More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Breaks

On the front page of Friday's issue of The Washington Post, Michael D. Shear and Jeffrey Birnbaum (the latter of whom wrote one of my favorite political books, Showdown at Gucci Gulch) have this:

Anti-Lobbyist Candidate Is Advised by Lobbyists

For years, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has railed against lobbyists and the influence of "special interests" in Washington, touting on his campaign Web site his fight against "the 'revolving door' by which lawmakers and other influential officials leave their posts and become lobbyists for the special interests they have aided."

But when McCain huddled with his closest advisers at his rustic Arizona cabin last weekend to map out his presidential campaign, virtually every one was part of the Washington lobbying culture he has long decried. His campaign manager, Rick Davis, co-founded a lobbying firm whose clients have included Verizon and SBC Telecommunications. His chief political adviser, Charles R. Black Jr., is chairman of one of Washington's lobbying powerhouses, BKSH and Associates, which has represented AT&T, Alcoa, JP Morgan and U.S. Airways.

Senior advisers Steve Schmidt and Mark McKinnon work for firms that have lobbied for Land O Lakes, the UST Public Affairs, Dell and Fannie Mae.

[...]

Even before McCain finished his news conference, uber-lobbyist Black made the rounds of television networks to defend McCain against charges that he has been tainted by his relationship with a lobbyist. Black's current clients include General Motors, United Technologies, J.P. Morgan and AT&T.

Black said he is still being paid by his firm and does work for clients in his "spare time," recusing himself from lobbying McCain: "I not only do not lobby him [McCain], but if an issue comes up that I have a client on, I will tell him that and stay out of the discussion."

That's not all that's on the front page of The Post. Here are Matthew Mosk and Glenn Kessler:

FEC Warns McCain on Campaign Spending

The nation's top federal election official told Sen. John McCain yesterday that he cannot immediately withdraw from the presidential public financing system as he had requested, a decision that threatens to dramatically restrict his spending until the general election campaign begins in the fall.

I haven't really chimed in yet on the stories today in The New York Times and The Post about John McCain's relationship (whatever its nature) with lobbyist Vicki Iseman, largely because I haven't felt like I had much substantive to add to the discussion. But after 24 hours of thinking about it, here are some thoughts, on the scandal as well as the above stories:

I've been saying it for years now, but McCain is a completely and utterly cynical politician who will do anything -- including, and especially, selling out his supposed beliefs (I've listed but a few of the many, many instances here) -- in order to further his insatiable ambition for power. Time and time again we see it. The stories that have been coming out in the last couple of days, and should continue to come out if the establishment media do their jobs, only serve to underscore this.

And it's important that these stories are coming out. I was speaking with another MyDDer earlier tonight upon seeing the front page of tomorrow's Post and he remarked that all of this has been known inside Washington for years, that McCain is as cozy with lobbyists as anyone inside the Beltway -- even though his image outside of the Beltway makes him seem like a reformer who eschews special interest politics. But it's specifically because of this major split between the reality in Washington and the perception around the country that these stories and reports are so important.

John McCain is no maverick, he's a dyed in the wool conservative who, while bashing his party from time to time, toes the line of the far right nine times out of ten (or more). And John McCain is no reformer, he's a typical career politician who wines and dines on on the lobbyist's dime -- and does their bidding up on Capitol Hill. The fact that his campaign is chock full of lobbyists is a testament to this fact, even if most Americans don't realize it.

Now I'm not under the belief that the establishment media will continue to do the type of reporting here that they need to -- exposing McCain for the cynical politician that he is. But as long as they are doing their job now, it's not a bad thing to amplify the message as much as possible so that the American people can meet the real John McCain.



Display:


he sure is (none / 0)

I know it too, but I'm not saying that many Dems are not also.  But his running on "ethics" makes me choke on my soda pop.


NoSlaves.com | The Economic Populist
by Robert Oak on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:15:10 AM EST

Public Financing (none / 0)

Would it be to crass for Obama to imply that he can't agree on pulbic financing since Mccain can't be trusted to keep his word?


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:17:40 AM EST

Re: Public Financing (none / 0)

Hell no.


by rfahey22 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:22:17 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Br (none / 0)

Hey!  Now this is the MYDD that got me to bookmark it years ago!  I almost forgot that the Republicans still had to be beaten.


by Drummond on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:26:24 AM EST

Re: More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Br (none / 0)

yup.  

i'll be glad when the primary's over, whatever the result.  Just so long as its over, and we can be party again.


by pholkhero on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:36:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Br (none / 0)

What do you mean?  We are partying!  The primary is a party!  Don't you live for primary parties?????


by tomthroop on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:51:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Nice reporting (none / 0)

I didn't even know that McCain was so in bed with lobbyists. This is really potent stuff that Obama (though, unfortunately, not Clinton) can hit him on.


by Korha on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:35:11 AM EST

Re: More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Br (none / 0)

   Another open secret that finally appears in print.  Notice how there are no open secrets about Democrats.


