Answer: The Bus

"Rev. Wright is no longer serving on the African American Religious Leadership Committee."

Ben Smith absurdly likens the comments and stepping down by Geraldine Ferraro, while being clumsily blunt, with those of the disgustingly anti-American and racist rantings, and dismissal, of Jeremiah Wright.

I just can't imagine the worldview that looks toward a person like Wright as someone that I'd attend Church to listen too, someone that I'd choose to get married by, someone I'd watch baptize my two children. I realize these are selective comments in the video, but come on, we all know that there's a lot more.

Even Obama does, saying: "The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach." He leaves open the possibility that there are others, and then the blanket dismissal for those the future ones: "All of the statements that have been the subject of controversy are ones that I vehemently condemn."

I have rejected the tactic of making Clinton, or Obama, responsible for the quotes of others that are merely associated with them. Unfortunately for Obama, behind the scenes, his staff has made a practice of it his entire campaign against Clinton, and now it comes back in the worst way against his entire campaign/persona/branding/message.

In the end, if you are already among The Ones, this, like all things that are anti-Obama, doesn't stick. I have a hard time seeing though, by the end of this, how Wright isn't as toxic as Farrakhan. But as for Obama, who knows, may be able to overcome it, we'll see.

The Bus, over and over again.



Display:


Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

So when will we see the gop God damn America commercials?

Obama should drop out.


by gotalife on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:12:21 PM EST

When will we see (none / 0)

racist Hillary supporters commercials.

Hillary should drop out.

(cuts both ways you see)


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Rasmussen
McCain 46, Clinton 40, Und 14    McCain +6
cCain 46, Obama 40, Und 14    McCain +6
by pcjnyc on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

tipping point, shmipping point (none / 0)

Obama has been pronounced dead by the Hillary campaign so many times.

Yet somehow she is still behind in delegates, popular point and states won.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yeah (2.00 / 0)

It's all so confusing.  I thought Rezko was going to sink him, and he had to drop out!

Oh, wait!  I thought the plagiarism thing would be his death knell!

No, no, I remember!  It was NAFTA!

Obama must have more lives than my two cats put together.


by jonweasel on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:22:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

My favorite was (none / 0)

Plagirize-gate....ohhh, his national committee co-chair helped with his speech.

I mean he had to drop out then.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:25:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My favorite was (none / 0)

Well Hillary used the words THE, PRESIDENT, and CHANGE.  She plagarized as well!  Ridiculous.


by yitbos96bb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I say she plagirized when she started (none / 0)

using English alphabet...I am telling ya I've see it used before her.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: tipping point, shmipping point (2.00 / 1)

I always thought it was the Obama camp who pronounces Hillary dead and she should drop out.  LOL - he is dead.  The bus won't even be enough.


by anya109 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:45:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 0)

Oh please. And the GOP is going to leave out Norman Hsu, Marc Rich, Monica, Hillarycare, travel office, etc. You think Hillary won't get swiftboated? Of course she will. But you also think she's "weathered" that storm. I don't think she has. Bill Clinton's own negatives have gone up the last few months. Hillary's can too. Also, African Americans are not as enthusiastic about Clinton as they were last year. And without a HUGE black vote, forget about PA, MI, WI, FL or OH. Both candidates will have to deal with crap.


by elrod on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:20:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

well said. (none / 0)


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:32:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well said. (1.00 / 1)

You have to be strong with morons.  And that is one of the biggest.

Obama did what he needed to do.  He handled it, he hasn't ignored it and that goes a long way.  All candidates can be tied to bad statements by others... as long as there is no footage of Obama agreeing with those statements OR sitting and watching them, then he is fine.  Throw under the bus and hit back, that's what he needs to do and that's what he is doing.


by yitbos96bb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:38:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: well said. (none / 0)

he "handled it" by not coming clean about what he knew (in terms of controversial statements) when he knew it and why he did nothing about it. Those questions will come up. If not now then later


by Wiseprince on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 09:08:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 0)

Yea, which is why I've always argued that by the end, the negatives of Obama will be just as high as Clinton's.

If I were a superdelegate, I'd tell them to go into a room alone and come out as a ticket, otherwise I'll vote for Gore.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:38:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

My guess is that Howard Dean will step in if one of them doesn't go on a run and make them do that before the convention.  I'm betting that if one of them isn't super close, then that's what will happen before the convention.


by yitbos96bb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:40:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Yeah, because either of them is going to listen to Howard Dean. That gave me a good chuckle.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:53:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Oh yes, the strong commanding presence of Chairman Dean will have the two Senators trembling like aspen leaves before his thunder...

:-)


Re-elect the President in 2012
by DemAC on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:58:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Speaking of the infamous Mr. Hsu,

Exactly WHEN does Obama plan to give back the $20,000 Hsu gave him, as well as the money raised for Him by Mr. Hsu?

Washington Post has the story:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/con tent/article/2007/09/07/AR2007090703047. html


by Grandma M on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 10:30:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

He'll never drop out. A man who embroils himself in the Chicago machine and then wants to be President despite a razor thin record is not someone to look beyond his own personal interests in power. He will have to be defeated the good old way, for the good of the party.


Re-elect the President in 2012
by DemAC on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:33:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.50 / 2)

That's rich come from a supporter of the most self centered power hungry selfish family in the Democratic Party, The Clintons.


by yitbos96bb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I guess you would have to hope that it would be, since it looks like Michigan may do a re-vote.  Wasn't that the reason you could never vote for Obama, according to your recent diary?  


by rfahey22 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:54:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Absolutely, Obama is a slow motion train wreck. His hoodwinked comments in SC & MS were too much, and like Jerome says, accusing the Clintons of everything behind the scenes. This is Karma, baby.

http://noratings.blogspot.com/


by JFK464 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:00:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Truth Time: Wright is Right (1.00 / 1)

"The struggle is not over and maybe it never will be, but don't get confused about Jeremiah Wright.  His only crime is being abrasive, but the people who find him most abrasive are the people who have are invested in denying the truth that he speaks."

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/tal k/2008/03/truth-time-wright-is-right.php


by NYFemDem on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:27:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Wow. Jerome Armstrong is actually endorsing this line of attack.
I am stunned.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:13:00 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 0)

What's the accusation?


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:15:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

I am not accusing you of anything. I am just stunned you crossed that line.
Even if you believe Clinton has a chance to win, you have to know Obama is more likely to be our nominee.
I don't exactly buy the whole outrage at Wright - especially not from someone as well-versed as you who knew about him since the beginning (I did and I am a simple citizen interested in politics) - but that you would endorse that kind of fundamental attack against our nominee will make it very hard, the day come, for you to backtrack.
And yes that is crossing a line. I understand you will never be a fan of Obama's. But that goes beyond that.
I really don't understand you anymore.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:19:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

"I don't exactly buy the whole outrage at Wright"

I didn't ask whether you buy the outrage. I asked whether you personally agreed with what he said, or found it very very wrong. Can you answer that question?  I did.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:23:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I don't agree with what he said and I find it wrong.
And as clearly stated in the Huffington Post, Obama concurs.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:26:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Now he does (2.00 / 1)

It is going to be hard to explain to the American electorate why he didn't walk out of Wright's sermons 10 years ago.

Put that together with Michelle Obama's claiming she is only now proud of America and you know why. The Obamas believe what Wright is selling.

The Republicans are going to be ruthless with this.


by ineedalife on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:16:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Now he does (none / 0)

Sure they will be and with your help in making this stuff acceptable even in Democratic circles, they might even have a change.


by marcotom on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 07:11:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Shhh! Be very, very quiet (none / 0)

I get sick and tired of this game. Trying to paper over a candidate's flaws by saying maybe the other side won't notice if we don't talk about it. That is the exact purpose of a primary. To flush out policy positions and expose weaknesses. To put the strongest candidate forward.


by ineedalife on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 09:42:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 6)

"but that you would endorse that kind of fundamental attack against our nominee will make it very hard, the day come, for you to backtrack."

I do not mean to speak for Jerome in any way, but as someone who deplores many of the views of someone like Reverend Wright I want to respond to this assumption.

I will never want to backtrack on this issue. I do not think it is in any way realistic to believe Obama can distance himself far enough from this church after attending it for 20 years, giving $20,000.00 last year, bringing his children to it, calling Wright his "spiritual mentor", etc.

Not only is this event not Hillary Clinton's "fault", I go so far as to fault Obama for offering himself as a presidential candidate with this kind of horrendous baggage in his past.

I know many people who would be awesome public servants, people who are brilliant, forthright, honest, deeply committed to the public good, who refuse to run for public office because they know they have connections in their past that would disqualify them from being elected when they are vetted. They would be made into targets, and harm the Democratic Party if their skeletons were uncovered. It is a real shame to lose their talents at the level of being an elected official, but frankly they are completely correct and eminently responsible for declining the opportunity to run for office. I deeply respect their decisions. That is the price they pay, and they refuse to hurt the future of the party, or take the support they deserve as people, when there is every reason to believe they would fail as candidates after being vetted. That's politics.

Obama should have done the same. It is his responsibility for putting himself forward as a candidate when he knows he has this tremendous vulnerability, and I see this as further evidence of his blind and all consuming ambition, in utter disregard for the good of the issues he promotes and the party that has supported him. When your baggage will deeply embarrass the party, and make you unelectable, do not run for office. You are sabotaging both the party and the issues you say you care about. Find another way to serve, where you will have a lower public profile and your personal baggage will not harm others.


by 07rescue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:43:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.50 / 2)


This is not baggage in HIS past.
You know enough about him to know Obama HAS nowhere near the kinds of racial views Pastor Wright holds.

by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:48:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

What this is really about is "what goes around comes around" and that is the meaning of this thread.  The BO campaign has been hitting HRC about things like this for months.  Any comment by anyone even remotely connected to the HRC campaign wsa used against her.  So this kind of nonsense is open because the BO campaign made if fair game.

If you run an holy than thee then you should have youd own house in order.

david


by giusd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:10:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

What a cowardly statement. For one thing, you just disqualified Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign. But even worse, you accept it as politically acceptable that guilt-by-association charges are worthy against your own party.

Jeremiah Wright's political remarks are disgusting. Obama has said as much. Obama has also said that he wasn't aware until recently about the existence of these awful sermons. You can believe him or not, but I see no reason to assume he's lying. And if he's telling the truth, he's accounting for a relationship based not on political views but on faith in Jesus Christ.


by elrod on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:34:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

"What a cowardly statement. For one thing, you just disqualified Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign"

"Cowardly?" I have always been outraged by Bill Clinton's wholesale disregard for the well being of his party, his wife, his child, and his own self respect for placing us all in the position of being his dupes for supporting him while he engaged in scandalous activities that derailed his presidency and indisputably led directly to the election of George W. Bush. He never should have run for the office if he was constantly engaging in infidelities that would damage the party the way they did. It is only the denial and arrogance of the intoxication of power that leads these people to believe their baggage will never catch up with them. He should have allowed someone else to run, who might have had a successful election and administration and not resulted in 4 years of complete Republican domination of all branches of elected government, with the destruction that has occurred.

Perhaps Hillary Clinton would be in a better position to be elected today without Bill's baggage, strategy of triangulation, and centrist compromises. No guarantee of that, of course, but I truly wish she had a chance to run as someone independent of his failings (my wishful political fantasy gets no traction, any more than Obama supporters' fantasy regarding their chosen candidate). She doesn't get to escape the "guilt by association" problem, either. You can argue that her name recognition was the main propellant behind her candidacy, also, so it is all a trade off in her case. There were also 8 years of peace and prosperity during Bill Clinton's administration, so you cannot say it was an effort without considerable merit earned. I do not see any upside to Obama's association with Reverend Wright, so it fails as a political calculus. It is all a trade off, and character and  judgement matters.

Agree with me or not, I also place sexual infidelity in a far different category from associating one's self with bigoted hate speech such as Reverend Wright's. The type of baggage matters to me, although the effect may be all too similar in the political paradigm. Unelectable is unelectable. Again, all candidates are imperfect, a trade off.


by 07rescue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:24:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"Even if you believe Clinton has a chance to win, you have to know Obama is more likely to be our nominee."

That spin is your rationale for attacking Jerome...? Puhleez.


Re-elect the President in 2012
by DemAC on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:48:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Speechless, horrified, disgusted, sad.  I don't get it, I just don't.


by mady on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:17:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You want sad, read his comment about 'not getting it' further down...


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:21:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Brillobreaks:

What gets me is that people are going on talking on this post as if any normalcy is left in this mess.  I am shocked at Jerome. I don't understand how any of this is supposed to lead to a good outcome for this party or for our country.


by mady on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:50:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I'm referring to JA's post, not the original Wright situation.


by mady on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You don't know much about him. (none / 0)

He's been in agreement with Fox News about Obama for the better part of a year.

The Democratic party ain't big enough for Obama and this blog.


by CarolinaNumber23 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:57:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You don't know much about him. (2.00 / 1)

You're way or the highway?

Be dismissive, but this in DEVASTATING.

I will vote for Mr. Obama is he's our nominee, but don't think the red states are going to buy this, especially with the forthcoming gd commercial.

It's sad.


by Si Ella Puede on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:31:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Well, even if you believe Clinton still has a chance, it is most likely he will be our candidate.
What is wrong with you people to be endorsing those kinds of attacks ?
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:15:26 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 0)

Because it matters...


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

So you guys are officially saying you would not vote for Obama ?


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Well, I was going to, but also, I know Indiana is never going to go blue.  So, I may very well write someone in out of protest.

Barack has to earn my vote now.  He's not going to get a blind Dem vote, and for the record, I have NEVER voted for a Republican in my life (I'm 32).  So, I do not take this lightly.

Earn it, Barack.  Show me you're worth my vote.


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:20:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

That is an interesting point (none / 0)

I'm in Arizona...guess who wins the state?


by Coldblue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:24:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Barack will earn your vote. You have to know better than to think Barack wants to damm America or thinks HIV is a government made disease.
Come on now  ! You may not like him but you have to know better !
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"Well, even if you believe Clinton still has a chance, it is most likely he will be our candidate."

Again: such spin is a stupid rationale for framing a question. It's not one bit more likely that the Senator from Rezko will be our nominee than Hillary Clinton. Not one bit.


Re-elect the President in 2012
by DemAC on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:52:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I absolutely agree.  This is fair game because Obama has portrayed himself as a man of faith, and if his is spiritual adviser is as bigoted as Rev. Wright, then it brings into question a whole lot about Obama as a man.

It is all well and good to renounce him, but doesn't Obama himself see that by condemning some things and condoning others, he is "cherryp icking" just like he accuses the media?

This is bad.  Very bad.  And I thought he was a better politician than to actually think that this wouldn't come out....


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:15:41 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Cherry picking?

God forbid a presidential candidate should take reasoned, nuisances stances.
With us or against us, right?


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:26:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ahhh, so he renounces the bigoted crap but accepts the fluffy bunny preachings, he is taking a nuanced stance....

Gotcha...


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:28:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I'm not sure it's that simple. Considering the "god dam america" speech was 5 years ago and Barack says he wasn't in attendance, I am willing to give him a little rope to see how often this card is played.
I  don't agree with everything my pastor says, so I find it hard to think that Barack would have thought this wouldn't have come out if he actualy heard those things first hand.
Obama won't be the first politician that sporadically attends a church but calls himself a devoted member. In fact, it's commonly accepted by most denominations, that you don't have to actually join a church to be a believer.

I would like to float this idea out there: What if Wright made a point to not get carried away when he saw Obama in the audience? This would mean that Obama is telling the truth but leaves him in a pickle. It's not a stretch that Obama would be probably one of the most noticeable members in his congregation , even 10 years ago when he was a state senator. Wright may have thought that he was  doing Obama a favor by taming down the rhetoric when he saw Obama in the front row.....


A PROUD Hopium user!
by xodus1914 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:03:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Props to you for actually defending our likely Democratic nominee for president.

It seems so many people are going straight for the jugular of a fellow Democrat. We got a whole 'nother party to do that for us.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:12:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 2)

Gonna be a tough road to hoe...

Accepting the fact that your guy. Senator 'The One' Obama is sure fire loser in the GE. But look on the bright side he's actually been very successful. How, well let's unpack this a little:

Split the party which should be unified but is no longer due to Obama revealing that Clintion is a Racist.

Split Left Blogostan between 'The Boys on the Blogs....Kos....Bowers...Josh...ad nauseum...' guys signed on with Senator loser and then...

Just as the leaders of the New Left in the 60s and 70s did banned all who did not agree. Result: No more New Left the beginning of the rise of the ReichWing.

