House Dems Have Another Great Special Election Pick-Up Opp.

Nice catch from The Daily Kingfish (via Breaking Blue): The Cook Political Report (subscription required) now rates the May 3rd special election in Louisiana's 6th congressional district as a "toss-up."

Meanwhile, the special election to replace GOP Rep. Richard Baker's seat in Louisiana continues to give national Republicans heartburn. Less than three weeks away from the April 5th primary runoff, competitive primaries are playing out in both parties. Insiders on both sides agree the nomination of the current favorites - moderate Democratic state Rep. Don Cazayoux and GOP newspaper publisher Woody Jenkins - would present something akin to a perfect storm for Democrats in the May 3rd special general election.

The results of the March 8th special primary illustrated Republicans' problems in this race. Like many in the South, this Baton Rouge-based district's track record at the federal level (it gave President Bush 59 percent in 2004) flies in the face of its party registration breakdown (49.6 percent Democratic to 28.1 percent Republican). But in the special primary, turnout appeared much more reflective of party registration than federal-level performance. The fact that 47,632 Democrats and just 29,875 Republicans turned out to vote is evidence of a serious enthusiasm gap between the parties. Of course, it is difficult to gauge how the district's fundamentals have changed since Hurricane Katrina added tens of thousands of new residents to the Baton Rouge area.

I've written about this race before, and it's worth noting once again that Cazayoux is a very conservative Democrat who, if elected in a month and a half, would likely find himself on the far right of his caucus in the chamber. However, it's also worth explicitly stating that Cazayoux would almost undoubtedly be a better member than Jenkins, both because he would caucus with the Democrats rather than the Republicans and because for as conservative as he is, Jenkins is that much more conservative.

Taking one step back, this race is good news for the House Democrats more broadly. The House GOP simply cannot afford to have to invest serious dollars defending another open seat special election -- particularly one that they should be able to win without an investment by the National Republican Congressional Committee (which sent out more money than it took in last month). If the Republicans keep on having to pour money into safe districts like Illinois 14 (which leans about 5 points more Republican than the nation as a whole in presidential elections) and Louisiana 6 (which tended to lean about 6 points more Republican than the nation as a whole before Hurricane Katrina shook things up in the state), there's simply no way they're going to be able to defend even more vulnerable seats come November -- let alone go after potentially vulnerable Democratic seats.



Display:


More Dems (none / 0)

Jonathan,

This is nice...but we don't need more Dems.  We need better Dems.  Is it totally impossible to elect a real Democrat in the state of Louisiana?

(sigh)  What am I saying.  This is, after all, the home turf of Mary Landrieux.  'Nuff said.  I'll try to content myself with the "D" after the name.


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:34:47 PM EST

Re: More Dems (none / 0)

Not true at all.  In places like these, we take what we can get.  It's seats like MD-04 where we work on getting better Dems.


"No government has the right to tell its citizens whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown
by auboy2006 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:37:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More Dems (none / 0)

Isn't that what I just said?

I'll try to content myself with the "D" after the name.


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:48:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More Dems (none / 0)

No, it isn't. You're looking for Mr. Perfect.


by spirowasright on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Aren't We All? n/t (none / 0)


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 08:41:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More Dems (none / 0)

The worst thing about what you're saying is that I saw the GOP take up a simialr mindset in the 1960s--and they won five of the next six Presidential elections.


by spirowasright on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:14:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Cazayoux? (none / 0)

How do you pronounce Cazayoux?


by howardpark on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:40:38 PM EST

Good Question (none / 0)

Kay-zee-oh ?


by antiHyde on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:12:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Cazayoux? (none / 0)

Caju , rhymes with ajou, like the gravy on roast beef


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:52:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: House Dems Have Another Great Special Election (none / 0)

(from my limited knowledge of French)

kaz A you

This one's actually a lot easier than "Hebert".  And it can't hold a candle to Natchitoches.


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:52:17 PM EST

Pronunciation (none / 0)

Ooops...accent on the first syllable.


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 04:56:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: House Dems Have Another Great Special Election (2.00 / 1)

Here's a campaign ad of his where they talk about the pronunciation of his name:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=dS_7PDI3Gfw


by alphaaqua on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:12:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

KAH-zhou. It's KAH-zhou. (none / 0)

Now, the first one of you who replies "Geshundheit" gets a troll.

Sorry, my bad.


by creeper1014 on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 08:40:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It can't hold a candle to Natchitoches. (2.00 / 1)

When I first came down here, I thought it was Natch-it-toches.  Ahhh ... but i learned ...

Nac-it-tish.  Gotta love it!


GeauxBama!
by DailyKingFish on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:48:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: House Dems (none / 0)

Man, will the NRCC have any money to spend in November?  Between spending loads of money on safe seats, and having thieves for accountants, it looks pretty good for a blue November.  Not trying to count chickens, though.  Keep up the good work!


by NewOaklandDem on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:30:46 PM EST

Caj-you (2.00 / 1)

That's how you pronounce it y'all.  Thanks for the hat tip, Jonathon.  

Cazayoux is a social conservative.  On the economic issues, he's a die-hard Democrat.  He gave a speech yesterday in which he said he would support the Employee Free Choice Act.  

Down here, that's what you get.  I'm more of a progressive, but it's the South.  We're not going to see pro-choice, pro-gay marriage types win elections here yet.  Give it time.  


GeauxBama!
by DailyKingFish on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 05:47:07 PM EST

Re: Caj-you (none / 0)

What is the Employee Free Choice Act? Forgivemy ignorance.  On a side note, what we really need is to make "at will" employment illegal and make employers accountable for their actions and provide security for their employees. Ok, sorry, rant over.


by goodleh on Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 12:03:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Caj-you (none / 0)

Provides workers with the right to unionize via signing cards stating they wish to. It would make unionizing much, much easier.


by Quinton on Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 11:05:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Ah, Hell.. (none / 0)

... give it to her. She's already screwed the party this year.  Give her the poisoned chalice and let's try this again in 2012. Obama will have more of that vaunted Washington experience, or maybe Gore will give it another go.  This thing's done.


by mikeinsf on Thu Mar 20, 2008 at 07:02:30 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.