Jim Oberweis
by cilerder86 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:02:50 AM EST

The Straight Jacket Express (none / 0)

God I hate that man. Hopefully McCain will bring us all back onto the same page when the democratic bloodbath finally ends.

I'll have to admit that as furious as I've been with Hillary over the Shuster thing (and other things), I really loved her in the debate tonight. I could be really happy with either of these candidates. I loved all of their answers. It was ridiculously obvious that they're both on the same side and that it's the right side.

All that said, I'm still deeply in Obama's corner for the simple reasons that I think he's got the intangible qualities that will allow him to push all these ideas through, and the electoral coattails to significantly increase the turnout for progressive candidates who might otherwise not make it. We really need a lot more than 50% plus 1. To have a chance at undoing all the damage Bush has done, we need a landslide of epic proportions and only Obama has a chance to do that, and if he does he could bring literally millions of people into the political process in the bargain.


McCain housing policy shaped by lobbyist.
by obsessed on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:16:15 AM EST

Re: The Straight Jacket Express (2.00 / 1)

I think he's got the intangible qualities that will allow him to push all these ideas through

This, too, is why I am excited about Obama.  He can make disagreeing with him seem like betting on the wrong horse.  He did it to Hillary.  He'll do it to the press, and he'll do it to the Republicans.

Oh, and the fact that Republicans will be twisting themselves in pretzels trying to avoid pointing out that he's B.L.A.C.K. all the time is an added bonus.  

 


http://www.yawnmccain.com
by enozinho on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:40:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: The Straight Jacket Express (none / 0)

Someone needs a nap.


by rfahey22 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:45:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More News on the John McCain-Lobbyist Nexus Br (none / 0)

The FEC thing could be huge:

By signing up for matching funds, McCain agreed to adhere to strict state-by-state spending limits and an overall cap on spending of $54 million for the primary season, which lasts until the party convention in September. There is a separate public financing arrangement for the general election.

[...]

If the FEC refuses McCain's request to leave the system, his campaign could be bound by a potentially debilitating spending cap until he formally accepts his party's nomination. His campaign has already spent $49 million, federal reports show. Knowingly violating the spending limit is a criminal offense that could put McCain at risk of stiff fines and a jail term of up to five years.



by animated on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 02:40:51 AM EST

the McCain position on financing is ridiculous (none / 0)

They ask for and accept the money without a quorum at the FEC but now they say they are not bound by any FEC ruling to prevent him from backing out of entering in because they don't have a quorum.  Obey the rules when they are convenient and ignore them when they're not.  Just do whatever the hell you want.

Serious hits to McCain's few real assets: 1) reputation as a straight talker; and 2) overall respect on both sides of the aisle.  Of course, they'll take these hits to be able to go private.

Obama has put up so many high bars for McCain to meet to agree to a public finance deal that there will be no deal.  Obama will have the money (in the $200 to $300 million range and including my future $2,300) to run a 50 State, ten week general election campaign and help achieve higher majorities in Congress.  

It's all good.    


Our Moment Is Now
by mboehm on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 03:45:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]

nice post (none / 0)

This is what gets me about a lot of the Dems that are scared shitless about facing McCain. Yes, it's true that the media likes him, but at the end of the day he is Bush+10 years or so. If we have the balls and the money, he can be knocked off the high horse very quickly.


by highgrade on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 09:49:16 AM EST

Re: nice post (none / 0)

No, it's actually not true that Obama has more lobbyists working at his campaign than McCain.


Blogging here @ MyDD.com. Twittering @jonathanhsinger.
by Jonathan Singer on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 11:38:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nice post (none / 0)

Are you supporting the Democratic nominee in November?  I'm just curious.


by rfahey22 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:24:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: nice post (none / 0)

Fair enough.


by rfahey22 on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 01:38:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Not the straight talk express (none / 0)

The coverage of the NYTimes article overshadowed the release of the League of Conservation Voters 2007 National Environmental Scorecard. The most shocking news is that "Straight Talker" John McCain received a 0% for missing ALL the environmental votes last year. This is the same guy flaunting his global warming/clean energy cred.  

The Director of the Sierra Club Carl Pope summed it up best:
"Every other Member who received a zero from LCV last year at least had the temerity to show up and vote against the environment and clean energy time after time.  And unlike John McCain, I doubt any of them would claim to be environmental leaders or champions on global warming..."
(www.sierraclub.org/pressroom/releases/p r2008-02-21.asp)

Check out the whole report at www.lcv.org


by envtruth on Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 12:46:51 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.