The sooner the rest of us put Kos & Co. under the bus the sooner we can start again to build a true progressive movement. Not a bunch of ass-kissers.

Enabled McCain, if Obama slips by Clinton, to win in the GE. Senator 'Hope' is a sure loser with the Rev Wright chained around his neck as The MIghty Wurlizer is sure to do. Save all the excuses. They won't work.

So measure by these metrics Obama has been a tremendous success.

Problem is that's the ReichWing's metrics we are talking about. No surprise there as if you check who backs Obama...Crown family...Goldman Sachs...Wall Street...Lieberman...

Well....best to start pukin' up the Kool-Aid. You will have plenty of company.


by Pericles on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:30:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

we all know that there's a lot more. (none / 0)

care to back it up?

after all apparently you know.


by shlenny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:01 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Two posts down you call this attack right wing swiftboating.  Now you're agreeing with it.  What the hell?


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:38 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

Because I think that Wright has said some disgusting things?

Let me ask you something, do you agree with what Wright has said?


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:19:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

First of all he certainly says some pretty dumb stuff (although the part that riles up conservatives about 9/11 and America's foreign policy is so fundamental to what we progressives have been saying for years that I dont see how it could rile u up). And certainly his language is offensive at times (god damm America).
But to tar Obama with the words of this pastor is just guilt by association. My mom is an unabashed racist. I love her to death and she has been an influence on my life. But I dont agree with any of her political views.
You may not like Obama but you are smart enough to know his whole message is fundamentally opposite of some of that black resentment stuff Wrigh is preaching. You know Obama is not about any of that.
And that you would cross the line of intellectual dishonesty to pretend they are the same is just ... sad. Sad. Really sad. It is Republican-style politics. And I guarantee you this post will be the first gleefully linked to on the Corner.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:24:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I have not tarred Obama with it, what part do you not understand:

I have rejected the tactic of making Clinton, or Obama, responsible for the quotes of others that are merely associated with them. Unfortunately for Obama, behind the scenes, his staff has made a practice of it his entire campaign against Clinton, and now it comes back in the worst way against his entire campaign/persona/branding/message.
I'm agnostic as to whether it dooms him or not, Americans have short memories and he may whether it out, as it's not Obama that's said the asinine things-- but that's not the standard his campaign has tactically used and now found itself having to fight off.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:27:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I am not going to argue with you.
I don't think Obama is the one who started the "if someone said something bad, let's shame them into leaving" game. But if you want to believe it, fine.

Wright has left the symbolic role he had in the campaign. Obama has publicly denounced the words his Pastor uttered on those videos while explaining his relationship with his Pastor.
That's all I needed. And I wish you would not fan the flames

I used to be angry at you for some things you wrote.
Tonight I am just sad. Ask Todd Beeton why if you don't get it from me. Arguably I am not the smartest or best writer out there.


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:31:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

So Sam Power was just a construction of my mind - because I'm quite sure that's where the latest guilt by association game started. Or wait, was it Farrakhan story?

You just parse reality through a very biased filter to get your opinions.


by marcotom on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 07:18:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Does anyone agree with them?  Obama doesn't, and has said so on multiple occassions now.  And yet you feel the need to do what exactly?  Call him a liar?  Say 'we all know' there's more out there?  Say that contrary to Obama's statement, he really has heard all these kind of things before?  

You're basically propping up this right wing attack, and contradicting Obama's efforts at pushing back against it by basically saying Obama's rejection of what Wright said is a lie.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:30:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 3)

If I don't agree with the pastor of my church, I leave.

I don't stay for 20 years.
I don't get married by him (if I could)
I certainly don't take my children to listen to his rants.
I don't give $20,000 to the church in 2007 alone...

So sorry, cherrypicking the quotes to denounce doesn't make Wright..well, right.


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

as I've been saying... (none / 0)

we should also denounce any Catholic because their spiritual leader the pope) is a gay hater.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

We demonize Republicans if they accept the endorsement of an evangelical hate-monger. Obama sat in this guy's church for over a decade. A person of presidential calibre would not abide by it.

At some point you have to put country over party.


by ineedalife on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:27:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Well, there is the "God Damn America" thing. To that I say 'meh'. Really - when taken in context it is easy to see where he is coming from. When taken out of context it is easy to get upset.

I have yet to see video of his AIDS comment - though that does seem far more offensive from what I understand.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:34:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Wright isn't running for President.  Supporters of our most likely nominee shouldn't have to answer about whether they agree with Wright.  Irrelevant.


We are the change we've been waiting for.
by jlars on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:38:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You think the voters are gonna see it that way? This whole line of excuse, and that's what is is pal, is so pathetic that it almost defies belief.

Since before our country was founded, since politics came into existence eons ago people have known each other by who their friends and associates were. It's hard-wired into the human brain.

Din't yer mama never tell you that...

YOU'D BE KNOWN BY THE FRIENDS YOU KEEP?

You know she did.. Everybody's mama tole 'em that.

'CAUSE IT'S HOW OUR MINDS WORK.

Give up the bullshit. Obama's campaign is over. Clinton will whip his ass in PA and the Superdelegates will trample each other in a stampeded to her.

Anything to get away from the estimable Rev. Wright: Black Racist that he is.


by Pericles on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:39:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

Jerome? Welcome to the black world. Jeeze I can't believe how disconnected we all are. That worldview is the worldview of millions of black people around the world who are freakin tired of being at the bottom of the human race. When you "Imagine THAT WORLDVIEW" maybe you'll understand.

Freaking living in lala land.


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:16:48 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

Well, I can't say I'm sorry that I fail to imagine that worldview.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:18:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Wow.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:19:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Obama seems to be doing quite good with the worldview I have, on which he's running.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:21:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Yes, I dont think you get to say that all AA have this worldview but Obama is post-racial.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

He is, I find that the most compelling part of his candidacy and of him as a person, about which I have previously praised him. I really look forward to when that is the dominant worldview, and am not going to apologize for sharing in it already.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:29:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

No, but you don't care to fake outrage because you have been made aware that the previous generation of AA's does not share that worldview. If it serves your candidate, that is.


by marcotom on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 07:14:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

What?  The person claiming all AA's have this "worldview" is the person attacking Jerome.


by DaveOinSF on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:29:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

no. I was concurring. I was arguing that one cannot claim to share Wright's worldview (or not find it objectionable) if you are also claiming to be post-racial.

To repeat from earlier, this would be like me saying that I am profoundly influenced and in agreement with Germaine Greer but I think we are beyond the patriarchy.  They two are somewhat incommensurable.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:39:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Sharing and being empathetic towards are very different. Many African Americans have determined that Obama does not share their completely understandable anger at America, but realize that he is at least empathetic to it, in a way that not even the Clintons (who they previously saw as the most empathetic politicians) are not.


by benb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:15:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I am sorry. I think your argument is reasoned, but taking a look at the Wright videos there is a clear hyperbole about race above all things that is not about who is empathetic toward the Black community. (I cite Wright as a representation of the true "shared" anger at America of AA--which I would challenge, but that is a digression.)
It clearly appropriates Obama as a Black man with a shared experience of racial intolerance and Hillary Clinton as a representation of white economic power. (no matter that this is pretty ridiculous) I didn't hear any he is 'of us but not one of us..' this is clearly about sharing an experience and the anger that comes from that experience.
And the empathy you claim the Clinton's do not have and have been thusly rejected for this absense--yeah, I wonder just how much that will change once all this is over. If Clinton was campaigning for Edwards over Obama and said the same fool things the campaign would have responded the same NOT because of some failure of empathy--because Obama needed to consolidate the AA vote. I do not think it takes very much to push such consolidation-- there is something really inspiring about breaking through a ceiling. That transcends empathy or understanding. It transcends the greater empathy or policy closeness.  
by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:32:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Obama may be running on it, but I know damn well he can imagine that other worldview that a great many minorities have in this country.  Hell, that was essentially the worldview that Ferrarro was expressing, now wasn't it?  It's a worldview shared by a hell of a lot of people, including a great many Dems and progressives.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:36:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

It is not about Obama's worldview. Clearly, he can make up his own mind. It is about people's failure to grasp the fact that what is acceptable at a massive, urban, black church is very different than what is acceptable to most people.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:37:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Read Some W.E.B. Dubois. (none / 0)

Jerome, you might want to read some W.E.B. Dubois.

And some Darcus Howe, with the UK New Statesman.

And listen to some Linton Kwesi Johnson.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Read Some W.E.B. Dubois. (none / 0)

I've read Dubois, along with Cullen, McKay, and Hughes--I read entire years of The Crisis for a grad research paper that covered view from Booker Washington, through the Harlem Renaissance, to James Baldwin. Native Son is one of my favorites. To this day, whenever I'm walk north out of Central Park, it comes to mind.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Read Some W.E.B. Dubois. (none / 0)

I do need to do some reading.  this story has been one of those moments where it really strikes me how much I don't know.

I do know Linton's work though, what I've heard is only the most famous songs.. he is a great artist.


by daria g on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:54:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

And while we are on this issue of Wright's "let us say very negative comment about america" maybe now is the time to revisit Michele Obama comment. For the first time in my life i am proud of my country.  I dont know if there is a connection but her comment fits in very closely to Wright's statements.  Just something to think about. Her comment is going to get more air time now because if fits a pattern.  And this if of course fair game because the BO campaign does this every day.

david


by giusd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:21:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

To many of us who have visited mydd, it is clear there are many worldviews you are incapable of imagining.


by Satya on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:06:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I frankly am a little disappointed with both sides of late.

You can disagree with Rev. Wright but still make an effort to understand where he's coming from.  Thousands of people go to that church (and I bet they pretty much all vote Democratic, too).  Obviously he's saying something that speaks to the community.

By the same token, you can disagree with Geraldine Ferraro, but too many people want to just yell "racist!" and walk away without understanding the place where she comes from.  I thought this was a very nice diary from an Obama supporter on that.  We ought to be able to have more discussions along those lines.

I was always taught that liberals were about being open-minded and trying to understand people.  Heck, the knock on us from the right is that we're too open-minded, that we're moral relativists.  If we're going to take the heat for that accusation anyway, we might as well travel a tiny bit down that road.  Who knows, you might learn something about your fellow man.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:34:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

i think most reasonable observers thought Ferraro's comment was initially race-insensitive, but that her insistence on digging herself deeper in a hole belied some racial resentment that bordered on the racist.
I personally do not know her so i would not call her racist.
But clearly what she said belied some issues with racial stereotyping and racial resentment that are common with people of her generation and that it would have been good for Hillary to denounce more forcefully.
All silly controversies in the end.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:37:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

What I'm saying is that it's more important to try and understand a worldview than to form a judgment about whether a given person is good or evil.  Let's say Ferraro was dead wrong.  Why do you suppose she feels that way?  Is there anything we can do to stop people from feeling that way?  Etc.

When people write diaries that are like "listen, it may be completely foreign to you, but here's how the world looks from where I sit," I find that extremely valuable.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:42:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

And that's part of my problem with Jerome embracing that line of attack on Obama. I don't approve of Pastor Wright language but he should know better than not acknowledge the suffering in the AA community that brings that kind of silly resentment.
There was a Malcolm X to a Dr King.

The wingnuts are those who think Malcolm X was evil. We should know better than to try to tar our candidates with those are more radical than us.

It is Obama's strength that he has been able to mainstreaming extremely progressive ideas (such as the idea 9/11 was partly explained by America's reckless foreign policy).


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:46:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You'd think white liberals would get it, but in fact, you kinda need to spell it out for us!  If Francis L. Holland were here he'd point out that this is why we need minority perspectives on the blogs.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:49:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Lol! Yes. But I am aware that there are many white people with their critical thinking caps on.


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:20:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

This is much more eloquently put than what I meant, and is what I was trying to convey.


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"You can disagree with Rev. Wright but still make an effort to understand where he's coming from... Heck, the knock on us from the right is that we're too open-minded, that we're moral relativists. "

Whether we as liberals, or progressives, or whatever you want to call us can empathize with the rage behind Reverend Wright's comments is immaterial to the discussion of whether we can afford to lead with our chin as Democrats when we nominate a presidential candidate to represent our entire party in this national conversation.

While I can personally empathize with the rage and the wound that underlies his worldview, I also understand that there is an intoxication of self righteousness that accompanies demonizing another race and offers a rush and a thrill when hating others for all the hurt one has sustained. There comes a time when venting that rage turns into a self propelling misuse of an original injustice. That is where we must turn back, or risk turning into the same bigots we decry.

I think it could ultimately be productive for the white community to hear Reverend Wright's worldview, if they have been sufficiently sheltered from it in the past.  

Many poor white people understand the rage very well, because today there is much of the same degree of wounding due to class and poverty issues that is similar to what the black community has unfairly suffered for generations (and I am one of those who does not believe things have improved all that much, or that they could not revert to their earlier horrors all too easily). Poor people are not regarded as human, either. Poor people are allowed to die without health care, and shamed horribly in the process. One could come close to calling it genocide of the poor as a group, and I personally have come close to that, on my most outraged days, when it has been right in front of me as a health care provider. It is very bad judgement, and it is bigotry. The abuse of the poor comes in all colors, for sure. When I am most tempted to get a charge and that deceptively healing balm that comes from condemning others I remind myself of that. I correct myself, before doing harm to others and committing injustice myself.

Reverend Wright's views are not such a stretch for me to empathize with. But if I want the freedom to express such anger in such unfair and uncompromising terms, I don't deserve to run for public office. If I want to tacitly approve such views, and donate money, time, and my verbal approval to a proponent of such views, as Barack Obama has done, I do not deserve to run for office.

On that basis, I do not believe Obama should have run for office. He made choices that disqualify him.


by 07rescue on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:16:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Speak for yourself--and you are (none / 0)


by chieflytrue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:42:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"Welcome to the black world. Jeeze I can't believe how disconnected we all are. That worldview is the worldview of millions of black people around the world who are freakin tired of being at the bottom of the human race. When you "Imagine THAT WORLDVIEW" maybe you'll understand."

I am long familiar with this worldview, and how broadly it is shared in the black community. There are also countless people in the black community who do not agree, and despite their anger at the bigotry and discrimination they face daily, believe Reverend Wright's views go much too far.

This worldview is also very toxic on the national political stage, where many voters will reject it, and Obama should know this as the saavy politician he is. He knew this would come out and disqualify him in the minds of many voters who are completely unfamiliar with it. They will be shocked at it. As a political calculation, it shows incredibly poor judgement to make himself vulnerable in this fashion, it harms the Democratic Party and will likely cause us to lose this upcoming presidential election in a year when it was ours to lose.

There are many of us who are only in electoral politics because it offers a means to social justice, and as volunteers without any particular dog in this fight, we do hold each other responsible to further the goal of social change and upholding real progressive values, like universal health care. That personal responsibility includes stepping aside when your personal baggage will derail the larger movement. Obama should not have placed himself forward in this way, as a presidential candidate. He should have completely disassociated himself long ago from this man he calls his "spiritual mentor" and repudiated those views. It's too late, now.

When politicians like Bill Clinton and Elliot Spitzer throw their political careers away and harm the Democratic Party credibility in voters' minds with sex scandals I condemn their cavalier misuse of the support, dedication, labor, and money we supporters give and sacrifice for them when we trust them and work for their election campaigns. I include in my estimate of a candidate how they manage their personal baggage and "youthful indiscretions" and what effect those things will have on the greater good. Obama needs to take a good, hard look at his own personal baggage and associations with people who will derail our message and our work.


by 07rescue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:44:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"There are also countless people in the black community who do not agree, and despite their anger at the bigotry and discrimination they face daily, believe Reverend Wright's views go much too far."

I agree. But looking at his statements he is talking about black oppression, is that going to far? I think it is if you are on the pulpit, yes, but for many people this is the only place they'll hear any kind of political discussion regarding black people.

""This worldview is also very toxic on the national political stage,"

He was speaking to his congregation, not campaigning for office. I think though, he should have shown better judgment and toned down his sermon, while still making those relevant points.

"That personal responsibility includes stepping aside when your personal baggage will derail the larger movement."

And this is my point. You have to understand that  this "personal baggage" is very, very, very, very difficult to just step aside from, if you encounter it daily, like many (not all) black people do GLOBALLY.  

"He should have completely disassociated himself long ago from this man he calls his "spiritual mentor" and repudiated those views."

I agree as well, but I also know that spiritual mentor and political mentor a two different things. I do not agree at all with my Pastor's political views (I go to a predominately white conservative Evangelical Christian church). But he is an outstanding preacher and motivates me to be a better person. I know how to separate his controversial statements from his enlightening ones, I'm sure a man like Obama, much smarter than myself, can do that too.

