Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago

According to one news report, Obama enjoyed the Christmas holidays in Chicago last year.  I quote:

Sunday, December 23rd 2007, 4:00 AM
PLEASANTVILLE, Iowa - A day before he will fly back to Chicago to spend Christmas with his family, a voter asked Barack Obama to explain his "Muslim background" - an Internet-fed fallacy that continues to dog his campaign.

Jeremiah Wright fulminated against Hillary Clinton while preaching from his pulpit at Trinity United Church of Christ on Christmas Day 2007.

Obama explains how he is a member of Trinity United Church of Chirst to an Iowa voter the day before he departed for Chicago for the Christmas holiday.  Was he present during this Christmas Day sermon?  Did he speak with his minister and spiritual advisor before the sermon was delivered on Christmas Day?  Was he aware of the content of Wright's sermon?  And if so, when was he alerted to the inappropriate content of Wright's sermon: Christmas Day, the day following Christmas Day, the week following Christmas Day?  Or were Barack, Michelle, Malia and Sasha standing and not "sitting" in the pews of TUCC when Wright uttered controversial comments critical of Hillary Clinton's whiteness on Christmas Day?

I await Obama's answers to my apposite questions.



Display:


Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (1.80 / 5)

Who cares?


by animated on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:11:51 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (1.91 / 12)

I do.

Tips and recommendations, please.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:16:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Nice picture, thanks.


by JoeCoaster on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:20:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 2)

Oh come on...changing the picture? Really?


by JoeCoaster on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:40:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (1.60 / 5)

I thought I should include the entire family.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:41:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

good one...mean...but good.


by JoeCoaster on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:54:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

That's pretty funny.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Another one of Obama's crazy uncles.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:26:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Thank you, truthteller... (2.00 / 3)

You really do live up to your user name.


No way, no how, no McCain! :-)
by atdleft on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:20:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Some people actually do care and they deserve our respect. Truthteller is obviously not one of them, he is just "concerned" in a trollish way.


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:20:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 5)

I care also.


by izarradar on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:18:21 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

He already answered it. He said he was not there! If is also wrong to believe that there was only one Christmas service in Trinity. So what exactly is your point again?


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:18:55 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

They think this is a gold mine of anti-Obama smear material. Obama must be destroyed (by any means neccessary) before Penn. for Hillary to have any chance.

Hillary is also going to have the right-wing smear machine working for her.

It's going to be a rough month for Obama


by JoeCoaster on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:26:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 3)

The right wing smear machine works for Hillary?

I laughed out loud when I heard that.


by Sensible on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:46:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

You must have missed the news....Rush Limbaugh is rallying the troops for Hillary.


by JoeCoaster on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:27:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Actually the picture of the family you put up has just melted away any prospect of critical language.

A really beautiful family.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:19:09 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Elliot Spitzer's family is lovely to look at.

You choose people by their looks?  Funny way to vote.


by zyx on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:43:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

It's interesting to watch you hate-mongers when you start to attack the reasonable ones among your own. Way to go.


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:16:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 6)

By the way I am getting tired of this story , I think baring any other revelation , its time to move on.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:20:33 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

I really do appreciate that coming from you.


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:33:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Same here (none / 0)

I appreciate it as well. They are a wonderful family and I really do look forward to them occupying the White House next year.


by kristannab on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:45:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Bless you for your comments. We're both East Tennesseans. We're both Democrats and we know how few there are of us in these parts. We support different candidates but we're on the same side in the end.  


by elrod on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:37:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Some people from the other side are trying to sow dissent in the midst of the democrats and they are profiting from it.

Its time to rally behind Obama as democrats.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:44:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Let me also thank you for this.  Hopefully one way or another we'll defeat McCain.


Beat McCain!
by thezzyzx on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:04:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Thanks for your honesty and decency!

There's just no legs to this story.


by Cycloptichorn on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:44:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Stay tuned!


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:27:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

yep surely he went to church on xmas day.


by zane on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:21:51 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Was he present during this Christmas Day sermon?

