UnChallenged Sexist Assumptions

Now, I am no fan of either Hillary or Obama for this reason, they are both going to enable global labor arbitrage on steroids.  That said, I have to point out a very sexist assumption that is truly offensive against Hillary Clinton.

What is that sexist assumption?  

Hillary IS Bill

I've seen policy enacted in the Bill Clinton administration as being assigned to Hillary.  Articles and articles written which assume whatever Bill Clinton wants, is endorsing, is pushing as policy agenda, then Hillary must also agree with it.

That is sexism.  

Hillary is not Bill

You might be so oblivious to sexism you may not understand why assigning Bill's administration and policy positions to Hillary is an issue.  

More on the flip.....

There is an underlying assumption that the wife would automatically take the views, positions, beliefs of the husband.

The wife is not subordinate to the husband.  The husband is not the head of the house.  The husband's agenda does not mean that the wife must repress her own beliefs, aspirations and ideas, her own goals and adopt the spouse's.

The husband's agenda does not supersede the wife's.  

Automatically assigning one person's agenda is to another as if they are not equal individuals devalues that person whose thoughts, beliefs, opinions are discounted.    Assuming that in a marriage automatically the male should have more power and dominate the female is also implied in many of these articles.  I think no one is challenging it because they cannot even see it.  They cannot see it because sexism is alive and well in America.

One needs to separate out that Hillary and Bill are two different people and while one can make a few assumptions because they are long term life partners, I think assigning Bill policy to Hillary just is not fair and not accurate.  Writers are making assumptions that Hillary is Bill in almost every policy area,  instead of researching and reading her policy positions, her statements and her voting record.

Hillary is a person in her own right, probably smarter (except in love) than Bill and has her own political career.  Assuming she is some sort of supplement to Bill is frankly sexist.

Back to global labor arbitrage and corporate controlled manipulation of domestic labor markets, if either one of them would co-sponsor, champion these bills:

S.1035 : H-1B and L-1 Visa Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act of 2007 (Durbin-Grassley)

H.R.2538 : To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide greater protections to domestic and foreign workers under the H-1B nonimmigrant worker program. (Pascrell)

H.R.2504 : To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to the admission of L-1 intra-company transferee nonimmigrants. (DeLauro)

H.R.548 : To establish a Congressional Trade Office (DeFazio)

I would immediately volunteer and work for that campaign.  


Poll
Is Hillary Bill?
Yes, she was born from his rib
Yes, the man is the head of the house
Yes, women cannot think for themselves
Yes, woman must submit to a man
No, I see what you're saying
No, I didn't realize this
Let me think about this for a minute

Votes: 4
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


not so (none / 0)

It's not so, she's over and over again said she is running, not Bill

but more importantly on CAFTA-DR and the Dubai ports deal, she introduced legislation to block it, while Bill was lobbying  for Dubai ports deal.

Bill was lobbying for CAFTA-DR and she spoke out and voted against CAFTA-DR.


NoSlaves.com | The Economic Populist
by Robert Oak on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 03:16:05 PM EST

Re: UnChallenged Sexist Assumptions (none / 0)

"It's not so, she's over and over again said she is running, not Bill"

She'll definitely say that.  Then out of one of her other faces, she'll claim credit for everything that happened under her husband's administration.  She wants all the benefits, but none of the burdens.  And anyone who calls her on it is some kind of "sexist."  Give me a break. Now, I understand that trying to paint herself as a victim at every turn is a big part of her campaign, to try to drum up the sympathy vote, but its really getting old.  And I think that her steady decline in the male vote as this campaign has gone on is a pretty clear indication that I'm not the only one who feels this way.


by davey jones on Fri Feb 08, 2008 at 03:57:54 PM EST

Re: UnChallenged Sexist Assumptions (none / 0)

Mr. Oak,

H-1b is my biggest issue, I'm familiar with your activism, and I cant remember ever disagreeing with anything you've ever written.

But I respectfully dissagree with you here.  I'll use a simple example.

Suppose you were an IT contractor, and you really got screwed over by a contracting broker (not hard to imagine, is it ;).  This broker may have been a man or a woman.

Now, suppose that this broker's spouse, also has a contracting broker agency, and their main experience and exposure to the business was working with their spouse

Would you trust them?

I know I wouldnt!!!!

It's got nothing to do with 'sexism', it has everthing to do with jusding someone by the company they keep


by TimA128 on Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 04:49:25 AM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.