I like how you keep using the word "baggage" that racism/oppression is something that non-whites are handed and must continually dump by the roadside.

Seriously, did you guys skip ethnic studies courses in college?


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:03:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ethnic studies courses?  My college served fried chicken and watermelon on MLK Day.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:08:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"The Ones."

I guess that explains the recommended diaries around here.


by rfahey22 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:17:51 PM EST

A couple of thoughts (2.00 / 1)

If Fred Phelps was Hillary's minister, what would I think?

This Wright guy is new to me -- but I've known about Fred Phelps and his church since I lived in Topeka in 1977.  And I wouldn't be supporting Hillary if she went to his church.

Because it's a judgment thing.  What does it say about the Obama's that they've been close to this guy for so many years.

Also, my Mother-In-Law (who watched things unfold on TV) said some of these videos were from DVD's sold by the church.  So (if that's true - is it?) it's not just a momentary lapse on the minister's part.  It was deliberate & possibly staged.  


by katiebird on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:18:08 PM EST

Re: A couple of thoughts (none / 0)

By the way, what if I told you Fred Phelps once hosted a fundraiser for Al Gore?


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A couple of thoughts (none / 0)

Beat me to it :D


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:33:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A couple of thoughts (none / 0)

Whoa.. really?


by Socraticsilence on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:40:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 4)

Typical white people running scared because a black man said (albeit very passionately = angrily) that life in America is not the same for everyone and that "rich white people" own everything. Yeah, we need God to start blessing America--fast!

Yeah but when suited-up, white people (the late Falwell, Dobson, Robertson, Hagee, Parsley) say hateful things then stand for photo-ops with Bush/McCain, they come out unscathed. If you all can't see the profound double standard in this than racism in America is a foregone struggle and will never be reconciled.


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:21:33 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 3)

As a gay man, I would never endorse any of those ministers that you have labeled.  And if ANY candidate where to be a follower of these men, they would lose my vote.

Add Wright to your list.  He belongs there, and it is NOT because he is black.  Thank you very much....


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Don't you think most politicians attend (or have attended) churches where homosexuality was, at one time or another, publicly demonized?


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:40:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

its funny you say that. (2.00 / 1)

So you won't be voting for  Hillary then for enlisting support of anti-gay people like Harold Mayberry, Darrell Jackson,

They are also black preachers who are anti-gay.

Read up: http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/10/24/162 436/74


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Alas, also as a gay man, you have to be pragmatic about things otherwise you wouldn't vote for anyone.

I know full well that religion as a whole, hates homosexuality.  Obviously, those views are not going to be changed over night.  I get it, but the hatred that has been SPEWED from the pulpit of Wright, Falwell, Robertson, et.al, cannot and should not be tolerated by ANYONE.

I'm sorry you can't see the difference...


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:59:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

whoa. so my liberal recoil at Wright's statements are because I am a racist just like Falwell, Dobson, Robertson, Hagee, Parsley who also draw my liberal recoil.

I think you are probably encountering a pretty liberal bunch among these boards (or DKos, DU, TL)... if there is some consensus that this is objectionable language then this will get much, much worse if it breaks.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Lol, yes and this is where white liberals and black liberals will surely part ways.

No actually my point is the coverage of this. Any wrong that black people do is always 10 times worse. Just look at sentencing laws, etc. Anyway, its a fact that Americans (all of us, black white, latino, asian) are profoundly ignorant and lost on talking about race. We are just all over the place. That's why you have some people agreeing with Ferraro and some not seeing the big deal with what Wright said.

I'm sorry but a lot of what Wright said is no different from reading some liberal authors (Blowback = the militarization of the world = the increase spread in radical Islam = retaliation against America) that's not saying you agree with 9/11. But we all know the only people who can criticize American culture are white people (Hagee, Robertson).  Because America is synonymous with white. Even the way people talk about the black community in the blogsophere its as if we are not American, just black.

You guys don't get it. So many of us (black people ) have grandparents who went to segregated schools and fought the colonialists (in Africa).  Yeah I hate the victim mentality, and I talk about hard work and I mentor young black kids, so i'm not about "blaming the man"

But don't pretend that we don't have some severe psychological damage that has been afflicted on us as a people, because of our skin color.

As for what Wright said, maybe I need some direct quotes from people or something, but I don't know what exactly was racist?? Saying that white people own most of everything? How is that racist? Its fact. Just like saying black people are a majority of those in many prisons. Like I've said before we are working with many errant definitions of racism. There are some basic things I don't agree with like him saying Jesus was black which is incorrect.

I think the deal here is anytime you see/hear the  phrase "white people", white people get nervous and fight back because you are not used to being singled out. Sorry, again, welcome to the world of "the other". If I have to hear "the black vote" one more time...

Please, I am willing to discuss this. Maybe this is a world view "I can't imagine"


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Beve,

Liberals can be critical. I hear you but I think you are wrong. I think you are suggesting that liberals are not allowed to challenge societal norms which is complete nonsense. I agree that it may be an easier argument from the right, but that is the problem with liberalism (with a little l) and there are plenty of people tryin to reconcile all that--Macedo comes to mind.  That they appropriate illiberal (i.e. intolerant) perspectives to accomplish liberal democratic objectives is nothing new.

We don't get it. As for your statement about some knee-jerk liberalism  that makes whites uncomfortable, comments like "You guys don't get it" may contribute to the defensiveness you are identifying among the "white people." Though all of this is pretty ridiculous since the internet should be an ideal speech environment because you cannot identify others' race, but I digress.

Frankly, the notion that I am not used to being singled out is pretty preposterous-- I am woman in   Academia. As one of the three women in my department, I get singled out plenty to speak for all women in my field, all women in academe, and all women students. It makes me pretty uncomfortable to do so, but maybe that is because being a woman does not come with a clear group identity provided to me. Maybe we as women lack that consciousness because we do not have escaped the severe psychological damage that has been afflicted on us as a people, because of our gender.

I can count on other posters to speak on the content of Wright's speeches.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:45:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ok point taken. I just really get annoyed by the lack of understanding on both sides.

You are right, I should know better. I grew up mostly around white people and was the "black friend" who always had to explain why there was still racism in the world--and i had to do it calmly and rationally and with stats. My apologies for any offense to you or others.


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:08:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Beve -  I don't recoil when I hear the words "white people" UNLESS it comes right before "... are the enemy"  Which is documented in video for everyone to see and hear. Wright calls "white people" the "enemey" Clearly.  He rants against women, whites, gays, and Jewish people.  He screams "G*D D*MN AMERICA!" and accuses America of being the "KKK SA!"  THAT is what I recoil from.  

I think the uber liberals that are falling all over themselves to excuse Wright's behavior and Obamas 2-decade relatiionship with him (as Obama's "spiritual advisor and mentor") have made a SERIOUS miscalculation.

1) Unless you're an Obama follower, Demcorats care whether or not they're accused of being racists.

2) they do not take kindly to grotesquely sexist attitudes, as displayed by Obama's "friend" and "mentor"

3)  Democrats happen to LOVE America!  We're patriotic.  Only the likes of Karl Rove want you to believe otherwise. I don't care what color Wright is, or anyone, but I DO care that my Country is being trashed by that man, and we have a Democratic Candidate that has endorsed that ideaology by choosing to stay with that church for 20 years, support them financially, and have Wright as an intimate in his family life.  

Has there been injustices on blacks in America? Yes. Toward women? Yes. Chinese? Yes. Irish? yes. Jews? Yes. Gays? Yes. Hispanics? Yes.  It doesn't make any of what Wright preaches okay.  It's never okay.


by Catriley sez on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:56:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think Obama's only hope on this (none / 0)

is to stick to the line he used in front of the Jewish audience in Cleveland: maybe you can relate to having an old uncle who says things you don't agree with.

A lot of Americans have crazy or racist older relatives.

The more people watch the actual video, though, the tougher it's going to be for Obama. If the GOP put this in campaign ads, even response ads featuring Hagee's anti-Catholic remarks might not be enough.


Join the Iowa progressive community at Bleeding Heartland.
by desmoinesdem on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:23:22 PM EST

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (2.00 / 3)

I am just glad we have a long primary season so we can evaluate Obama's ability to respond to this stuff.  If he can deflect all the controversy, he truly is a political wizard.

I can only imagine how this plays amongst your typical ELCA attendees from Iowa.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:29:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (none / 0)

It doesn't play at all.  You see, most people couldn't care less about this issue.


by Cycloptichorn on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:31:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (2.00 / 0)

Yup, which is why people were gathering around the TV at the gym tonight for the 5 minute story on Headline News....

I'm in Indiana, btw.  Obama will be here tomorrow, and we vote on May 6th.  You can bet this is important to this red state...


-----------

Blog: http://fitnessnerd.blogspot.com/

by FitnessNerd on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:34:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (none / 0)

I was panicked at first because I am not religious and didn't know how people who are would take it.
But all I see is a lot of Republican outrage who have finally found a way to get their base riled up against Obama (which was expected as Jerome said time and time again).
But most people who worship share the same stories about their rabbi/priest/pastor/Pope saying crazy stuff and noone caring.
So I am confident that will blow over with maybe a net positive coz now everybody knows Obama is not a Muslim.
His reaction tonight was forceful (and clever for him to do the Rezko interviews the same day).
So let's not endorse those types of attacks on a progressive blog. Pleas.e
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (none / 0)

No one caring? Did you watch the same video I did? No one was sitting on their hands. Everyone was jumping up and screaming in agreement.

The idea that this is "just his pastor" is someone disingenuous. Incidentally, Obama took him off of the campaign when he first announced because, "He can be controversial" at times. That doesn't seem to me to be the actions of someone who was unaware of this as he has been claiming throughout the course of his response. It will someone have to be proven that Obama disagrees with every member of the congregation and I highly doubt that is true. If he DOES disagree with every member of the congregation then I am not quite sure why you would affiliate yourself with them over the course of some 20 years.
As I see it Barack has been lying (during the course of this response) about his knowledge about the "controversial" statements being played on tv and the ones that haven't been played. Ultimately the lie will play much worst than the pastors rhetoric


by Wiseprince on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 08:44:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (none / 0)

!!!!!


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (2.00 / 2)

I think that's the rub: It's on video and can be played and played again.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I think Obama's only hope on this (2.00 / 0)

That would only work if Wright was actually a relative. Not someone Obama chose to closely associate with for 20 years, donate money to, call a "spiritual advisor" and "mentor".

Sorry the crazy uncle thing doesn't fly.


by Catriley sez on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:03:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Agreed Beve.  I'm amazed at how out of tune all these supposedly progressive bloggers are to how black people (with some justification, I might add) view their relationship with their country.

To his credit, Obama while obviously "linked" to these people, has, on his own, has taken on a lot of orthodoxy:  calling out homophobia and parental absenteeism in front of black audiences is something I haven't seen a politician (black or white) do in front of a black audience in some time.  

Even John McCain, during an interview in front of Sean Hannity wouldn't take the bait.  He said as I say:  this is not what Barrack Obama believes.  Hillary disavowed Ferraro pretty quickly, and to her credit.  Obama's just done the same.

If Jerome and the Clintonites want Democrats in power, they would push back on this.


by thewrath on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:14 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Thank you.

I also think that the reason why many, not all, white people are able to find Obama appealing is that he's not confrontational about racism or injustices of this kind.  This is the litmus test of whether you are an "acceptable" black person.

Do you rant and rave (and that's exactly what Wright was doing) about injustice, racism and oppression? Nope, sorry, we are "post-racial" now. We don't do that.

The day we will be post-racial society is the day that what Wright's comments will not be a newsflash for a segment of society. (Yes the Romans were rich white people! Gasp!)


by beve83 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:16:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Your comment about Obama and Wright is not believable, and after listening to these screeds and racial bias, and Israel positions, anger, rage, and demagogery, it is impossible to have us believe that Obama spent 20 years with in Wright's church.

The lame and hypocritical response from Obama does not pass the smell test. Part of Wrights ethos is black victimology and the rest of us as Whitey demons.

Obama is not telling the truth that HE NEVER HEARD ANY OF THIS IN CHURCH OR HE WOULD HAVE LEFT.

ONLY FOOLS WOULD BELIEVE THAT IN 20 years this was the first [last yr] that he ever heard this sick paranoia.

And, if so, how can he possibly denounce what he knows is the philosophy of Wright, his love for Farrrakhan, and his obvious contempt and hatred for this country and the people in it,

This is black muslim dreck screamed with hate and we don't need a black supremist as President who pretends to be a unifier.

Barack....fold your tent.  You are a liar and not who you say you are. Obamatons will excuse this which is deplorable, but Barack can NEVER win the general after this exposure.  And believe it, there is more to come about his church and its philosophy of a black america.


by morris1030 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:44:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Excellent point, Jerome. (1.00 / 2)

And what kind of spineless, unethical, sycophant would sit at dozens of Walmart Board meetings -- where illegal and unethical union busting was planned, and where unions were labelled "blood-sucking parasites," and do and say absolutely nothing about it?

Oh wait, that was Hillary.

She sat there for six years, Jerome. And did nothing. NOTHING. While Walmart busted Unions, harrassed worker, treated them like crap. Called them all kinds of disgusting names.

NOTHING.

And this sycophantic poseur pretends to be a friend of working people?!?

How can you stand to look at yourself in the Mirrr Jerome as an apologist for this woman.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:25:55 PM EST

Re: Excellent point, Jerome. (none / 0)

Michelle Obama also drew a paycheck for sitting on a Wal-Mart related board, until Obama started his prez campaign.

God, Obama supporters = dumb, dumb, dumb. Why doesn't he have more intelligent people supporting him?


by euripideandreams on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:19:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Excellent point, Jerome. (none / 0)

see you are misleading even here

she was on that board in the VERY early days of Walmart

they were NOT a HUGE arse sweat shop at that point!

I don't know the NUMBER of stores back then but I've read it was EARLY in their days.

You act like she's only JUST resigned from them.
That's misleading


by CarolinaDawn on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:46:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Where was the fuss when McCain called Washington D.C the 'city of Satan' which he did a week ago. Not a word of it has been discussed. He gets a free pass from the media and Obama is smared with association by a ranting pastor.


McBush: ''Doesnt' know that much about economics''
by PrinceCA on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:26:10 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Jerome I wonder if you will be happy if Obama loses the general election to McCain.  You seem to think he is far worse for this country than McCain by your posts.  I am just wondering if your preference order goes 1) Clinton, 2) McCain, 3)Obama(nader?)


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:28:04 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

Dem.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:30:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Do you consider Obama to be a Democrat?


by Kal on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Obviously he is a democrat...


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:37:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for making that clear.
Defend Clinton all you want but remember there is a huge chance Obama may still be the guy we need to fight for in November.
And not only by default.
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I appreciate that actually, thanks for the easy answer bud.


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:37:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

obama doesn't need any help. He seems to be doing a great job of driving voters away himself.


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:36:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Hey, your candidate used a word I never thought I word here her utter in my life in describing your candidate and swore to never vote for her last week over drinks.

So with the vitriol on both sides, dems are doing what they do best...trying to lose.


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:39:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Note to self, don't type and talk on the phone at the same time.


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:54:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Lets all step back... (2.00 / 1)

Ok. I think these comments by Wright are absolutely disgusting. They are obviously a problem for Obama. I don't know how this plays out, but right now (and thanks for the derisiveness, Jerome) I suppose I still am one of "The Ones." I support Barack Obama because I believe he would be a great President. Are there things that could happen that would make me change my mind...yes. I'm not a "cultist" or "a lemming." I'm not blinded by his rock star appeal. But I am not going to assume that the words of his pastor represent his views.

There are currently 3 (I believe) videos of Rev. Wright spewing all kinds of bile on the tubes. Is anyone here assuming that 3 clips are indicative of an entire career? I'm not defending him, certainly, and maybe all his sermons are like this. I suspect not, however, because the networks (Fox for sure) would have shown more of them and not just the same few in a mind numbing loop. But imagine being defined by 3 of the worst, most idiotic things you've ever said.

Further, would anyone here really have more respect for Obama if he threw this man under the bus as soon as it was politically expedient? It may not be helpful politically, but I think it says something about Obama that he is willing to acknowledge the role Wright has played in his life while disavowing his hateful statements.

My rabbi vehemently opposes gay marriage and abortion. He's delivered sermons at services that say that Jews who marry non-Jews are traitors. I think that's idiotic.

It wouldn't be right for the news organizations, or anyone on these blogs to hold Clinton accountable for everything her pastor says, and it isn't right for them to do it to Obama. Can we all agree that "gotcha" politics is destructive and move past it? The answer isn't for the media to treat Obama as shitty as they've treated Clinton, the answer is for them to stop treating both of them shitty and focus on the fact that, whether you support Obama or Clinton, both have plans to jump start the economy, provide health care, and end the war. McCain has "bomb bomb bomb Iran" and no information on the economy at all.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:30:15 PM EST

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

"3 of the worst, most idiotic things you've ever said."

