilliant economists of this generation.   Just because George Will says "he's a smart guy" doesn't mean that he's a bad guy.

DLC?  A CLINTON supporter is talking about the DLC?


"Behold, I send you out as sheep amidst the wolves! Therefore, be as wise as a serpent, And as harmless as a dove."
by Setrak on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:57:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why are we taking cues from the right? (2.00 / 0)

I know that I'll never convince you to rethink your opinion, but I do recommend you read the following:

http://riverdaughter.wordpress.com/2008/ 01/31/the-audiology-of-hope-dogwhistle-e conomics/

Or you can read what one British fan of Goolsbee has to say about him (I esp. recommend you read the letters, most of which are written mostly by Brits who are well schooled in economics):

http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/dani el_koffler/2008/01/substance_not_style.h tml

And yes, it's true, on economic matters I am convinced that Obama is more DLC-friendly than Hillary. It's a pretty sorry state of affairs.


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 11:34:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary less DLC? (none / 0)

this is an alternate universe I don't care to visit.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:13:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hillary less DLC? (none / 0)

That figures.


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 01:25:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Whoa (none / 0)

Did you even read that?  Why would I have a problem with someone who obviously understands economics and can accurately and apolitically predict the results of economic action?

George Will is not a mindless dittohead; he wouldn't praise the guy if he weren't deserving based on legitimate points.

I want Obama being advised by the best minds of our generation, not just people that agree with him on everything.  Yes-men are one of the things that got us into this mess in the first place.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 09:50:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Whoa (none / 0)

George Will is not a mindless dittohead; he wouldn't praise the guy if he weren't deserving based on legitimate points.

No, he isn't a mindless dittohead; he's a right-wing pedant and corporate tool. Oh, but I forgot, there is no more left or right -- we've finally moved such artificial ideological constructs.

I want Obama being advised by the best minds of our generation, not just people that agree with him on everything.  Yes-men are one of the things that got us into this mess in the first place.

So tell me about the great economic minds from the left who are advising him. Why do all of his economists have to come from the anti-regulatory center-right of the political spectrum? (I know, I l know -- I'm still caught up in 20th century pardigms).


Fortune strums a mournful tune for those whose campaigns peak too soon. --Bored of the Rings
by Inky on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 01:38:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Flexible appeal (none / 0)

I think it's quite possible that the (honest) conservative ideology might have a lot of it right with regards to economic issues.  The problem is that there are very, very few honest conservatives, and most political conservatives are just trying to do favors for their big-money friends that will help them stay in power.

Obama seems to understand that this is bad for the nation, and will attempt to combine intelligent regulation and labor protection with free-market-friendly overall policies.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Mon Mar 31, 2008 at 12:02:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why are we taking cues from the right? (none / 0)

Exactly. It is ridiculous to argue Senator Obama is not a progressive candidate, imho. No one looking at his voting record and legislative agenda can honestly say otherwise.

One thing I think he's done that is good is focus on the injustice in our justice system. Making that law in Illinois that all suspect interviews be videotaped, for example. That is what progressives--and civil rights "conservatives" (conservative to protect the bill of rights)--should be impressed by.


by bethmydd on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 09:35:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

well, since Hillary's doing such a good job of it (2.00 / 2)

Rush Limbaugh and his ilk are attempting to prolong Hillary's campaign so she can do their work for them.


by hekebolos on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:20:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wish I could consider Obama progressive.. (none / 0)

Strange.  In another diary I've been discussing with  a HIllary supporter about his/her reason for wanting to vote McCain should Obama win the nomination.

The reason?

To punish the left wing of the party, for nominating a candidate who's too much of a "leftist."

Of course, you're not accountable for another Hillary supporter's position, but it IS a pretty strange dichotomy, these two positions, and they're extremely difficult to reconcile in any way, whatsoever.


