My Closing Argument for Hillary

Cross posted from my dKos diary with my permission.

New material and lots of stuff I need to say again.  

This is my final argument for Hillary.

I think Democrats are good people.  I have friends in every campaign and we treat each other with respect.  The Democrats of MyDD are no different.  

You are good people and respectful.  Those tr's who frequent every candidate's diary's are trolls.  They are tr's sent by the right, maybe employed by the right.  They are here to do what they do.  Disrupt discourse and direct our conversations away from where they should be.  I don't have time to waste trying to convince the republican tr's here.  


I'm am working hard for Hillary just as she has worked hard for us for 35 years.

Please join me now in my final argument.

From one of my previous diaries:

Does anyone think our Hillary was foolish to call them what they were and are, "The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy"?

I believed it then and after Cleland, Gore and Kerry I believe it even more.

Can a thinking person believe that they've packed up their bags like Karl, gone home and said, "it was fun for 35 years, let's relax and leave the Democrats alone this hunting season".

I too was and in many ways I am still idealistic.  My first campaign work was for George McGovern, when the rethugs were just trying out some new hunting tools.  They were still amateurs back then.

They are no longer amateurs.

The wrong wing wants this election more than any other, ever.  

They can smell the scent of 3 maybe 4 Supreme Court seats.  They are hard on the trail of a Court majority that may last until the last ice melts on Mt. Everest.

Those in the pin stripe camouflage have barely begun the privatization of the U.S. Government.  Blackwater is just the beginning.  The God Reagan wanted to tear down the government from the inside and his plans have only partially been implemented.  We only see the lack of toy safety inspectors and meat inspectors.  Unless you've broken a law you don't see the private prisons, the next step being a private FBI.  A private and profitable IRS.  A privately run FAA accepting real time bids for priority landing rights at La Guardia.

They are building the Fascist Corporate State with a cunning twist.  This time around it isn't based on anti-religious Nazi thugs.  This time the front is Christianity itself.  

I do not want to live in a Christian version of Iran.  

The only Democrat who will fight them tooth and nail is Hillary.  The only Democrat with the thick skin of 20 years is Hillary.

The Democrat I trust to do right by us once elected is Hillary.

In our representative democracy trust is what matters.  We hire those we trust then send them to DC to do the job.  

I trust Hillary Rodham Clinton with my future and my children's future.

Qouted from my previous diary with my permission:

The Hillary I know went straight from Law School to Fall River, Mass. to work for the Children's Defense Fund.  Not to the high paying corporate jobs she was offered, but to where she could help the most helpless of our society.

As a law student, Hillary represented foster children and parents in family court and worked on some of the earliest studies creating legal standards for identifying and protecting abused children. Following graduation, she became a staff attorney for the Children's Defense Fund.

The Hillary I know worked to bring down the most corrupt presidency in American history.  She was still young and may have made a mistake or two, but she was on the side of the good guys.

After serving as only one of two women lawyers on the staff of the House Judiciary Committee considering the impeachment of Richard Nixon, Hillary chose not to pursue offers from major law firms. Instead she followed her heart and a man named Bill Clinton to Arkansas. They married in 1975 and their daughter Chelsea was born in 1980.

The Hillary I know continued to work for children after her marriage.

Hillary ran a legal aid clinic for the poor when she first got to Arkansas and handled cases of foster care and child abuse. Years later, she organized a group called Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families. When she was just 30, President Carter appointed her to the board of the United States Legal Services Corporation, a federal nonprofit program that funds legal assistance for the poor.

The Hillary I know took on the mantle of the Woman's movement and worked tirelessly around the world to bring the horrible treatment of women into public awareness.

When her husband was elected President in 1992, Hillary's work as a champion for women was recognized and admired around the world. She traveled the globe speaking out against the degradation and abuse of women and standing up for the powerful idea that women's rights are human rights.

The Hillary I know spoke in 1995 to The UN Fourth World Conference On Women, Beijing, China

I want to speak up for mothers who are fighting for good schools, safe neighborhoods, clean air and clean airwaves . . . for older women, some of them widows, who have raised their families and now find that their skills and life experiences are not valued in the workplace . . . for women who are working all night as nurses, hotel clerks, and fast food chefs so that they can be at home during the day with their kids . . . and for women everywhere who simply don't have enough time to do everything they are called upon to do each day.