Ever, or while preaching? Having done a few of those while a teenager in the church, I suppose I have a different perspective on it being something with sacredness attached, a bit more than just spouting off racist bs around the cooler.

Anyway, I'm sure the wingers are scuming the earth.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:34:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

Ok, but what about the rest of it? What about it being Wright saying these things rather than Obama? What about Obama disavowing Wrights comments but NOT throwing him under a bus?

I'm not defending Wright, but Wright DOES NOT EQUAL Obama.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:41:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

I totally agree with that defense.

I'm saying, non-apologetically, that I don't understand the worldview that can sit there and take that in and go along with it, I just can't, that's what I expressed.

I also pointed out that, unfortunately for all he's worked for, the Obama campaign has made people associated with Clinton out as spokesperson's for her views when they say stupid things. That's something I abhor (its personal I guess having been in that position with camapigns), and it's come back at him.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:12:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

I agree. I think holding people responsible for the statements made by people other than them is ridiculous.

Hopefully (though it may be too much to hope for) the fact the candidates from both parties have religious leaders with ultra-radical views will help us recognize that the extremes of any religion are hateful and problematic.

This is politics...not church. or mosque. or synagogue.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

C'mon, Jerome.  Don't be disingenuous about the Obama campaign.  I believe (most recently) it was the Clinton campaign that threw the first stone by demanding that Samantha Power be fired for merely venting her frustrations over the campaign while doing a book interview in Europe...  The Obama campaign offered an apology, but Clinton wanted a resignation.

Before Ferraro, the primary Hillary surrogate under attack was Bill himself - and I think his remarks are completely in bounds...

As for this sentiment:

I'm saying, non-apologetically, that I don't understand the worldview that can sit there and take that in and go along with it, I just can't, that's what I expressed.

Now I don't know if I've listened to every Wright comment out there, but so far I've heard two things: 1) That blacks should be pissed that they live in a country that has been plagued with institutional racism; and 2) 9-11 was ultimately the product of decades of American malfeasance abroad.

Now his rhetoric may have been angry and outside of the mainstream, but as a progressive, how do you not understand a worldview that would sympathize with those ideas?


by Damien in Texas on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 07:02:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (2.00 / 1)

Growing up southern baptist I can tell you would be surprised what is said in the heat of the moment on the pulpit.

I heard stuff even in grade school that made me recoil and my mother told me "what a man says isn't the same as what god says"


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:41:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

Sacredness has a different feel for different people.  You ever been to any of the Black churches the Clintons regularly attend?  May not be Rev. Wright style offensiveness, but I've known more than one White person shocked at just how... expressive the preachers are.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:43:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (2.00 / 1)

I think it is flawed for any white person to compare their church to TUCC. It is not some secret that black congregations can be very different from your run-of-the-mill white, protestant congregation.


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:43:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (2.00 / 1)

Which is why I think the Clinton campaign hasn't gone anywhere near this.  Every single person that's attended a Black church has seen a pastor fly off the handle in the middle of things like this a time or two.  

Hell I know the Clintons have repeatedly gone to Abyssinian Baptist, and Calvin Butts is supporting Hillary. I know damn well he said some stuff during the Diallo case that made all kind of right wing heads explode and had White people all over New York going "OMG, racist!  Doublestandards!  Reverse Racism!", etc.

The fact that Hillary's remaining 10-15% of the Black vote seems to consist of older Black women who would go totally off the wall if she said or did anything perceived as disparaging to the church probably plays a hand in that as well.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:55:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

Or maybe she's not as evil as y'all think she is.  


by mgee on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 08:45:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

It probably does fall short, all of our worldviews are limited to our own at somepoint.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:14:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary threw Ferraro under the bus too. (none / 0)


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:54:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

Awwww....no. there are more than 3 clips trust me and he is saying some awful things.

Here is something new that I heard tonight,

Yes, 911-01 happened to us
and so did slavery
yes, the WTC happened to us
and so did Tuskeegee
yes, the Pentagon happened to us
and so did White supremacy

Yes, I get it that some bad things were done to the Black community but it is unfair and divisive to use them as a basis to bash America or try to equate it to why America deserved 911 or why those victims deserved to have their lives snuffed out!


by shark on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:35:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

Again, I won't defend Wright. Even if it isn't three, even if it is 10 or 20, consider this:

Obama said he joined the TUCC in 1991, that's 17 years ago. Lets assume a pastor delivers 1 sermon per week (they may take weeks off, but make up for it at high volume times--Christmas, Easter, etc.) In the time Obama has know Jeremiah Wright, he has delivered 884 sermons. Wright has been a pastor for 30 years, in that entire time, delivering roughly one sermon per week, he has delivered 1,560 sermons.

Even if it is 20 sermons that are on the news and the tubes this evening (which it isnt, because I've watched Countdown, AC360, and Hannity & Colmes--the last one made me kinda nauseous, and I saw the same clips repeatedly), that is an infinitesimal fraction of the sermons Wright delivered.

I don't think anyone can hold Obama accountable for what Wright said ever. And I don't think anyone can call TUCC inherently hateful with such a small amount of evidence.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:11:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lets all step back... (none / 0)

The Obama campaign kept him from view because he "could be controversial at times". Obviously they knew more than they alluded to during the course of their response to this. Clearly Barack heard enough controversial statements from the "pastor" that he would come to that final decision. Barack Obama needs to come clean about the controversial statements that he heard in the past and why even after hearing them he would not leave or question the church/"pastor".
In the end his not being truthful will be more damaging than the statements of his spiritual advisor
by Wiseprince on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 09:06:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

Cool it!

I don't care what Ferraro said and I don't care what Wright said.  Neither are running for President.  Nonesense on both counts.

Now lets try and hold it together here and realize this frame -- where everyone ever associated with either Clinton or Obama somehow represents those two as surrogates is -- preposterous.

If you support Clinton then you should already know this is some bullshit of a weak attack.  Now lets not tear each other apart over it.  Both our candidates are running good campaigns and this line of attack is old news and furthermore entirely irrelevant.

Remember, McCain IS in the race and he actually makes mistakes so lets keep our guns pointed at him and not at each other.


We are the change we've been waiting for.
by jlars on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:30:34 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You win the award for awesome today :D


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:42:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Doesn't matter whether you care or not.  It has become accepted practice, in this campaign, to attribute statements made by anyone remotely affilitated with the candidate to the candidate her/himself.  The Obama side wants Hillary to be responsible for statements by Andrew Cuomo, Bob Kerrey, Geraldine Ferraro, Bill Clinton.  But, in order to pull that off, Obama will have to be accountable for statements by Samatha Power, Jesse Jackson Jr, Austan Goolsbee, Michelle Obama, and Jeremiah Wright.


by DaveOinSF on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:40:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

But every pastor disparages Hillary Clinton during his Christmas Day sermon.  

Did Obama attend church on Christmas?


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:31:08 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Obama spends Christmas in Hawaii.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:43:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

And I imagine he knew about this.  After all, the congregation is full on Christmas.

I guess wright really was his mentor.  wright certainly did obama's work at the pulpit.

out of touch


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:46:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Yeah, you imagine a lot of things.

(I'll accept a troll rating for this, if need be)


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:02:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Moral compass is your phrase, not Obama's. He's said, many times, and the NYTimes just wrote a story on this today, that his moral compass is his mother.


by LiberalFL on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:32:14 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.50 / 2)

I want a president who has high standards for America and who is unafraid to let others air those standards.

Rev. Wright holds those standards.  Michelle Obama holds those standards.

What's the alternative... some joker with a flag pin declaring "Mission Accomplished" every five seconds?

Rev. Wright bringing up white privilege could not be more different than Ferraro's blind remarks.  He is the opposite of racist.


by Cloudspitter on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:33:33 PM EST

He's the Definition of a racist (1.00 / 1)


by chieflytrue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:46:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: He's the Definition of a racist (none / 0)

So calling attention to white racism in this country is the same as being a racist?

This is still a progressive blog, right?


by Cloudspitter on Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 11:09:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ben Smith absurdly likens the comments and stepping down by Geraldine Ferraro over saying being clumsy blunt with those of the disgustingly anti-American and racist rantings and dismissal of Jeremiah Wright.

Do you proofread your posts? 'Cause I don't know what you're saying here.


by Kal on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:33:59 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I confess, hardly. Comma's added.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:36:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

lets try this (none / 0)

1. But I am assuming you can see how somebody endorsed by Hagee can win???

2.
----
I cannot see any way which we can win in November with Clinton as our candidate after these Ferraro revelations.

Ferraro is clearly a racist -- or at least does a great impersonation of one in his comments -- and that is not going to fly with the majority of the people in this country, IMO.
----

you see how this works?


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:35:50 PM EST

Re: lets try this (2.00 / 2)

"Ferraro is clearly a racist -- or at least does a great impersonation of one in his comments"

Ferraro is neither a racist nor a man. When you know so little about a person it is best not to offer such an inflammatory accusation against them. Going by a statement that was taken completely out of context and had it's meaning and intent completely perverted in order to use it against Hillary Clinton is really foul. Ferraro was a fighter for the civil rights of all for all of her 40 years of public service. Turning around and demonizing her after all that commitment and support is atrocious.

Nothing seems to be beyond the pale when it is time for Obama and his supporters to try to gain an advantage, including stabbing old friends in the back, as David Axelrod has done.


by 07rescue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I think you missed my point (none / 0)

I was saying that you can present things in any hypothetical way.

I am saying the GOP can easily run that ad against Hillary. Hell they smear Obama as a muslim and that CLEARLY not true.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:08:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So is Obama supposed to quit ... (none / 0)

Because he listened to an NWA cassette in 1992 and did not immediately send out a press release denouncing Ice Cube, Dr. Dre and Easy Mothereffin' E ?

This is pearl clutching at its finest ...


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:36:12 PM EST

I'm sick of the pathetic defeatism at MYDD (1.50 / 2)

Hell, John Kerry was at a VVAW meeting where the assassination of US Senators was openly discussed.

This came out in 2004, and I had someone dig through the VVAW archives in Madison, WI for me to find out when Kerry actually resigned from the organization. It was after that meeting.

Yes, he resigned. But did he call the FBI or denounce them? No.

Compared to THAT, this is nothing.
 Get a freaking grip, people. Hillary's not going to be the nominee.

And if she does become the nominee through this kind of slimeball politics, she's going to lose a 3rd to half of Obama's voters in the fall, and lose in a landslide to McCain.

So either defend Obama, or run a third arty candidate, because you are making me sick wth your whining and lack of intestinal fortitude.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:38:20 PM EST

Re: I'm sick of the pathetic defeatism at MYDD (1.00 / 3)

No, I do not believe Obama will be the nominee.  And his supporters will vote for their economic interests in November.  If not, they will be rendered irrelevant by those who are TRUE DEMOCRATS, ones that are REAL and AUTHENTIC.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:40:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Don't delude yourself. (1.00 / 1)

Hillary has lost half the black vote in the fall with this crap.

And I know a LOT of young peole who simply will not even show up to vote at all.

This site used to DEFEND good Democrats from this crap -- not reinforce rightwing GOP talking points and narratives. I can't tell you how disgusted I am.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:44:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't delude yourself. (none / 0)

Oh, you'll get over it. One day it won't be all about who does or doesn't support Obama.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:15:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Don't delude yourself., Jerome (2.00 / 1)

Do you realize how arrogant your comment sounds?

Are you really going to argue that Hillary can grab the nomination with fewer pledged delegates without fracturing the party?

With her high negatives, Hillary can ill afford to lose any base voters.  Many will stay home, many will protest with Nader, many will vote for McCain.

Unless she gets on a roll and wins a strong majority of the remaining pledged delegates she will have zero legitimacy.

I have voted for Dems in every election in my life, and I will not vote for her if she cheats to win the nomination.  I am completely disgusted by the Clintons filthy tactics.


by upper left on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:41:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm sick of the pathetic defeatism at MYDD (2.00 / 2)

Again with blaming the controversy on Hillary.  Look, she's not the source of all evil in the world.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome is a Hillary apologist. (2.00 / 1)

And he's advancing the story instead of defusing it -- like this site USED to do with good Democrats.

I cold understand if Obama HIMSELF ad said ths stuff. Then at least Jerom'e lament would be legitimate.

But he didn't. He repudiated it and denounced it and cut Rev. Wright loose.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:47:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome is a Hillary apologist. (2.00 / 3)

Hillary is not going to become the nominee based on what Jerome says at MyDD.

The controversy is out there.  If Obama skates past it, great for Dems.  If he doesn't, it doesn't become Hillary's fault.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

snort (2.00 / 1)

No, no no, you don't understand, this isn't a site that speaks to political junkies that are 100% decided, MyDD has a reach of 33.333% of the undecided voters nationwide!  </snark>


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:17:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: snort (2.00 / 1)

Some of these comments are classic examples of shooting the messenger.

These people genuinely don't seem to understand that the controversy is all over the place today, whether it ought to be or not.  It's as though you singlehandedly dredged it up from some dark place where no one knew about it.  Must be kinda weird.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:21:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: snort (none / 0)

Yes, it is out there, but I will add that the silence was deafening from Jerome when the Ferraro thing came up and was all over the news.


A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy. - Teddy Roosevelt
by minvis on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:44:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: snort (2.00 / 1)

And Jerome not writing about it didn't much affect whether it became a story, did it?  I saw SIX recommended diaries on Ferraro AT THE SAME TIME over at Daily Kos, which I'm sure more than made up for Jerome's failings.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:05:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: snort (2.00 / 1)

What the hell does DKos writing about Ferraro have to do with Jerome not saying a thing about it?  That's not the point and you know it.  I think even Jerome would agree that he doesn't have that much affect on whether things become a story or not.  The point is not whether it's a story or not, it's the implicit acceptance of Jerome that it was alright for Ferraro to say it and for the Clinton campaign to let it stay out there as long as it did.  That's what makes the indignation of his comments now about Rev. Wright and the Obama campaign ring that much more hollow.

Don't get me wrong, he can write whatever he wants and have his opinions on the current political news.  It is his blog after all, but the respect I had for him has certainly decreased during this primary.


A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy. - Teddy Roosevelt
by minvis on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:56:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: snort (2.00 / 1)

If I were Jerome, I guess I would pretty much feel like I can't win at this point.  Write about something too much, don't write about something enough, someone thinks you're ruining America.  For all I know he was in Argentina at the time.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:07:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm sick of the pathetic defeatism at MYDD (none / 0)

Obama loses even more voters than Hillary. He'll lose in a landslide by your standards too right?


No longer a Democrat, now proudly an independent voter!
by Ga6thDem on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:47:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Well...we are just screwed then aren't we? (none / 0)

Might as well call off the election and hand it to McCain.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:48:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

and disassociate himself with every person in Arkansas and the Entire South who ever made a racial crack in his presence ?

Just wondering ...


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:41:28 PM EST

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (1.00 / 3)

Obama donated money to this man's church, and this man sat on Obama's advisory committee for his campaign.  He also baptized Obama's children.  Moreover, he officiated over Obama's marriage to the upwardly mobile Michelle.  


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:44:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

Hello. It's not "this man's church." Do you go to church? Have you ever gone to church? It is not the preacher's church. It is the congregation's church. The church is the people (remember that Sunday school song?). Our methodist church had many ministers that were not particularly popular with segments of the congregation. Congregations are not uniform and homogenous. What one segment of the congregation likes about a minister, another part of the congregation hates. This is commonplace in Protestant denominations.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:48:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

Obama cites this man as a mentor.  Remove the rating.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:50:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (2.00 / 1)

I love my mother and she has been a tremendous influence in my life.
She is also a rabid racist Republican.

One does not follow the other.


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:53:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

You can cite someone as a mentor but that does not mean you adhere and agree and support everything they have ever said in their life, or, more important to this case, the words they choose to express it.

You are getting very desperate here. Please stop before you hurt yourself.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:56:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Like William Fullbright! (none / 0)

Who was Bill's "mentor," and was a racist prick.


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Like William Fullbright! (none / 0)

Great comments. Thanks.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:57:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Like William Fullbright! (none / 0)

Watts-- are you trying to be inconsistent?

Do you think it was wrong that Bill Clinton did not denounce his mentor, Fulbright? Your comments seem to suggest yes.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Like William Fullbright! (none / 0)

Tuche'


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:09:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

Actually, I think for a white kid to grow up in the South when Bill Clinton did, and to end up on the right side of the civil rights issue, shows a spectacular amount of character.