No way. No how. No McCain.
by freedom78 on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 01:12:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wish I could consider Obama progressive.. (none / 0)

I am certain he is a stealth right wing candidate, who is going to give a free pass to his Wall St and K St backers to further the right wing strip mining of our country. His advisors and right wing economic positions affirm further "free market solutions" to problems that deserve an emphasis on the public good, not maximizing investor return, like health care, will succeed in further destroying the middle class and American Dream.

Those progressives who back him now will be self righteously condemning him later, claiming, "I was robbed". You were. Pay more attention and be a little more discerning next time, don't get taken in by glitz with no substance. And don't help destroy the real progressive candidate, Hillary Clinton. I'm profoundly disappointed and revolted by my fellow progressives and their tactics and behavior..


by 07rescue on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:21:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I wish I could consider Obama progressive.. (none / 0)

Listening to the stories about his interraction with Rezko, it's easy to believe that Obama is just another corrupt run of the mill politician.

In other words, a rightist.


Until recently I was selling drugs, and now I'm selling Obama T-shirts.
by switching sides on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:54:52 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Good one. (none / 0)

How does someone remain a stealth right wing candidate for over a decade of elected service?

What do you call someone who says that they're a Democrat, gains mostly Democratic votes, pushes Democratic legislation, and vocally opposes Democratic opponents?

A Republican?  That doesn't make much sense.

Hillary Clinton has gotten support from Newt Gingrich in the past, Bill Clinton has met with Karl Rove, and their senior advisor Mark Penn owns a company that provides John McCain with his top advisors, despite the company having a clause that prevents their employees and subsidiaries from working at cross purposes.  Clinton has used every trick in the Republican playbook, plus stuff that even the Republicans won't do (McCain and Huckabee both defended Obama on the Wright issue, and now Clinton is bringing it up?).  Do I think that Clinton is a "stealth right wing candidate?"  Well, if she were, it wouldn't be so stealthy, but no.  I take her on her word that she's a Democrat.

Give Obama the same respect, please.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:06:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Great Letter, Better Diary. (2.00 / 2)

This is the very sort of postive diary that should be posted.  I cannot agree more with its basic tenants and specific details.


by a gunslinger on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08:20 PM EST

Re: Great Letter, Better Diary. (2.00 / 1)

I don't agree with a many of the things in the diary, or more accurately I am not convinced of it. Nevertheless, this Clinton supporter is reccomending the diary, because it is a substantive and wholly positive one.

I find that refreshing.


Your attempt to change the subject to "the issues" is irrelevant.
by itsthemedia on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 11:03:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Great Letter, Better Diary. (none / 0)

I cannot disagree more with this letter and it's content, I think it is sadly mistaken, and the people who have written it don't know what they are talking about. If they aren't willing to do the research and be more careful about endorsing a center right economic candidate then they do not deserve consideration of their views. They shouldn't be misleading progressives this way.


by 07rescue on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:24:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Glover? (none / 0)

Danny Glover is a crap actor, and a worse 'progressive'.

So why is he for Obama?

Maybe for the same reason the 90 percent of AA's are going for Obama?

Race?


Until recently I was selling drugs, and now I'm selling Obama T-shirts.
by switching sides on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:56:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lethal Weapon 2 rocked. (none / 0)

And Danny Glover is too old to put up with this s**t.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:07:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

If they disagree with Danny (none / 0)

they need only call him a "crap actor" and order is restored to their world.  How pathetic.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:17:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Well, he'd be the paragon of acting ability... (none / 0)

...if he only supported Clinton.

Also he'd prove that he was 1000% better than all those pesky black people that only support Obama because of their skin color.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:30:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Progressives for Obama (2.00 / 2)

The movement is what brought me into the Obama camp. I was an ardent Edwards supporter, and I was really unsure of who to support after he dropped out.

I'm a PA voter and a recent college grad. There's a groundswell of support for Obama among young voters here, and it's so very encouraging.

I've been involved Young Dems stuff for a few years, and Obama's candidacy is injecting some much needed excitement to young people.