If there is one message that echoes forth from this conference, it is that human rights are women's rights . . . And women's rights are human rights.

The Hillary I know spoke once again at the 5 year follow-up to the Beijing meeting.  When she finished her speech the 1000's of women at the U.N. began to hold hands and sing the anthem of freedom, "We shall overcome". This is an inspiring woman and republican's don't like that.

The Hillary I know is in it to win.  She's in it to win the nomination and she's in it to win the Presidency.

Quoting Markos:

What's more, Clinton was the only top-tier candidate to refuse the ultimate Iowa and New Hampshire pander by removing her name from the Michigan ballot. That makes her essentially the de facto winner since Edwards and Obama, caving to the cry babies in Iowa and New Hampshire, took their name off Michigan's ballot. Sure, the DNC has stripped Michigan of its delegates, but that won't last through the convention. The last thing Democrats can afford is to alienate swing states like Michigan and Florida by refusing to seat their delegates.

So while Obama and Edwards kneecap their chances of winning, Clinton is single-mindedly focused on the goal.

The Hillary I know has an awesome record in the Senate.  She came to the Senate, rolled up her sleeves and learned the ropes better than most Senators ever do.  She's worked across the aisle more than any and she has fought the rethug controlled Senate to keep our progressive agenda out front.

The Hillary I know has not only fought the wrong wing smear machine for 20 years, she knows how to successfully stand up and fight their crap now.

Once again quoting Markos:

Clinton, by far. No one has taken more shit from the VRWC, not by a long shot. Edwards earned valuable campaign experience in 2004. It makes me wonder why he'd go through it all again a second time, but still, it's something. Obama has never had a competitive race against a Republican. His best experiences comes from winning primaries. But he's never been in the crossfires of the GOP. Maybe that's why he can pretend that he can move beyond partisanship. Because he's never had to run a partisan race.

The Hillary I know is a progressive whatever that means and a lifelong fighter for our liberal beliefs.

Markos once again:

Clinton isn't horrible on this front, but Obama has made a cottage industry out of attacking the dirty fucking hippies on the left, from labor unions, to Paul Krugman, to Gore and Kerry, to social security, and so on. People think I was being ticky tack with the Gore thing, and in isolation it would've been but a minor non-event. But it was the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back for me, yet another in a pattern of attacks against Democrats and their constituencies. He is the return of Bill Clinton-style triangulating personified.

The Hillary I know is a funny, likable woman.  She admits she is uncomfortable talking about herself but she can speak to the issues better than any candidate in this race.

Even Markos likes her:

In other words, I'd have a beer with any of them. But I do love the idea of breaking a new barrier this year, whether it's by having a woman president or an African American one.

The Hillary I know is a Woman.  She is the best spokesperson the woman's movement has ever had and republican's don't like that either.  Women, over 50% of the population, may not always like her policies but they respect her and admire her fighting spirit.

The Hillary I know is the greatest threat the GOP has ever faced.    Why have they relentlessly attacked her for all these years?  Because they know what will happen to the GOP if Hillary is nominated for the Presidency of the United States.

Women.  Single mothers.  Working women. Feminists. Housewives. Women.  Bartenders, Convenience store workers, mill workers.  Women.  Hookers, Strippers, Black Jack Dealers. Women.

Women. who have never voted.  Women. who have voted Republican.  Women. who are independents.

The Hillary I know when nominated will unite these women into the greatest force for freedom that the world has ever seen.

The Hillary I know when nominated will cause the largest voter registration the country has ever seen.  All those women voters standing with their sisters to see the first Woman President will be registered as Democrats.

If you are not threatened like republican's are, you will support this incredible woman.

The Hillary I know is the greatest threat the GOP has ever faced.  She is a Woman.



Display:


What a Great Argument NewHampster (2.00 / 5)

Highly rec'd.  Well done!


Donate to Hillary Now!
by alegre on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:11:34 PM EST

Alegre thank you (2.00 / 2)

I sometimes feel that I have to repeat myself to catch new audiences but I can't get way from this argument.

women are the largest voting block, period.  Having an incredibly skilled woman seek the presidency is something the white haired rethugs don't know how to handle.  I think she truly scares the living hell out of them.


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:17:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Alegre thank you (2.00 / 1)

thanks, Hampster!!!


I have yet to see what [Obama] has done to take the highest office in the land. He is no Martin Luther King. --Helen Thomas
by ghost 2 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 06:10:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Alegre thank you (none / 0)

Being female is no reason to vote for a candidate any more than basing one's vote on race.

