Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama

Among all the endorsements and the superdelegate talk, there's been a conspicuous and rather surprising silence on the part of the former Democratic presidential candidates. That ended today.

Former Democratic presidential candidate Chris Dodd has endorsed Barack Obama.

The Connecticut senator made the announcement Tuesday in Cleveland. The endorsement comes a week before crucial contests in Ohio and Texas.

His e-mail to supporters explained why:

And while both of our Party's remaining candidates are extremely talented and would make excellent commanders-in-chief, I am throwing my support to the candidate who I believe will open the most eyes to our shared Democratic vision.

I'm deeply proud to be the first 2008 Democratic presidential candidate to endorse Barack Obama.  He is ready to be President.  And I am ready to support him - to work with him and for him and help elect him our 44th President.

Put simply, I believe Barack Obama is uniquely qualified to help us face this housing crisis, create good jobs, strengthen America's families in this 21st century global economy, unite the world against terrorism and end the war in Iraq - and perhaps most importantly, call the American people to shared service and sacrifice.  In this campaign, he has drawn millions of voters into politics for the first time in their lives and shown us that we are united by so much more than that which divides us.

That is why I believe the time has come for Democrats to come together as a Party and focus on winning the general election.  The stakes are too high not to.

Dodd will stump for Obama in Ohio in advance of the March 4th primary there.

Update [2008-2-26 12:29:31 by Todd Beeton]:On the radio this morning I heard Chris Dodd say "For 27 years I've been hearing about 'Reagan Democrats.' Now for the first time I'm hearing about 'Obama Republicans.'"

Senator Obama's reaction to Dodd's endorsement can be found HERE.



Display:


Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

Another superdelegate, another fundraising list

Other than that, not much to see here folks


Wiz in Hussein Wis
by Wiz in Wis on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 10:56:47 AM EST

I'm hoping Tim Tagaris gets involved (none / 0)

sooner rather than later.


No vetting is complete until we've seen the tax returns.
by Bill White on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:39:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does an old fart like Dodd (2.00 / 4)

Easy there.  I thought Dodd was an old fart until he lead the fight (with Ted Kennedy) against telecom immunity on the FISA bill.  He impressed me mightily, and made me wonder aloud, "Why the hell is that ass-wipe Harry Reid the majority leader?"

I don't know if his endorsement means much (other than an additional superdelegate), but Chris Dodd is the man.


John McCain the flip-flopper...
by chinapaulo on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:50:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Why does an old fart like Dodd (none / 0)

He's still an old fart.   One who wins some (FISA fight) and loses some (running for prez, endorsing Obama).

Nothing wrong with old fartism.   We'll all be there some day.  If Dodd hadn't taken on the FISA thing,  he'd be nowhere with the blogosphere.  He's certainly not right for Majority Leader - although I can agree that Harry Reid isn't right, either.


by Montague on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:26:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

your comment is an embarassment (none / 0)

and shows you know next to nothing at all about what Dodd has done on behalf of our country in leading the fight against the despicable telecom immunity and FISA capitulation bill in general, not to mention all of the other fights he has taken up on behalf of the constitution and the American people. I find it strange that you post on a political site and yet know less than nothing about Chris Dodd's leadership and strength of character.
by Ajax the Greater on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:15:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

What Dodd brings to Obama. (none / 0)

Dodd speaks Spanish...fluently.

Plus Dodd is very well respected among Democrats and only 3 years older than Hillary.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:22:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

treacherous? LOL

This sense of entitlement hurt Hillary's Campaign a lot.


- Sam Hussein Longhorn
by LonghornSam on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:07:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

whose side are you on? (none / 0)

cause you sure as heck aint on the side of the American people.
by Ajax the Greater on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:16:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

Appears Dodd is the appointed one to bury Clinton prior to Pennsylvania.


by Liberty on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:00:00 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

He must have been the one who drew the short straw.


Bill Foster would agree, Barack Obama has coat tails.
by Walt Starr on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:01:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

barackis44.org (1.75 / 4)

Somebody needs to start this web site.

;-)


Bill Foster would agree, Barack Obama has coat tails.
by Walt Starr on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:00:18 AM EST

While I have the utmost trust (2.00 / 7)

In Barack Obama being a President that respect the constitution and rule of law, first Feingold and now Dodd confirming my trust is definitely a good thing.


by zonk on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:04:49 AM EST

Re: Old Geezers Club for Obama! (2.00 / 2)

The last demographic he needs to capture.


by Bob Johnson on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:42:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Old Geezers Club for Obama! (2.00 / 1)

haha!


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:49:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Old geezer? (2.00 / 1)

Feingold is 6 years younger than Hillary.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:25:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Talmud and HRC (2.00 / 1)

'Said Rabbi Eliezer, "If the law is as I hold it to be, let this tree prove it," and the tree uprooted itself a hundred amma, but they said, "Proof cannot be brought from a tree." Rabbi Eliezer persisted, saying, "Let these waters determine it," and the waters began to flow backwards, but his colleagues responded that waters cannot determine the law. Once again Rabbi Eliezer tried, asking the walls of the study house to support him. They began to totter, whereupon the spokesman for the majority, Rabbi Joshua, admonished them, "when rabbis are engaged in legal discussion what right have ye to interfere!" So the walls did not fall in respect for Rabbi Joshua, nor did they return to their upright position, in respect for Rabbi Eliezer-and "they remain thus to this day!" But Rabbi Eliezer would not surrender and cried out: "Let Heaven decide." A voice was heard from Heaven saying: "Why do ye dispute with Rabbi Eliezer; the law is always as he says it to be." Whereupon Rabbi Joshua arose and proclaimed, quoting Scripture, "It is not in Heaven!" '