Did he denounce everyone who made a racist remark?  I bet he denounced quite a few!


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:46:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not William Fullbright! (none / 0)


by Hesiod Theogeny on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:49:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

"Did he denounce everyone who made a racist remark?  I bet he denounced quite a few!"

--

Doesn't matter. The new standard is he had to denounce and immediately disassociate himself from all of them -- every single one of them.

Double Standard ... it's what's for dinner !!!


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (2.00 / 2)

Yeah, uh, I'm not really up for silly arguments, but I'll indulge you this once.  This issue is not about some random person who once said something controversial while in the same room as Barack Obama.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:53:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Did Bill Clinton publicly denounce (none / 0)

Nice try refusing to address the double standard.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:59:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 3)

I have never voted republican in my life.  I am not saying I will now.  However, i don't support any kind of racism period.  I am at a real crossroads if Obama wins.  Right now, I can't see how i can support a guy that has such close relations to this type of church.  I have no idea how to vote come November.  This sucks because I can't vote republican, but i also don't feel Obama is right for this country.

I am a 32 year old gay white man and have worked hard to change the opinions and feelings of many people close to me.  I know what discrimation is all about.  You don't create progress for your community by painting anyone different than you as the bad guy.  This is exactly what Rev. Wright is doing.  Blaming all whites for blacks problems.  That is racism.  I don't support it nor anyone who buys into it as Obama has.  

People often say that the catholic church is no better.  As a gay man, when i realized what the catholic church's view was on homosexuals & abortion, i walked away.  It wasn't any easy thing to do, having been alter boy and attending catholic schools my whole life.  I wish obama was strong enough to do the same.  Walking away from racist/discriminatory rhetoric is the very least i expect from a potential US president.  Obama as a man has let me down.


by Scope441 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:44:15 PM EST

Wise words--and a compelling story (none / 0)


by chieflytrue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:47:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.50 / 2)

Obama does not walk away. He goes to the pulpit and defends gays.


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:52:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

And then bashes gays with Donnie McClurkin while campaigning in South Carolina.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:53:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Look at his record:  Obama has never "thown gays under the bus" the way that the Clintons consistently have during their career.  He's done more to call out black homophobia publicly than any candidate in recent memory.


by thewrath on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:57:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 0)

He campaigned with Donnie McClurkin in South Carolina in order to gain votes from religious homophobes.  Yes, Obama's record with LGBT is very problematic.

He campaigns with known homophobes in South Carolina.  


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:59:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

His record on LGBT issues makes Bill and Hillary look like down right queer bashers for God sake.  You obviously don't have a clue about Obama and LGBT issues.  It's not all about McClurkin.


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:07:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 0)

No, for it also includes Obama's decision to not be photographed with Gavin NEwsome as a result of San Francisco gay marriage.

Obama campaigns with homophobes, and he is frightened to be seen with vigorous defenders of gay rights.

And then he bashes gays with Donnie McClurkin in SC for votes.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:11:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

He never "bashed" gays, not with or without Donnie McClurkin.  That is just silly to even try and make that leap.  If you are an LGBT voter then Obama is your candidate, he wants to repeal DOMA Hillary wants to "amend" it.  


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:02:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 0)

I am LGBT, and I do not vote for bigots who campaign with known homophobes during a gay bashing tour in South Carolina.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Bullshit. (none / 0)

He never once bashed gays.  Never.

Yeah, the McClurkin thing was a mistake, but he used that as an opportunity to publicly chastise McClurkin and the Black community in general for the sort of views that McClurkin has expressed.  

I can't find the actual quote right now, but Obama basically said straight up to a several large groups of Black people that 'you can't have it both ways.  You can't want civil rights for yourself while denying them to others.'

Linking the fight now for gay rights to civil rights in general and the Black community's historical struggle for them is farther than any of the candidates running for president have gone.  Further than virtually any politician has gone.  


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:22 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bullshit. (2.00 / 1)

Gay bashing tour with Donnie McClurkin in South Carolina.

Refused to be photographed with Gavin Newsome as a result of San Francisco gay marriage.

Obama is WEAK on LGBT issues.  and he engaged in a gay bashing tour in South Carolina.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:08:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bullshit. (none / 0)

i forgot about the Newsome thing.  That was really distasteful.  Was it ever debunked?


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:17:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bullshit. (1.00 / 0)

Obama has not proven strong on LGBT issues when he chose McClurkin to tour with him and refused to photograph with Gavin.  He seems to send different signals to different groups of people.  Reminds me of Bush with his compassionate conservatism bullshit.  Look where that got us.  I didn't fall for it the first time and I am not gonna fall for it with Obama.  I know a lier when I see one.


by Scope441 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:19:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bullshit. (none / 0)

Obama is out of touch with the LBGT community.  this may explain why clinton wins this community 67-33.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:28:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I choose to walk away from hate speech period.  I don't care if Obama supports gays.  That isn't the only issue to me.  (even though i question his support for the gay community.)  He supports a preacher that preaches hate. I have a fundamental problem with that.  


by Scope441 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:01:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

This wasn't just his church. TUCC is a massive institution that does immense good for disenfranchised and underprivileged people.

I suggest you research this church before passing such damning judgment against it.

And as for discrimination - are you forgetting the revolutionary impact a black presidency will have on this country?


www.thingsyoungerthanmccain.com
by LandStander on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I do not believe Barack Obama (none / 0)

has ever issued a press release denouncing Professor Griff of Public Enemy when Griff made an anti-semitic comment on a radio station broadcast in 1991.

What is Obama waiting for ?

For this reason alone, he needs to quit the race now. He has no chance in the swing states because of this grievous failure.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:13 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Your credibility was shot about six months ago when you went completely in the tank for Hillary.

Now you're cribbing FOX News talking points.

Congratulations, folks. MyDD has jumped the shark.


Further Reading
by Dave Sund on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:13 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Sadly, I agree. I never thought I'd see the day when the great netroots pioneer mydd threw in its lots with Hillary-Walmart-antiDean-antigrassroots- DLC-yesonIWR Clinton.

It makes me sad, and sick.


by Oregonian on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 05:20:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

this is nothing but hillary supporters last ditch effort to take this nomination.anyone that is seriously arguing that obama believes in HIV conspiracies, or that he hates this country is so past the point of reasonable debate that any response is just futile. this must be the final stage of primary grief.


by highgrade on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:45:15 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 3)

Believing that Hillary has anything to do with this issue is kinda up there with HIV conspiracies in my book.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:47:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You do understand don't you why the HIV story is an easy connection for the African American comunnity to make don't you?


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:56:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

I do my best to try and understand these things.

I also understand why it is easy to blame everything on Hillary, for the record!


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ok, slight exaggeration, but I agree with your general point.

This has been floating around for a while (though the videos, to my knowledge, are new).  It's clear the MSM -- perhaps Fox, but perhaps the less-evil segment as well -- did plenty of digging and was going to get to this on its own.

Is it possible that Hillary's campaign helped push this, deciding that they needed to respond to the Ferraro stuff?  Yeah, sure, but even then it would just be a question of timing.


by jackstah on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:12:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice try (none / 0)

I didn't say Hillary, I said her supporters (esp those on MyDD).  


by highgrade on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:35:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's really amazing that Kos does a flyer hunt (2.00 / 2)

that doesn't work, so then you all do a hunt for the next "racist" progressive liberal female Democrat who's been fighting Republicans for years on women and minority rights--Geraldine.  And you blow her up and destroy the Democratic female base and separate this party just to try to keep people from remembering Mar. 4th.

Then, your own ACTUAL bigot--scandal-- comes out to karma you the next day.

And again, you try to blame it on Hillary?  Nice try, but ask ABC news where they got Obama's pastor's tape from.

Try this--he's so proud of his Christmas sermon and other greatest hits all ABC news had to do was order this crap from the Reverend's website.

And guess what, go call ABC a liar because they told the world exactly how they got his number.


by chieflytrue on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:54:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

   What is this post about?  Who are "the ones?"  What is "the bus?"  
   Anyway, I hope this Wright controversy becomes as much of a non-issue as Farrakhan.
   Ferraro wasn't "clumsily blunt" she made an oopsie by revealing her thoughts of Obama as an affirmative action candidate.  That story got little play on Mydd.  I realize that it's typical in the Democratic party to take black voters for granted.  What a shame.   So Jerome, what do you think?  Do you think Obama would be on the verge of the nomination if he weren't black?  Do you agree with Ferraro, or are you not willing to be as clumsily blunt?
Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:46:29 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

And Fox News insists on exploring this issue.  I imagine they will continue to explore OBama's relation to Wright for at least a week.  

May we have access to Obama's appointment book?  I desire to know when he was at Trinity.  For I know Obama was "present" when Wright mounted the podium.

Obama is out of touch, outside of the mainstream.

OUT OF TOUCH


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:49:19 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

  Taking cues from Fox News now?  Real nice.


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:55:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

No, I simply do not believe that Obama was never exposed to Wright's problematic statements, especially as Wright was campaigning for Obama on Christmas Day at the Trinity Church.  


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:56:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

The mainstream elected Bush the last two elections. Maybe it would be better to have someone outside the mainstream.


by benb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:18:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (1.00 / 2)

Obama had 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE himself from this Black bigot.

SERIOUS DAMAGE IS DONE ! And this DAMAGE will ONLY escalate as more americans watch this video.

Would you go to a church with a Pastor who says things like that ?

Would you ask a Pastor like that to marry you?

Would you ask a Pastor like that to baptized your very own kids!

PLEASE! What do you call someone who associates himself for 20 LONG years with a character who spews Anti-White, Anti-American sermons ???

DAMAGE DONE! GAME OVER!

Do you think the 19 Million White Reagan Democrats who are already very skeptical of Obama vote for him after seeing this?

Do you think that the 36 Million white democratic leaning seniors would vote for Obama after seeing this?

Sorry, 20 LONG years is more than enough time to DISTANCE yourself from a Black Bigot !

There are ONLY Two Groups of people in America who are GIVING Obama a FREE pass!

White Liberals & some African-American die hard obama supporters.

The 75% of the country will find this outrageous.

Wright & his followers are No Different than some White  Southern Evangelical Churches. They are all racist!


by latinfighter on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:55:55 PM EST

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

We will find out very shortly in the polls exactly how much of an impact this will have. It's all over the news now, Obama was just on Hannity's show appearing evasive and weak. It's going to be very difficult for people to not see this story, and that will be reflected in polls very soon.

And I LIKE Obama. I support Obama. I'm also, for the first time, skeptical about his chances of winning.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:58:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

Because you don't think the republicans dont have a LONG list of silly controversies to throw Senator Clinton's way ?
And remember. People are already inclined to believe bad stuff about her.
Obama is fighting right back against those accusation. No need to start panicking because he has a few rough news cycles !
by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:02:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

I hope you're right. But don't blow this off. Obama's key strength that he's running on is his virtuous and ethical nature. His key weakness is that he hasn't been around long enough for people to feel they really know who he is. This might hit him hard on both fronts.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:05:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

At least with Hillary, people have already heard most of the dirt, even moreso than with McCain. It would be very difficult for her to be seen in a more negative light, especially if Obama imploding on this issue is the way that she managed to secure the nomination.

Like I said, I'm not saying this WILL happen. I'm saying it might. And that sucks.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:07:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

I will grant you all that.
And I can't say I am very happy tonight.

But once again I think Obama's message about racial reconciliation is strong, powerful and clear enough and his brand established enough that he can withstand it.
Some downs maybe, for a few days like after OH, but he will pick right back up


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:15:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (none / 0)

If he stays up from this, he wins in November. I think I feel pretty comfortable saying that. But if he can survive the direct, long-term association with some of the most anti-American rhetoric seen in this campaign, he really IS going to be Liberal Reagan.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:23:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: 20 LONG YEARS to DISTANCE! (2.00 / 1)

  How many times do you need insist that the "bigot" is "black?"  It's really creepy.  Does his blackness make the bigotry worse somehow?  


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome=Hannity. (1.00 / 1)

Mydd's days as a Democratic blog are under 90.

Then Armstrong can go ahead and pimp John McCain.


by CarolinaNumber23 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:56:05 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"As toxic as Farrakhan" is right. How toxic was Farrakhan to Obama's campaign? Not very. Obama made the distinction and the issue died in its crib. This psuedo-scandal, the latest in a long line of sleazy Hail Marys, has no legs. The Clinton camp isn't biting (and good for them, I say). McCain won't touch it. Sadly, some former progressives on MyDD are comfortable getting pwnd by John McCain in the dignity/common sense sweepstakes.

How many fake scandals is this, Jerome? The guy is retired. The video is from 2003. Obama said the guy had said stupid things he disagreed with long ago.

These damp rags aren't going to catch fire, blow on them as you might.


by EMTP democrat on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:57:30 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Was the guy really talking about Hillary and Obama back in 2003?


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:03:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

  Yeah, really.  Tim Russert dragged Farrakhan from irrelevance.  Obama had no relationship with Farrakhan whatsoever.  Nor did Obama accept Farrkhan's endorsement, like McCain accepted Hagee's endorsement.  Farrakhan was the epitome of a non-issue.


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:56:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I am as shocked as any of Armstrong espousing right-wing frames to attack Obama but this has nothing to do with race. Let's not be silly.


by Benjaminomeara on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 09:58:58 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Yes every political candidate -- and indeed everyone -- should be held responsible for what their church has done.  Catholic candidates who went to mass as adults after knowing about the Inquisition are responsible, at least, for the bad judgment of being associated with a misogynistic anti-semitic genocidal religion -- believing in the teachings that lead to such slaughter and bigotry -- and should be judged accordingly.  In fact, I'd say that all Christians have a very large cross to bear.  Look what Christianity has done over the ages.  Let us atheists start casting the first stones.

And Christians?  They should just STFU if it comes to any other Christians.


by kaleidescope on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:00:26 PM EST

When is John F. Kennedy (none / 0)

going to posthumously resign in disgrace for being part of a Church that aided and abetted pedophilia !!!

And his visage is on the half dollar !!1!!!


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:06:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I Forgot About the Pedophilia Angle (none / 0)

Dang.  Why didn't anyone question the six Catholic Supreme Court justices about this?


by kaleidescope on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:34:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 1)

Hillary gets very strong support from conservative Catholic Democrats.  Well, they have a wee problem in their own church.  Something like 4,500 priests have been accused of being sexual predators.  Many have already been convicted.

When are we going to require that Hillary and all her Catholic supporters disavow their relationship with these perverted priests?

Waiting...


by global yokel on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:03:15 PM EST

Why has Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

still refused to issue a press release denouncing Muhammad Ali for refusing to serve his country in Vietnam on the racist, divisive grounds that "No Viet Cong ever called me nigger."

This proves, as if we needed more proof, that Barack Obama is a racist bigot and needs to quit now.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:04:06 PM EST

Re: Answer: KEEP IT REAL (1.00 / 1)

Game over.  Roll the credits.... MYDD FAMILY listen to me clearly.  Im speaking the truth.  THIS crap will not win white votes for an African American candidate in a General Election.  This Rev Wright crap is toxic.  The problem is that unfortunately middle America is only going to hear the "headline" coverage of THE REV CALLING HRC A BIGOT BECAUSE SHE "Has never been called a nga."  WTF?!?!  Let's keep it real.  WARNING
WARNING
WARNING....
Wait till the 527's get a hold of this crap during a GENERAL ELECTION!!!!!
HOW can Obama win OHIO, FLORIDA, or Pennsylvania in A G.E with this shit.
Damn this sucks guys.....
by nzubechukwu on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:07:02 PM EST

Say goodbye to Michigan too n/t (none / 0)


Sexism is real.
by grassrootsorganizer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:16:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

NYG 08 stop the hatred.  Enough.  J.A is not the issue.  Lets stick to the topic guy.  Go watch reruns of the Superbowl.  


by nzubechukwu on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:08:50 PM EST

On DailyKos...they are crazy (none / 0)

On DailyKos they are saying it was worse, I quote "to say that Obama was lucky to be a black man" end quote

Seriously...they said specifically it was worse for one of your financial supporters to say it's lucky to be a black man...than for Obama's spiritual advisor of 20 years to say the AIDS virus was genetically engineered by America to kill all the blacks in genocide


by thorgrim on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:10:11 PM EST

Re: On DailyKos...they are crazy (none / 0)

Look, I don't think anyone here thinks the AIDS thing is anything but ludicrous.  Agreement there -- it's more evidently factually incorrect than Ferraro's statement.

But there are many ways in which Ferraro's statement is worse.  First of all, it is itself clearly not correct.  