Maybe, maybe not. I am sure TUCC held many different series for Christmas. Even small churches hold multiple services.

Did he speak with his minister and spiritual advisor before the sermon was delivered on Christmas Day?

Maybe - but Barack Obama is a busy man. Besides, why would Obama review or critique his pastors sermon before he gave it? Obama does not advise Wright on spiritual matters. Just as Wright does not advise Obama on political matters

Was he aware of the content of Wright's sermon? And if so, when was he alerted to the inappropriate content of Wright's sermon: Christmas Day, the day following Christmas Day, the week following Christmas Day?

What did your pastor say two Sunday's ago? Do you remember? And who cares either way?

Or were Barack, Michelle, Malia and Sasha standing and not "sitting" in the pews of TUCC when Wright uttered controversial comments critical of Clinton on Christmas Day?

Way to invoke his children. What a nice thing for you to do.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:25:55 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Obama already said he wasn't there.  I don't see any evidence to the contrary.

I find it pretty funny that people think that congregants tell others what the pastor said. I've never found that and I am a semi-regular service attender.  


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:43:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (1.75 / 4)

he said he never witnessed controversial comments while he "sat" in the pews of trinity.

reread his huffington post essay.  i quote:

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation. When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign. I made it clear at the time that I strongly condemned his comments. But because Rev. Wright was on the verge of retirement, and because of my strong links to the Trinity faith community, where I married my wife and where my daughters were baptized, I did not think it appropriate to leave the church.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:45:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

There is a WHOLE OTHER PARTY that can engage in these kinds of smears. Why are you so determined to help them out?


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:50:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

hUH?

Oh wait, I get it!  He was STANDING not SITTING!  You caught him!!!  


by neonplaque on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:56:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

When you find some actual "truths", tell us about them.


by victoryfordems on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:39:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 3)

Whether he was there or not on that particular occasion is irrelevant. That man has attended that church, where that despicable pastor have been spewing hate, lies and division for 20 years. It was hard listening to him for even a few minutes. Anyone attending that church for 20 years, who considers that man his spiritual mentor,who borrowed the title of his book from his sermon, who was married by him, had him baptize his children, who donated thousands of dollars for that church,who chose him to serve an advisory role in his campaigs, has to agree with the aberrations that reverend preaches. Obama is a liar and should do the right thing and step down now, while there is still some time to unite the party. Nobody in his/her right mind will believe a word he or his surrogates say to try to spin that in any positive light.
Obama, please step down.
by RC01 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 02:55:48 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Here's the audio from one of Wright's sermons, the one Obama has cited as inspiration for the title of his book:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFZROa0rl MU


by davisb on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:10:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

In case you're interested, you can read Wright's Audacity of Hope sermon.  I've posted it in my diary: http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/3/16/1052 16/271

I hope you come back and tell us what you think of it and how, if at all, it affects your views.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:10:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Why hasn't Obama Apologized to Hillary (2.00 / 2)

and Bill???????????

Obama needs to apologize, and his pastor need to apologize for what his 20 year associate and person intimately involved in his campaign said about them personally on Christmas day.


by chieflytrue on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:35:18 PM EST

Re: Why hasn't Obama Apologized to Hillary (none / 0)

I just watched that whole video from Christmas day, and I don't understand what in it you think Obama needs to apologize for. What did he say that was untrue or offensive?


by MaximumBob on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:07:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why hasn't Obama Apologized to Hillary (2.00 / 1)

He assumes HIllary Clinton, a woman, never experienced oppression.  He also assumes human beings are incapable of exercising a sociological imagination.  Empathy, I guess, is an emotion Jeremiah Wright does not understand.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:23:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why hasn't Obama Apologized to Hillary (none / 0)

I guess you missed the question:

I don't understand what in it you think Obama needs to apologize for

You do get that Jeremiah Wright and Barack Obama aren't the same person, don't you?

He assumes HIllary Clinton, a woman, never experienced oppression.  

Who "assumes" that?