I swear, if Clinton herself quit tomorrow, said that she had always been Obama's biggest fan, and gave him her strongest endorsement, her supporters would call her a sellout and the haters would still hate the man.  I mean really, you call Obama supporters robots for their supposedly unthinking devotion to the man?  As the illustrious Kirk once said, "People who live in glass houses shouldn't have sex."


by carloseljefe on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15:07 AM EST

Captain Kirk said that? (none / 0)

I thought he was a Denny Crane Rethuglican! /snark


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:02:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Captain Kirk said that? (none / 0)

Could be, but apparently he used to command a starship and say things that were (inadvertantly?) pithy, in a 1960s sort of way.


by carloseljefe on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 05:23:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 4)

Hillary buried herself with the mocking sarcastic speech she gave on Sunday.  Undoubtedly this will come up in tonight's debate and now he has Dodd to add to the list of people like Kennedy, Leahy, Kerry, and Feingold.  But even more so, it is clear now he will hit the goal of 1,000,000 donors by next Tuesday.  That is quite an achievement.  That is 1,000,000 people who understand that change doesn't come easy in this country, that change requires participation on the part of the American people, that it requires getting involved and staying involved.  That is approximately 1 in every 300 people in America who Hillary openly mocked this weekend.  It was not Presidential and it was not smart and she deserves to pay for it.


by Piuma on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15:41 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

I respectfully disagree. If Clinton had buried herself as you have stated this past weekend with her actions, Dodd would have no reason to issue an endorsement at this time. The endorsement is also scripted as a push for Clinton to suspend her candidacy prior to heading to Pennsylvania.
This is a strategic move, not one of punishment in my opinion.
by Liberty on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:41:31 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Buried herself. (none / 0)

Not so much buried herself as shot herself in the foot.  She appears not to realize it yet.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Lighten up, dude! (none / 0)

Didn't Dodd have a glazed-over look in his eyes at his endorsement? Did you notice that? I think he is now part of the cult!!!!!

Thank god Tubb-Jones has resisted Obama's Svebgali-like powers!


by Bob Johnson on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:41:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

No, (2.00 / 3)

not really.  Not too cool at all really.  In fact, I'd say it was the opposite.  Most uncool.


by Cycloptichorn on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:00:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

But we can count on you this November, right?


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:09:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

We'll try to limp along without you, LOL!


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:16:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 3)

Well -

Then you need to take yourself to Redstate.com or some other similar site.

IF you're advocating for a GOP President, you don't belong on a Democratic site.


by zonk on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:36:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

No one's denying you "freedom of speech".

What you seem to fail to recognize is that this is a DEMOCRATIC ADVOCACY SITE.  It's right there in the posting guidelines.

Freedom of speech does not give you the right to walk into any house, website, or meeting hall and screach your support for "your way or the highway".

Keep it up... soon - it won't be your choice to leave, you'll be banned.... and the site will be better for it.


by zonk on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:45:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

No one is censoring you, just pointing out the painfully obvious logic that since you are a self-admitted supporter of 100-years-in-Iraq McCain, that you'd fit in much, much better at a wingnut site like freerepublic, or redstate.

Simple logic really.

Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!
by John in Chicago on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:47:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Oh, and once you make your way to joining the mouthbreathers on the right, be sure to tell them that you were driven away from the Democratic Party because they didn't hand the nomination to Hillary on a silver platter since, as you said your self, she was ENTITLED to it.

See how well that goes down in freeperville.


Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!
by John in Chicago on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:50:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Enjoy your new home in wingnuttia.  It isn't too different from suckass DLC land, so you'll get used to it fast.


by JK47 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:52:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 3)

Actually if you look in the guidelines for this site you will see that while supporting Republicans is your right via the first ammendment it isn't your right here. Go somewhere else and support endless war and corporate greed. As far as I am concerned you are a judas, pure and simple.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:15:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

Thanks for confirming my long held suspicions that you are an RNC plant, troll.
Two riders were approaching......the wind begins to howl!
by John in Chicago on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:37:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Wow. You really are pathetic. Talk about a sore loser. Go ahead and take your ball and go home.


by godemsin08 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

You are a sick person.  Enjoy your 100 years of war...


John McCain the flip-flopper...
by chinapaulo on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:53:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yes, we can (none / 0)

Of course we can.  Oh, you're full of bluster right now.  It's understandable.  But you'll pull the lever for Obama this fall all the same.


by Cycloptichorn on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:05:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Gotcha! (none / 0)

Obama supporters are a cult but Hillary supporters like you are real Democrats who will not support the chosen candidate unless it is Hillary.  So what is the definition of a cult then?


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:30:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Rule Number One in Politics: (2.00 / 1)

NEVER insult the voters.


John McCain wants to stay in Iraq for a century.
by jkfp2004 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:41:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

BREAKING: Chris Dodd Doesn't Matter (2.00 / 1)

The Clinton Campaign sent out a press release that "Chris Dodd and his stupid hair no longer matter, because his vote isn't important in the General Election, and wouldn't vote Democratic anyways."

As always, the Clinton campaign, headed by Mr. Penn, is on point.

 Its funny that Mr. Penn's company is also running McCain's campaign. Mr. Penn 'wins' if either Clinton or McCain win, so he's using both of their campaigns to attack Obama. Not in Clinton's best interest's for saving face, but in Mr. Penn's strategic and tactical advantage for the McCain gruppen.


M Hussein Garvey
by MGarvey on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:15:46 AM EST

Re: BREAKING: Chris Dodd Doesn't Matter (none / 0)

It's going to be really bad PR for that firm if both end up losing.


by rfahey22 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:29:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Defeating Mark Penn's firm TWICE (2.00 / 2)

in one election cycle would be awesome!


No vetting is complete until we've seen the tax returns.
by Bill White on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:59:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

The Democratic establishment is disloyal (1.00 / 1)

Hillary Clinton has been abandoned by a bunch of ungrateful Democrats and it is now up to the voters to show her the support she deserves.

Where is the decency?  The Clintons have been maligned and trampled undeservedly.