I don't want to re-argue THAT point to death, but here's my summary: a) black men don't exactly get all the breaks in this country, historically and currently remember when hillary was winning the black vote? it's not like people all of the sudden changed their vote because they just noticed barack is black c) barack is winning plenty of other subgroups, including educated white people and (in many states) white men d) the man has been a MASTER campaigner, fundraiser, and speaker.  the best of my lifetime. that doesnt count for anything?

Second of all, she was directly addressing the campaign while it was going on, knowing that she represents Hillary (whether she was intending to or not).  Third of all, she was directly denigrating the accomplishments a particular candidate -- a DEMOCRATIC candidate.  Fourth of all, she refused to apologize for sounding racist.     Finally, these are the best tidbits of Wright's lifetime as a pastor.  The guy makes a living making impassioned speeches.  Ferraro is a politician, and can be expected to be more careful with not saying anything over the line.

So let me reiterate: I think some of Wright's statements (the HIV thing, in particular) are ludicrous.  But tell me this:  have you ever said "Fuck America" to make a point in a public setting?  I certainly have.  What is acceptable depends on the audience.


by jackstah on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On DailyKos...they are crazy (none / 0)

Who is "they"?  It's easy enough to troll for comments and say that "they" are saying some controversial thing.  On a website with a million hits per day, you're bound to find something.


by rfahey22 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:42:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Zephyrus stop the personal attacks.  Lets keep to the facts.


by nzubechukwu on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:10:12 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

The facts?

This thread is McCarthyism at its finest.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:14:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Ok, I am watching Obama's interview with Anderson Cooper.  He is claiming that before he ran for President he had never heard about any of Rev. Wright's more inflammatory statements.  This.. I just don't believe.  I cannot believe he never heard about any of this.. even if he didn't hear it first hand.


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:11:48 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

We are together on this, Jennifer. He got asked about this in the last few months so I think this claim of ignorance is a little naive.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:50:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's about the general election, duh (2.00 / 2)

Is the plan here to educate the 120 some million white voters out there who will vote in November on how different things are in black churches?  Or is it to convince them all how it really doesn't matter that Obama's spiritual touchstone preaches about sinking to the level of the white man.

When the Catholics, and the white Protestants and all the other self-defining "very religious" people in this country get a daily blast of "God damn America" preached from Obama's pulpit, what exactly is the plan for getting that out of their minds on election day?

And all those folks out there who fly thier flags and support their troops put their hands over their hearts for the National Anthem, how exactly will the liberal blogosphere shame them into seperating the candidate from his America hating advisor of twenty years?

I get the part where, as good card caring liberals, we aren't allowed to be offended by this ourselves, we are supposed to turn a blind eye to outright bigotry, it's our f#cking job to disparage America and make fun of people with patriotic sentiments, and, duh, yeah, we have to support our candidate regardless of how repulsive we find the company he keeps, but, ah, what about the rest of America?

what's the plan again?


Sexism is real.
by grassrootsorganizer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13:06 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 0)

newt gingrich claims Obama has a credibility problem.  how did he not know of the anti-american rhetoric of jeremiah wright for twenty years?  

someone should place michelle obama's lack of love of country in proper context.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13:07 PM EST

Let the fun continue! (none / 0)

Here's a link to a story about Norman Hsu, Hillary Clinton's corrupt fundraiser.  Because of Norman Hsu, Hillary is clearly unelectable.  How long until the media remembers this story?  Since the atmosphere is already so poisoned anyway, why not co-opt right-wing attacks on Hillary in return?  

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB1 18835199704811801.html


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13:31 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I expect that some of the nasty race-baiting stuff coming from the Clinton campaign is indeed going to be effective, particularly with the low-information, economically downscale white folks that make up her core constituency.  But that may be more than offset by dramatically enhanced turnout by seriously pissed-off African-American voters.

Taking the low road may not prove to be the winning strategy that Hillary believes it to be.


by global yokel on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:13:55 PM EST

It's not just black folks (none / 0)

My wife (white/native american) is a serious Hillary supporter and she is becoming turned off by the "low road" approach of late. She just wishes HRC will leave before more damage to Nov. 08 is done.
It's not just black folks who are getting pissed at this. It's everybody who cares about, and is knowledgeable about, the history of the civil rights struggle in the U.S. for women, blacks, ethnic minorities, gays, Native Americans. This type of "gotcha" soundbite, Sister Souljah knee-capping is like sulfuric acid to the progressive movement. It helps nobody except the Bob Jones Universities of the world and their funders.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:19:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

global yokel... you sure live up to your name.  I think your looking down your nose at Hillary's "core constituency" is a blantant bullshit tactic.


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:19:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

So Bill Maher is anti-America? (none / 0)

After 9/11, people got emotional and said lots of things among them, Bill Maher on Political Correctness said terrorists are not cowards. They flew themselves into the buildings. That may be evil but not a coward act. He said this because polititians started calling terrorists cowards. Guess what, he lost his show because of hot heads like you Jerome. Jerry Falwell said it's God's punishment of gay people. So according to Mr. Pinhead, Bill Maher and Jerry Falwell are anti-america? Rev. Wright made some of the same statements, blaming on somebody or something in reaction to 9/11. In this case, he blamed on US past practice of supporting terrorism. Don't tell me you don't think the US supported the Mujahedeens in Afghanistan and death squads in El Salvator among others. Heck, we supported Saddam Hussein. So get a grip man. You are sounding more and more like a right wingnut. You probably think Abu Graib and Quantanamo are proud American Achievements. You are losing it man. May be you're a closet republican or you've freaking lost your head for Hillary Clinton.

Wright made some offensive statements and Obama rejected them. If your dad made a dumb statement, would you be responsible for the,? Would you disown him?

Bottomline is you are anti-Obama. Just say it. I'd love to see your petty ass jumping on the Obama bandwagon when he's won the nomination.


Not another Bush or Clinton.
by Barackulikahurricane on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:14:21 PM EST

Re: So Bill Maher is anti-America? (2.00 / 1)

It's not just the 9/11 statements.  It's the stuff about Bill Clinton "ridin dirty" along with crude thrusting gestures.  It's about railing on Hillary Clinton (just in December 2007 by the way) because she has never been called the N word and told her people don't matter.  Which isn't exactly true for a long time women didn't matter.  Black people got the right to vote before we did.  


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:18:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So Bill Maher is anti-America? (none / 0)

Black people got the right to vote before we did.  
--

Oh Please. Black women did not get the right to vote before white women did.

Are you so racist that you don't realize that black people are comprised of women and men?

Go read some W.E.B. Dubois.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:25:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So Bill Maher is anti-America? (none / 0)

OK I should have said black men.  And since we are discussing black men.. Look I am not saying that there isn't plenty of mistreatment to spead around.  Are you defending his statements then?


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:48:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: So Bill Maher is anti-America? (none / 0)

Hmmm... so when Wright talked about Bill doing America from behind and "ridin' dirty", just like he had with Monica, that was because of his emotions from 9/11?  How about and that "G*D D*MN America" that was about that too? Or how about continually referring to "white people" as the "enemy"?  Or how about his anti-Jewish comments? Or sexist comments? Or how about the comments that will be featured tomorrow in the NYT about "semen stains on dresses"?  

And then.. how about having a 20 year relationship with that man, as Obama has. Calling him his "mentor" "spiritual advisor" "moral compass" and "friend"?  

You cannot explain away these things by saying that it's the same if your Dad said something stupid.  You cannot choose your Dad. You choose your pastor and your "mentor" and your "friends".  This was not an isolated instance, you know it.  The Obama fans are grasping right now because they realize how very very bad this is.  David Axelrod can only do so much with his generic, one-size fits all, Hope message.  He's used it on all of his clients... but sometimes even a media consultant like Axelrod can't spin away "G&D D*MN AMERICA!"  

No way.  


by Catriley sez on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:46:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

My my, well, Obama can kiss the Jewish vote good-bye, among others......


by BlueDoggyDogg on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:14:44 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I love these sort of celebrations from 'Democrats'.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:23:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 2)

obama is too controversial.  and michelle obama does not love her country, even though she she enjoys more wealth and power than 98% of the american people.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

So I guess you've given up any and all pretense of not being a troll?


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:28:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I'm Jewish.  My entire family is voting for Obama, I don't think we are alone. You really think we vote monolithically?


by mady on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:09 PM EST
[ Parent ]

you are funny (none / 0)

I talked to a few jewish folks today. None of those Obama supporters are changing any votes.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:28:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: you are funny (none / 0)

ask them in October after the 527's have morphed your candidate into Louis Farrakhan......


by BlueDoggyDogg on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:09:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

OH NOES!111!!!!! (none / 0)

The 527s are coming!  RUN!  RUN!!!!!

Look, if the 527s are this irresistible force, we might as well give up now. You think there's nothing they could say about Clinton?  Obama is handling these attacks about as well as anyone can.  If he can't do it, especially with a 7 month head start, who could?


But in the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope.
by thezzyzx on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 09:47:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Good for Obama (none / 0)

The day a man is forced to refute some particular contextual part of his personal Christian religion in this country in such a public way is the day he demonstrates true courage and engenders true sympathy among the electorate and the American people. Today, when Obama dealt with all this mess regarding his own pastor, we witnessed the courageous words of a future president. (And this is coming from a Hillary supporter!) Obama is not ready today, but he will be ready in eight years. And he will win.

This struggle highlights the true Christian nature of Obama's personal beliefs and puts to bed any talk of Muslim sympathies. This is essentially JFK's moment in front of the Baptist ministers in Texas when he refuted the Catholic church's hold on him in terms of public policy.

This is actually good for Obama.


by Zeitgeist9000 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:15:23 PM EST

Which bus is that? (none / 0)

This one?


by Shaun Appleby on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:20:16 PM EST

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

Why was my first thought that that was a screenshot from Lost?


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:24:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

An interesting post-modern observation which is not entirely inappropriate.


by Shaun Appleby on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:30:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

I've been on that bus.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:29:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

Really?  I'm intrigued, I would be very interested to know more.


by Shaun Appleby on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:32:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

My memory, ugh. A friend in undergrad school in Portland, that I drove to school daily with, had an uncle named Ken.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:43:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Which bus is that? (none / 0)

Far out.  Six degrees of separation, eh?  Thanks for the insight.


by Shaun Appleby on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:50:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

This was posted by one of the other folks here at MYDD today, but it's so right on that I'm repeating it:

"If the 'inevitable' Hillary Clinton, with her 'thirty-five years' experience', is losing to the man she herself says is unfit to be Commander-in-Chief, and whom her supporters call an empty suit, then how is she going to fight the man she's been giving her quasi-endorsement to for the past three weeks?"


by global yokel on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:20:36 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Once the inevitable impact of koolaid reduces and people realize that their Messiah lacks spine and character and is a hypocrite, then rational thinking sane people will gravitate towards Hillary Clinton.

We believe the Messiah has lots of rational thinking sane followers who are different from the hypocritical ones.

Where do you fit in?:-)


by Sandeep on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:30:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

tony perkins believes obama is lying. after all, all members know what one's leaders are espousing.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:22:34 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 2)

now i understand why michelle obama did not learn to love her country until her husband had a chance to win the democratic nomination.  

let us place michelle obama in proper context.  


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:23:51 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Tip o Neill had said that if my spiritial leader says something abhoring, disgusting, I will stand up and walk out of that church. Rev Eugene Rivers said Obama can not be given a pass on this.

Obama lacks spine and character. You dont pick your father, your pick your pastor. What does this tell us about his judgement? And why did it take so long to reject? And why reject only specific statements? Does this mean he agrees with Rev Wright's sentiments?

Why did Obama praise Rev Wright till now instead of walking out of the church?


by Sandeep on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:51 PM EST

God damn America! (none / 0)

New catch phrase for the kids?

T shirts and bumper stickers with this new campaign slogan?

Come on people, Obama should drop out.

He can't win the general. Period.


by gotalife on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:26:57 PM EST

Re: God damn America! (none / 0)

It's amazing that you can say that without any evidentiary support.  Fantasy is not the same as reality.


by rfahey22 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:29:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman (none / 0)

I'm sure the American public wants to relive that again. Of course, Hillary supporters concluded from the whole episode that Americans really didn't care about Bill's wagging finger and false denial. They're wrong. It wasn't worthy of impeachment, and that's why we rallied for him. But it's not something we want to deal with again. And I can guarantee you, if Hillary made it back to the White House, we'd hear about it again. With a different woman.


by elrod on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman (none / 0)

Dodge and weave.

He may be a steaming pile but she is a worse steaming pile. Rather, her husband is a worse steaming pile.

The hope is flowing through me. Yes we can.


by hctb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:09:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

James Cone and Black Liberation Theology (2.00 / 1)

Rev Jeremiah Wright was on tv and mentioned 2 specific thinkers that underpin his teachings/Obama's theological underpinnings: Joames Cone and Dwight Hopkins. Here's some of what James Cone's Black Liberation theology is all about:

"1. "[W]hiteness is the symbol of the Anti-christ."

2. "The goal of black theology is the destruction of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods."

3. "The black experience is the feeling one has when attacking the enemy of black humanity by throwing a Molotov cocktail into a white-owned building and watching it go up in flames. We know, of course, that getting rid of evil takes something more than burning down buildings, but one must start somewhere."

4. "Black theology seeks to analyze the satanic nature of whiteness and by doing so prepare all nonwhites for revolutionary action."

5. "We have reached our limit of tolerance, and if it means death with dignity or life with humiliation we will choose the former. And if that is the choice, we will take some honkies with us."

6. "To be black is to be committed to destroying everything this country loves and adores."


by euripideandreams on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:28:29 PM EST

sweet... (none / 0)

now you are basically assign Obama hatreds in 2 degrees of separation.

You know he is a Dick Cheney relative too. You should get some miles out of that.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:31:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: James Cone and Black Liberation Theology (none / 0)

I am not familiar with "black liberation theology" in particular, or the two authors you cite; but I am very familiar with the general "liberation theology movement" that grew up during the sixties and seventies.  Your characterization bears no resemblance to any of the teachings I am familiar with, in fact, it is entirely antithetical to the tenets of "liberation theology."

You have placed quotes around the statements you list in your comment.  Are these actual quotes? If so, please give a real cite.  I find it difficult to believe that anything you have to say is true.


by upper left on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: James Cone and Black Liberation Theology (none / 0)

Erm ... Joe McCarthy is dead ...

Why not just quote Stalin.

After all, I took a Marxism course in college.

Give it up.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:38:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: James Cone and Black Liberation Theology (none / 0)

Euripideandreams pasted in an excerpt from James H. Cone's book, A Black Theology of Liberation. It's on Amazon.com:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0883446 855/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

From a review of the book:

There's not anything theological about this book at all. In fact, it's not about God, Jesus Christ, Christianity or any other religion. This is nothing more than a hate-mongering diatribe on why blacks should hate whites (and a poorly-written one at that). Here are just a few choice excerpts:

1. "[W]hiteness is the symbol of the Anti-christ."

2. "The goal of black theology is the destruction of everything white, so that blacks can be liberated from alien gods."

3. "The black experience is the feeling one has when attacking the enemy of black humanity by throwing a Molotov cocktail into a white-owned building and watching it go up in flames. We know, of course, that getting rid of evil takes something more than burning down buildings, but one must start somewhere."

4. "Black theology seeks to analyze the satanic nature of whiteness and by doing so prepare all nonwhites for revolutionary action."

5. "We have reached our limit of tolerance, and if it means death with dignity or life with humiliation we will choose the former. And if that is the choice, we will take some honkies with us."

6. "To be black is to be committed to destroying everything this country loves and adores."

Why anyone, regardless of race, creed, color or even religion would buy this rubbish is beyond me. It's nothing more than hate-as-theology.

I've known about Wright, Cone and Obama for a while now. It isn't pretty and Obama is lying about it all.


by Nobama on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:03:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: James Cone and Black Liberation Theology (none / 0)

Go back to your kleagle and wash your white hood.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:06:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (2.00 / 1)

Jerome said, "disgustingly anti-American."

I can't begin to tell you how angry this post made me feel.  My hands actually shook when I first tried to type a response.  Fortunately, I managed to take a walk and think about why Jerome's comments infuriated me so deeply. Here are my thoughts:

When I was twenty, I spent a year in Peru.  This was in the late seventies, when Peru was one of the first countries in the world to get into major debt problems.  The IMF used Peru as a test tube to experiment with its "stabilization policies."  These policies, imposed at the behest of US based multinational banks, sent Peru's economy into a depression far more severe than the Great Depression here in the US.  