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:40:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why hasn't Obama Apologized to Hillary (2.00 / 2)

Obama doesn't need to apologize to anyone. He is above criticisms,above scrutiny. He can lie, distort people's words, smear anyone, use the race card every time someone questions him on anything and accuse anybody who sees him for the fake that he is of being racist. He has done an unimaginable harm to the party by conducting his campaign the way he does and showing a highly unpleasant and repulsive aspect of his personality. Dividing people on race is the most abject tactic to win a campaign I've ever witness in my life, and I hope I will never see that again. He makes George Bush seem noble and honorable in comparison, and I'm sure in the end Americans will get it and reject him, because we don't want or need the kind of change he is inspiring.


by RC01 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:25:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 2)

'd be more inclined to accept his explanations if he'd been forthcoming earlier, if he weren't claiming he didn't know, and if he hadn't been using every possible opportunity (damn few there have been) to claim Hillary's been behind remarks that attribute his negatives to his race. She would gain nothing by that and there is no reason to think she's got a race issue, clearly that's belongs more to his supporters than to hers. But she does point out differences in qualifications and experience, and in the depth and detail of their plans, and between her Iraq exit plan and his, her universal health care plan and his, issue things. He's disingenuous in suggesting these issue based differences she campaigns on are really meant to 'smear' him, she'd be running on her own positives and her own plans and her own professional and experienced advisors, on her own record, whomever she were running against. obama is running on his so-called superior judgement and I think he's used poor judgement in acting like the victim of racism.


Hillary - alternative energy
by anna shane on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:44:40 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 2)

Are you people tripping?
The moment Obama  secures the Dem (if), 527's will start their engines and  hammer this issue into the collective consciousness.
sound bytes will echo through the airwaves.
"God damn America" along with endless montages of Obama and Wright, Michelle's latte'-liberal sounding quotes, the crap about AIDS being a genocidal conspiracy, as well as the comparisons to Jesus' plight will be on perma-loop.
This WILL NOT FLY with Nascar demographic Obamacans and Independents. Do you really think they'll have as nuanced a view as any of you literati?
You need to give me a tab of that, because you are tripping and i want to see unicorns too.
GEP
General
Election
Poison
by Zorkon on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:55:23 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 3)

Yep. It's going to be seared into the minds of voters. Twenty years at that church and he just happened to miss all the "controversial sermons". Cue the laugh track. He's toast.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:01:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

If you think the Democratic nominee (none / 0)

is going to be toast in November, you should be joining up to help prevent that happening instead of laughing about it.  Unless you are a republican, in which case laugh away as you won't be laughing in November.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:12:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: If you (2.00 / 3)

Face reality. I nor you can undo the huge problem Obama has. The only opportunity we have at this point to win the election is to not nominate him.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:24:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I would like (2.00 / 1)

to see this sort of thing directed towards Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton to just .... Stop.

I guess I am glad that a lot of this kind nonsense is coming out before the GE about both of them, because the righties and rove will be relentless. When looking back at this period in time later in the year (no matter who our nominee is), we will all see how minor it is compared to what rove and crew WILL do!

Anyone who would blame Hillary Clinton for this mess with Obama and Wright is a fool. You should be glad it is coming out now and not later. If Obama is the nominee, the righties would have used this and more! They still will use this crap and Obama will need to find a way to blunt it or kill it.

My thoughts...


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 03:56:47 PM EST

Re: I would like (2.00 / 2)

So far, response not good. Donna Brazille is defending Wright. Thanks for the damage Donna.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:02:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

ugh (2.00 / 3)

I could see defending why he maybe said some things but NOT what he said and how.

The one thing I see most people forgetting is this.

WHY is this church and many others allowed to delve into politics like this? Wright obviously supports Obama and actively campaigns for him IN church and IN his sermons from the pulpit.

Do politics in church, loose your tax exempt status. Period.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:07:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: ugh (none / 0)

Well, many churches of all stripes get involved in politics, with a nudge and a wink at best to the laws regarding tax exemptions.

