Suppose you said that judgment is the most important quality, not experience? How then do you get judgment? by having some bad experiences, that's how. You don't just have good judgment, it is earned through experience. And you don't learn from success but from failures. So it is such a stupid reach and do you know why? Because Obama has no experience, but claims to have better judgment, but I dispute that he actually has this great judgment he is claiming to have. How can a man who has such great judgment have a friend for 17 years and not know he is corrupt? How can a man use his influence to get money for this friend, see that the work is not being done and still get more money for him to rip of his own constituents. How can a man claim to have such great judgment that he would use that friend to acquire a property after he knows that the guy is under investigation to get said property and then casually say the it was a bone headed decision? How does this prove this guy has such superior judgment? Because he gave a speech where he didn't support a war that was supposed to find weapons of mass destruction? Perhaps he had some inside information that told him that those weapons did not exist, maybe he did know they were not there, maybe he should tell us what that information was and where he got it because our intelligence agencies sure could have used it at the time. Such great judgment that he would chose for his mentor in the senate one senator from Conn. who happened to be an independent who supported the very war he himself decries with such fervor now. Same guy, same war, who now touts the support from men who also supported this war and voted for this war but then changed their minds, like so many Americans who have changed their minds about this war. Maybe the same guy who claims than his judgment is so superior that experience of the other candidate means nothing, that spending 8 years in the WH gives her not one bit of experience to handle anything, no his judgment is supposed to outweigh hers why? One vote in the senate? Really? How dross.
Now comes the claim that not only is judgment far better than experience but that his is better by far because he doesn't have any experience. Is that right? Because he has no experience that's better? In fact, now that you mention it, being a first lady doesn't give you anything much to speak of, no you only had tea and crumpets with women, and we all know how unimportant women are in the world, they don't matter, so what if you were the wife of a president, doesn't matter, can't use that experience. What if you have represented our country in other countries throughout the world, nope, doesn't matter, can't count any of that, but his experience in a state senate, now that's experience we can count on, wait I thought that experience didn't matter it was judgment we wanted, no in this case its experience, legislative experience, you see, its the number of years he has as a legislator, state senate is fine, counts, white house, not that doesn't count, you were not the president so you can't count that. You see how ridiculous this gets? What counts is what counts, right? If you are talking about having experience, only his counts, because everyone knows that what a woman does representing her husband doesn't count, everyone know that right?
When you get right down to it, whatever Hillary Clinton brings to the table can be dismissed with a casual insult, but anything Obama does is well, great! right? Right? He's the ONE, right? O.K. then, pass the coolaid. That stuff isn't spiked is it? Cause I don't want anything that's spiked, gotta keep my wits about me.
|
|
|
Permalink :: 28 Comments :: Post a Comment
|
In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.
If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.