Disgusting.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:09 AM EST

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 1)

I find the argument that loyalty is more important than exercising independent judgment as to the best person to fill an important role reminiscent of another recent politician who's been widely excoriated for said view.

You may want to think again before promoting that argument.


by Rorgg on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:36:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (none / 0)

Troll.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:10:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (none / 0)

Way to completely ignore my point and throw a gratuitous swipe in the process.


by Rorgg on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:22:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Personally, speaking for me only (none / 0)

I value loyalty and honesty. Our party has a problem with disloyalty, cowardice, and the circular firing squad tendencies.

It is the inferior party, politically and tactically.

I'm going to be an independent after March 4th in the event of a Clinton defeat.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:39:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Take your ball and go home (none / 0)

That's a great argument.  I hope you rethink your sour grapes attitude, because a lot more independents and even honest Republicans are going to join us than the reverse.  3500 attempted caucus voters in NM who waited hours in line to cast a provisional (read second class, rejected) ballot can't be wrong.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:58:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

It's not my fault the party is what it is (none / 0)

My conscience will be clean as a whistle.  The Democratic party has had a horrible media strategy, does way too much backbiting, and doesn't take strong stands on the issues.  (see Pelosi, Reid)

America is in decline, that is pretty obvious.  I am just going to make the best of it without worrying about politics in the future.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:29:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 1)

The voters are showing her the door.


by godemsin08 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:37:08 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Chris Dodd is disgusting? (2.00 / 3)

Did you really type that?

Wow!

Had Clinton bothered to show up and vote for Dodd's FISA amendments, had she shown LOYALTY to Chris Dodd maybe this endorsement would have turned out differently.


No vetting is complete until we've seen the tax returns.
by Bill White on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:38:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

that's a good point (none / 0)


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:28:05 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 3)

What, exactly, does Chris Dodd owe Hillary Clinton? And why?


by BlueinColorado on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:40:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

nothing (none / 0)

I was wrong, Chris Dodd can do whatever he wants and he ran a classy campaign.  I am in the wrong party I've realized that's all.  Independent after March 4th.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:29:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nothing (2.00 / 0)

You do realize that there is no Clinton Party right? You could become a member of Liberman for Conneticut, it appears to be a moderate party, I don't know when their convention is though.


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:38:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

no thanks (none / 0)

Lieberman backstabbed us all long ago.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:26:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nothing (2.00 / 0)

I was wrong, Chris Dodd can do whatever he wants and he ran a classy campaign.  I am in the wrong party I've realized that's all.  Independent after March 4th.

Gee, that explains why Chris Dodd owes Hillary Clinton an endorsement. Thank you for taking the time to make such a well-reasoned argument. Where does anyone get the crazy idea the Clinton faction operates under an assumption of entitlement.
That's just kooky talk!


by BlueinColorado on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:29:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

nope (none / 0)

it wasn't a well reasoned argument.  Did you see the "I was wrong part" ?


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:31:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nope (none / 0)

So why are you "in the wrong party" and "an independent after March 4"?


by BlueinColorado on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:37:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the Democratic Party leadership is a big failure (none / 0)

It seems very weak and fails to stand up to the media and the right wing.  Done carrying water for Democrats in both the blogs and in my heart.

This sentiment goes back to the failure of Congress to stand firm against the charlatans of the Bush administration.  The primary process has only broken the camel's back for me.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:42:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the wrong part (none / 0)

calling this Dodd endorsement disgusting.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:45:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (none / 0)

I guess we owe a lot more to John McCain... I mean war hero


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:44:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 0)

Oh, the same Democratic establishment that spent much of the late 1990s twisting themselves into a pretzel fending off attacks about Bill Clinton's sex life, it's they who are the problem?  

Hillary has been abandoned by nobody.  She wanted a bigger prize, and she's losing.  Every once in a while I get a sense from her that she's being gracious about it.  I wish some of her supporters were as well.


by thewrath on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47:06 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 0)

It is not for us support the Clintons, it is for them to support us - the citizens - America.  The job is Public Servant - not Monarch.  We owe no politician anything.   This sense of entitlement is nauseating.  Dear Leader Clinton.  


by etoipi on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:50:23 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (2.00 / 1)

isn't this the same line of reasoning that Leiberman tried to use?


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:51:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

ok then maybe I was using satire (none / 0)

this whole election is a joke anyway.  I retract my whole post.  


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:35:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

what makes you think (none / 0)

this is all about the Clinton?


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:01:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Chriss Dodd's own comments (none / 0)

insinuated that it had something to do with him foolishly believing Drudge over his own Democratic friend.

He bought into the "Clintons released spooky photo" theory.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:31:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (none / 0)

maligned and trampled undeservedly? Ole Bill was out their as attack dog trying to use Obama's race against him....the Clinton's have a history of smear and destroy campaigns against political and personal enemies......please..the last debate she claimed Obama was "plagiarizing" becuase he used a line from Deval Partick's speech......however upon further review she stole nearly verbatim a line from John Edwards, one which he used repeatedly.....this was even shown last night on TV and long time democratic consultant Bob Beckel ridiculed her for it....cmon...these people are gonna get exactly what they deserve.....


by adbct on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:10:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Bill Clinton did not do anything racist (none / 0)

That is one of the worst smears of this entire campaign actually.

But Chris Dodd made his choic and he is not the worst person.  The disgusting part should not have been applied to him in retrospect.


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:33:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bill Clinton did not do anything racist (none / 0)

he made S. Carolina about race.

yes, he took a solid Obama win and turned it into a race thing. Heck, even jesse jackson won S. Carolina! Egads!

or how about the leaked emails regarding Obama being a Muslim? That was completely legit right?


