Back from London

Ah, American politics, did you know I got away for a week to the UK? I was over there for the Liberal Democrats international conference. It brought out campaign operatives from sister parties of the LD's from mostly Africa and eastern Europe.

I gave a presentation on the blogosphere, social media, and the netroots. The basis of it was from a presentation I'd done for NPI a year ago, but things have been radically altered even since that time. For the most part, only the UK and Europe are close to the development of the blogosphere found in the US. In some ways, what I was talking about over a couple of hours of back and forth was a foreign language to the professionals working campaigns in those areas of the world where internet access is very low due to a lack of personal PC's, like single-digit, and broadband access even lower.  What they do have is cell phones, and lots of them.

During one of the afternoons, we delved into the use of SMS in campaigns, and the participants, all of whom had much more experience than we do in the US with using mobile, shared their experiences. What struck me was how disruptive the tactics were for using SMS. It shouldn't have, given that's what new media technologies have done over and over again, in the hands of online insurgents and revolutionaries, even here in the USA.

In the recent Kenya elections, a professional read through some of the most popular viral SMS messages used during the campaign. They were incredibly incendiary (the most bizarre revolving around circumcision), and he questioned the assumption that new tools are being used in a constructive manner. SMS is used a lot, and is transforming politics in Africa, but not in a very controlled campaign-centric manner, but instead its very bottom up. One really key tip I learned from their experiences was that over half of the sign-ups for SMS from campaigns in Africa is not done from texting to the campaign, but actually calling a number, and having an automated service register your enrollment for SMS, so providing both routes when marketing the join process is key.

In eastern Europe, the most successful campaigns have also been the viral disruptive ones. Texting "he's lying" in Georgia, for example, during the speech's by their President broadcast on television. Or while in the traffic of Belarus, people setting a time ahead during which every person in their own car will suddenly honk their horn, or turn off their car for a minute and sit there on the road.

Every single country is very different in their experience, but one thing that's common among them all is the lack of browsing the internet. I think this could radically change in the next few years. The convergence that is happening between mobile and browsers right now will facilitate a leap-frog effect for countries where personal PC's are few in number, but mobile devices are proliferate. The use of social media via the internet will broaden widely. The cost will be a barrier still, but similar to how SMS is used, the information will be widely disseminated. And probably even more disruptive. It much easier to mask content on the internet than it is over the phone. There were many stories about persons who got in trouble with the ruling gov't or party, when SMS messages they forwarded fell into the wrong hands. Yes, IP's are tracked too, but places like internet cafes serve to mask the identity, as well as IP masking.

I'll hopefully be following up on the state of the parties, especially the LD's in a follow-up, and the current mayoral race in London. Probably the highlight of the trip, from a tourist perspective, was getting a prized ticked to attend the parliamentary questions and budget presentation last Wednesday. I watched the PM Brown, in the rapid fire format of UK politics, take questions, and then the follow-ups to the Budget presentation, given by the party leaders, especially those of David Cameron, the Conservative leader, and Nick Clegg, the LD's new leader. The UK political situation, at the leadership spot, has really transformed a lot in the time since the elections of 2005. It will make the liklihood that the next one, possibly in mid 2009, is a change election. Though the early betting was on the Tories behind Cameron, Clegg has got a populist change message that will resonate:



Online Videos by Veoh.com

Also, catch MP Ed Davey on Clegg's speech here. I met over dinner one night with Ed and some other LD's, and he asked me if I was 'spinning him' when I gave him a review of the Dems chances here in the US congressional and senate races, lol.

And you just have to take a look at Brian Paddick, the LD's candidate for Mayor in London. I got a chance to meet with him, advising him and his staff on using the internet for viral campaign strategy, and what a change he'd bring. His bio, a recent article, and the most recent poll shows him at 19, compared to 37 and 34 for the Labor and Torie. They use an IRV system of first and second choices on the ballot, so Paddick does have a good shot at winning with a late break toward him by voters.



Display:


Re: Back from London (none / 0)

ah my home town, hope you enjoyed it Jerome.

as for the mayoral race all o will say is that im for Ken till i die.

Boris Johnson is a freaking elitist oaf.


by zane on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:09:53 AM EST

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

Yea, a bit loose seems Boris. I gotta think he will sink. Ken does have to be favored, but if Brian can get second on the first run, I think he'll overtake it in second choices.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:13:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

OT: Jerome, is it true that you are 'striking' from dkos? I think you name is listed.

http://taylormarsh.com/archives_view.php ?id=27233


by JFK464 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:37:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Back from London (2.00 / 0)

Yea, I'm holding out for past wages due too, haha :)


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:59:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

What's keeping the London mayor's race close is the unpopularity of Labour right now, although
the Tories' lead in national polls has shrunk somewhat.