For the last several years, the Bush Administration has been using the IRS to target black churches that allegedly engage in partisan politics.  (They also went after the NAACP on the same basis.)  They completely ignore, however, the vast number of right-wing evangelical churches which engage in the exact same behavior, only it benefits the Republican Party.

It would be just as wrong, of course, if a Democratic President were to target only the right-wing churches.  All or nothing.

It's important for you to understand, just so you have all the facts, that partisan electioneering in black churches is a significant contributor to Democrats winning elections.  That doesn't make it right, but I don't want you to have blinders on.  Traditionally this is an important part of how Democrats get elected.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:16:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I understand perfectly (none / 0)

There is no all or nothing. It should be this... ALL churches involved in political campaigns in any way AUTOMATICALLY Loose their tax exempt status!  PERIOD!

I understand that "issues" are not necessarily the same as campaigns, so maybe that is OK.  BUT to promote a candidate... NO WAY NO HOW!


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 10:31:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 2)

I find this video especially abhorrent. This is what this Reverend believes is appropriate to preach on Christmas Day? It is so far removed from anything I have ever been taught about Jesus that I can hardly believe that someone preaching this hatred would be considered by anyone to be a Christian.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:12:43 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Wow, imagine that, other people have different world views than you!! What an amazing surprise.

Notice how the congregation enjoys this sermon? I suggest thinking a little about WHY they enjoy it and why you find it so abhorrent.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:15:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 2)

Where in the New Testament do you find a single passage that lends credence to delivering these sermons of hate and denigration? And on the day celebrating Christ's birth?

I have no problem with people having a different world view. I have lived in a foreign country and I get it. What I do not accept is this perversion of Christianity that preaches hate inside and hope outside.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:35:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

People join different churches for different reasons.  Sometimes, they join the one that is in their neighborhood or one that some of their friends are going to.

You too can choose whatever church (or no church) you want to go to.

Personally, I find all churches offensive but that's just me and I won't hold it against anyone who goes to one.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:15:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Can I ask what in particular you find so abhorrent about it, and why?


by MaximumBob on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:18:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He assumes HIllary Clinton, a woman, never experienced oppression.  He also assumes human beings are incapable of exercising a sociological imagination.  Empathy, I guess, is an emotion Jeremiah Wright does not understand.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:21:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

I suppose you would condem this speech also:

And don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as his divine, messianic force to be a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems that I can hear God saying to America, "You're too arrogant! And if you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power, and I'll place it in the hands of a nation that doesn't even know my name. Be still and know that I'm God."

I will let you guess as to whose sermon this is attributed.


by BDM on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:20:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

It was spoken by Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

It was written and spoken in a different time when it was more appropriate. He didn't berate the First Lady. He didn't celebrate the assassination of JFK. He believed in LOVE and EQUALITY. And PEACE!


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:28:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He believed in LOVE and EQUALITY. And PEACE!

So you're saying MLK wouldn't have supported Hillary AUMF Kyl-Lieberman Clinton?

I suspect you're right.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:42:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He would not have supported Obama's craven decision to AVOID VOTING ON KYL-LIEBERMAN.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:44:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Yup. I certainly wish he had voted against.

But she voted for it. She was there, and she voted for it.

Same with the war.

She voted for it. You can spin and screech and jump up and down all you want. She voted for the war. That's why she's losing. That and her (and her supporters') inability or unwillingness to address that fact forthrightly and honestly.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:47:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Yes, she was there.

Obama hid in a corner, just as he did during the move on vote.  but you and other easily duped drones still believe he embodies a newer and more promising version of politics.  i find it utterly amusing.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:49:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

So you equate the "move on vote" with her vote on the war?

How many people died as a result of the moveon vote again?


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:51:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

how many people froze in apartment buildings as a result of the obamas' decision to purchase a mansion with rezko cash?  