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:45:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Democratic establishment is disloyal (none / 0)

No, the Democratic establishment was all for Hillary until she started losing big time.  The Democratic voters simply see a better future with Obama.  That's not disloyalty; it's our prerogative.  Hillary (and yes, Bill too) abandoned us time after time.  That's karma for you.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:54:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

who is the establishment? (none / 0)

maybe they are different people to you than who I am thinking about.

I forgot to mention the media, but that's been talked about already by many others who are in much better moods than I am right now.

laters


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:38:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Excellent news.  Dodd should help in Ohio very much.


What would LBJ do?
by Socks The Cat on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:43 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (1.00 / 6)

Another white male threatened by a woman..


by Opandora on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:36:01 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

Yes. I'm sure the idea of her stunningly incompetent campaign going up against WarHeroJohnMcCain (who outpolls her in CT but loses to Obama) played absolutely no role in his decision.


by BlueinColorado on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:42:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 3)

Playing the victim seems like a backwards step for feminism.


M Hussein Garvey
by MGarvey on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Backward step for feminism (none / 0)

Like running on your husband's record.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:50:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

This comment is ridiculous.  Among 47% of the population it's always been cool to "hate" her.  Obama did nothing but run his own campaign, and has showed amazing restraint in not criticizing Hillary harshly.


by Garret on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:19:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

Clearly, every male politician who supports Obama (and every male voter who supports him) are threatened by powerful women.  It has nothing at all to do with her positions, her campaign, or her electability...


by rfahey22 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:43:55 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

If you think come November all these independent and republican white men who voted for a black man over a woman in democratic primary are going to choose an inexperienced unaccomplished black man vs a war hero and experienced white man then I think you are living on a fantasy island.


by Opandora on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:51:37 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

The only evidence I've seen are the head-to-head polls, and they look pretty good to me.  But keep up with your conspiracies and wish fulfillment if that helps you get through the day.


by rfahey22 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:58:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

They voted for an "unexperience, unaccomplished white man" over a "war hero" last cycle.


Tony Romo for Secretary of Awesome
by kasjogren on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:13:21 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

By youur metric, is every HRC voter getting fitted for their Klan whites as we speak? I mean if people vote for Obama because their threatened by a woman then surely the only reason to vote for HRC is a deep loathing of what your friends would in more polite times call the negro?


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:20:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

not to mention the legions of female politicians and leaders who endorsed Obama who are apparently frightened at the prospect of a female leader.

please.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:54:39 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Slogan at the bottom of your comment says all about you.


by Opandora on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:51:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

It refers to her campaign strategy.


by mainelib on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:18:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

thanks for being perceptive.

yes, the line is in regards to her firewall state strategy she keeps on playing and losing.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:47:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: slogan (none / 0)

IMHO, this ad hominem attack is a troll.


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Huh?  So... by your measure any white male who supports a male candidate for president is sexist?  By the same logic, any female who supports a female candidate for president is sexist.  Both are nonsense.  ...and what does "white" have to do with it?  What a repulsive comment.  


by etoipi on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:58:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Thats right, everyone who votes (2.00 / 1)

against Hilary is sexist.


-- be excellent to each other
by kindthoughts on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:01:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

And... (2.00 / 1)

Everyone who votes against Obama is racist.  

Logic is fun!


by Brillobreaks on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:08:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Why do you suppose Obama went through the entire year of 2007 without decrying his deficit in the polls to racism?

He got his shit together and did the HARD WORK necessary to build a viable campaign. Your smear efforts simply illustrate that your candidate did not.


by scvmws on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:18:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The usual comments... (2.00 / 0)

It is now confirmed that Dodd has been brought under Obamaa's Svegali-like powers.

Another cultist!

Obama must be stopped!


by Bob Johnson on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:40:05 AM EST

Re: The usual comments... (none / 0)

Hi Bob.  Not so snarky here as you were on DK.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:42:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

Face it.  It's over.  Obama is our nominee and we need to support him.  Hillary tried, but it wasn't her year.


by rayspace on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:42:14 AM EST

I Wish HRC Rad Run... (2.00 / 1)

...in '04.  That was her moment.  I'd have follwoed her to the ends of the earth then.  Now... times have passed her by.  

I won't rule her out in '16 though!


by a gunslinger on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I Wish HRC Rad Run... (none / 0)

She will be almost as old as McCain is now in 2016- it isn't going to happen.

As an Obama supporter I actually do feel a bit bad about that- Hillary would make a fine President and I would be proud to vote for her in November if she were to win the nomination. Its not a question of liking one or the other. I like both as candidates; I just like Obama more.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:23:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Barbara Boxer 2016 (none / 0)

Because there are actually qualified, competent, and strong women in the Senate -- who had the judgement to stand against Bush on the war vote.


by scvmws on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:25:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Barbara Boxer 2016 (none / 0)

LOL!  A woman can't win for president, except in a progressive country.

(Yes, I'm a woman, but more a cynic.)


by Sensible on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 05:26:19 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

When did Dodd support Clinton as a Presidental candidate in the past?

Why do you think he's backstabbing?


- Sam Hussein Longhorn
by LonghornSam on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:12:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Hillary IS ENTITLED to this nomination (none / 0)

Thank you for your candor.

Of course, democracy means we get to vote, first.


No vetting is complete until we've seen the tax returns.
by Bill White on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:28:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Do you ever stop and think about what the Clintons have done for this party.

"The Clintons" aren't on the ballot. So why don't you spell out for us what Hillary Clinton has "done for this party"?


by BlueinColorado on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:33:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

So, women voted for Clinton in 92 because of Hillary?

That's right, it's not like they voted for Clinton due to the economic crisis of the time, which any political scientist would tell you women rate at a higher level of importance than men.

It was Hillary! Perot and Bush duking it out for conservatives had NOTHING to do with it...


Fight the Smears!
by Lettuce on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:58:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

So, women voted for Clinton in 92 because of Hillary?

That's right, it's not like they voted for Clinton due to the economic crisis of the time, which any political scientist would tell you women rate at a higher level of importance than men.