During my trip I became very interested in the "liberation theology movement." Through some contacts,  I ended up working for several weeks as a volunteer with a group of Maryknoll Nuns who ran a maternity clinic in the "pueblos jovenes" (shantytown slums) outside of Lima.  I saw infants and children drop like flies from dysentery, malnutrition, and just plain starvation.  All of this suffering was so that the US banks could squeeze their pound of interest flesh out of the bodies of Peruvian children.

When I returned to the US I was filled with  outrage and disgust.  Outrage at the greed of the banks and disgust at the casual indifference of the vast majority of Americans.  If someone had said "God damn, America" for causing such suffering, I certainly would have understood.  

I do not condone the formulation of Reverend Wright, because I know it is low hanging fruit for "patriotic demagogues" to exploit for their own ends.  But the passionate commitment to social justice that lies behind this unfortunate rhetorical formulation is not worthy of disgust; it is worthy of high praise.

To hear this passionate man's words taken out of context and used in conjunction with the term "disgust" by someone who is supposed to be a "leader" of the progressive movement, once again fills me with outrage.  Jerome, if your disgust is real, I suggest you examine your own commitment to social justice and your own understanding of the suffering that takes place in the shadows of US multinational capitalism.  If your disgust is manufactured sentiment to help you push your own anti-Obama political agenda, then spare us.  Save your disgust for the social injustice and suffering that takes place every day.

Obama has no choice but to distance himself from someone who speaks in terms that can so easily be exploited, but I feel even more certain of his personal commitment to progressive policies knowing that he has been a member of a Church that holds a commitment to social justice as central to its understanding of faith.


by upper left on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:28:45 PM EST

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (2.00 / 2)

You know, I've been able, through the support and resources of America, to volunteer in places like you describe, among the poorest of the poor of the world, and work to help make it better. You can be disgusted by the ways that exist, I'll stick to being proud of the Americans who are trying to change the world.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:35:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (2.00 / 2)

Jerome, you don't respond to Upper Left's comment. You ignore it.
You don't get it Jerome. You deliberately do not get it. When I say, Goddamn America, I mean the acts of America. What American has actually done. When America commits genocide on American Indians, I don't care what America "says," I care about what America actually does. Because what it does is all that matters if you are on the wrong side of legalized, institutionalized  prejudice.

Dissent and critique is the essence of patriotism. You apparently believe that patriotism is blind, unconditional hero worship. Read some Samuel Adams.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:43:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

I am proud of our country when it lives up to its ideals.  When we treat all people as equals.  When we seek to make our democracy real and not just rhetoric.  I am proudest of those who struggle to move forward on the march to bring the dream of the founding fathers to reality.

Over and over, I have tried to engage you in real and substantive debate and every time I get some short flip response.  How about a real substantive debate?

Are you saying that you do not see the connection between the wealth of our country and the poverty in the third world?  Are you saying that you do not understand the connection between wealth and poverty in our own country?  Are you saying that you condemn the social gospel preached at Obama's Church?  

I think you took a cheap shot, a shot I would expect from Pat Buchanan, but not from you.


by upper left on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:50:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

An interesting comment on the anniversary of the My Lai Massacre.


by tysonpublic on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:16:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

What's sad is that after all this is over and the conservative assholes don't care anymore, this could continue to have repercussions on Wright, his church and the movement. All of which have done far more positive things than negative. Meanwhile, Pat Robertson and Joel Osteen will continue to make millions and millions of dollars to pay for the gas in their private jets.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:36:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

That's because you are a divisive racist, vcalzone. Remember, it's all right for Pat Robertson to call for the assassination of Hugo Chavez but Hugo Chavez deserves to be assassinated for shipping heating oil to Massachusetts and Maine to help poor working people whose pipes are freezing.

What kind of Democrat are you !!??!!!


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:48:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

Wow, what a compelling and thoughtful post.  I hope it opens a few peoples eyes and gives them pause.

Thank you.


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:42:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

This is a powerful post.

It frankly never occurs to me to question anyone's patriotism.  I'm a liberal, I'm not wired that way.  To me "anti-American" is someone like Osama bin Laden.

Now again, I'm just a guilt-ridden liberal, but I sorta feel like if there are people who feel so shut out from the benefits of our society that they don't see our system as a positive, that's kind of on us in a way.  Not everyone who feels excluded is irrational.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:57:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

Steve,

Thanks for the kind words. I really value praise from someone with whom I frequently disagree :-)

I share your sentiments about patriotism.  I think the true patriots are those who fight to make the country live up to its rhetoric.  I think that is what Obama meant when he was talking about "lapel pin patriotism."  

Again, thanks for your response.


by upper left on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:26:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome, your disgust is misplaced (none / 0)

I'm just a latte-drinking sellout myself.  I really respect those of you who have been out in the bushes trying to make the world a better place.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:34:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

YAY!  Jerome "Hillary Is Always Right, Obama is Always Wrong" Armstrong is back!

I know you are a poll watcher, and I look forward to your analysis of Survey Usa's 50 state head to head polls!


by peter peter on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:32:21 PM EST

Well said. (none / 0)

W.E.B. Dubois, Linton Kwesi Johnson, Darcus Howe.

All three of these black writers say things in ways that Barack Obama would have to "denounce" in the ridiculously slanted and stupid and double standard atmosphere of this campaign, in this country. Christ, Barack Obama would have to denounce Herman Melville and Walt Whitman too !!!!

Excellent comment. Thank you very much.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:35:46 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

All the wierdos are out: Jeremiah Wright; Tony Perkins; Newt Gingrich.  This is hilarious.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:38:52 PM EST

Hagee and Parsley (none / 0)

Don't forget McCain's new buddies.


by elrod on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:44:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hagee and Parsley (none / 0)

I just posted about this.  I just heard him say something about the level of sin in New Orleans and Katrina.  UGH WTF?  What is with all these freaking blaming people anyway?  I am sorry but invoking the name of Jesus and blaming people for their misfortune is one of the biggest perversions of religion I have ever witnessed.


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:46:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 0)

Michelle Obama's speeches are sanitized renditions of Jeremiah Wright's sermons.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:41:37 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Do you ever consider that you dirty yourself by wallowing in filth?


by rfahey22 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:43:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (1.00 / 1)

Just as most anyone with a brain can't see a way we will win with Hillary, one of the most hated politicians in America, as the nominee.


by yitbos96bb on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:43:37 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/30/us/pol itics/30obama.html?_r=1&pagewanted=a ll&oref=slogin

Obviously Obama and Wright both knew this was going to be a problem and that if he won the primaries he would have to distance himself from Wright personally for while.

Check out this article and especially the last two paragraphs.


by americanincanada on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:43:47 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (2.00 / 0)

OK, I am still watching Anderson Cooper and they just showed that Hagee guy saying "New Orleans had a level of sin that caused Katrina" (I am paraphrasing)  How about we all jump on this???  Geesh.


by JustJennifer on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:45:11 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

If half the 'Democrats' around here actually were, they'd be writing stories about this instead of about Wright.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:52:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I'm really getting a kick (none / 0)

out of seeing all of you Hillbots trying in vain to get people to care about this story.  Obama handled it.  It's done.


by bigdcdem on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:49:35 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

it's getting close to official...

MYDD = TAYLOR MARSH

yuck.

i mean, obviously this is bad news for obama.  BUT, why do i spend several days a year in a church that is anti-gay, anti-birth control, and has a penchant for hiring child molesters??  come on catholics (lapsed and otherwise), you know what i'm talking about here.  just because you go to a church doesn't mean that you agree with everything that the priest says.  JESUS...how obvious is that??


by bluedavid on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:50:07 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Umm.. I'm trying to decide if you are deliberately being obtuse, or if you're gravely misinformed:

1) Audacity of Hope. Named afer one of Wright's sermons.  

  1. Obama donated over 20k this year alone to that church
  2. he's had a 20 year relationship with the church and wright.
  3. he placed Wright on his AA affairs committee for his campaign
  4. He asked Rev. Wright to perform his marriage ceremony
  5. He asked Wright to baptize his daughters
  6. He asked WRight to bless his new mansion
  7. He prayed with Wright just before announcing his bid for presidency.
  8. He originally had asked Wright to give the invocation at his announcement, before being advised against it because of Wright's hateful rhetoric.
  9. His campaign was quoted in the NYT last April that Obama was "proud of his pastor and church"
  10. Obama has publicly stated many times that Wright is his "mentor" "Spiritual advisor" and "friend" oh, and "moral compass"

Need I go on???  this is NOT one of those situations where you go to church only on Christmas and Easter.  That man and that church is an integral part of Obama and his family.  I'm sorry that you refuse to believe the documented evidence of this, or that you were misinformed.  


by Catriley sez on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:39:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Excuse me...But you're telling me that all those fine ladies who go to mass every single sunday have never once used birth control.  you're telling me that every single catholic is radically anti-abortion just because that's the church's official policy?

People (at least most people) go to church (or other religious services) for a connection to god.  For the overwhelming majority of people, the ideology comes second.  Additionally, you can deeply respect some parts of the faith of a religious person while abhorring others.  For instance, I have a deep reverence for John-Paul II for a number of reasons which i will not go into here.  However, i ABHOR the way that he treated the sexual abuse scandal in the USA, and particularly the way that he tried to scapegoat gays.

It's my understanding that this church has a deep commitment to social justice.  I've read both of obama's books, and whenever he mentions religion, it is almost always in this context.  You've really got to be going out on a limb to try and paint barack obama as a radical black nationalist.  Unfortunately, that's probably what some people will do.  I think it's pretty obvious what the motive will be for most of them...  


by bluedavid on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:25:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

Ben Smith absurdly likens the comments and stepping down by Geraldine Ferraro, while being clumsily blunt...

Did you really have to defend what Ferraro said? Sure, take a swipe at the Obama campaign if you want, but I just couldn't get past that line. I can't take anything else you say seriously in this post when you make that sort of statement.

Absurd? "Clumsily blunt"? It wasn't clumsily blunt, it was false and ignorant. Senator Obama isn't winning because he's black. He's winning because he's Barrack Obama, he's a better candidate with a better campaign, and he's getting more votes.

I'm really not comprehending you these days, Jerome. You're full of what seems like blind rage, upset that Senator Clinton isn't going to be the Democratic Party's nominee. You're upset that Senator Obama is Crashing the Gate in 2008. Your co-author, Markos, is quite happy with this outcome and the prospects for the upcoming election. Your viewpoint, however, is thoroughly puzzling and seems irrational. It cannot be based on policy differences, can it? (Senator Obama did not vote for the Iraq War, and Senator Clinton did, for example.) So what gives?


by BBCWatcher on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:52:28 PM EST

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

I'd really like to know this once and for all as well.  

Markos has laid out his support for Obama quite clearly.  Jerome... come on.  Do us all a favor and explain who you're supporting and why.


by Brillobreaks on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:54:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

Markos seems to have been luckier than I this time, and has some sort of values connection with Obama, while detesting Clinton, an easy world to view it from.

I view it more like the choice between the 5th and 7th favorites (of all the candidates that were on the potential Dem 08 list), which is why you never see me saying anything more about Clinton other than I think she's got a path to victory.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:12:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Doesn't Seem Like 5th v. 7th Emotion (none / 0)

Gosh, I'd hate to run into you in my favorite bagel shop, Jerome, if the proprietor happened to run out of sesame and only had poppy available. :-)

And who are 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6, by the way? Let's see, we had Dodd, Edwards, Richardson, Kucinich, Gravel, and Biden. So you're saying that either Kucinich or Gravel would be a better candidate than Obama? What would their paths to winning the general election have been? :-)


by BBCWatcher on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:51:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Doesn't Seem Like 5th v. 7th Emotion (none / 0)

I assume people like Gore, Clark, etc. are high on that list.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:08:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Doesn't Seem Like 5th v. 7th Emotion (none / 0)

yea, and Warner and Fiengold (before the divorce).  I had Obama up there too, like in Dec of '06, but that lasted about 2 months. FIFO I guess.


by Jerome Armstrong on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:50:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

  I don't really understand how Ferraro's comments were "clumsily blunt."  You're absolutely right, they were false and ignorant.


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:59:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

Well said. Some folks (ahem ...) are desperately hoping for HRC to deliver the decisive "Sister Souljah Moment" right on top of Barack Obama's uppity head.

Na ga happa.

This could be a thread to have an intelligent discussion about how progressives should best negotiate the mine field of America's race problem. Unfortunately, only one side seems interested in an informed and intellectually and spiritually stimulating discussion.

Oh well.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:01:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

There's no policy difference, Obama supports (votes) for the war just as much as Clinton. The risk with an Obama candidacy against McCain is higher, untested and a gamble. Maybe Clinton will win, maybe she won't, it's gonna be close no matter what; but I see her path to the presidency (high Latino and women vote), I don't as clear for Obama. He's too untested in a GE for my likes, though his campaign has been tremendous. Anyway, stuff like this just confirms my gut take on his first time candidacy for the Presidency.


by Jerome Armstrong on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:08:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

It was too soon. I knew that the second he announced his candidacy. I support him because I support his priorities and dislike Hillary's campaign system, but I don't know what the hell he was thinking by running four years into his very first Senate campaign.

Wright's retiring this year! If he'd been running in 2012 or 2016, this issue wouldn't have any play whatsoever.


"Hey, check it out. You just had yourself a glue OD. So you're learning another lesson. Don't do too much glue, or your night sucks."
by vcalzone on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:14:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Jerome Driving the MyDD Bus Off a Cliff? (none / 0)

Jerome, you can't play both sides of the fence.

You can't spew out this toxic McCarthyist spew in the guise of questions of "unelectability" and then say he might be good next time around.

You need to find one set of arguments and stick to it, instead of alternately adopting arguments that are mutually contradictory.

Cheers.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:23:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Every Nomination Is a Risk (none / 0)

If you want a risk-free business, try working for the U.S. Department of Justice or the Federal Reserve...

OK, maybe not those. :-)

So you say you see a clearer path to the presidency for Senator Clinton. I disagree with that assessment -- and so does your co-author, Markos, and so does at least current polling -- but let's leave all that aside for the moment. The fundamental trouble with your argument is that Senator Clinton is not going to be the nominee. Obama is Crashing the Gate. (Actually, I saw the clearest paths for Senators Edwards and Dodd, but their paths aren't so clear right now.)

Your Iraq War comment is disingenuous, by the way, with all due respect. We do have one of the few clear policy contrasts in this case, and in the case of the recent Iran sabre rattling vote. Clinton cannot raise the Iraq War issue with McCain as effectively as Senator Obama because she voted to go in and she still refuses to say her vote was a mistake, as Senator Edwards did. I think that's a critical contrast the Democratic nominee must draw in the general election campaign, and Senator Clinton is ill-equipped to do it, just as John Kerry was. And beyond the politics, Clinton has surrounded herself with a foreign policy team that, frankly, I don't want to see anywhere near the levers of power in Washington.

The central thesis in your book was to argue for Democratic candidates that are at least much more similar to Obama than to Clinton, and that new political institutions are arising which will change the political landscape. In short, your book argued for transformative politics, not the Shrum-style thread-the-needle-for-270-electoral-vote s identity politics that has failed Democrats so miserably for decades. Take a look around. Who do you see that most closely fits the transformative description?

It's not your fault, my fault, or anyone else's fault that Senator Clinton ran a lousy campaign. (I disagree with Senator Obama on that point.) That's how it goes sometimes, and thank goodness our party has plenty of talent ready to step in and take over when we have bumbling former front-runners. Obama is running a brilliant campaign, and I like our odds for November.

And of course any nominee will get attacked. If Senator Clinton had run a better campaign, I'm sure we'd hear all about her atheism, her lesbian trysts, her plan to force every American to buy crappy and expensive health insurance, the skeletons in her tax returns (where are those, anyway?), her earmarks for a radical pro-Confederacy feminist center, etc., etc. Defeating Rick Lazio was not exactly much of a test.

So our Party is going to try the other candidate this year, the one who usually doesn't win rigged nominations like 2008 with such massively front-loaded contests that should have favored the establishment front-runner. Well, that Obama guy won, surprise, surprise. It looks like he understood the thesis in your book. And isn't that something to celebrate?


by BBCWatcher on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:42:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

This isn't about Hagee! We know the religious wingnuts like Hagee and Parsley are sick extremist whackjobs.
The whole freakin' point was supposed to be that the progressive side could use that extremism and Mccain's willing association with it against the GOP in the General Election (note the caps).
Now, that whole quiver of arrows is smashed because we have the same crazies even more intimately associated with the progressives. Do you get that?
That just sucks.
by Zorkon on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:54:12 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Game over.  Roll the credits.... MYDD FAMILY listen to me clearly.  Im speaking the truth.  THIS crap will not win white votes for an African American candidate in a General Election.  This Rev Wright crap is toxic.  The problem is that unfortunately middle America is only going to hear the "headline" coverage of THE REV CALLING HRC A BIGOT BECAUSE SHE "Has never been called a nga."  WTF?!?!  Let's keep it real.  WARNING
WARNING
WARNING....
Wait till the 527's get a hold of this crap during a GENERAL ELECTION!!!!!
HOW can Obama win OHIO, FLORIDA, or Pennsylvania in A G.E with this shit.
Damn this sucks guys.....
by nzubechukwu on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 10:59:57 PM EST

You already Cut and Pasted This (none / 0)

You already Cut and Pasted This.