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:57:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

None.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:58:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

actually, many people did.  but i guess it is perfectly acceptable for the obama's to purchase a home with an indicted slumlord who left obama's constituents in apartments with no heat for five weeks during a cold chicago winter.  i wonder how many of these constituents are members of jeremiah wright's church.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:03:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

You're gonna have to show some direct correlation between the contributions Reszko made to Obama's campaign and R's purchase of those buildings. If you're saying that Obama taking contributions are responsible for those deaths, then you're going to have to say the same thing about the money he gave the Clintons.
(and Susanhu's innuendo pixel-marathons aren't proof)
by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:06:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

no money from rezko to clinton.  sorry.  no.  no no.

no

sorry


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:07:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Oh christ. Your smear is even more tenuous than I thought. You're saying that the house Obama bought (with money he got from royalties on his book--you know, the one he actually wrote) is connected to Reszko's holdings?


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:08:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Rezko's wife purchased the lot for the house on the same day the Obamas purchased the mansion.  And yes, Rezko cash enabled them to obtain the stately property they could not afford.

Obama's ability to earmark millions of dollars for Michelle's employer also assisted them with their purchase, for Michelle's salary increased.  And yes, Rezko cash enabled Obama to campaign for the position that enables him to earmark for Michelle's employer.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:10:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

You are truly disgusting.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:18:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Why? Did Clinton not vote for that war? Did she not vote to ratchet up the Lieberman-Cheney brinkmanship with Iran?


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:19:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

I really have listened to as many people as I am willing mischaracterize the AUMF as a vote for war. The vote was to force inspections under threat of use of force if not allowed. It worked. And when Blix came to the Security Council and said that they could not find any WMD and wanted a few more months to finish inspections, Bush said no, kicked the inspectors out and started a war. That is what REALLY happened. So stop your bullshit lies and revisionist history.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 08:28:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Jesus Christ. You take my breath away. You people are more deluded than I ever thought possible.

You sit here for days on end smearing Obama with guilt by association and innuendo, and when someone mentions Clinton's actual record, you call them "disgusting" and retreat into fantasy.

But Obama supporters are 'cultists'.

Absolutely, utterly pathetic.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 08:43:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Are you even aware that it was Hillary that insisted that the "teeth" be taken out of Kyl Lieberman? Or doesn't a fact like that mean anything to you? I suspect the latter.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:20:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 0)

There is such a big tendency to make King into a figure of love and peace. But he really was quite radical.  Catch what folks here call racially charged language in this selection from his great Letter from a Birmingham Jail, as well has his argument for why people have to break laws.

Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say, "Wait." But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen hate filled policemen curse, kick and even kill your black brothers and sisters; when you see the vast majority of your twenty million Negro brothers smothering in an airtight cage of poverty in the midst of an affluent society; when you suddenly find your tongue twisted and your speech stammering as you seek to explain to your six year old daughter why she can't go to the public amusement park that has just been advertised on television, and see tears welling up in her eyes when she is told that Funtown is closed to colored children, and see ominous clouds of inferiority beginning to form in her little mental sky, and see her beginning to distort her personality by developing an unconscious bitterness toward white people; when you have to concoct an answer for a five year old son who is asking: "Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?"; when you take a cross county drive and find it necessary to sleep night after night in the uncomfortable corners of your automobile because no motel will accept you; when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading "white" and "colored"; when your first name becomes "nigger," your middle name becomes "boy" (however old you are) and your last name becomes "John," and your wife and mother are never given the respected title "Mrs."; when you are harried by day and haunted by night by the fact that you are a Negro, living constantly at tiptoe stance, never quite knowing what to expect next, and are plagued with inner fears and outer resentments; when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of "nobodiness"--then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait. There comes a time when the cup of endurance runs over, and men are no longer willing to be plunged into the abyss of despair. I hope, sirs, you can understand our legitimate and unavoidable impatience. You express a great deal of anxiety over our willingness to break laws. This is certainly a legitimate concern. Since we so diligently urge people to obey the Supreme Court's decision of 1954 outlawing segregation in the public schools, at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. One may well ask: "How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?" The answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that "an unjust law is no law at all."