It was Hillary! Perot and Bush duking it out for conservatives had NOTHING to do with it...


Fight the Smears!
by Lettuce on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:58:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

Wow, pure entitlement. Makes me sick. Hopefully there are not too many like you around. Hope you get better until November.


by marcotom on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:37:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

The Clinton sense of entitlement (2.00 / 0)

Sorry, Deano. Nobody is 'entitled' to be the Dem nominee. You must convince voters that you are the best candidate, just as you must do to earn a Senate seat.

Thus far, Sen. Obama seems to be doing a better job of convincing people than Sen. Clinton. There's no shame in losing... there can only be one nominee, after all.

by PhilFR on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:54:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

there is no line and no entitlement. It isn't somebody's "turn" for the Presidency. That isn't the way it works and you have either no understaning, or no respect, for Democracy if you think differently.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:24:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

This is snark right? You are not really serious? Bill didn't do all that much for the party. The congress was lost to the Republican's under his watch. Then he handed Al Gore a going away present with his irresponsible self indulgent behavior. He couldn't keep it in his pants until he hit the post Presidential lecture circuit? Good riddance. Time for a change not just in the country but in the party. Obama is building a grassroots organization and fund raising machine that could remake the political landscape. Finally this party is getting it's ass in gear.
by hankg on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:43:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

See, you left out an important piece of the puzzle...us.  

Or maybe we shouldn't matter?  Maybe instead of elections everyone should just take a number.  Then when their number is up, they get to be president.  So one day it would be your turn or my turn too?  Helluva way to run a democracy.


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:48:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

Didn't you misspell your name: DINO?


by rfahey22 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:13:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Backstabers? (none / 0)

You've said this a few times in this thread with no explanation.  Why?  What here do you consider backstabbing?


by Brillobreaks on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:14:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Must be something in the water in parts of Connecticut that induces hallucinations.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:15:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Your senator has made his choice. (none / 0)

This will be your choice:

"We know it's time to time to restore our Constitution and the rule of law. This is an issue that was at the heart of Senator Dodd's candidacy, and I share his passion for restoring the balance between the security we demand and the civil liberties that we cherish"

or:

Q: President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years -- " (cut off by McCain)

McCain: "Make it a hundred."


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:43:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

What the Clinton's did is screw Democratic principles in the 90's by triangulation, backed republican positions when it fitted them, made themselves a giant caricatured target for the Riechwing (which you are now joining) to throw jabs at, and left the House and Senate Dems out to dry.  

The only thing I have to say to the Clintons is 'Don't let the screen door hit ya where the good lord split ya.'

Your ideas of loyalty over everything else is strongly reminiscent of the current administrations mindset, and just as effective.

We'll miss your vote.

One question though: Do you have children? How do you feel about them paying for 100 more years of war?

 


M Hussein Garvey
by MGarvey on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

You're going to vote against DeLauro, Murphy and Larson? Wow. You must really get around to live in three different congressional districts.

What's wrong with you folks?


by ConnecticutHack on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:23:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Susan, is that you?

I'm trying to think of rabid Clinton supporters in Connecticut who would formulate a list of backstabbers that doesn't include Joe Lieberman.


by scvmws on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:27:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Yea, let's not wait to hear from the voters in TX (none / 0)

can Zogby just give us the final numbers so we can assign the delegates based on his poll? ok thx


by diplomatic on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:36:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

I feel MyDD coming back


Bring Back MyDD - Just say No to Rec'ing Candidate Diaries.
by CardBoard on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:45:33 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

i hope so. it's been a long time since this site had a grip on reality.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:56:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

Purged?


by marcotom on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:38:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (2.00 / 1)

In the same way that Hillary is being purged from the race, I guess.
by PhilFR on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:55:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (2.00 / 1)

There's a difference between candidate advocacy within the realm of a Democratic primary and outright nonsense.

Upthread, there's a poster talking about converting Clinton supporter to McCain.

Do you support that?

This isn't a non-partisan site - it's a DEMOCRATIC site.   No one should be here posting crap you'd find on LGF or freerepublic or advocating directly for a GOP Presidential candidate.

I find it utterly fascinating that so many folks call Obama supporters "cultists"... Look around, the cult of personality I see most evident are the numerous "Hillary Clinton or I blow it all up!!!!" folks.

...and YES - the same goes for any Obama supporter that says the same thing as above.

I likely would have spent more time and effort on local races were Clinton to be our nominee (and being in IL, it wouldn't have matter anyway) -- but I have NEVER backed off saying I would vote for the Democratic nominee.

Shame on anyone that says otherwise.


by zonk on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:42:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Remember the last president.... (none / 0)

Gimme a break.

I've known plenty about Senator Obama since I supported him for the 2003 Democratic senate primary in Illinois.

I wish all you so-called experts on the minds of millions of Americans would put your oh-obvious insights and talents to work doing something other than trolling on a website.


by zonk on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:34:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Remember the last president.... (none / 0)

Or you know Bill Clinton, I mean unlike that old out of touch George Bush, Bill's knows what the scanner at the Supermarket is and knows how much a gallon of milk and a carton of eggs cost (seriously, this was an issue in 1992, elections didn't suddenly become like this they been like this for year, hell JFK getting destroyed by Nixon in a debate but winning it on image-- TV, is one of the most famous political ancedotes of all time).


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:07:55 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

eh.

you're assumption is wrong.

MyDD could have been a clearinghouse for honest debate about both candidates. It didn't turn out be that. It was wrong at nearly every turn, it didn't focus on policy differences as much as it could have. It didn't focus on moving the candidates to the left as much as it could have. It didn't really do much except become a place for Hillary supporters to "read clones of themselves".

While all of this was going on, this community ignored FISA and the happenings around the globe. because so much energy was being pumped into saving Hillary's campaign from eventual doom.