Tool.


by DougWatts on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:03:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

From tomorrow's NY Times:

"In the interview last spring, Mr. Wright expressed frustration at the breach in relationship with Mr. Obama, saying the candidate had already privately said that he might need to distance himself from his pastor. But perhaps the two could repair things, said Mr. Wright, pointing out that Mr. Obama's opponent, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, had faced worse.

"At least there are no semen stains on any dresses," Mr. Wright said, one of several digs he has taken at Mrs. Clinton.

"That kind of frankness scares people in the campaign," he added."

Yeah, sounds like a man of God alright. Wright clearly states that "white people are the enemy" several times in at least one video.  He makes crude and sexist comments about women, he attacks other races and religions.  And he is Obama's "spiritual advisor"? "moral compass"?

Stick a fork in Obama. He's done. Yeah, "GodDamn America" is going to play really well in the Midwest...  And spare me the lame excuse Obama and his surrogates are using that Wright is like a "crazy uncle."  We don't choose our uncles. We choose our churches, our friends, and our "mentors".  David Axelrod has done his best to repackage Obama as suitable for the job of president, but it's more apparent every day that he is not.  From his ties to the unrepentent Weather Underground characters, to his 20 year relationship with that racist, and his repeated dealings with Rezko, it's obvious he is not as advertised.  For a man of HOPE, his moral compass is a man of hate.  The hope theme is a freakin'  THEME trotted out by Axelrod for all of his clients -- We're finding out the true character of Obama and hope is not one of the words I'd use.


by Catriley sez on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:32:23 PM EST

The most important thing you just wrote: (none / 0)

"We're finding out the true character of Obama..."

Why, oh why, are we "finding out" this late?   Many of us Hillary supporters have worried about this for months - that our doubts would not be realized until BO was just about a shoe-in, costing us the Presidency.


by avrdream on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 03:28:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

BILL (none / 0)

You think Obama has a liability?

Let's talk about Bill. Let's talk about the affairs, the contracts, the library records, and the tax returns.

Quit crying because Obama is our presumptive nominee. Hillary can't win and you know it.

Superdelegates will not overturn the pledged delegate leader in favor of the less electable candidate.

Every Clinton voter is a supporter of John McCain because their continued support hurts our party's future nominee.

How can you support someone with the poor judgment to vote for this war? You can't. It's irrational and stupid. If you support Hillary its not that you simply have a different opinion than me, you have a seriously messed up set of priorities.


by bzbergmann on Fri Mar 14, 2008 at 11:56:14 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

That's it. Keep bashin' the almost certain democratic nominee...  Real smart.  All you're doing is helping John McCain. Dummies.


by Democrat in Chicago on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:31:12 AM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Dumb are the machine Democrats in Chicago who reflexively voted for Obama on Super Tuesday.


by truthteller2007 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:47:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

We Were Wrong (none / 0)

What drives me crazy is how this could have been avoided so easily if Wright was the slightest bit media-savvy. Had he merely controlled his tongue and limited himself to advocating an attack on Iran to encourage massive worldwide Muslim attacks leading to a fulfillment of the biblical prophecy of end-times and bringing about Armageddon and the summary slaughter of every Jew, Muslim, Catholic, and non-believer on the planet while rapturing him and his flock up to heaven, then followed it up by denouncing Catholics as cult members and blaming Hurricane Katrina on gay people, this story wouldn't be metastasizing like this. One five minute milquetoast repudiation by Obama and it would all be behind him.

But what does Wright do instead? He spews this vile "God damn America" bile. What a psycho.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/


by DougWatts on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:53:41 AM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

"Ben Smith absurdly likens the comments and stepping down by Geraldine Ferraro, while being clumsily blunt, with those of the disgustingly anti-American and racist rantings, and dismissal, of Jeremiah Wright."

Frankly, I found Ferraro's comments worse, as they were meant to belittle and undermine Obama directly.  I could maybe have gone along with your description of "clumsily blunt" if she had maybe just said her first thing, and then apologized and just explained it differently.  Instead, she continuously went on TV to actually DEFEND exactly what she said, over and over again... Explaining, in no uncertain terms, that she absolutely meant what she said about how Obama was quite lucky to be a black man running for president, and that the only reason she was being attacked was because she was white.  We're far out of the range of "clumsily blunt" at this point...  There's a difference between a "guilt by association" when it appears (rightly or wrongly) to be a pattern of attacks against a candidate, and "guilt by association" for just knowing someone who has said  stupid shit that doesn't relate to any candidate. I'll leave it to you to figure out what's worse.

Wright's comments aren't great, and I know he's also insulted Clinton in the past, but the ones people are seeming to go nuts about has nothing to do with Obama or Clinton.  This "God Damn America" stuff, to me anyway, is completely irrelevant.  An African-American pastor displaying anger at what he perceives as a social injustice? Oh, the horror, the horror!

Please... as if religious leaders of all religions aren't known for saying far more controversial things.  I don't think acceptance of all political views of your religious leader is a necessary pre-requisite for joining the congregation.

But what do I know, I'm just a stupid agnostic... maybe that's why I don't really care what some crazy pastor says, particularly since the views of the candidate himself are so far removed from them anyway.


by leshrac55 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:57:58 AM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

i guess you haven't seen the video of him talking about Hillary then.


by hctb on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 03:42:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

I haven't, although that doesn't seem to be what's pissing everyone off here and calling Obama "toast" and "done" etc... The number of times I've heard his candidacy was done for... well, you probably know all about them.

I have heard about them, though, and while I don't support the comments, they seemed relatively tame to me.  Personally, I just don't think he should be mentioning the campaign, or at least not his political beliefs about other candidates in the race.  That's probably his worst offense, as far as that goes.

In the short term, I'm sure this will give Clinton a boost in the polls again, as people seem to bounce between which candidate has had the more negative news cycle last.  I'm hoping that by the time we get to an election, we can get to a point where the race isn't a matter of who is apologizing for someone else's comments, or whatever.  This primary season has been beyond ridiculous.


by leshrac55 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 12:21:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

You insult America's intelligence.

Obama has been with this creep for 20 years,married,baptized children,etc, and it's only because he was caught out, that he had to repudiate this racist bigot' screed of hate and poison. A black america was not what Obama promises.

Ferraro is not Hillary's pastor and mentor. As part of fundraising group she made an entirely clumsuly stated comment and was wrong.

Same with darling Samantha Power saying to The Scotsman that Hillary was a "monster", and that "we f****d up" in Ohio. Then, Power tels BBC that as foreign policy advisor to Obama he won't necessarily do what he says about Iraq, you know, "wink wink he's saying this now for the campaign".  Deplorable all around.

Judgement is not Obama's talent. Rezko,Power, Canadian embassy re" NAFTA denial and then proof from memo found. Zbig Brezinsky the anti semite left over Carter failure and Israel enemy is another "advisor".

And now we see and hear exclusionary black muslim screed and bias,hate,victimization,and the final insult.....Wright comparing Obama to Jesus as Jesusin our presence. Someone should tell this crazyman that Jesus was a Jew.

Obama is through. The general would decimate him, and there is much more on Wright and Obama to emerge.  He's a liar to deny he ever heard any of this in 20 years. Or does he think his followers are all idiots?  Maybe they are, but Obama should fold his tent.

Wright's screeching,insulting and inflamatory screeds are well known along with his love for anti-semitic Farrakhan.

We don't need a leader for the Nation of Islam.

Obama is unclothed and it's an ugly,ugly sight.

He can never win in the general. GOP and 527's will destroy him for this and the Rezko alliances.

Obama, fold your tent.


by morris1030 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:01:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Blah blah... this is maybe the 4th or 5th time I've heard this from you guys.

I'm sorry, but if Clinton were the nominee, this would probably be even uglier.  Does no one remember the crap that they've been through?

Sorry if you have partisan blinders on and can't see that neither one of our candidates would be given a free ride this election.


by leshrac55 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:01:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

all is not lost (none / 0)

This won't get swept under the rug, so Obama might as well attempt to use it to his advantage.

I saw his response on Olbermann tonight, and I think he has a good tack if he follows through with it.

Obama said that Wright represents the old generation that came of age in the 60s - a generation angry at the injustices they've witnessed over the years -

He contrasted that position to his own message of positive change through reconciling differences and creating unity...

Now, we all know that Barack will not be able to shake the 'God Damn America' quote -thanks to the prepubescent slanders of the 527s...

So he might as well use the angry caricature of Wright - and incorporate it in his stump speeches even - to further specify who Obama is as a candidate-- and more specifically who he is not.    He could mention briefly that Wright helped him find God, but that he didn't always agree with him politically.  In fact, it's the very rhetoric of anger, cynicism and frustration that Obama wants to change in this country....

We never got anywhere with that old divisive rhetoric- he could say.  His candidacy is bridging what divides us - Black, white, rich poor, etc..
There's an opportunity for a new discourse in America that is more constructive than the anger we've witnessed in recent history... Wright represents the past.  Obama represents the future...You get the idea..

The messaging may be a bit tricky, but it can be done.

All is not lost, folks.
(By folks, I mean the few in the myDD community that do not hope for the ultimate demise of the candidacy of Barack Obama.)


by Damien in Texas on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:24:15 AM EST

Can we stop this crap? Please? (2.00 / 1)

If we are going to keep holding our own candidates responsible for the statements of their slightly crazy supporters, then we are going to legitimize it when the GOP does it and will also legitimize their jingoistic base appeals to nationalism/phony patriotism. On the other hand, that could be a good thing--I mean, if you start holding up the shit some of McCain's prominent supporters have said to the light of day, then all the "controversy" over Wright and Ferraro would be trivial by comparison. McCain's supporters are, almost by definition, truly batshit crazy.

I think Obama's people overreacted to Ferraro even though her comments WERE stupid and insensitive, and Hillary's supporters once again find themselves attacking Obama straight from the GOP playbook. Who actually cares if Obama's pastor said those things? I certainly don't. As I understand it, the things Wright has said aren't half as crazy as, say, what John Hagee says on a daily basis.

I never go to church, but I ask of those who do--do you agree with everything your pastor says, or does your worldview differ in significant ways from that of your spiritual leaders/mentors?

Fear-mongering is reprehensible, whether it targets low-info squishy independent voters into voting GOP, or whether it targets low-info Democrats pissing their pants over "electability". I would expect mindless religious zealots not to understand how a person can disagree with the leader of their church, but they are not exactly a prime voting demographic for the Democratic Party, which should stop chasing the votes of people who will never vote for them anyway, and start energizing their base (and stop sowing division among their core voters, BTW). By trying to exploit this non-controversy, the Clinton folks are again acting like a Republican fear-and-smear campaign to tear Obama down to the ruin of all who care about the party.

I guess since perceived electability is a real sore spot for Clinton and her supporters, they will try anything, no matter how transparently stupid, to turn her own weaknesses into her opponent's. Positively Rovian.

This diary is an emotional overreaction to what should be a non-issue to anyone but crazy christianist (ans slightly racist) Republicans. I have been mostly agnostic in this campaign until the latest craziness. I voted for O in the VA primary based mainly on electability perceptions and coattails, but since then I've grown increasingly confident that I voted the right way. The behavior of the Clinton campaign since then has been Bush-league. Even though she is close enough to legitimately stay in the race, I wish she would drop out and stop forcing O to burn money defeating her. Sorry Jerome.


by ajpuckett on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 08:57:44 AM EST

Live by the sword, die by the sword. (none / 0)

Obama's campaign has dug its own grave here.  It is they who have obsessively hit the race issue over and over.  Going so far as to complain that Clinton's "3 am" ad didn't have any black children in it!   See Sean Wilenz' piece "Race Man" in The New Republic for one very good accounting of the race politics David Axelrod has used to pry African Americans away from the Clintons.

I see this as nothing less than divine justice, that it finally came back to bite him in just a gloriously well deserved way.  


Reasonable people can disagree.
by mnicholson0220 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 01:50:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And Jerome.... (none / 0)

you keep feeding the fire.

I never pegged you as a RedState parrot.

Keep it up for as many news cycles as possible, because I'm sure there is no one else out there losing respect for you.

Sigh. What a disappointment.


James
by james c on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 10:16:50 AM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

Thank you Jerome for a very direct, cogently written appraisal of this whole "Rev" Wright debacle.

What Obama does not seem to get is that he is being asked to become this country's ceremonial head of state, not just some progressive technocratic fixer of the government like a British Prime minister. As head of state he will be asked to embody and represent the heart and soul of America, he will have to stand before George Washington's historic Old Guard regiment and take salute, he will be the heir of 200 plus years of American history, he will be at the heart of the American establishment, he will be the chief guardian of the country's inheritance, ill begotten or otherwise, he will have the keys to the kingdom. However, before he gets the keys to the kingdom, your average American wants to know that he will be unwavering and singleminded in his defense and representation of America. Sitting in "Rev" Wright's company for 20 years raises doubts.  A would be president cannot afford a hint of doubt about his patriotism, your either all in or not, you either believe wholeheartedly in the whole of it, good and bad, or not. If you have doubts, then leave the job alone, be a consumer advocate, or an activist, a progressive congressman or some other work that will allow you to challenge the country. But once you become the country's head of state, there is no  room for doubting your country, all your patriotism deck of cards are on the table. Clearly after Wright, the country wants to see Obama's full deck of cards. Once the public becomes suspicious that you are not representing the full interests of the country, you can never reassure them. Let me put it this way, just as Britain's former Prime Minister will never be forgiven by its people for putting America's interests above Britain's in the matter of the Iraq war. Obama must be seen unquestioningly to put America's interests above "Reverend" Wright's if he is to be trusted to hold office as the country's its next head of state, commander in chief and president. I don't think anything short of severing his ties with this Trinity church will do the trick otherwise the Republicans will continue stoking the fire.


by superetendar on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 10:22:26 AM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

The toxic nature of Rev Wright and Obama's long association with him speaks for itself.

Obama is toast. His disavowal of Wright is unbelievably lame and devoid of facts as it's impossible that in 29 years he was not subjected to these sermons of hate.

This is Farrakhan and Wright's man for Black America. The intensity of bile,hate,victimization,and hate for America is chilling.

So Obama thinks we believe that he NEVER heard this in 20 years, aaaaaaand Trinity.

How he could take the support and patronage of this man is the question that he answered. He's been close to Wright and has tithed to the Trinity.

This Wright is a toxic message of disunity that Americans will not accept and suspect Obama's judgement on a serious level.

His judements have been very flawed regarding: Rezko, Wright, Farrakhan,Samanatha Power, The Canadian NAFTA dustup of wink wink it's ok I just "need to say this for political reasons".

So Obama is just another politician who wil say anything, bla bla.

We are going to hear more of Wright and Obama's attendance during Wright screeds, and approval of his friend/mentor.  Obama is lying.

The General will destroy him. He should fold his tent.


by morris1030 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:13:21 PM EST

Re: Answer: The Bus (none / 0)

The toxic nature of Rev Wright and Obama's long association with him speaks for itself.

Obama is toast. His disavowal of Wright is unbelievably lame and devoid of facts as it's impossible that in 29 years he was not subjected to these sermons of hate.

This is Farrakhan and Wright's man for Black America. The intensity of bile,hate,victimization,and hate for America is chilling.

So Obama thinks we believe that he NEVER heard this in 20 years, aaaaaaand Trinity.

How he could take the support and patronage of this man is the question that he answered. He's been close to Wright and has tithed to the Trinity.

This Wright is a toxic message of disunity that Americans will not accept and suspect Obama's judgement on a serious level.

His judements have been very flawed regarding: Rezko, Wright, Farrakhan,Samanatha Power, The Canadian NAFTA dustup of wink wink it's ok I just "need to say this for political reasons".

So Obama is just another politician who wil say anything, bla bla.

We are going to hear more of Wright and Obama's attendance during Wright screeds, and approval of his friend/mentor.  Obama is lying.

The General will destroy him. He should fold his tent.


by morris1030 on Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 02:14:48 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.