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:48:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

MLK insisted on PEACEful protests. His message of equality and the content of one's character is pure LOVE.

Enough of your distortions of a great man to try and excuse the heinous hate and racism of Reverend Wright.


by Fleaflicker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 08:34:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

well, first and most intrinsicly abhorrent is political stump speeches coming from the pulpit .
Then the immediate dilution of a campaign down to racial divisions
from a stump speech from the pulpit.
As a stump speech, which it is, it would be universally decried as race baiting.
As a spiritual lesson, which it isn't,  it gets a free pass because it's "something we liberal whites can't understand because we're white"
which is also exclusive and divisive.
it sucks.
Obama said so himself.
Why won't you listen to Obama?
by Zorkon on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:31:46 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

On this point I agree. There is no place for stump speeches or candidate advocacy in sermons.

I do not believe TUCC should have their tax status revoked. Wright has already resigned, and the church does an enormous amount of good in the Chicago area.

However, if there is any way to fine TUCC for breaking IRS regulations in this manner I would be for it. That's not religious persecution and it would not be wrong.


No Way. No How. No McCain-Palin!
by Texas Gray Wolf on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:47:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Ack completely miswrote that. Hate when that happens!

I meant to say: if there is any way to fine Wright for political advocacy. Wright is the guilty party, not TUCC.


No Way. No How. No McCain-Palin!
by Texas Gray Wolf on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:47:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

I lived in Hyde Park for over half a decade, and I never heard of this place.

Revoke their tax exempt status.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:50:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Actually, he took the birthday of Jesus (none / 0)

as an opportunity to compare BARACK to Jesus, raised as a poor black child of a single mother (forgetting to mention she was white) and to compare Hillary with the cruel Romans = Italians = Europeans = WHITE people who crucified him.

Man oh man.  


Reasonable people can disagree.
by mnicholson0220 on Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 03:14:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

Oh, yeah.
This is a Christmas Sermon?

Using the Baby Jesus' birthday for a race baiting stump speech?


by Zorkon on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:43:54 PM EST

He took the birthday of Baby Jesus (none / 0)

as an opportunity to compare BARACK to Jesus, raised as a poor black child of a single mother (forgetting to mention she was white) and to compare Hillary with the cruel Romans = Italians = Europeans = WHITE people who crucified him.

Man oh man.  


Reasonable people can disagree.
by mnicholson0220 on Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 03:15:34 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

So, you're saying that the pastor gave a tirade about Obama and Clinton, and you're saying that the candidate himself was in the room at the time, and no one noticed? The camera didn't so much as glance at, acknowledge, or hint at the candidate who was under discussion?

As conspiracy theories go, this is pretty far-fetched.


Unable to rec or rate
Still supporting Obama
Still not putting up with "preening" posts
by jaiwithani on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:43:58 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

If my understanding of the statements made on this issue is correct, Obama has said that he first learned the statements of Wright that have caused the whole issue in early 2007. At that point he began to disassociate himself with Wright. He did not entirely disassociate himself, because Wright is, by many, many accounts a very good spiritual leader and does an enormous amount of good in the Chicago community. There is no need, then or now, to throw Wright under the bus.

As a speaker on social matters, Wright has some strange views and a very inflammatory way of expressing himself. That's not all that unusual in black social gospel churches. As a speaker on spiritual matters Wright has done a lot of good for many, many people.

So yes, I expect Obama knew about Wright's controversial statements in 2007, and if so that would be no lie or deception, since he's said that he found out about them many months before. His statements about when he found out fit together very nicely with the media coverage of when Wright said what.

I'm not sure why anyone keeps trotting out the straw men about baptisms and marriage ceremonies. Wright is very well spoken on matters of spirituality and traditional religious topics. I expect he was a perfectly fine religious leader at those events.

Wright ties himself into these knots when he's speaking on social and political matters. Baptisms and weddings are pretty unlikely to be those occasions, and indeed according to the evidence so where the vast majority of speeches. It's taken something like 9/11 or Katrina to work him up into making the statements that have caused this whole issue.