This used to be my favorite blog, not no more. I think sites such as OpenLeft do a great job at jabbing at both candidates, finding truth and lies that come from both sides. Looking at polls that are both good and bad for both candidates. I'm not looking for a site that cherry picks. I'm looking for a site that can be a positive model for progressives and liberals alike. If a site parrots bad information, then we liberals parrot that same bad information in the real world. When and if this happens, our believability becomes compromised.

Folks like Todd write quite well outside his strong, one-sided support of Hillary. His predictions have been worse then ARG to put it bluntly. And I truly believe his reputation has taken a huge hit from his refusal to look at things more objectively.

DailyKos on the other hand did become more pro Obama but regardless of its followers views, they've been basically right about outcomes all along. Best of all, they've stuck to issues outside just getting someone elected.

but if you believe I'm just looking for people with views like mine, so be it. I can attest to you that I wouldn't still be here if that were true and you yourself would engage elsewhere.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:42:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bye (none / 0)

i don't think so, Dad.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:26:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Welcome to MyDD (none / 0)

im glad you feel qualified to ask others to leave after being here for a fucking week.


BHO/HRC 08
by omar little on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:19:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Bye bye (none / 0)

the frustration is dripping from your fingertips. You have resorted to this kind of behavior which is interesting in a behavioral study kind of way.

but I'll oblige to you're kindness, bye bye sickand tired. Now I've got more postings to make.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:30:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

I would give you an uprating, if I could. Sorry :(

I didn't detect the changes you're describing until sometime around the Nevada caucuses, but you're right that MyDD has become a shadow of its former self.


by scvmws on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:35:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

Todd hasn't been that bad, I mean I'd bet he has a much better record than Jerome (2/5 "It'll be over by tomorrow morning"  was my favorite).


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:09:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

well, between the both of them, may they not predict anything for the rest of the year. It'll jinx our prospects!

but i do want to be clearer, I think Todd and Jerome are for the most part really good writers. I dig what they've had to say in the past. I've learned quite a lot from Jerome especially. They're just having an awfully awful time with predicting anything while being so pro-hillary to the point of loosing objectivity.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:37:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

The progressive blogosphere rose up out of one primary concern: the war in Iraq.

Clinton didn't give this community the one thing it wanted. So she gets booed practically everywhere online.

You have to admit, it could have been different, if she had followed a different approach. Instead, we get this "ready on day one / obama is too inexperienced" baloney, basically telling people like me that our judgement (political, security, and other) is flawed for our opposition to the war.

If you go online and tell war opponents that a pro-war candidate was right and they were wrong, they're not going to like it. Is this a surprise to you?


by scvmws on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:32:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

the isreal of the blogosphere?


Being Normal is for the Mediocre.
by Doug Tuttle on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:50:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You only want to read Clones of you (none / 0)

Actually, I would relish an honest intellectual, evidence-based discussion here.


by mainelib on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:19:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 2)

Chris Dodd would be an excellent VP.  This will get him on the list.


by tiffany on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:47:49 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

I don't know I deeply respect his commitment to the constitution (and honestly that could be the reason he's backing a former constitutional law professor), but I worry about him on the trail, he just seems like a blander Biden (though he does seem brighter than Biden, especially in the debates).


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:22:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 5)

Chris Dodd for Majority Leader. He has shown more guts and principle then any Senator with the possible exception of Russ Feingold.


by hankg on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:53:32 AM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

I really like Chris Dodd. Ever since moving to New Haven for my masters, I've learned to really like the guy. Some locals I've talked to seem worn out with him however.

Hillary, Dodd, Feingold, Durbin would all be great majority leaders in my opinion.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 11:58:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

News Bulletin... (2.00 / 0)

By order of Dear Leader Hillary, Chris Dodd no longer matters.
by PhilFR on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:25:22 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

interesting that he doesn't wait til after march 4th.


by nikkid on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:40:11 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Cash?  Really?  Please, share with us the source of this allegation.


by ReillyDiefenbach on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:36 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

you are unlike your username.

cash? please. politicians at this level trade in power.


!
by alex100 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:29:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Yeah, I sure Kennedy and Feingold were also bought off.

Can't wait for Silly Season to be over.

by PhilFR on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:58:40 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

Chris who?

So what?


by krj47 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 12:59:01 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

The link to the Obama response is inaccurate, but here's the response:


It has been my pleasure to serve alongside Chris Dodd in the United States Senate. It was a privilege to share the stage with him during his principled run for the presidency. And it is an honor to stand here with him today, and to accept his endorsement of my candidacy for President of the United States of America.  

I say that because Chris Dodd loves his country - and believes in the ideal of public service - as much as anyone I know. From his years as a young Peace Corps worker in the 1960s to this very day, Senator Dodd has devoted his life to building a stronger, fairer, healthier America; and a more just and secure world.  

Whether it was his work to protect voting rights; his long, determined battle for the Family and Medical Leave Act; his leadership on U.S. relations with Latin America; or his defense of our Constitution - Chris Dodd has been at the forefront of some of the most important issues of our time. He has worked hard to preserve the right of workers to organize despite an onslaught from a hostile administration. He has been an advocate for our children, and no one has fought harder to improve our schools. He has been a voice for unity amid the often bitter debate over immigration reform. And I have seen firsthand on the Foreign Relations Committee his commitment to restoring our standing in the world.  

But as passionate as Chris Dodd is about the causes he champions, he also has that rare ability to disagree without being disagreeable. He is respected on both sides of the aisle for his authenticity, reason, and civility. And that is how, time and again, he's been able to bring Democrats and Republicans together to make a real difference in the lives of the American people.  

He conducted his campaign for President with that same character. He resisted the cheap and easy shots, and elevated the debate with important ideas about how to address the great challenges we face. He and I share a deep commitment to take our country in a new direction.  