John McCain: Four More Years of Failure.
by dannybauder on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:21:52 PM EST

Is this a cut 'n paste (none / 0)

diary?
2. Elect Barack Obama: If we are to build a Obama movement we need to elect Barack Obama. Outside of registering new voters the best way for people not in a upcoming state to help is by donating to him via the Obamathon and calling delegates in Texas. There are lots of other ways to help though. What is one that you have been doing?

If not, knock yourself out with the Texas activism...

by Coldblue on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:21:59 PM EST

Follow the link (2.00 / 1)

Texas still isn't over.


"Live your beliefs and you can turn the world around." --Thoreau
by Populista on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:25:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the link (none / 0)

It's over.

Hillary won the popular vote.


by Coldblue on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:29:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the link (2.00 / 1)

It's about delegates.


"Behold, I send you out as sheep amidst the wolves! Therefore, be as wise as a serpent, And as harmless as a dove."
by Setrak on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:50:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Follow the link (none / 0)

Meaningless unless it seals the nomination. It won't.


by Coldblue on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:54:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Then why is Clinton robo-calling delegates? (none / 0)

I've gotten reports that Clinton is auto-calling Texas caucus delegates so that she can convince them to switch sides at the Texas convention.

That would suggest that Clinton doesn't think it's over.


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 09:54:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Progressives for Obama (2.00 / 2)

Yes, very nice diary!

And I want to share.  I just got back from the pre-convention party for my precinct in Austin and I am finally fired up again.  

I can't seem to go on these candidate sites without getting pissed off.  I don't hate anybody.  I loves me some Bill and Hillary.  I am not ashamed of that.  I refuse to be swayed by hate from anyone.

I am a delegate for Obama.  And we had a great time plotting and scheming about how to get the most state delegates, etc.  We are ready to convene Saturday morning.  Our car pools are full and our delegate roster is prepared.  So I am posting this one (these days unusual) happy comment and this blog site and running the heck away before I get caught up in some ugly argument!!!

hugs to all for today.


by crazyshirley2100 on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:24:00 PM EST

Re: Progressives for Obama (none / 0)

Big props for your Texas work.  It was a great success; it's a pity the media doesn't report the truth about who actually won there... but we know, and we appreciate. :)


In this avalanche, the pebbles get to vote.
by Dracomicron on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 10:11:24 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Progressives for Obama (none / 0)

Frankly, it's unhealthy to define candidates. Who is it that defines the distinctions between a progressive and a liberal. And who would suggest that a conservative approach to a balanced budget is a bad thing?

The GOP is all about single mindedness. Is that what we want for the Democratic Party? One of the enduring qualities that brought me to Senator Obama is his willingness to try and craft a consensus from all Americans.

America has great challenges ahead that cannot be addressed by the left wing or right wing. Rather, a debate joined by all shades of people is in the best interest of this great country.


by tharr on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:33:04 PM EST

Re: Progressives for Obama (none / 0)

"One of the enduring qualities that brought me to Senator Obama is his willingness to try and craft a consensus from all Americans."

Like by caving in to the moneyed interests to sell out the public good, consumer protections, and allowing unbridled capitalism to pirate the economy while common sense regulation is abandoned? Why do the Republican's work for them with progressive dollars and support for a right wing candidate? Republican solutions haven't worked for America, and are completely destroying the safety net, unions, and the middle class. Want more of the same? Vote Obama!

Don't complain later if you get what you want. You forfeited the right to complain by jumping on a PR induced bandwagon without doing your homework.


by 07rescue on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 04:30:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Progressives for Obama (none / 0)

I assure you my homework will trump your hollow rhetoric.


by tharr on Wed Mar 26, 2008 at 05:12:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Great diary (2.00 / 1)

Thanks, it's nice to see a positive post among all the Obama attack diaries.  


by furiousxgeorge on Tue Mar 25, 2008 at 10:34:12 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.