I know Clinton supporters really, really want this to be Obama's "Monkey Business". I'm sorry, it's not going to happen. We already have polling data showing that this isn't doing much damage to Obama, and this story is old enough to have filtered well into the popular consciousness. Yes, he's lost the rabid right-wing all-Democrats-hate-America vote solidly after this. Did you think he had it before?

In exchange he's probably picked up a bunch of votes from confused low-information Independents whose reason for opposing him was the persistent belief that "he's a Muslim". Hard for anyone to believe that, now.

The difference between this and the 527's swiftboating Kerry is the difference between Obama and Kerry. Kerry believed that a nonsense story was best ignored, or responded to lightly, and allowed to discredit itself. Obama believes in a firm, immediate response. He's denounced Wright's charges in no uncertain terms.

If this and the idiocy with Rezko is the best you think the Republican 527's are going to be able to do, Obama can feel confident in placing orders for White House drapes. Compared to the mountain of things we know the 527s will be able to trot out about Clinton, this is hopelessly miniscule.


No Way. No How. No McCain-Palin!
by Texas Gray Wolf on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:44:38 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

what's really sad on this site is how BADLY the hillary people want to destroy Obama.... almost as if he were a republican.

A year or so ago, I would bet most people on this site loved Obama....now look at all of you, so eager to find something....anything to destroy his candidacy

That is how utterly ridiculous this primary season has gotten.

I'm not saying Obama is perfect...but look at how hillary has to win - either by the superdelegates handing it to her or by tearing Obama apart....and you all are ok with that... I never thought I'd see the day


by stevepdx5 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:51:13 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Look.  I AM a Clinton supporter, but bottom line, I am a Yellow Dog.  And after Wisconsin I accepted that Obama is by far most likely to be the party's nominee.

I still do.  But with a campaign bio dedicated to a pastor of 20 years who has cursed America, I think the Obama zealots have picked us a loser, and we will have at least four more years of a Republican in the WH.

Yes, I am plenty bitter about this.  And I find Wright's language inexcusable.  The US government invented AIDS in order to kill people of color?  He preaches this to young people?  The US deserved 9/11 because of its support of Israel and that sort of thing?  If the tables were turned, the Obama supporters would have Clinton drawn and quartered--and they are saying that everything is just fine.  

They are wrong.


by zyx on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:52:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Obama is the one destroying himself. Stop trying to shift the responsibilities of his actions to others and playing the victim. He was the one responsible for NAFTAgate, he was the one who chose to attend a racist church for 2 decades, he was the one who chose to befriend a corrupt man in Chicago. If the media weren't so corrupt and did their job of investigating and informing the public, he would have been vetted by now and democrats wouldn't find themselves in such a predictament. He is toast. I know it, you know it and everybody knows it, but whether some democrats will stubbornly choose to keep in denial until november or take action to correct the mistake now, remains to be seen.


by RC01 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:57:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Last night during his show "Geraldo At Large" on Fox, Geraldo confirmed that Obama was in Chicago for Christmas, but was told (not sure who confirmed) that Obama did not attend the Christmas service. Also, the day that Rev. Wright made his anti-American sermon post 9/11, Geraldo confirmed that Obama was in route to a campaign stop. With that said, I still don't give Obama a pass on a 20 year association with a race-baiting, anti-American "preacher". Obama knew what was going on in his church. I don't buy it.


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:29:44 PM EST

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

link?  and for what was the local illinois state Senator campaigning in September 2001?  and who told the fox news anchorman obama was not present at tucc?

and do you take fox news seriously?  after all, all geraldo ever found was an empty crypt in al capone's basement.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:32:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

I would have provided a link, a transcript, etc. but I couldn't find one on Geraldo's site. Just going off memory with TV in background. As for September 2001, maybe Obama was campaigning for someone else. Sorry, I could have heard "traveling" and translated that to campaigning. My take on what GR said was that Obama was confirmed in Chicago, less so on whether Obama attended the service, and that Obama was confirmed not in Chicago for the post-9/11 sermon. But you are right about GR and the "empty crypt". I'll poke around a bit more and see if I can get the transcript.