We know it's time to end the war in Iraq. This war has not made us safer, it has overstretched our military, it has cost us precious American lives, and it is costing us billions and billions of dollars that could be better spent finishing the fight in Afghanistan and bringing relief to the middle class here at home.  

We know it's time for an energy policy that ends our addiction to oil. We can't keep buying oil from dictators while our planet is in peril and Americans are paying more at the pump. It's time to embrace a clean energy policy that enhances our national security, while creating green jobs right here in states like Ohio.

We know it's time to reclaim the American Dream for the middle class. Instead of giving tax breaks to companies that ship our jobs overseas, it's time to put a tax cut in the pockets of working people and seniors. Instead of giving hundreds of millions to well-connected contractors in Iraq, it's time to put America back together again by investing in our infrastructure - an issue that Chris Dodd has shown real leadership on in the Senate. And instead of standing by while there's a squeeze on the middle class, it's time to expand the Family and Medical Leave Act so no American has to choose between a job and their family.  

We know it's time to time to restore our Constitution and the rule of law. This is an issue that was at the heart of Senator Dodd's candidacy, and I share his passion for restoring the balance between the security we demand and the civil liberties that we cherish.  

The American people must be able to trust that their president values principle over politics, and justice over unchecked power. I've been proud to stand with Senator Dodd in his fight against retroactive immunity for the telecommunications industry. Secrecy and special interests must not trump accountability. We must show our citizens - and set an example to the world - that laws cannot be ignored when it is inconvenient. Because in America - no one is above the law.  

It's time to reject torture without equivocation. It's time to close Guantanamo and to restore habeas corpus. It's time to give our intelligence and law enforcement agencies the tools they need to track down and take out terrorists, while ensuring that their actions are subject to vigorous oversight that protects our freedom. So let me be perfectly clear: I have taught the Constitution, I understand the Constitution, and I will obey the Constitution when I am President of the United States.  

Finally, it's time to once again inspire this nation to rally behind a common purpose - a higher purpose. Throughout his campaign, Senator Dodd spoke eloquently about the need to turn the page to a new era of public service. That is the legacy of his own family - the legacy of a father who stood up to the Nazis at Nuremberg, and a young man who enlisted in the Peace Corps after he heard President Kennedy's call to service on a cold Inauguration Day.  

I am running for president because I believe deeply in the promise of America - without that promise, I would not be here today, because my story is not possible anywhere else on earth. I believe that each of us has an obligation to do our part to extend that promise - not just for ourselves, but for our country. That's why I share Senator Dodd's commitment to dramatically expand public service programs like AmeriCorps. That's why I will give all Americans more opportunities to serve their communities and their country. And that's why I will work to put an end to the division and distraction in our politics, so that we can finally come together to meet the great challenges we face.  

I know that it will not be easy to deliver the change that we seek, but I know that the road will be easier with the support of Senator Dodd and the millions of voices who have joined our call for change. With his help, I know that we can unite our Democratic Party, and build a coalition that brings together Democrats and Independents and Republicans behind a mandate for change. Together, we can keep America's promise in the 21st century.  


by Piuma on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:04:27 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Wow... big time news.  Need I remind you all that Dodd endorsed Ned Lamont over Lieberman. Yawn...


by KensUSA on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:06:52 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

You would have preferred he support Lieberman?


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:29:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Well.. that's another discussion for another day.  My point is that his endoresement of Lamont didn't help Lamont much.


by KensUSA on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:05:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

So you're saying HRC is Liberman? I can agree with that.


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:11:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

But it does add another superdelegate to Obama's column, no?


by mainelib on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:20:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

He hadn't run for President yet (n/t) (none / 0)


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:41:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 0)

They're only Obamacans if they vote in the General.

What they outta be looking at is how many McCain Democrats are in the offing.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:13:01 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Um, why would there be more Mccain Dems with Obama than with Hillary?


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:13:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

LOL oh oookay


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:50:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Clinton's Razor

"The explanation of any phenomenon should make as many assumptions as possible that back up some sort of conspiracy against Hillary."

For example:

Some frustrated Clinton staffer sent a long-blog-circulated pic that could exacerbate Obama's "Muslim" problem to Drudge, since Drudge was a reliable outlet in the past.
FALSE

Obama, working with Tom DeLay, convinced Drudge to claim the photo was from Obama's camp, thus creating a backlash that could draw the focus off Hillary, thus keeping her well-thought-out plan of mocking Obama and his supporters out of the press, since it would totally have resonated, had the media paid more attention.
TRUE

Chris Dodd is supporting Obama because he thinks Obama would be a good President
FALSE

Chris Dodd, paid off from a secret Bahaman bank account, agreed to support Obama over Hillary (who secretly donated a kidney to him last year, but didn't want any publicity because that's not what she's about) because deep down, he likes Republican rule since it gives him an opportunity to make futile attempts to fight for what he believes in. Chris Dodd's greatest fear is of success.
TRUE

It's easy and fun!


Fight the Smears!
by Lettuce on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:25:57 PM EST

Re: MCCAIN DEMOCRATS (none / 0)

Perhaps because you are seeing things that aren't really there. Stop hallucinating.


Oh Mammy Dear, we're all mad over here livin' in America
by JDF on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:30:36 PM EST

Re: MCCAIN DEMOCRATS (none / 0)

I see it, too.  That is becoming my worst nightmare. How can so many Americans be so dumb and not see what is going on?  Read the local papers and you will read so many comments by people who voted democrat for a day. 4 more years of Republiscum!


by tiffany on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:35:39 PM EST

Re: MCCAIN DEMOCRATS (2.00 / 0)

Ok, I'm sorry, but even if this were true how would it help Hillary in the general, basically it means that no GOP would crossover, and she would get slaughtered in Indies, it'd be Mcgovern-Nixon.