I do think the next election in the UK will be a change election, but I really have a lot of doubts
whether the Liberal Democrats will ever be a serious alternative.  I don't know if a populist makeover is going to work.


by mikelow1885 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:01:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The best the Lib Dems can hope for (none / 0)

is to do well enough to deny a majority to either Labour or the Conservatives.

It would require a total collapse of Labour for the Lib Dems to win a majority.

Hell, due to district proportioning they could come out ahead of both Labour and the Tories and still not win the majority outright.

Suggestions of their winning control of government are highly improbable.

Most likely outcome...Tories take back government.


by Nazgul35 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 04:21:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

I know nothing of British politics, but just a question?  Why the preference for LD over Labor?


by mady on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 11:17:51 AM EST

One reason (none / 0)

is that the LD opposed the War, while Tony Blair forced the Iraq War down the throats of a largely resistant labour party.

Speaking only for myself, the left in the Labour Party is far to my left and would would be far to the left of even Ralph Nader.  


by fladem on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 10:08:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: One reason (none / 0)

I tend to be on the left of the Democratic party here so always have looked at Labour sympathetically.  How did Blair drag a party that should have been vehemently opposed to going with the U.S. on this, into it?  My totally unknowledgeable impression of the LD was that they would tend to be more conservative in all things, and less likely to oppose Iraq.  Thank you for disabusing me of that.  Makes more sense now.


by mady on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 12:20:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I would love to see the Lib Dems (none / 0)

supplant the Tories as the main alternative to Labour in a lot of districts (they call them constituencies). The problem for them is that for many decades, they have not been a national party. They only did well in Scotland and parts of England and Wales.

With the collapse of the Tory party in the last 15 years, the Lib Dems should be able to do a lot better in constituences in the Midlands and the north of England.

Thanks for the update, Jerome.


John McCain: 100 years in Iraq "would be fine with me."
by desmoinesdem on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:08:39 PM EST

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

Clegg is too right wing for many in the Liberal Demcrats. Some of his party MP's made  fools of themselves during the recent European Referedum vote. The Scottish Party under Nicol Stephens is even worse, by voting the wrong way in a Scottish Parliament vote last week

Paddick has no chance of winning - he will be eliminated and where his 2nd preference go will be the key to who actually wins. I still think Ken will win in the end.


by albagubrath on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:10:00 PM EST

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

You are very polite to your hosts but flatter them somewhat....

Paddick has no chance in the London Mayoral elections. And I'm afriad that Nick Clegg has made a very weak start to his leadership. The problem he has is how to distinguish himslef from David Cameron and he has shown weak leadership over his party's position on whether there should be a referendum on the new European treaty.

Anyway, next time you are in town get in touch and we can introduce you to some people on the Labour side of things...

http://www.e8voice.blogspot.com


See latest on US, EU and UK politics at http://www.e8voice.blogspot.com
by e8voice on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:56:59 PM EST

Cool (none / 0)

Unfortunately I can't understand his jokes through the accent. Does anyone know of any blogs that cover foreign elections from a progressive perspective? It would be cool to see more of this here, though it might be hard to dig up experts.


by js noble on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:00:42 PM EST

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

Jerome: Will a transcript or video of your presentation be available? I saw you last February at the Bob Dole Institute of Politics in Lawrence, Kansas when you appeared on a panel on "Blog to the Chief: The Impact of Political Blogs on the 2008 Election" as part of its Annual Presidential Lecture series. That was my first diary on dKos:

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/2 /8/202016/3332/186/299839

KnowVox


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:01:17 PM EST

Re: Back from London (none / 0)

No, it wasn't on video, I may put up the powerpoint somewhere. I'll post here if it happens.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:47:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I travel a lot to London (none / 0)

and through the years have talked about blogsphere with a number of people.  

One of the critical differences I think is that there is no real analogy to Right Wing Radio in the UK or Europe.  In some ways the left blogsphere is a reaction in the US against something that doesn't exist in Europe.  

But there is, I think, a significant similarity with respect to the War. Labor's support for the War created the need for an alternative critique of politics in the same war that the support of leading Democrats for the AUMF did here.  


by fladem on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 10:05:47 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.