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:07:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

He must be a Muslim after all! Go with this one, Obama haters!


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:26:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Marcotom, I'm a Hillary supporter and I agree this is getting out of hand.


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:37:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Ok, this is parsing and getting out of hand. Let's just stick with what the diarist is questioning. Was Obama at the Christmas service in question where Rev. Wright was seen on video going off?


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:36:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Most large congregations have a family service as well. Since I didn't see any kids in the video, I assume that the kids were probably there - as would be the father of young children.

Now, that might not be true.

But no one has evidence that Obama was at the Wright sermon, so why keep claiming he was unless you really don't care if you have any basis in fact for this assertion?


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:51:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

basis in fact (none / 0)

is what the diarist is trying to get to. If you read my comments here, I think you'll see that I'm encouraging that as well instead making claims that he was there, or call him a Muslim if he wasn't.


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 08:23:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Oh my god.

"Democrats" offering the FoxNews "people are saying...." trope as evidence.

You people are truly amazing.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:44:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

obama's tropes are equally bankrupt and empty.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:47:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

Hey Blue, did you bother to read the comment or just see Fox News and foam at the mouth. I'm actually helping Obama out here and saying that he was NOT at the service that this diarist is wondering about.


by grlpatriot on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:55:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama in Chicago, but not at Service (none / 0)

You're right. My apologies.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:01:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

The preacher is a racist. Period.
How Obama followers can defend him is disgusting!

Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 05:47:15 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

A racist? What do you even mean by this? Is he perpetrator of racism or a victim of it that has never forgiven the victimizer? Do you not see how stupid that argument is?

And I have seen nobody on this blog defending Wright's statements. We are at this point defending Democratic and progressive values. And right-wing attacks on any Democrat should be defended. That includes Clinton, by the way, who has been defended by the same Democrats over and over again who are now rejecting the current attacks by right-wing opportunists.


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:30:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Wright is a victim of racism - and a perpetrator of it.
His racist screeds FROM THE PULPIT are disgusting!

Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 07:31:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He "distanced" himself from Wright in the Spring of 2007.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/pol itics/30obama.html?_r=3&pagewanted=a ll&oref=slogin&oref=slogin&o ref=slogin

The fact that you didn't know about doesn't mean it didn't happen.


by BlueinColorado on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:00:36 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (2.00 / 1)

No he did not, for Jeremiah Wright was an official member of his campaign until two days ago.


by truthteller2007 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:02:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He distanced himself before, it's a fact and as such hard to spin away.

Wright was not active in the campaign, he was on some list. Not even a fundraiser, but apart from that on the same level as Ferraro.


by marcotom on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:34:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

 No distance or rejection will erase the kind of preaching he willingly accepted for 20 years. It's like GWB "founding" Jesus,after years of drinking and other irresponsible behavior. Sure.
Like GWB so 'aptly'once said:"fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again."
by RC01 on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 07:29:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

If Hillary Clinton attended for 20 years a church with a white supremacist minister and gave the church $20K, there is no explanation she could ever give that would satisfy the media or Obama's supporters.  This is a double standard.  Plain and simple.


by MidwestTracker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:13:46 PM EST

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

I'm not sure why the Clinton campaign is taking a pass when asked directly about it.  Schumer was horrible on Fox.  He should at least say you should ask the Obama people about it instead of comparing this to Ferraro.  The democratic party is being hijacked by america haters.  We will lose in November if we are apologists for Rev. Wright.


by MidwestTracker on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:25:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

Now, doesn't like just seem like they think this cannot help them?  They are not shy at speaking up to make their points usually.


We care about politics because we know politics matters for people's lives and opportunities.
by politicsmatters on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 06:53:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Christmas Day 2007: Obama in Chicago (none / 0)

He's not a poor black man, is he?  He has a good education, he's got a good family - beautiful children - and he's making some