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:12:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

he is afraid he might get the lieberman treatment


by awayer on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 01:36:29 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Source? If that is true, Obama could put a few red states into play this fall.


by NJPolitico84 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:11:03 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Indeed, this would be incredible, more of a step than Zell, and at least as big as Liberman.


by Socraticsilence on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:14:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

I thought McCain and Hagel were friends (despite their differences on the war).


by mainelib on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:21:48 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Obama has a serious gravitas deficit, and would need a VP who can supply it for the ticket.  Dodd, Richardson, or preferably Biden would be my choices.
Perhaps the estimable Dodd has had it dangled before him?
by Bob H on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:30:02 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

I think we're going to be hearing a lot about "McCain Democrats" if Obama gets the nomination.


by grlpatriot on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:32:50 PM EST

Yarite! lol (n/t) (none / 0)


Senator Al Franken. Have I died and gone to heaven?
by NM Ward Chair on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:39:23 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Only from selfish Clinton supporters who put entitlements before good of country...


by NJPolitico84 on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:44:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

No, you'll hear about Democrats who simply couldn't deal with the thought of a black man in the White House.

If Obama's campaign thinks Clinton's "attacks" have been ugly, I pity them (and all of us) when the Rove machine and the Swift Boaters let fly.

I'll work my ass off for whoever gets the Democratic nomination, but I just don't see how Obama can win in November.

I hope I'm wrong.


No way. No how. No McCain. . . . . . If you can ship a job to Bangalore India, you can ship a job to Flint Michigan.
by NJ Liberal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:07:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

I agree, but that doesn't change the fact that they are out there, in large numbers, and therefore we will likely get president McCain.

Again, I HOPE I AM WRONG.


No way. No how. No McCain. . . . . . If you can ship a job to Bangalore India, you can ship a job to Flint Michigan.
by NJ Liberal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 07:13:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

No, you'll hear about Democrats who simply couldn't deal with the thought of a black man in the White House.

If Obama's campaign thinks Clinton's "attacks" have been ugly, I pity them (and all of us) when the Rove machine and the Swift Boaters let fly.

I'll work my ass off for whoever gets the Democratic nomination, but I just don't see how Obama can win in November.

I hope I'm wrong.


No way. No how. No McCain. . . . . . If you can ship a job to Bangalore India, you can ship a job to Flint Michigan.
by NJ Liberal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:07:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Hell, McCain is having enough trouble finding "McCain Republicans".


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:50:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

deanno should be banned (none / 0)

Please enforce your policy, denno has no value here. I would for others to get warnings.

There is no excuse for some of this writing. No excuse for it to be here anyway they can spew hare and lies on some thug site if they like.

Its time to organize, don't mourn.

Go Dems!


by inexile on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 02:56:48 PM EST

Re: deanno should be banned (none / 0)

yeah! there's no Unity with Dissent! so ban Dissent!

so appealing a prospect...NOT


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:13:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: deanno should be banned (none / 0)

Nobody is saying it's not okay for deanno to dissent... it's just not okay for deanno to actively endorse McCain (and convert at least 10 other Hillary supporters to vote for him) at MyDD. There are other places for that... like FreeRepublic and RedState.


unapologetic Obama supporter
by dantes on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:17:47 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

it's okay for Republicans to cross over and vote for Obama in the primary as a torpedo to a responsible nominee but not okay for Democrats to insist that the party offer a responsible choice as it's nominee?

I'm a citizen first, if the party presents an irresponsible choice then a citizen may need to abandon party to find the responsible candidate.

Every Democrat when face with the party abandoning reason and responsiblity to the country must stand up and say Don't Do It!

If the party does it, it will force many a Democrat away from voting for the Democratic Nominee in the General.

That is trolling, it's called citizenship.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:23:47 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

"that isn't trolling, it's citizenship" that is.

:-P

you can't demand a Democrat abandon citizenship since being a Democrat is conditioned upon citizenship.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 03:26:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (1.00 / 0)

Agreed. This crap about Super Delegates declaring their allegiance in February is nonsense. The entire reason for having Super Delegates is so that someone (hopefully someone smarter than me) can, AT THE CONVENTION, be the voice of reason.

For the same reasons that the Obama camp doesn't want to seat the MI & FL delegations (IT'S THE RULES, DAMNIT), I think that any Super Delegate who has opined one way or the other at this early date should be removed.

Of course, I haven't drunk the Kool-Aid.
 


No way. No how. No McCain. . . . . . If you can ship a job to Bangalore India, you can ship a job to Flint Michigan.
by NJ Liberal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:13:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (2.00 / 1)

even the Obama camp abandons it's own stance.

yesterday in direct response to a question from Wolf  Blitzer over whether she'd change her support from Obama to Clinton to reflect the will of her constituents, Gov Napolitano of AZ said "No".

The Obama SD's feel no need to abide by the pronouncements of the Obama campaign nor should the SD at large.

They should stand up and do what they were designed to do...protect the party.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." - Samuel Johnson
by autumnal on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:42:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)

Yep, he needs the money that Obama supporters may or may not provide. Hope all those Obama Republicans will help him out. Lets get real. Even Reagan Democrats left us with huge debt after Reagan's 2 terms. More debt. More poverty. Gaming the race - how naive the democrats are. No wonder we lose so much. Rove is still working hard. From the electorate that gave us 2 terms of Bush also. Why? Because Gore was soooo stiff and boring. Lets go with the uniter, nit divider.


by glennmcgahee on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 04:54:59 PM EST

Dodd is a disappointment (none / 0)

on many levels, FISA, this.

Yet another slimy pol.


by Sensible on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 05:22:56 PM EST

Re: MCCAIN DEMOCRATS (none / 0)

perhaps it's not the rest of the world -- maybe it's you?


by poserM on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 06:59:49 PM EST

Re: Chris Dodd Endorses Barack Obama (none / 0)


Maryland Democrat
by jproctor on Tue Feb 26, 2008 at 07:27:16 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.