But you said it all here: Hillary is a warmonger, in this case, and for the Middle East in general, wilil carry out AIPAC's initiatives. There is no separation between Hillary and the AIPAC agenda, just as there is no separation between Hillary and McCain on foreign policy. Her stance concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will continue the "hate America" sentiments throughout the Middle East, which will maintain bad sentiments by the entire Muslim world. There will be no settlement of this conflict by a Hillary administration, which will only churn up more strife and more hate and more death.

Hillary is beholden to the Israel Lobby, the big elephant in her campaign, that no one wants to talk about.

Yes, Hillary will attack Iran because her tail is being wagged by warmongers representing a foreign country, not America.


Click on Peace, Propaganda, & The Promised Land and learn the truth about the I/P conflict.
by shergald on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 09:11:18 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 2)

These are some great thoughts in support of Hillary.  Thanks for writing this diary.

The reason I am supporting Hillary, is she is the most experienced, she is a fighter and she inspires me as a woman to go after what I want to achieve in this world and never give up.  


by kopards on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:13:45 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 1)

She is the most qualified of all candidates and she just happens to be a woman.  That fact is a strength which cannot be ignored.  It is part of who she is, what she is made of.


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:20:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 2)

You wrote a good post. Thanks.


by cc on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:23:44 PM EST

Thnaks for reading it (2.00 / 1)


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 05:41:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 1)

Bill Richardson agrees, but the lefty blogs don't mention it.


by Bob H on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 06:34:27 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 0)

Not mentioned anywhere but NPR


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 07:58:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

Care to explain?


by LakersFan on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:03:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 0)

NPR says Richardson endorsed Hillary but it could be a mistake since nobody else has it.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story .php?storyId=18648372


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:13:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 0)

That is mysterious. Thanks for the link.


by LakersFan on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:19:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 1)

That link currently contains an update:

Correction: The on-air version of this story has been edited to correct an error: We incorrectly stated that Sen. Hillary Clinton had won the endorsement of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson.

I'm guessing they just went on the two watching the Super Bowl together, but who knows.  Maybe an endorsement will be forthcoming soon.  


by Jack Roy on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 02:13:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Girl's Power (2.00 / 2)

I agree with the woman bloc.  Obama said he can win vote that Hillary can't.  But Hillary can unit the largest voting bloc there is, both in DEM and GOP camp.

That's why GOP men are so scare of Hillary.


by JoeySky18 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 07:45:15 PM EST

Edwards Supporter Now with Hillary (2.00 / 2)

She's not perfect, but she is a fighter.


Let the change begin!!!!!
by demwords on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:41:03 PM EST

She'll make you proud (2.00 / 1)

She is one heck of a woman


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:53:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: She'll make you proud (2.00 / 1)

I actually think she's better on policy issues than Bill...and will have a dem controlled senate and house...this could the most change we have seen since the days of FDR.


Let the change begin!!!!!
by demwords on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:58:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Beautifully said (2.00 / 3)

This is beautifully said.  Thank you.


by katiebird on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:41:20 PM EST

Re: Beautifully said (2.00 / 2)

It's easy to say for a beautiful woman like Hillary.

Check out the new endorsement from women at Huff

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/irwin-redl ener-md/obama-hires-harry-and-lo_b_84716 .html


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 08:54:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

That's it?...Really?

I came here hoping to hear a convincing argument, but instead I found that you don't know Hillary all that well.

I think if you knew the real Hillary Clinton, warts and all, you would still be for her as much as I am ambivalent.

I was leaning Obama, and still am.


by wolff109 on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:14:27 PM EST

How's this for a simple one? (2.00 / 3)

Since he doesn't know that much yet and appears to have way too much confidence in his own powers, Obama (assuming that, against the odds, he does manage to get elected) will fumble around for his first few years and 2010 has a great chance to end up like 1994 (OK, maybe not that bad, but bad enough to lose at least the House).

Personally, I don't think we'll have to worry about that because I don't believe he can ever beat McCain.


by lombard on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:24:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 3)

I love your post. Hillary is going to win this whole election. It is just a little tougher in the beginning than we had thought.

As for Hillary, I think she has the potential to be a FDR type president. She has a lot empathy for people. That came across during Kosovo and Rwanda and her push for universal health care. The fact that she cares that no one is left behind in health care speaks volumes for her.


by moi moi on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:26:15 PM EST

We never thought it would be easy (2.00 / 1)

and she never backs down


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 09:31:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 1)

The more I see HRC the more I like and admire
this lady. The last 4 months I have seen more
new dimensions in her than before.
by BlueSea on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:00:28 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

"My first campaign work was for George McGovern".  This says it all.  You were so excited about McGovern when you were young.  That's the same excitement about Obama.  Don't stop the youth from being able to realize their dream--- and that dream will be a reality for you, too.  

It's time for real change.


by drjk on Sun Feb 03, 2008 at 11:36:15 PM EST

Well, maybe your right (2.00 / 3)

We should allow euphoric young people and old hippies to nominate Obama.

Then, after he gets crushed like McGovern did in 1972, they'll start thinking a little more with their heads instead of their hearts.


by lombard on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:18:56 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (2.00 / 1)

And just like me in 1972, I bet you could ask 10 or 20 young old bama nuts about his health care plan and they'd look at you with saucer eyes and say, "what's up with that?".


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 08:05:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

The more I see of Hilary the less likely I am to vote for her.  


by orin76 on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:24:31 AM EST

Great diary! (2.00 / 1)

Go Hillary!


by texasdemocrat06 on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:34:27 AM EST

you're closing argument is that HRC is (none / 0)

a woman?

That's it?

Here's a case for Obama.


Rrrinnggg... Time to change the government.
by Carl Nyberg on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 02:46:28 AM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

I'm going to be really curious to see the spin on this board after Obama does better than expected tomorrow.

No one seems to want a different kind of politics here, lie, cheat, steal, it's all ok.

Where have our morals gone?


by A from Phoenix on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:38:35 PM EST

But we do want a different kind of politics (2.00 / 1)

Not the cheating, empty suit kind Obama is bringing to the table.  We want someone qualified for the job by an entire life of good works.


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:50:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

DeNiro (a FORMER Hillary supporter) on Obama:

"He wasn't experienced enough to authorize the invasion of Iraq," he says.

YES WE CAN!


by DoubleDs on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:20:50 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

Let's not compromise this year - like we did in 2004

Hillary voted for the war in Iraq and voted again in 2007 to all but authorize war against Iran.  This reflects terrible judgment.  She is as responsible for the mayhem in Iraq as president Bush is.  Experience is worthless if it is not accompanied by sound judgment.  Look at John McCain - he has all the experience in the world, nonetheless he has repeatedly supported bad policies in Iraq.  Obama does not have to explain any vacillations on the war, he has opposed the war in Iraq and has committed to ending it.  

Why nominate a candidate who, like John Kerry, will have to spend half of their time explaining how they supported the war in '03 but oppose it in '08.

This year we have a chance to vote for another flawed compromise, like John Kerry in '04, or we can vote for someone who embodies our ideals, and the best of the Democratic party - without the flaws - Obama.  


by ruskin on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:28:40 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

If Obama embodied "our ideals" - he wouldn't be using rightwing talking points against Democratic ideals.


Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 07:47:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Support for Clinton-Obama ticket (2.00 / 1)

Guess what, the tent and the ticket is big enough for us all. What's important is to win and Hillary can win in the general election. Yes, it will be hard fought, but she can win. Obama does not stand a chance in the general election. Don't think for a minute that the Republicans aren't trying to spin this. Republicans raving about Obama and saying that they like him doesn't mean they won't dig up everything they can and bury him in the fall. And they certainly won't vote him. Honestly, McCain will have a much easier time against Obama. Also, I heard Obama say that Hillary's supporters will back him. Some might. However, Hillary's supporters that support her on the experience issue, will vote for the moderate McCain. Our best chance is a Clinton-Obama ticket. Hillary has to put Obama on the ticket and if Obama is truly a man of the people he will except VP; however, if he is power hungry and out for himself he won't.


by grlpatriot on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 03:10:36 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

"Yes, we can" vs. "Yes, she can." There you have the key difference between the two campaigns.


by DoubleDs on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 03:26:31 PM EST

Re: My Closing Argument for Hillary (none / 0)

The biggest difference is the "we" in "Yes we can" includes the Corporate Owned Media promoting Obama 24/7 - and delivering him on a silver platter.
The media did the same with Bush in 2000.
Hillary/Obama08
by annefrank on Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 07:50:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.